Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #719279 > unrolled thread

charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why  it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:07 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-19 15:34 +0000
      Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 07:38 -0800
        Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-19 15:57 +0000
          Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 08:28 -0800
            Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 14:52 -0800
        John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist, so, is Up and Down the best??? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 08:49 -0800
          John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist, so, is Up and Down the best??? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 11:12 -0800
          John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist, so, is Up and Down the best??? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 11:16 -0800
            settled on Open and Closed as being charge Re: John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:33 -0800
              settled on Open and Closed as being charge Re: John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:19 -0800
                proton is hollow tube of windings, electron is closed object as bar magnet Re: settled on Open and Closed as being charge Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 19:00 -0800
                  Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 07:14 +0000
                    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 04:00 -0800
                      Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 15:33 +0000
                        Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 08:03 -0800
                        Moroney for you-- never any science never any math-- only hatred of everyone around him-- is this what Harvard and MIT encourage Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 13:32 -0800
    Re: charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why  it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 14:55 -0800

#719279 — charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:03:39 -0800 (PST)

Subject: charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why
 it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:03:39 +0000

charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant

Now this is a tough question to answer as to why it took 330 intervening years to realize that all of graphing and Cartesian Coordinate System is true only for 1st quadrant only, meaning that the other three quadrants are fake math. Well, if you look in the history of graphing Descartes and Newton did math on a x-axis, not even a y axis. So, they did graphing on even less than 1st Quadrant only. 

And, so, in the intervening years from 1687, you had plenty plenty of time for the village idiots of mathematics with their less than a microgram brain of logic, to screw up royally, the Cartesian Coordinate System by adding negative numbers. When negative numbers never existed in the first place. Idiots of math when doing arithmetic, never learned a axiom of algebra-- you can subtract, only when there is enough to subtract from. In other words, you cannot remove (subtract = remove) more than what is available. Every person in the world that accepts negative numbers is not a mathematician but a village idiot zombie of math. 

NEGATIVE NUMBERS DO NOT EXIST 

Now in physics they say negative 1 charge, and they are wrong also, for they should be saying the proton is right handed spin while the electron or muon is left handed spin. Charge does not come in +1 or -1, but charge comes in right handed or left handed. 

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#719404 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Village Idiot of Mathematics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant

>NEGATIVE NUMBERS DO NOT EXIST

>Now in physics they say negative 1 charge, and they are wrong also, for 
>they should be saying the proton is right handed spin while the electron 
>or muon is left handed spin. Charge does not come in +1 or -1, but charge 
>comes in right handed or lefthanded.

What about positrons, pi mesons, antiprotons, xi particles etc?

Hey Uncle Al, check out this new math! Two right hands plus one right hand
equals three right hands, but two right hands plus one left hand equals
one right hand!! Isn't that brilliant, Al?


"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean rock-hard
stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.  Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.  
Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape.  Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719406 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

MM
“Hey Uncle Al,”
Uncle Al is long dead, Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719408 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>MM
>"Hey Uncle Al,"
>Uncle Al is long dead, Michael

Is he? I don't think so.  I see his activity online in April after a quick 
look. He just abandoned this 'River of Shit'.

Even if he is dead, that's even worse for Pluto. It would mean that Pluto
is getting his ass kicked not by one, but *two* dead guys every day of the
week, and twice on Sundays.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719410 — Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole 


On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 9:57:10 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >MM
> >"Hey Uncle Al,"
> >Uncle Al is long dead, Michael
> 
> Is he? I don't think so.  I see his activity online in April after a quick 
> look. He just abandoned this 'River of Shit'.
> 
> Even if he is dead, that's even worse for Pluto. It would mean that Pluto
> is getting his ass kicked not by one, but *two* dead guys every day of the
> week, and twice on Sundays.

AP writes: insane people do not see sci.physics or sci.math as a forum to do science, no, insane people see these places as "kick ass". John, good luck on even trying to reason with the insane MM, for 26 years MM has only sunk deeper and deeper into his abyss of insanity

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Village Idiot of Mathematics


Moroney says ///////// physicists////////////// too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding


Moroney just ask Drs. John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, why they still believe proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding

AP writes: why does not Moroney simply ask professors of physics at Harvard and MIT why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole 

