Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720926 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-26 06:06 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-12-26 17:11 +0000 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:06 -0800
Re: 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 07:22 -0700
Re: 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:27 -0800
Re: 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-26 17:05 +0000
Re: 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-26 17:11 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 06:06 -0800 |
| Subject | 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV |
| Message-ID | <dc5029c3-6797-4414-a476-1f902267832d@googlegroups.com> |
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 4:23:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 14:05:49 -0800 (PST) > > Subject: 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures > of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks > proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 22:05:49 +0000 > > 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV > Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV This is an attempt to learn why Logic and Physics has so many failures, yet they still manage to make a career out of it. It is worth noting for the sake of history why so many in Logic fail to grasp even the essentials of *logic* yet still manage to make a career out of it. Compare them to those in physics, who never grasp a understanding of Angular Momentum what it is and thus blind all their life long career in physics thinking that you can have a proton at 938MeV, electron at .5MeV and still have Chemistry covalent bonding. So what I want to analyze, is how we can have so many intellectuals and a career in science, but who have a microgram brain of Logic to do science. Whether there is some SOCIOLOGY function that allows airheads to enter Logic and to enter Physics when they really should seek a career elsewhere. And see if there is a common-hole-in-the-head in both groups why they fail to even understand the Baby Steps of their profession in Logic or Physics. LIST OF Failed Physicists, in no order, going back to about 1979 when the idiocy of Standard Model of physics was in full bloom. And in the list below, is what I mean that in the long view of physics history, the Nobel prize has become a joke for there are more mistakes than is there actual true physics Steven Weinberg Peter Higgs Sheldon Glashow Murray-GellMann Edward Witten Rainer Weiss Kip S. Thorne Barry C. Barish David J. Thouless F. Duncan M. Haldane John M. Kosterlitz Takaaki Kajita Arthur B. McDonald Francois Englert Saul Perlmutter Brian P. Schmidt Adam G. Riess Makoto Kobayashi Toshihide Maskawa Yoichiro Nambu John C. Mather George F. Smoot Roy J. Glauber David J. Gross Hugh David Politzer Frank Wilczek Raymond Davis Jr. Masatoshi Koshiba Riccardo Giacconi Gerardus 't Hooft Martinus J.G. Veltman Jerome I. Friedman Henry W. Kendall Richard E. Taylor Carlo Rubbia Simon van der Meer Subramanyan Chandrasekhar William Alfred Fowler Kenneth G. Wilson Kai M. Siegbahn James Watson Cronin Val Logsdon Fitch Sheldon Lee Glashow Abdus Salam Steven Weinberg . . little fishes . . On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 7:48:34 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu more and more layers of error thinking physics . . John Baez Brian Greene Lisa Randall Alan H. Guth Michael E. Brown Konstantin Batygin LIST of failed Logicians Source- Wikipedia list of logicians (alive ones) Peter Bruce Andrews Lennart Aqvist Henk Barendregt John Lane Bell Nuel Belnap Paul Benacerraf Jean Paul Van Bendegem Johan van Benthem Jean-Yves Beziau Andrea Bonomi Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers) Alan Richard Bundy Gregory Chaitin Jack Copeland John Corcoran Dirk van Dalen Martin Davis Michael A.E. Dummett John Etchemendy Hartry Field Kit Fine Melvin Fitting Matthew Foreman Michael Fourman Harvey Friedman Dov Gabbay L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers) Sol Garfunkel Jean-Yves Girard Siegfried Gottwald Jeroen Groenendijk Susan Haack Leo Harrington William Alvin Howard Ronald Jensen Dick de Jongh David Kaplan Alexander S. Kechris Howard Jerome Keisler Robert Kowalski Georg Kreisel Saul Kripke Kenneth Kunen Karel Lambert Penelope Maddy David Makinson Isaac Malitz Gary R. Mar Donald A. Martin Per Martin-Lof Yiannis N. Moschovakis Jeff Paris Charles Parsons Solomon Passy Lorenzo Pena Dag Prawitz Graham Priest Michael O. Rabin Gerald Sacks Dana Scott Stewart Shapiro Theodore Slaman Robert M. Solovay John R. Steel Martin Stokhof Anne Sjerp Troelstra Alasdair Urquhart Moshe Y. Vardi W. Hugh Woodin John Woods AP
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 07:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brsodf.brd.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #720926 |
