Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720105 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-21 22:30 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-12-29 14:11 -0600 |
| Articles | 15 on this page of 115 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 22:30 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 22:37 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:20 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-22 10:09 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:19 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:41 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-27 19:51 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 20:16 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-28 20:38 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 21:15 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 21:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 21:53 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-28 22:12 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 22:59 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 11:47 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 22:23 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:48 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 19:17 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 10:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-28 22:00 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 04:28 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 22:25 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:36 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 21:33 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-22 12:36 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 22:50 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-25 22:59 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 23:19 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-25 23:32 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 23:58 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 10:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 22:48 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-03 19:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 06:44 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 16:07 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 21:50 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 19:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-22 20:06 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 20:29 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-23 00:09 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 19:54 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-22 21:39 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 20:57 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 08:49 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-24 20:01 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-24 21:38 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 07:48 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-25 17:28 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:07 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-26 04:15 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 22:46 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-26 14:25 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:22 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 18:12 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 21:38 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 22:55 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-25 22:09 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-26 21:41 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:40 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-25 23:42 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 22:10 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 08:22 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 08:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:01 -0700
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 09:55 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 11:36 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 15:20 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 16:36 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 20:50 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 20:39 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 21:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 20:51 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-30 00:11 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 09:39 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 15:00 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 16:00 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 17:30 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 18:31 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 19:56 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 20:26 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 20:54 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 21:13 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 22:13 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-31 00:19 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-31 05:14 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 21:57 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 17:19 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-31 23:58 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:46 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 19:05 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 06:56 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 23:50 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 04:39 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 21:58 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 22:08 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 22:18 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-03 15:52 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:21 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 02:26 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-29 06:44 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-29 09:36 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-29 17:37 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-29 11:54 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-29 17:27 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 12:24 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 11:39 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 14:11 -0600
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q0m06e$11ne$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #722030 |
On 1/2/2019 12:08 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 9:58:39 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > >> Saykally is a convoluted vague nitwit, just like y'all. > > Dr. Satkally is a very respected member of the scientific community, and you are not fit to lick the sweat from his balls... > Saykally has over 704 professionally reviewed and published Papers. McGinn has nothing. (just flake imagination) Claudius Denk,(known lying piece of shit), has got nothing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 22:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q0m34r$1eeo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #722145 |
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 1/2/2019 12:08 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 9:58:39 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: >> >>> Saykally is a convoluted vague nitwit, just like y'all. >> >> Dr. Satkally is a very respected member of the scientific community, and >> you are not fit to lick the sweat from his balls... >> > > > > Saykally has over 704 professionally reviewed and published Papers. > > > > McGinn has nothing. (just flake imagination) > > > > Claudius Denk,(known lying piece of shit), has got nothing. > > > > > Claudius Denk is a fictional character. Fictional characters do not have anything, by definition. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 11:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b61558d5-8b50-4446-b1aa-4a58293a7d70@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #722145 |
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 1:52:19 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > On 1/2/2019 12:08 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 9:58:39 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > > > >> Saykally is a convoluted vague nitwit, just like y'all. > > > > Dr. Satkally is a very respected member of the scientific community, and you are not fit to lick the sweat from his balls... > > > > > > Saykally has over 704 professionally reviewed and published Papers. > > > > McGinn has nothing. (just flake imagination) > > > > Claudius Denk,(known lying piece of shit), has got nothing. All academia does is serve dumbed down models to dummies, like you. You simple nitwits have turned science into a religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 08:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4a880a10-8df6-477e-8d0b-b9094dd749e9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #722021 |
