Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720105 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-21 22:30 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-12-29 14:11 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 115 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 22:30 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 22:37 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:20 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-22 10:09 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:19 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:41 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-27 19:51 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 20:16 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-28 20:38 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 21:15 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 21:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 21:53 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-28 22:12 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 22:59 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 11:47 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 22:23 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:48 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 19:17 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 10:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-28 22:00 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 04:28 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 22:25 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:36 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 21:33 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-22 12:36 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 22:50 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-25 22:59 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 23:19 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-25 23:32 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 23:58 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 10:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 22:48 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-03 19:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 06:44 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 16:07 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 21:50 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 19:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-22 20:06 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 20:29 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-23 00:09 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 19:54 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-22 21:39 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 20:57 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 08:49 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-24 20:01 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-24 21:38 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 07:48 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-25 17:28 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:07 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-26 04:15 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 22:46 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-26 14:25 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:22 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 18:12 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 21:38 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 22:55 -0500
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-25 22:09 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-26 21:41 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:40 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-25 23:42 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 22:10 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 08:22 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 08:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:01 -0700
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 09:55 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 11:36 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 15:20 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 16:36 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 20:50 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 20:39 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:45 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 21:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 20:51 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-30 00:11 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:35 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 09:39 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 15:00 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 16:00 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 17:30 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 18:31 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 19:56 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 20:26 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 20:54 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 21:13 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 22:13 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-31 00:19 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-31 05:14 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 21:57 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 17:19 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-31 23:58 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:46 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 19:05 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 06:56 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 23:50 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 04:39 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 21:58 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 22:08 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 22:18 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-03 15:52 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 08:21 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 02:26 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-29 06:44 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-29 09:36 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-29 17:37 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-29 11:54 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-29 17:27 +0000
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 12:24 -0600
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 11:39 -0800
Re: Ghosts and Cold Steam Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 14:11 -0600
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-23 19:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <94675be6-dc0f-4c2e-91f8-cab5159e5821@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720328 |
Your snottiness is itself evidence of this deeply held bias. You want to believe what you've always believed. Many others want the same. I am not like that. I don't want to believe. I am a scientist. I want to understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-22 21:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvn02d$1paf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720313 |
