Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720451 > unrolled thread
| Started by | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-23 21:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-12-28 17:55 -0800 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-23 21:42 +0000
which of these three failed Angular Momentum the most? was it John Baez, Peter Higgs or Ben Bullock ( or known as the bull) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:55 -0800
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-23 21:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pvovge$ss6$1@pcls7.std.com> |
Chattering Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Subject: Moroney reporting on LOCKDOWN at HARVARD until they can get a true > book of LOGIC, rather than brainwash and pollute the minds of students just > so some moneygrub rednecks like Christensen makes more money Weird how Plutonium keeps asking for me to calculate how much his posts fail, measured in the unit of failure, the plutonium. ☑ Archie responds to criticism but refuses to discuss the issue... ☑ ...would rather run away by trying to delete his posts... ☑ ...actually believes deleting something on Google actually deletes it from Usenet... ☑ ...Considers attempts of actual discussion to be 'stalking'... ☐ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... ☑ ...with zero new content... ☐ ...and posted to the wrong newsgroup... ☑ ...multiple times... ☑ ...again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...enough times to be classified as spam... ☐ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... ☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... ☑ ...who are university math or physics professors... ☑ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... ☑ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... ☑ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... ☑ ....no, Archie demands they be fired for not teaching his broken math... ☑ ....Archie demands they shut down an entire university for not teaching his broken math... ☑ ....Archie demands they shut down HARVARD for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why post stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... ☑ ...maybe he thinks these professors do a Kibo and will respond here just by mentioning their names... ☑ ...even though those profs have never heard of him and never will... ☐ ...speaking of Kibo, mentions Kibo (how last century!) ☑ ...Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... ☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... ☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... ☐ ...Archie whines about iPhone's self-protection feature rather than heat his trailer in the winter... ☐ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... ☐ ...actually claims that anyone who believe the ellipse is a conic section is stupid... ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of his long-discredited ellipse/conic section non-proof... ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... ☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☑ ...and that whatever-it-is ascii art... ☑ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☑ ...and Archie still can't answer Dan C's easy 4 question math test... ☑ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... ☑ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... ☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... ☑ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... ☑ Archie says something really dumb and stoopid, but realizes how dumb it is, so he accuses another poster of saying it... ☐ Archie doesn't know the definition of "racism", so calls anyone who points out all the flaws in his claims are "racist"... ☐ Archie roots for cockroaches in the Law of the Jungle... ☑ Archie can't tell the difference between Boolean AND/OR and arithmetic addition/subtraction... ☑ Archie outsmarted by someone too stupid to come out of the rain AGAIN... ☑ Archie doesn't even know the 'rules' of Boolean logic... ☑ ...in particular, doesn't know the difference between AND/OR and addition/subtraction... ☑ Archie thinks he is the very first person in the history of the world to disbelieve in negative and imaginary numbers... ☐ ...and demands credit from anyone else who also disbelieves in them... ☑ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. ☑ ...because he's too stoopid to configure a newsreader with killfile... The Failure Score of Archie's post: 42 plutoniums! (The plutonium is the new SI unit of failure) Possibly a new record for failure!!!!
