Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #720754 > unrolled thread

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson of Stanford, is McGinn the example of how physicists react when told the proton is 840MeV, electron 105MeV to have chemistry bonding

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-12-24 21:03 -0800
Last post2018-12-26 03:00 +0000
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson of Stanford, is McGinn the example of how physicists react when told the proton is 840MeV, electron 105MeV to have chemistry bonding Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 21:03 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-26 02:57 +0000
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-26 03:00 +0000

#720754 — Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson of Stanford, is McGinn the example of how physicists react when told the proton is 840MeV, electron 105MeV to have chemistry bonding

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-24 21:03 -0800
SubjectGregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson of Stanford, is McGinn the example of how physicists react when told the proton is 840MeV, electron 105MeV to have chemistry bonding
Message-ID<a91ae6d5-5424-47b1-87da-f1671ba99a13@googlegroups.com>
Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson of Stanford, is McGinn the example of how physicists react when told the proton is 840MeV, electron 105MeV to have chemistry bonding


About McGinn, we all know he is an idiot when it comes to science or even thinking straight, and although he deserves 1 or 2 posts per day (some would say that is too much) but he does not deserve 75 posts per day under various names like Denke or Pnal. So either he post 1 or 2 or I recommend he be kicked out permanently as a front page hog spamming jackarse. I hate his practice of just churning his posts, where the creep adds two words to his prior post just to get it on the front page again.

Ghosts and Cold Steam (19)
By James McGinn 19 posts 32 views updated 10:40 PM


+ 4 others






Pauling's Mistake
By James McGinn 1 post 3 views updated 10:11 PM




This topic has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.



CalTech's Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,Konstantin Batygin are you like McGinn/pnal too stupid to understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry


Too stupid to understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry. The .5MeV particle that Thomson discovered was actually Dirac's magnetic monopole

Why does McGinn simply not ask professors of physics at UCLA why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole 

Why does any physicist not believe proton is 840MeV, electron is 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding, because a ratio of 840 to 105 allows for Angular Momentum
----------------------------------- 

UCLA Physics dept 
Ernest Abers 
Elihu Abrahams 
Katsushi Arisaka 
Michalis Bachtis 
Eric Becklin 
Zvi Bern 
Rubin Braunstein 
Stuart Brown 
Robijn Bruinsma 
Charles Buchanan 
Wesley Campbell 
Troy Carter 
Sudip Chakravarty 
W. Gilbert Clark 
John Cornwall 
Robert Cousins 
Eric D'Hoker 
Robert Finkelstein 
Christian Fronsdal 
Walter Gekelman 
Graciela Gelmini 
George Gruner 
Michael Gutperle 
Brad Hansen 
Jay Hauser 
Karoly Holczer 
Huan Huang 
Eric Hudson 
George Igo 
Per Kraus 
Alexander Kusenko 
Thomas Mason 
George Morales 
Warren Mori 
Steven Moszkowski 
Christoph Niemann 
Kumar Patel 
Roberto Peccei 
Claudio Pellegrini 
Seth Putterman 
B. Regan 
James Rosenzweig 
Joseph Rudnick 
David Saltzberg 
William Slater 
Reiner Stenzel 
Terry Tomboulis 
Jean Turner 


Stanford University, math dept. 

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie  Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu   


President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian


CalTech math dept 

Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari 
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris      
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov, 
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI, 

Caltech Physics Dept 

Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi 
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips 
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in sunny California?


And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being .5MeV, your students deserve better. 

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. 

Yes, there McGinn, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

What answer did they give?




AP 

Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium                 
                                

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#720874 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-12-26 02:57 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<pvuqnc$tps$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#720754
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

[]

WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to trach your children
his broken math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your children! He
teaches there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, he teaches a
sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many, many other instances of bad math.
Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math, just like he is.
Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. But the
point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous book! 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#720875 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-12-26 03:00 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<pvuqs5$tps$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#720754
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

[]

WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to trach your children
his broken math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your children! He
teaches there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, he teaches a
sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many, many other instances of bad math.
Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math, just like he is.
Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. But the
point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous book! 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web