Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #719478 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-19 13:04 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-12-20 15:47 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Christensen says Cornell too dumb in logic; Martha Pollack,Yuri Berest,Justin Moore, Birgit E. Speh too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry bonding Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:04 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 15:47 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-19 13:04 -0800 |
| Subject | Christensen says Cornell too dumb in logic; Martha Pollack,Yuri Berest,Justin Moore, Birgit E. Speh too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry bonding |
| Message-ID | <51a37c67-a0cc-480a-9110-edb624765bb6@googlegroups.com> |
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 9:38:24 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: > Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. > > 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places? __________ (Ans: 0.707) > > 2. True or false: 10^604 = 0 __________ (Ans: False) > > 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is __________ (Ans: False) > > 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is __________ (Ans: True) > > Dan AP writes: no wonder math and physics professors of Cornell are failures-- when they cannot tell a oval apart from an ellipse and they nattering nutter the Boole Logic of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1. Why does any physicist not believe proton is 840MeV, electron is 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding, because a ratio of 840 to 105 allows for Angular Momentum Dan Christensen, 6 year insane stalker Canadian .. .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-.. , . `.' ' `. .' .' ` ` ' `.. ; . ; .' . `. ; ; . ' `. . ' . ' ` `. | . '. ' . 0 0 ' `. ' ` ; ` .' ` ; U ` ; '; ` : | ;.. :` ` : `;. ```. .-; | ' '. ` ``.., .' :' ' ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Christensen, so dumb I think chemistry bonding can exist with proton 938MeV & electron at .5MeV just as dumb as my idea that Boole logic is valid as 10 OR 4 = 14 with 10 AND 4 = 6, when a 8 year old knows 10 AND 4= 14 ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` `. ````'''''' ' ' ` . ' ' / ` `. ' ' . / ` .. ..' .'"""""...' / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....''' / .'' ; ` .' ` ...'.' ; .' ` .' ` "" .' .' | ` .; \ ` ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ ` :' | ' ` , `. ` | ' ` ' `. ` ` ' ` ; `. | `.' ` ; `-' `...' Christensen says Cornell professors too dumb in logic; Martha Pollack,Yuri Berest,Justin Moore, Birgit E. Speh too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding AP writes: why does Christensen simply not ask professors of physics or mathematics of Cornell Univ why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole /\-------/\ \::O:::O::/ (::_ ^ _::) \_`-----'_/ You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Cornell? Why no math professor at Cornell understands the oval is a conic section, never the ellipse-- because they are pathetic fools of math Re: Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND. AP writes: Christensen, why you want to fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept? Why? because they accept the fool Boole that 10 OR 2 = 12 while 10 AND 2 = 8. Or is it because the Cornell professors were so dumb and dull as to never see the ellipse was a cylinder section never a conic? Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND Cornell Univ math dept which none of them can even do correct logic, witness-- the imps still abide by the worthless Boole Logic of 8 OR 3 = 11 with 8 AND 3 = 5, when even a 8 year kid knows that 8 AND 3 = 11, so, hopeless in doing correct math. And to this very day the fools of Cornell Math dept still believe a ellipse is a conic when a High School student can bring to these professors a cone and Kerr jar lid and demonstrate the slant cut is a oval, never an ellipse. All of which made worse in that these failing professors control Arxiv.org. The blind leading the blind. See TRUE LOGIC corrections below:: President Cornell: Martha Pollack (computer science) Martha, don't you feel ashamed that your math and logic professors brainwash young students in the error filled Boole Logic? You yourself being a computer scientist, and to fill young students with the brainwash manure of Boole logic. Martha, did you know that Boole went to lecture at a college and forgot his umbrella in a downpour rain, and on arrival instead of changing into dry clothes lectured in front of students shivering cold and wet and caught pneumonia and then ordered his wife to make the bed wet and give him cold showers, thinking that to combat pneumonia is to use coldness. Of course Boole died from pneumonia for he was a illogical fool. And Martha, to think that a barren of logic mind of Boole is what silly math professors of Cornell abide by. Cornell Univ math dept Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty Marcelo Aguiar Jason Manning Slawomir Solecki Dan M. Barbasch Karola Meszaros Philippe Sosoe Yuri Berest Justin Moore Birgit E. Speh Louis Billera Camil Muscalu Michael E. Stillman Xiaodong Cao Anil Nerode Robert S. Strichartz Robert Connelly Michael Nussbaum Steven Strogatz R. Keith Dennis Irena Peeva Edward Swartz Daniel Halpern-Leistner Ravi Ramakrishna Nicolas Templier Timothy J. Healey Richard H. Rand Alex Townsend Tara Holm Timothy Riley Alexander Vladimirsky John H. Hubbard Laurent Saloff-Coste Marten Wegkamp Martin Kassabov Shankar Sen James E. West Allen Knutson Richard A. Shore Inna Zakharevich Lionel Levine Reyer Sjamaar David Zywina Emeritus and Retired Faculty Allen Back Allen Hatcher Alfred H. Schatz James H. Bramble David W. Henderson John Smillie Kenneth S. Brown J.T. Gene Hwang Moss E. Sweedler Stephen U. Chase Yulij Ilyashenko Daina Taimina Marshall M. Cohen Peter J. Kahn Robert E. Terrell Clifford J. Earle Harry Kesten Maria S. Terrell Roger H. Farrell G. Roger Livesay Karen Vogtmann Leonard Gross Michael D. Morley Beverly West John M. Guckenheimer And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, starpower is only 10% fusion, 90% Faraday Law of its atoms. And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. Yes, there Christensen?, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is105 MeV. What answer did they give? Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-20 15:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pvgdj6$b9n$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #719478 |
Chattering Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
> Franz writes:
>>C'mon, Archie, the proof just consists of 3 short lines. It should be
>>easy for you to spot the error (or the errors) in these 3 short lines!
>Is this Matthias Franz of Univ Western Ontario acting and playing dumb on
>ellipse? and stalking and pestering AP
Why aren't you answering Franz, Archie? He has a great proof, nice and
simple, any mathematician can easily understand it.
Whining by claiming that asking for an error is "stalking and pestering AP"
is just plain dumb and stoopid, it just makes you look like a fool.
So disprove it by finding a flaw in the 3 short lines of the proof itself.
Here it is again.
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web