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:55 -0800 |
| Subject | which of these three failed Angular Momentum the most? was it John Baez, Peter Higgs or Ben Bullock ( or known as the bull) |
| Message-ID | <1f1ca417-d644-48b1-853b-af4688b54fb2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #720451 |
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 3:42:41 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Chattering Math Failure AP writes: Peter Higgs was more into physics than mathematics Bullock & Baez-- fat heads no content Re: John Baez flunked the physics and math lifelong generation > About the only thing John will be remembered for is his Crackpot Index because John is #1 crackpot in much of science. > > Usually when one has a dual-major-- studied in both math and physics, usually means they are poor in both. > > Witness: > > John's greatest failing is never understanding what Angular Momentum means and is all about. If the imp ever did, he would instantly recognize that you cannot have Chemistry bonding with a Proton at 938 MeV and electron at .5MeV. That the only way to have Chemistry at all is for the Proton to be 840MeV and the muon is the electron at 105 MeV. But, the trouble with Baez is he never was a physicist in the first place for all he does is peddle push crazy stuff like quantum foam, when poor John never even understood, let alone master Angular Momentum. > Ben Bullock wrote: 9/17/94 >I would like a list of all the cranks, loonies and crazies on >sci.physics, so that I can save the trouble of continually having to >update a "kill" file. >Please send responses to me directly by e-mail, and I will summarise >with a full "loony" list to directly enter into a kill file. >So far my "loony list" is as follows: *Ludwig.P...@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium)* *atla...@aol.com (Atlantur)* *ab...@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian)* *t...@ic.net (Tom Potter)* *st...@fwn.rug.nl (Student Natuurkunde)* *pr...@price.demon.co.uk (Michael Clive Price)* *pa...@meed47.ee.man.ac.uk (Paul Floyd)* *an3...@anon.penet.fi (Father McGlone)* *pe...@csn.org (bert)* *ver...@netcom.com (Vertner Vergon)* >Some of the above "loonies" may have just been making a joke or >something when I read their posts, so if they are not really loonies >someone should tell me (they can't tell me themselves because their >posts are totally exterminated from my newsreader) -- >Ben Bullock @ KEK (National Lab. for High Energy Physics) 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, JAPAN : tel. 0298 64 5401 AP writes: hey Ben, Bullock Ben why you such a loser in physics, I mean there you are in Japan, and you never even learned what Angular Momentum was all about-- for if you had learned angular momentum you would have known that Chemistry cannot exist with proton = 938MeV and electron at .5MeV. So why not pull your head up out of your arse and think for a change. From: ba...@math.ucr.edu (john baez) wrote: >There was a quite nice thread on Bose-Einstein condensation here on sci.physics, which seems to have died down now that everyone knows what they want to know, and the presence of a parallel, utterly inane, thread about Bullock, Plutonium, etc. is quite immaterial, because one is perfectly free to ignore such silliness. In fact the only reason I happen to see your contribution to that inane thread (and to contribute to it myself) is that I am using a newsreader whose killfiles I haven't yet optimized. Now I will kill this thread and >read interesting things. AP writes: you too John Baez, you had your head up your arse all your life time in physics not even knowing what angular momentum was, for if you had any idea what angular momentum was, you would not be as stupid of an idiot like Ben Bullock, and realized you have no chemistry with a 938MeV versus .5MeV. I mean you bragged about reading Feynman Lectures in Physics at the ripe age of was it 15? but what good was that when you still to this day think chemistry bonding is 938 to .5. What kind of moron are you John? On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 3:28:35 AM UTC-5, noTthaTguY wrote: > ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course; > just grab a dictionary, asshole AP writes: yea John how many alias names do you have? I mean, not only did you never realize what angular momentum was, but you never understood a ellipse is never a conic. And you say you have a Dual degree in math and physics? I would say you are a dual failure in math and physics. john baez wrote 9/30/94 >Dirac knew a certain amount about quantum field theory, and his complaints about it were very valid worries, shared by many people. It is still not known whether QED or the standard model is a mathematically consistent theory or not, despite vast efforts along these lines. It's important to note that Dirac's successes (the Dirac equation being one example) and theories on which the verdict is still out (magnetic monopoles being one example --- while never found, they continue to haunt the dreams of theorists) are due to the same curious habits of thought that led him to his failures, like the business about gravity. As he said: "I think it's a peculiarity of myself that I like to play about with equations, just looking for beautiful mathematical relations which maybe don't have any physical meaning at all. Sometimes they do." [from Abraham Pais' essay `Playing with equations, the Dirac way', in _Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac_, eds. Behram N. Kursunoglu and Eugene P. Wigner, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1987.] Note the humility of this attitude, so unlike that typical of crackpots who have NO successes to report, and who attempt to compensate for this fact with bluster. AP writes: Baez is a little fish of physics, whereas Dirac was a giant of the 20th century, and it is never fair for a little fish to evaluate a giant of science. AP me (Archimedes Plutonium change) 1:47 PM (1 minute ago) what the hell is angular momentum???? afterall Re: Bullock & Baez-- fat heads no content What was that Bible saying?? : What does it profit a man to own the whole entire world, yet lose his own soul in the process. Which is easily adaptable to our two most arrogant fools of physics-- John Baez and Ben Bullock. Of what does it profit Baez and Bullock to have read Feynman Lectures on Physics at age 12, when throughout their entire lives, never could grasp or understand what the hell is angular momentum, afterall. Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web