On 2018-12-26 7:06 a.m., Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 4:23:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: >> Newsgroups: sci.math >> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 14:05:49 -0800 (PST) >> >> Subject: 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures >> of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks >> proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV >> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> >> Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 22:05:49 +0000 >> >> 1-Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV >> > > Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV > > This is an attempt to learn why Logic and Physics has so many failures, yet they still manage to make a career out of it. > > It is worth noting for the sake of history why so many in Logic fail to grasp even the essentials of *logic* yet still manage to make a career out of it. > > Compare them to those in physics, who never grasp a understanding of Angular Momentum what it is and thus blind all their life long career in physics thinking that you can have a proton at 938MeV, electron at .5MeV and still have Chemistry covalent bonding. > > So what I want to analyze, is how we can have so many intellectuals and a career in science, but who have a microgram brain of Logic to do science. Whether there is some SOCIOLOGY function that allows airheads to enter Logic and to enter Physics when they really should seek a career elsewhere. > > And see if there is a common-hole-in-the-head in both groups why they fail to even understand the Baby Steps of their profession in Logic or Physics. > > LIST OF Failed Physicists, in no order, going back to about 1979 when the idiocy of Standard Model of physics was in full bloom. And in the list below, is what I mean that in the long view of physics history, the Nobel prize has become a joke for there are more mistakes than is there actual true physics > > Steven Weinberg > Peter Higgs > Sheldon Glashow > Murray-GellMann > Edward Witten > Rainer Weiss > Kip S. Thorne > Barry C. Barish > David J. Thouless > F. Duncan M. Haldane > John M. Kosterlitz > Takaaki Kajita > Arthur B. McDonald > Francois Englert > Saul Perlmutter > Brian P. Schmidt > Adam G. Riess > Makoto Kobayashi > Toshihide Maskawa > Yoichiro Nambu > John C. Mather > George F. Smoot > Roy J. Glauber > David J. Gross > Hugh David Politzer > Frank Wilczek > Raymond Davis Jr. > Masatoshi Koshiba > Riccardo Giacconi > Gerardus 't Hooft > Martinus J.G. Veltman > Jerome I. Friedman > Henry W. Kendall > Richard E. Taylor > Carlo Rubbia > Simon van der Meer > Subramanyan Chandrasekhar > William Alfred Fowler > Kenneth G. Wilson > Kai M. Siegbahn > James Watson Cronin > Val Logsdon Fitch > Sheldon Lee Glashow > Abdus Salam > Steven Weinberg > . > . > little fishes > . > . > On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 7:48:34 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu > more and more layers of error thinking physics > . > . > John Baez > Brian Greene > Lisa Randall > Alan H. Guth > Michael E. Brown > Konstantin Batygin > > > > LIST of failed Logicians > > > Source- Wikipedia list of logicians (alive ones) > > Peter Bruce Andrews > Lennart Aqvist > Henk Barendregt > John Lane Bell > Nuel Belnap > Paul Benacerraf > Jean Paul Van Bendegem > Johan van Benthem > Jean-Yves Beziau > Andrea Bonomi > Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers) > Alan Richard Bundy > Gregory Chaitin > Jack Copeland > John Corcoran > Dirk van Dalen > Martin Davis > Michael A.E. Dummett > John Etchemendy > Hartry Field > Kit Fine > Melvin Fitting > Matthew Foreman > Michael Fourman > Harvey Friedman > Dov Gabbay > L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers) > Sol Garfunkel > Jean-Yves Girard > Siegfried Gottwald > Jeroen Groenendijk > Susan Haack > Leo Harrington > William Alvin Howard > Ronald Jensen > Dick de Jongh > David Kaplan > Alexander S. Kechris > Howard Jerome Keisler > Robert Kowalski > Georg Kreisel > Saul Kripke > Kenneth Kunen > Karel Lambert > Penelope Maddy > David Makinson > Isaac Malitz > Gary R. Mar > Donald A. Martin > Per Martin-Lof > Yiannis N. Moschovakis > Jeff Paris > Charles Parsons > Solomon Passy > Lorenzo Pena > Dag Prawitz > Graham Priest > Michael O. Rabin > Gerald Sacks > Dana Scott > Stewart Shapiro > Theodore Slaman > Robert M. Solovay > John R. Steel > Martin Stokhof > Anne Sjerp Troelstra > Alasdair Urquhart > Moshe Y. Vardi > W. Hugh Woodin > John Woods > > > AP > no one here reads posts as long as the ones you make
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 06:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b2f3dcd4-a961-488e-ad1c-fde9448e6ead@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720932 |
And to think in High School English class when the teacher said write an essay of 3 pages long, i had a hard time of 3 sentences long
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q00ccv$h8d$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #720934 |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >And to think in High School English class when the teacher said write an essay of 3 pages long, i had a hard time of 3 sentences long It's still true. All your posts are just reposts of what you've written before and saved away, with little new content.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 17:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q00co2$qou$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #720951 |
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes: >Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >>And to think in High School English class when the teacher said write an essay of 3 pages long, i had a hard time of 3 sentences long >It's still true. All your posts are just reposts of what you've written >before and saved away, with little new content. Especially when the autism meltdowns take place.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web