On 12/22/2018 8:50 PM, benj wrote: > On 12/22/2018 1:37 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:30:30 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: >> >>> People that believe in ghosts can point to a plethora of evidence >>> that "confirms" it. >> >> Not empirical evidence, no they can't... >> >>> There's just one problem. All of the evidence is anecdotal. >>> Apparently ghosts are afraid of laboratories. >>> >>> Apparently gaseous H2O at ambient temperatures has the same fear of >>> laboratories as do ghosts. >> >> Not true, there is plenty of empirical evidence that the gaseous form >> of water is present in the air at STP. Read a chemistry book. Take a >> chemistry course, including a lab. >> > Hey, McFly, there are lots of connections between ghosts and steam. > Steam makes ghosts visible. In a lab I used to work in ghosts used to > bang the steam radiators when I was in there alone at night. I swear > it's absolutely true! Ghosts can control cold steam! > > My Grandma's House on Long Island had a huge boiler in the basement, used Coal to heat water, which would go up the pipes to the radiators, most on the top floor had regulators which would make strange sound, and since all the pipe was connected, the sounds traveled throughout the house. She knew more about Cold Steam than McFly ever will. Had an apartment in Atlanta in the 60's, the landlord would turn on the steam (heat) from only 2 AM to 4 AM that was it. The steam was cold, Huge clanking noises all during that time, could be McGinn's Ghosts, froze a lot there, rent was very cheap.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-22 20:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvn4k8$m7c$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #720313 |
On 12/22/2018 6:50 PM, benj wrote: > On 12/22/2018 1:37 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:30:30 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: >> >>> People that believe in ghosts can point to a plethora of evidence >>> that "confirms" it. >> >> Not empirical evidence, no they can't... >>> There's just one problem. All of the evidence is anecdotal. >>> Apparently ghosts are afraid of laboratories. >>> >>> Apparently gaseous H2O at ambient temperatures has the same fear of >>> laboratories as do ghosts. >> >> Not true, there is plenty of empirical evidence that the gaseous form >> of water is present in the air at STP. Read a chemistry book. Take a >> chemistry course, including a lab. >> > Hey, McFly, there are lots of connections between ghosts and steam. I had a good laugh when a programmer called a bug a ghost one time. > Steam makes ghosts visible. In a lab I used to work in ghosts used to > bang the steam radiators when I was in there alone at night. I swear > it's absolutely true! Ghosts can control cold steam! > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 08:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0d9462ad-b4be-4d65-bd89-ecc43592bb21@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720107 |
On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:37:57 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 10:30:30 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > > > People that believe in ghosts can point to a plethora of evidence that "confirms" it. > > Not empirical evidence, no they can't... > > > There's just one problem. All of the evidence is anecdotal. Apparently ghosts are afraid of laboratories. > > > > Apparently gaseous H2O at ambient temperatures has the same fear of laboratories as do ghosts. > > Not true, there is plenty of empirical evidence that the gaseous form of water is present in the air at STP. Read a chemistry book. Take a chemistry course, including a lab. You have not evidence you lying piece of shit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 20:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4fc4f68c-f15a-434f-b584-f6618b8541c8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720573 |
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:50:01 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > You have not evidence you lying piece of shit I don't need evidence, I'm not making an unusual claim. The same cannot be said of you because you DO make unusual claims. Let's see your evidence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 20:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <efc69f07-fa16-4a61-989f-87f21e862999@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720747 |
My theory/scenario does not depend upon or have any need for the rhetoric based idiocy. There is no "cold steam' in my scenario.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 21:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e0e31e16-f9fe-4ee9-95fb-f784c1b3f85e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720750 |
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > My theory/scenario does not depend upon or have any need for the rhetoric based idiocy. There is no "cold steam' in my scenario. Unfortunately, your theory/scenario is just a wild-ass guess and has ZERO empirical evidence, no observations, and zero experiments. You have no clue if it is correct or not, and neither does anyone else because it has no evidence at all... although there is plenty of actual evidence that it is wrong. Why is it so hard for you to understand and use the scientific method?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 07:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2b96433e-3d0d-4401-9a48-ee45f16332b2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720760 |
Your desperation tells a different story. The world is filled with people who are happy or even eager to pretend to understand what you are pretending to understand. It was not my goal to get you to admit you don't really understand any of this. Everybody lies. And it is easy to lie when everybody else is lying. It was only my goal to demonstrate your desperation to continue to believe despite any and all evidence to the contrary. Thank you for your participation. James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 17:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pvtpbp$c3b$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #720782 |
James McGinn writes: >Your desperation tells a different story. If you weren't so desperate yourself (and projecting it), you could easily supply your proof of your claims, just as the scientific method expects. Quoting pnal's quote of Dr. Richard Saykally: "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." - Dr. Richard Saykally
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 10:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3845a4a0-659a-4a66-94b3-984f2882d303@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720806 |
Moroney: "If you weren't so desperate . . . JMcG: LOL. Me? Did you think this through? James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 04:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pvuv9i$hv$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #720820 |
James McGinn writes: Moroney: "If you weren't so desperate . . .[yourself (and projecting it), you could easily supply your proof of your claims, just as the scientific method expects.] >JMcG: >LOL. Me? Yes, you. If you didn't snip what applies to you and how you project your own failings, instead of reading it, you'd see it. So why don't you supply your proof of your claims? After all, it is your responsibility to prove to science that you are correct, not the science commumity to prove to every crank that comes along that they are correct. Quoting again pnal's quote of Dr. Richard Saykally: "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." - Dr. Richard Saykally >Did you think this through? Better than you ever did. So where is your proof of your claims? What?? The proof doesn't exist??? Really????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 22:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4a48cdbe-8926-4f1d-a946-5ad7cd696d1f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720890 |
Moroney: "If you weren't so desperate . . .[yourself (and projecting it), you could easily supply your proof of your claims, just as the scientific method expects.] >JMcG: >LOL. Me? Yes, you. If you didn't snip what applies to you and how you project your own failings, instead of reading it, you'd see it. So why don't you supply your proof of your claims? JMcG: You expect me to prove that your imagination is wrong? Guess again. I only have to show that it exists only in your imagination. And I have already done that. You got nothing!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 14:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q00o3r$1us0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720890 |