Moroney, insane stalker for 26 years

                              .. 
            .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```....'`-.. 
           ,      . `.'            '        `. 
         .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ; 
         .   ;  .'                     . `.    ; 
         ;   . '                       `.  .   ' 
          . '                            ` `.  | 
        . '.                                  ' 
       .          0              0            ' `. 
      '                                          ` 
     ;                                            ` 
    .'                                             ` 
    ;                      U                        ` 
    ;    ';                                         ` 
    :   | ;..                                 :`     ` 
    :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    ' 
    '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    ' 
     ;       `        ;'..          ..-''    '     '  Moroney on percentages:
 Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
  of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 
      `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    ' 
       `       `        ;            ;      '    ' 
        `       `        ;          ;      '    ' 
         `       `.       ````''''''      '    ' 
           `       .                     '    ' 
         /  `       `.                  '    '        . 
        /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...' 
       /   .`   `       ``........-'     .'` .....''' 
      / .'' ;     `                    .'   ` 
  ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      ` 
   ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       ` 
           ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       ` 
           :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     ` 
                  |    '     `      '     `.    ` 
                  `   '       `     ;       `.  | 
                  `.'          `    ;         `-' 
                                `...' 


Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first ee in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly 

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
>  Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
>  Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
>  of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) 

MIT physics dept 
L. Reif, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young   

Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole 

Harvard Physics dept 
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai 
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau 
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine 
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii 
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul 
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson 
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin 


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston?   

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. 

Yes, there Moroney, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

What answer did they give?

AP

Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#728575 — Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

Jim Rohr, are you a physics failure of CMU? vs. Daniela L. Rus,Farnum Jahanian,Jeremy Avigad,CMU are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV for chemistry bonding//Either..Or..Or..Both

Jim Rohr chairman Carnegie Mellon University are you a physics failure and is Moroney post certified CMU post? 

AP writes: Hi Jim, just wondering if your Moroney stalker posts are CMU certified, for I am worried these days over certification, ever since Apple tells me my cables have to be Apple certified and not the cheaper  $5. knock down in price cable.

Feb 19Michael Moroney writes: 
Physics failure 
> Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 9:57:10 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > >MM
> > >"Hey Uncle Al,"
> > >Uncle Al is long dead, Michael
> > 
> > Is he? I don't think so.  I see his activity online in April after a quick 
> > look. He just abandoned this 'River of Shit'.
> > 
> > Even if he is dead, that's even worse for Pluto. It would mean that Pluto
> > is getting his ass kicked not by one, but *two* dead guys every day of the
> > week, and twice on Sundays.
> 
> AP writes: insane people do not see sci.physics or sci.math as a forum to do science, no, insane people see these places as "kick ass". John, good luck on even trying to reason with the insane MM, for 26 years MM has only sunk deeper and deeper into his abyss of insanity
> 
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Village Idiot of Mathematics
> 
> 
> Moroney says ///////// physicists////////////// too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding
> 
> 
> Moroney just ask Drs. John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, why they still believe proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding
> 
> AP writes: why does not Moroney simply ask professors of physics at Harvard and MIT why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole 
> 
> Moroney, insane stalker for 26 years
> 
>                               .. 
>             .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```....'`-.. 
>            ,      . `.'            '        `. 
>          .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ; 
>          .   ;  .'                     . `.    ; 
>          ;   . '                       `.  .   ' 
>           . '                            ` `.  | 
>         . '.                                  ' 
>        .          0              0            ' `. 
>       '                                          ` 
>      ;                                            ` 
>     .'                                             ` 
>     ;                      U                        ` 
>     ;    ';                                         ` 
>     :   | ;..                                 :`     ` 
>     :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    ' 
>     '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    ' 
>      ;       `        ;'..          ..-''    '     '  Moroney on percentages:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
>   of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 
>       `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    ' 
>        `       `        ;            ;      '    ' 
>         `       `        ;          ;      '    ' 
>          `       `.       ````''''''      '    ' 
>            `       .                     '    ' 
>          /  `       `.                  '    '        . 
>         /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...' 
>        /   .`   `       ``........-'     .'` .....''' 
>       / .'' ;     `                    .'   ` 
>   ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      ` 
>    ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       ` 
>            ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       ` 
>            :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     ` 
>                   |    '     `      '     `.    ` 
>                   `   '       `     ;       `.  | 
>                   `.'          `    ;         `-' 
>                                 `...' 
> 
> 
> Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first ee in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly 
> 
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
>   
> >  Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> >  Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
>   
> >  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> >  of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 
> 
> President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) 
> 
> MIT physics dept 
> L. Reif, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young   
> 
> Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole 
> 
> Harvard Physics dept 
> Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai 
> Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau 
> Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine 
> Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii 
> David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul 
> Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson 
> Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin 
> 
> 
>    /\-------/\ 
>    \::O:::O::/ 
>   (::_  ^  _::) 
>    \_`-----'_/ 
> You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston?   
> 
> And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. 
> 
> Yes, there Moroney, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 
> 
> But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 
> 
> What answer did they give?
> 
> AP
> 
> Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
> ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 
> 
> 
>                 ::\ ::|:: /:: 
>                  ::\::|::/:: 
>                      _ _ 
>                     (:Y:) 
>                      - - 
>                  ::/::|::\:: 
>                 ::/ ::|:: \:: 
> One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
>             . \ .  . | .   /. 
>            . . \. . .|. . /. . 
>               ..\....|.../... 
>                ::\:::|::/:: 
> ---------------      ------------- 
> --------------- (Y) ------------- 
> ---------------      -------------- 
>                ::/:::|::\:: 
>               ../....|...\... 
>            . . /. . .|. . \. . 
>             . / .  . | .   \ . 
> 
>   
> http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 
> 
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      
> 
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
> Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719413 — John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist, so, is Up and Down the best???

