Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720312 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-22 18:49 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-12-23 04:21 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 18:49 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-23 04:21 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-22 18:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV |
| Message-ID | <5f811ad0-e742-4fd6-904f-dbcd23e1a0ec@googlegroups.com> |
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:42:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 02:42:24 +0000 Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV This is an attempt to learn why Logic and Physics has so many failures, yet they still manage to make a career out of it. It is worth noting for the sake of history why so many in Logic fail to grasp even the essentials of *logic* yet still manage to make a career out of it. Compare them to those in physics, who never grasp a understanding of Angular Momentum what it is and thus blind all their life long career in physics thinking that you can have a proton at 938MeV, electron at .5MeV and still have Chemistry covalent bonding. So what I want to analyze, is how we can have so many intellectuals and a career in science, but who have a microgram brain of Logic to do science. Whether there is some SOCIOLOGY function that allows airheads to enter Logic and to enter Physics when they really should seek a career elsewhere. And see if there is a common-hole-in-the-head in both groups why they fail to even understand the Baby Steps of their profession in Logic or Physics. LIST OF Failed Physicists, in no order Steven Weinberg Peter Higgs Sheldon Glashow Murray-GellMann Edward Witten Rainer Weiss Kip Thorne Barry Barish David J. Thouless F. Duncan M. Haldane John M. Kosterlitz Takaaki Kajita Arthur B. McDonald Francois Englert Saul Perlmutter Brian P. Schmidt Adam G. Riess Makoto Kobayashi Toshihide Maskawa Yoichiro Nambu John C. Mather George F. Smoot David J. Gross Hugh David Politzer Frank Wilczek . . John Baez Brian Greene LIST of failed Logicians Source- Wikipedia list of logicians (alive ones) Peter Bruce Andrews Lennart Aqvist Henk Barendregt John Lane Bell Nuel Belnap Paul Benacerraf Jean Paul Van Bendegem Johan van Benthem Jean-Yves Beziau Andrea Bonomi Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers) Alan Richard Bundy Gregory Chaitin Jack Copeland John Corcoran Dirk van Dalen Martin Davis Michael A.E. Dummett John Etchemendy Hartry Field Kit Fine Melvin Fitting Matthew Foreman Michael Fourman Harvey Friedman Dov Gabbay L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers) Sol Garfunkel Jean-Yves Girard Siegfried Gottwald Jeroen Groenendijk Susan Haack Leo Harrington William Alvin Howard Ronald Jensen Dick de Jongh David Kaplan Alexander S. Kechris Howard Jerome Keisler Robert Kowalski Georg Kreisel Saul Kripke Kenneth Kunen Karel Lambert Penelope Maddy David Makinson Isaac Malitz Gary R. Mar Donald A. Martin Per Martin-Lof Yiannis N. Moschovakis Jeff Paris Charles Parsons Solomon Passy Lorenzo Pena Dag Prawitz Graham Priest Michael O. Rabin Gerald Sacks Dana Scott Stewart Shapiro Theodore Slaman Robert M. Solovay John R. Steel Martin Stokhof Anne Sjerp Troelstra Alasdair Urquhart Moshe Y. Vardi W. Hugh Woodin John Woods AP Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-23 04:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pvn2fv$nfj$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #720312 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Subject: Re: Comparative Analysis of failures & fumblers of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV >This is an attempt to learn why Logic and Physics has so many failures, yet > they still manage to make a career out of it. <chatter chatter chatter> >LIST OF Failed Physicists, in no order Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium >LIST of failed Logicians Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium There. I fixed your post for you.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web