On 12/25/2018 10:15 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > James McGinn writes: > > Moroney: > "If you weren't so desperate . . .[yourself (and projecting it), you could easily > supply your proof of your claims, just as the scientific method expects.] > > >> JMcG: >> LOL. Me? > > Yes, you. If you didn't snip what applies to you and how you project your > own failings, instead of reading it, you'd see it. > > So why don't you supply your proof of your claims? After all, it is your > responsibility to prove to science that you are correct, not the science > commumity to prove to every crank that comes along that they are correct. > > Quoting again pnal's quote of Dr. Richard Saykally: "The way our business > works is that one who argues that a given model is incorrect and proposes > a new one to replace it must also propose an experimental test that can > clearly evidence the claims." - Dr. Richard Saykally > >> Did you think this through? > > Better than you ever did. > > So where is your proof of your claims? What?? The proof doesn't exist??? > Really???? > Dr. Richard Saykally: "James McGinn does not understand the first things about Science. James is lost in his imagination, no facts, no math. I'd rather talk to a small dog."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 16:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q00rfc$edu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720987 |
On 12/26/2018 3:25 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/25/2018 10:15 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >> James McGinn writes: >> >> Moroney: >> "If you weren't so desperate . . .[yourself (and projecting it), you could easily >> supply your proof of your claims, just as the scientific method expects.] >> >> >>> JMcG: >>> LOL. Me? >> >> Yes, you. If you didn't snip what applies to you and how you project your >> own failings, instead of reading it, you'd see it. >> >> So why don't you supply your proof of your claims? After all, it is your >> responsibility to prove to science that you are correct, not the science >> commumity to prove to every crank that comes along that they are correct. >> >> Quoting again pnal's quote of Dr. Richard Saykally: "The way our business >> works is that one who argues that a given model is incorrect and proposes >> a new one to replace it must also propose an experimental test that can >> clearly evidence the claims." - Dr. Richard Saykally >> >>> Did you think this through? >> >> Better than you ever did. >> >> So where is your proof of your claims? What?? The proof doesn't exist??? >> Really???? >> > > Dr. Richard Saykally: "James McGinn does not understand the first things > about Science. James is lost in his imagination, no facts, no math. I'd > rather talk to a small dog." > Hey, the last time I asked a small dog about "cold steam" he didn't seem to have any interest in the subject. He just kept talking about how climate change was going to cause the end of the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 18:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0eb60504-1c6c-48ec-8ea1-5022d9c8fc3f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720987 |
Scientific methods were developed and codified by a small dog in order to deal with the billions of well intentioned, stupid, gullible, liars who would turn it into a religion--yourself included.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 21:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pvu807$19mt$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720782 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > Your desperation tells a different story. > > The world is filled with people who are happy or even eager to pretend to > understand what you are pretending to understand. > > It was not my goal to get you to admit you don't really understand any of > this. Everybody lies. And it is easy to lie when everybody else is lying. “The way I’ve established myself as honorable is by declaring that everyone else is a liar. The way I establish myself as a genius is by declaring everyone else stupid. The way I establish myself as insightful is by declaring everyone else gullible.” > > It was only my goal to demonstrate your desperation to continue to > believe despite any and all evidence to the contrary. > > Thank you for your participation. > > James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 22:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvuu49$4pi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720855 |
On 12/25/2018 4:38 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> Your desperation tells a different story. >> >> The world is filled with people who are happy or even eager to pretend to >> understand what you are pretending to understand. >> >> It was not my goal to get you to admit you don't really understand any of >> this. Everybody lies. And it is easy to lie when everybody else is lying. > > “The way I’ve established myself as honorable is by declaring that everyone > else is a liar. The way I establish myself as a genius is by declaring > everyone else stupid. The way I establish myself as insightful is by > declaring everyone else gullible.” Wait. Odd does declare that everyone else (who does not agree with him) is a liar, stupid and gullible. That certainly makes Odd, honorable, genius and insightful and also (dare a say it?) a "winner". >> It was only my goal to demonstrate your desperation to continue to >> believe despite any and all evidence to the contrary. >> >> Thank you for your participation. >> >> James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes >> > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 22:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5c471ad7-39ba-4f0a-9136-c6ecb9a7adc1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720782 |
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 7:48:27 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > It was only my goal to demonstrate your desperation to continue to believe despite any and all evidence to the contrary. What evidence to the contrary would that be, Jim? You can not possibly provide *any* evidence to the contrary to demonstrate my desperation. Go ahead, show us your evidence, finally...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 21:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q01hkq$1aip$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720900 |
On 12/26/2018 12:09 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 7:48:27 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > >> It was only my goal to demonstrate your desperation to continue to believe despite any and all evidence to the contrary. > > What evidence to the contrary would that be, Jim? You can not possibly provide *any* evidence to the contrary to demonstrate my desperation. Go ahead, show us your evidence, finally... > James McGinn's Evidence is probably in his book, "WHAT GOES UP: Storm Theory: What meteorologists believe but won't debate, discuss, or even doubt (Solving Pornadoes: Hacking the Atmosphere Book 1)" 99 cents Top Reviews; K. Parker 1.0 out of 5 stars *insane rambling* July 3, 2014 Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. hunter 1.0 out of 5 stars *Waste of time, a non-funny joke* July 16, 2014 Format: Kindle Edition This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 20:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3021802e-65ed-41fa-b879-06bf841891c1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720747 |
Maybe those thousands of scientists' dogs ate all of their papers. Hmm. Thousands and thousands?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web