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 9:38:25 AM UTC-6, john wrote:
(snip the talk over MM insanity)

John I been meaning to ask you since the title of this thread is "charge is not -1,+1 but rather right-handed and left-handed"

So, John, I am trying to get rid of the use of +1 and -1 because no negative numbers exist in physics or math.

So, my problem then is -- how to replace -1 as charge. Do you have any suggestions or recommendations?

The best I can do at the moment is Up charge and Down charge. Or perhaps left hand and right hand? But this suggests three types of description for three axes in 3D. Left to right for x to z axes. Up to down for y to z axes, and I suppose forwards and backwards for x to y axes.

Looks like my best option is Up charge to Down charge, so that the proton is up charge and the electron=muon is down charge.

This is simply to get rid of a horrible concept in math that does not exist-- negative quantity.

Any suggestions?

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719444 — John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist, so, is Up and Down the best???

AP
“Looks like my best option is Up charge to Down charge, so that the proton is up charge and the electron=muon is down charge. ”
Since atoms DO in fact have an ‘up’ and a ‘down’, all you need to specify is clockwise or counterclockwise as seen from above. But first we should find out which is which.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719445 — John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist, so, is Up and Down the best???

AP
“Looks like my best option is Up charge to Down charge, so that the proton is up charge and the electron=muon is down charge. ”
Like spins repel.
Opposite spins attract.
Go clockwise/counterclockwise

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719465 — settled on Open and Closed as being charge Re: John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 1:16:31 PM UTC-6, john wrote:
> AP
> “Looks like my best option is Up charge to Down charge, so that the proton is up charge and the electron=muon is down charge. ”
> Like spins repel.
> Opposite spins attract.
> Go clockwise/counterclockwise

Yes, I agree, I concur, that clockwise and counterclockwise is the very best option, in that such would satisfy up or down as being clockwise or counterclockwise in that plane such as the x to z plane, and then left to right is another clockwise or counterclockwise in plane y to x.

But I would not argue with a repel and attract since in my work, I dismiss repel altogether.

Now this leaves one concept open, the forwards and backwards, as I do not see clockwise and counterclockwise conquering forwards or backwards. In fact, I do not think Physics even has a concept of forward motion and backward motion. So that an atom can be moving in Space in a forward direction, and all of a sudden shift into a backward motion, like a car can stop and shift gears to move backwards.

So in the Faraday Law or EM laws, is there backward motion? Well I guess when we pull the magnet out is backward motion.

Now another concept that needs satisfying is the Hund's Rule, so can clockwise and counterclockwise conquer that one also? So in P orbital, we have to put a muon singularly in Px, Py Pz before we pair them up.

So say the muons are clockwise particles (protons counterclockwise motion) So what happens when we put two clockwise spinning particles together? Try spinning two pencils clockwise and they roll together just fine in the same direction, but try spinning one opposite to the other and they bunch up. So this does not tell me anything about Hund's rule.

Let me consider whether the positive and negative refer to whether it is open such as a coil inside is open inside, and whether it is closed such as the bar magnet in Faraday law is a closed figure. So positive charge is a opened inside of a cylinder while a negative charge is a closed figure of a bar magnet that gets thrust into the inside of a cylinder.

Now let me go back to Hund's Rule: so say the coil is a proton and is a hollow tube so it is open while the bar magnet is the electron and a solid closed figure that is thrusting through the open tube. That would satisfy Hund's Rule in that we need a bar magnet in each of the three open tubes of Px, Py, Pz one in each before we pair the bar magnets.