On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:39:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: > James McGinn writes: > > >MM: > >And his exact words were: > > >"The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is > >incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an > >experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." > > >JMcG: > >The larger truth you are all missing is that science is supposed to be > >about open minded weighing for truth, not about defending intellectual > >territory so that it is impermeable to assault by reason. > > That expression is exactly about open minded weighing of the truth. It > is saying "Come here with evidence that you're right and we'll update our > science." You have to admit it makes perfect sense and is quite fair. You got nothing!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 08:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <40eddd28-3888-4144-8f94-4bbd36401d7e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #722021 |
On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:39:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: > James McGinn writes: > > >MM: > >And his exact words were: > > >"The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is > >incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an > >experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." > > >JMcG: > >The larger truth you are all missing is that science is supposed to be > >about open minded weighing for truth, not about defending intellectual > >territory so that it is impermeable to assault by reason. > > That expression is exactly about open minded weighing of the truth. It > is saying "Come here with evidence that you're right and we'll update our > science." You have to admit it makes perfect sense and is quite fair. Lying retard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 02:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <363f2b5a-45c6-49d2-a3f5-5f2933f4503b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #722021 |
On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:39:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: > James McGinn writes: > > >MM: > >And his exact words were: > > >"The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is > >incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an > >experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." > > >JMcG: > >The larger truth you are all missing is that science is supposed to be > >about open minded weighing for truth, not about defending intellectual > >territory so that it is impermeable to assault by reason. > > That expression is exactly about open minded weighing of the truth. It > is saying "Come here with evidence that you're right and we'll update our > science." You have to admit it makes perfect sense and is quite fair. Where is the evidence that you are right, moron?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 06:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <86d1e3ad-05cb-4419-a81e-87ed70c40cd5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #725051 |
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 2:26:26 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:39:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: > > James McGinn writes: > > > > >MM: > > >And his exact words were: > > > > >"The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is > > >incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an > > >experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." > > > > >JMcG: > > >The larger truth you are all missing is that science is supposed to be > > >about open minded weighing for truth, not about defending intellectual > > >territory so that it is impermeable to assault by reason. > > > > That expression is exactly about open minded weighing of the truth. It > > is saying "Come here with evidence that you're right and we'll update our > > science." You have to admit it makes perfect sense and is quite fair. > > Where is the evidence that you are right, moron? The very fact that you've asked this question only confirms the reality that you don't understand how science works. An actual scientist would get busy and provide evidence for his own position, which is the only evidence that counts. You are no scientist, but rather a common fraud.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 09:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q2pruq$1gsi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #725060 |
On 1/29/2019 8:44 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 2:26:26 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: >> On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:39:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: >>> James McGinn writes: >>> >>>> MM: >>>> And his exact words were: >>> >>>> "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is >>>> incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an >>>> experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." >>> >>>> JMcG: >>>> The larger truth you are all missing is that science is supposed to be >>>> about open minded weighing for truth, not about defending intellectual >>>> territory so that it is impermeable to assault by reason. >>> >>> That expression is exactly about open minded weighing of the truth. It >>> is saying "Come here with evidence that you're right and we'll update our >>> science." You have to admit it makes perfect sense and is quite fair. >> >> Where is the evidence that you are right, moron? > > The very fact that you've asked this question only confirms the reality that you don't understand how science works. An actual scientist would get busy and provide evidence for his own position, which is the only evidence that counts. You are no scientist, but rather a common fraud. > ask McGinn, "Where is the evidence that you are right, moron?" McGinn has never shown any evidence, only his imagination, and he still misunderstands basic science words, like density, pressure, anomaly, vapor, latent heat, convection, partial pressure, evaporation, humidity, fog, and does not know how science works.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 17:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2q30k$iqr$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #725051 |
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 2:26:26 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:39:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: > > James McGinn writes: > > >"The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is > > >incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an > > >experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." > > >JMcG: > > >The larger truth you are all missing is that science is supposed to be > > >about open minded weighing for truth, not about defending intellectual > > >territory so that it is impermeable to assault by reason. > > That expression is exactly about open minded weighing of the truth. It > > is saying "Come here with evidence that you're right and we'll update our > > science." You have to admit it makes perfect sense and is quite fair. > Where is the evidence that you are right, moron? Provided over the decades by other scientists who followed this: >> "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is >> incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an >> experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." They provided the tests that demonstrated their claims to the satisfaction of science, so their models were accepted. I just repeat the validated models of these scientists. Now it is your turn, James. Propose an experimental test that clearly validates your claims, and enjoy your Nobel Prize. If you can.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 11:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q2q40p$o3a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #725079 |
On 1/29/2019 11:37 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 2:26:26 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:39:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> James McGinn writes:
>
>>>> "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is
>>>> incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an
>>>> experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims."
>
>>>> JMcG:
>
>>>> The larger truth you are all missing is that science is supposed to be
>>>> about open minded weighing for truth, not about defending intellectual
>>>> territory so that it is impermeable to assault by reason.
>
>>> That expression is exactly about open minded weighing of the truth. It
>>> is saying "Come here with evidence that you're right and we'll update our
>>> science." You have to admit it makes perfect sense and is quite fair.
>
>> Where is the evidence that you are right, moron?