So, I started this post with full agreement with John on clockwise, counterclockwise but could not satisfy Hund's rule. And end the post with the conviction that Positive Charge is Open versus Closed, where the magnet is negative charge and is a solid closed figure.

Sorry John, but then I would not have concentrated so much without your help.

I am settled that we replace +1 and -1 charge with open and closed charge.

Is there any repelling with open and closed? No there is none, but there is a Denial of Same Space Occupancy-- Pauli Exclusion Principle. So that two Closed charges (two electrons) can get close to one another but cannot enter into one another's space.

+1 is the same as Open and -1 is the same as Closed, and now, finally we can get rid of negative numbers.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719481 — settled on Open and Closed as being charge Re: John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1 charge because negative numbers do not exist

And this makes total sense for the Maxwell equations for the math in those equations do not embody a charge of +1 or -1, but the math embodies geometry of a open coil thrust through by a closed magnet.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719567 — proton is hollow tube of windings, electron is closed object as bar magnet Re: settled on Open and Closed as being charge

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 3:19:51 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> And this makes total sense for the Maxwell equations for the math in those equations do not embody a charge of +1 or -1, but the math embodies geometry of a open coil thrust through by a closed magnet.
> 

This also tells us the muon is the bar magnet, and that would mean that the protons are like the Plum Pudding model of Thomson that compose the dot cloud pattern in a coil shape.

This also allows charge to not get mixed up with spin. So that charge and spin are separate features. If it were clockwise to counterclockwise we get in trouble with spin.

So ,yes the concept of charge is the geometry feature of being the hollow inside of a torus tube or cylinder with windings for positive charge and for negative charge since no negative numbers exist, what charge is here is a solid closed object. Protons are open tubes for Faraday law, electrons are closed solid particles to act as magnet.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719612 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Chattering Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: John Sefton, any suggestions on what is best to replace +1 and -1

Failure Plutonium, why are you calling on a physics kook like Sefton for
support? Do you think you kooks can win and sabotage math and science in
the US and Canada if you only band together?  So why do you kooks want to
sabotage math and science in the first place?  I'll ask again, are you in
the employ of Vladimer Putin to sabotage math and science in the US and 
Canada??

I think you will like Sefton. Like you, he has this really dumb and
stoopid idea that a galaxy is just a part of an atom. It's very much like
your own really dumb and stoopid idea that the whole universe is part of
an atom.  You two should get along great. Why don't you two shack up
together? I hear John has a very nice cabin on a lake. Then again, maybe
not, since it gets really really cold in much of Canada. I wouldn't want
the Canadian authorities having to deal with a body in a snowbank, dressed
in sandals, shorts and a T-shirt, when spring thaw arrives there.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719625 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

MM
“ think you will like Sefton. Like you, he has this really dumb and 
stoopid idea that a galaxy is just a part of an atom. It's very much”
You’re similar to Fake News- dishonest as hell.
Ill bet people called you dumb AND stupid your whole life and you STILL think they’re two different things

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719664 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>MM
>" think you will like Sefton. Like you, he has this really dumb and
>stoopid idea that a galaxy is just a part of an atom. It's very much"
>You're similar to Fake News- dishonest as hell.
>Ill bet people called you dumb AND stupid your whole life and you STILL 
>think they're two different things

You're projecting, John.

So tell us, why any scientist should consider *anything* that you have
posted here, especially since you *never* did come up with any science
model. In fact just about everything you have said conflicts with existing
models. Without corroborating evidence, this is a red flag for being ko0k
beliefs, not some new science discovery. This is exactly what Plutonium
is doing here. He is claiming to have "discovered" this and that, but
never any corroborating evidence. He doesn't seem to know what it means
to have "discovered" anything in math and science, so he'll be doomed
to kookdom forever.  Same as your "fractal universe" and precessing
spinny thing claims. No model, no corroborating evidence, just what 
everyone except yourself calls kookbabble.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719667 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot of Mathematics" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

MM
“corroborating”
You would have to be able to think logically.
You and Odd aren’t capable of that.
Point particles are an example of your stupidity.
Suck Gravity another MM and Odd idiocy.
Virtual particles are like the QM religion’s ‘angels’
Really????
You are sycophants for pseudo Religio-Science.

You still think Black Holes are FULL of crushed matter still furiously ‘gravitating’ swarming ‘gravitrons’.
How? No problem- the same unknown way as before.