>
> Provided over the decades by other scientists who followed this:
>
>>> "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is
>>> incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an
>>> experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims."
>
> They provided the tests that demonstrated their claims to the satisfaction
> of science, so their models were accepted. I just repeat the validated
> models of these scientists.
>
> Now it is your turn, James. Propose an experimental test that clearly
> validates your claims, and enjoy your Nobel Prize. If you can.
>
McGinn, time to put up or shut up.
show your evidence supporting your claims.
Show us you have evidence, measurements, and it is not just your
imagination.
if not, you live in your imagination.
Like a brony with no ponies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 17:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q08aqt$d4n$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #721427 |
Subject: Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam From: James McGinn <jimmcginn@gmail.com> >> Apparently gaseous H2O at ambient temperatures has the same fear of laboratories as do ghosts. >Not true, there is plenty of empirical evidence that the gaseous form of >water is present in the air at STP. Read a chemistry book. Take a >chemistry course, including a lab. >CD: >Then show us this evidence you pathetic liar. >BTW, there is no such thing as "mainstream" science, you nitwit. >McGinn is right--as always! Whoops! Looks like McGinn put on the wrong sock!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 12:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q08e4h$1sk3$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721435 |
On 12/29/2018 11:27 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > Subject: Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam > From: James McGinn <jimmcginn@gmail.com> > >>> Apparently gaseous H2O at ambient temperatures has the same fear of laboratories as do ghosts. > >> Not true, there is plenty of empirical evidence that the gaseous form of >> water is present in the air at STP. Read a chemistry book. Take a >> chemistry course, including a lab. > >> CD: >> Then show us this evidence you pathetic liar. > >> BTW, there is no such thing as "mainstream" science, you nitwit. > >> McGinn is right--as always! > > Whoops! Looks like McGinn put on the wrong sock! > the only one that says "McGinn is right" is Claudhopper Dink, his other main sock, but he has about 10 of them. Including "Paco the talking Duck"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 11:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a523eda3-3b5c-403a-9950-f61eb6409087@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #721456 |
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 10:24:22 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > On 12/29/2018 11:27 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Subject: Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam > > From: James McGinn <jimmcginn@gmail.com> > > > >>> Apparently gaseous H2O at ambient temperatures has the same fear of laboratories as do ghosts. > > > >> Not true, there is plenty of empirical evidence that the gaseous form of > >> water is present in the air at STP. Read a chemistry book. Take a > >> chemistry course, including a lab. > > > >> CD: > >> Then show us this evidence you pathetic liar. > > > >> BTW, there is no such thing as "mainstream" science, you nitwit. > > > >> McGinn is right--as always! > > > > Whoops! Looks like McGinn put on the wrong sock! > > > > > the only one that says "McGinn is right" is Claudhopper Dink, his other > main sock, but he has about 10 of them. > Including "Paco the talking Duck" Lots of people believe what you believe. But none of you can make a coherent argument. Counting people who agree with you is anti-scientific. Scientific methods were developed as a systematic way of dealing with the multitude of brain dead retards who look to each other for evidence of their scientific believes. You idiots got each other and millions upon millions of brain-dead believers. I just got simple facts. I win. James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 11:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2c2ef1fc-715f-412f-a713-69310373cfcb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #721465 |
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 11:04:53 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > I just got simple facts. You are simple, sure, but your 'facts' are all bullshit. Go ahead, prove me wrong, provide evidence in support of your 'facts'. > I win. Not a chance, you are a loser through and through...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 14:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q08kdd$q96$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721471 |
On 12/29/2018 1:39 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 11:04:53 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > >> I just got simple facts. > > You are simple, sure, but your 'facts' are all bullshit. Go ahead, prove me wrong, provide evidence in support of your 'facts'. > >> I win. > > Not a chance, you are a loser through and through... > Quote James McGinn; (this thread) 1 "The world is filled with people who are happy or even eager to pretend to understand what you are pretending to understand." 2 "Pretending to understand is the (my) lie." 3 "It is my goal to admit I don't really understand any of this. Everybody pretends. Everybody lies. Especially Me. And it is easy to lie and pretend when everybody else is lying and pretending." 4 "It was only my goal to demonstrate my desperation to continue to believe." 5 "In science the absolute best reason to believe a certain notion is because everybody else does not believe it." 6 "Thank me for my participation." 7 "There is no such thing as cold steam, except for fog." 8 "Meteorology's theory on storms is refuted by me, as I do not understand science."
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web