Ignorance at its bloated-est!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719738 — Moroney for you-- never any science never any math-- only hatred of everyone around him-- is this what Harvard and MIT encourage

Moroney for you-- never any science never any math-- only hatred of everyone around him-- is this what Harvard and MIT encourage

On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 9:33:42 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >MM
> >" think you will like 


never any science or math from the shitheads Moroney, shein barry, kibo of std // just 26 years of attack dog cranking

Michael Moroney writes:

Dec 11 (16 hours ago)

Math Failure 

Boo

On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 10:50:01 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure 
> >>Subject: Re: Racist-Physicists, Weinberg,Witten,Glashow,Gell-Mann,Higgs
> >>who refuse to admit proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, Dirac monopole
> >>.5MeV, proofs by AP, because they never respect the source
> 
> >** because they never respect the source **
> 
> >Respect must be earned, 

AP writes: the Moroney, kibo-shithead, shein, barry of std, never any science, only, ever ad hominem
The pathetic Boston failures-- cranking ad hominem

Boston's std 26 year long stalking shitheads kibo,Moroney implies Richard E. Taylor Physics-Racists John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron=.5MeV, you need the proton at 840MeV to 105MeV electron for chemistry to exist

Boston's std 26 year long stalking shitheads kibo,Moroney implies Richard E. Taylor Physics-Racists John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron=.5MeV


barry shein's --- std --- stalker Moroney implies Richard E. Taylor Physics-Racists John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV 

On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 1:11:46 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

Richard E. Taylor Physics-Racists John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV 
1 post by 1 author   



me (Archimedes Plutonium change)          
11:34 AM (4 hours ago) 



barry shein's --- std --- stalker Moroney implies Richard E. Taylor Physics-Racists John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV

On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 1:11:46 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

Richard E. Taylor Physics-Racists John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV 
1 post by 1 author   



me (Archimedes Plutonium change)          
11:34 AM (4 hours ago) 


Richard E. Taylor Physics-Racists John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV 



On Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 4:32:23 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure 

Endless mockery by insane Moroney-- Cornell, Harvard, MIT, you name it. Sci.math & sci.physics were never created for an insane stalking mocker like Moroney yet his abuse is unchecked in 26 years...


Michael Moroney wrote:

4:32 PM (2 hours ago)
 "Village Idiot"

Math Failure
Moroney mocking Cornell math dept being dumb on ellipse and logic, yet Moroney cannot even do percentages correctly

On Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 4:52:40 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> Math Failure 


AP writes: MM has been nothing but an insane stalking spammer for 26 years-- worthless loud mouth idiot fool that needs a straightjacket-- 

Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first ee in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly 

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
  Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
  of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) 

MIT physics dept 
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young   

Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole 

Harvard Physics dept 
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai 
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau 
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine 
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii 
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul 
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson 
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin 


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston?   

Yes, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

In that manner,  physics departments are racist physicists for the knowledge that Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840 MeV, and the .5MeV was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole is going on 2 years now in the public eye starting 2017, yet none of these physicists (these poor physicists lacking understanding of angular momentum has raised a single peep). The reason they keep their mouths shut, is because they are so poor in physics, they do not want to be embarrassed. These gentlemen are not physicists, for a real physicist would debate the issue, not hide from the issue. And real physicist would not discount a discovery because of the person-- Archimedes Plutonium who discovered it. 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#728578

Need to review this again


On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 4:07:42 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Newsgroups: sci.math
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:03:39 -0800 (PST)
> 
> Subject: charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why
>  it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:03:39 +0000
> 
> charge is not -1,+1 but is rather right-handed, left-handed Re: Why it was discovered that geometry has only 1 quadrant
> 
> Now this is a tough question to answer as to why it took 330 intervening years to realize that all of graphing and Cartesian Coordinate System is true only for 1st quadrant only, meaning that the other three quadrants are fake math. Well, if you look in the history of graphing Descartes and Newton did math on a x-axis, not even a y axis. So, they did graphing on even less than 1st Quadrant only. 
> 
> And, so, in the intervening years from 1687, you had plenty plenty of time for the village idiots of mathematics with their less than a microgram brain of logic, to screw up royally, the Cartesian Coordinate System by adding negative numbers. When negative numbers never existed in the first place. Idiots of math when doing arithmetic, never learned a axiom of algebra-- you can subtract, only when there is enough to subtract from. In other words, you cannot remove (subtract = remove) more than what is available. Every person in the world that accepts negative numbers is not a mathematician but a village idiot zombie of math. 
> 
> NEGATIVE NUMBERS DO NOT EXIST 
> 
> Now in physics they say negative 1 charge, and they are wrong also, for they should be saying the proton is right handed spin while the electron or muon is left handed spin. Charge does not come in +1 or -1, but charge comes in right handed or left handed. 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web