Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #719105 > unrolled thread

Question for Bodkin

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 20:08 -0800
    Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 13:52 +0000
      Re: Question for Bodkin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 05:55 -0800
        Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:02 +0000
          Re: Question for Bodkin benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:56 -0500
          Re: Question for Bodkin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 06:16 -0800
            Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 02:35 +0000
      Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 -0800
    Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:40 -0800
      Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 02:35 +0000
        Re: Question for Bodkin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 19:32 -0800
          Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 20:30 -0800
          Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 14:08 +0000
            Re: Question for Bodkin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 08:05 -0800
              Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 18:33 +0000
        Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 20:39 -0800
          Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 21:11 -0800
            Re: Question for Bodkin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 06:30 +0000
              Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 05:20 -0800
                Re: Question for Bodkin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 15:17 +0000
                  Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 15:48 +0000
                    Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 10:05 -0800
                      Re: Question for Bodkin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 18:21 +0000
                        Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 12:10 -0800
                      Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 18:43 +0000
                    Re: Question for Bodkin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 18:43 +0000
                  Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 09:59 -0800
                    Re: Question for Bodkin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-20 18:29 +0000
                      Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 12:15 -0800
                        Re: Question for Bodkin Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 14:32 -0800
                          Re: Question for Bodkin pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-20 14:57 -0800
                            Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 17:41 -0800
                              Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 02:57 +0000
                                Re: Question for Bodkin benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:52 -0500
                                  Re: Question for Bodkin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:45 -0800
                                    Re: Question for Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:38 +0000
                        Re: Question for Bodkin pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-20 14:55 -0800
                          Re: Question for Bodkin James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:41 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#719105 — Question for Bodkin

On Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:01:52 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: 

Odd Bodkin: 
It is NOT called the boiling point because gas cannot exist below it. 
Gas does exist at temperatures below the boiling point, as has been 
shown extensively in experimental data. 

Jim McGinn: 
Where is this extensive experimental data? 

Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 

Do you think they are hiding it from us?  Why would they do that? 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#719151

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:01:52 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: 
> 
> Odd Bodkin: 
> It is NOT called the boiling point because gas cannot exist below it. 
> Gas does exist at temperatures below the boiling point, as has been 
> shown extensively in experimental data. 
> 
> Jim McGinn: 
> Where is this extensive experimental data? 
> 
> Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 
> 
> Do you think they are hiding it from us?  Why would they do that? 
> 

“Hey, watch out, you almost walked into a telephone pole.”
“I don’t see a telephone pole.”
“Well, you ARE walking around with your eyes closed.”
“I still don’t believe you. There’s no telephone pole.”
“Open your eyes, it’s right there.”
“Why are you claiming there are invisible telephone poles everywhere? Who
would make such things?”
“They’re not invisible. Everyone can see them.”
“Feel free to present your argument for the existence of these invisible
poles, you evasive twit.”

.....

“Well?”

....

“Hello? You still there?”

.....

“YOU GOT NOTHIN!”

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719153

Odd
“...”
You busy this time of year Odd?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719155

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “...”
> You busy this time of year Odd?
> 

Very.

I was just thinking, this group surely has gone downhill when even John
Sefton gives up on it. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719268

On 12/18/2018 9:02 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Odd
>> “...”
>> You busy this time of year Odd?
>>
> 
> Very.
> 
> I was just thinking, this group surely has gone downhill when even John
> Sefton gives up on it.
> 
But you can't take full credit for that, Oddster. The "kensi" twins get 
to cop at least half the credit for the decline.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719389

Odd
“I was just thinking, this group surely has gone downhill whenI was just thinking, this group surely has gone downhill when even  even John 
Sefton gives up on it. “
Facebook allows pictures.
For instance, a permanent magnetic field in a ferrofluid is pictured here in this thread, and I then exactly duplicated it with 1:1 rotations every 30 degrees.
I know won’t look
https://magnetismtoroidaldynamics.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719561

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “I was just thinking, this group surely has gone downhill whenI was just
> thinking, this group surely has gone downhill when even  even John 
> Sefton gives up on it. “
> Facebook allows pictures.

Good for you. I don’t have a Facebook account. 

> For instance, a permanent magnetic field in a ferrofluid is pictured here
> in this thread, and I then exactly duplicated it with 1:1 rotations every 30 degrees.
> I know won’t look
> https://magnetismtoroidaldynamics.com/
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719324

Oddness:
"Feel free to present your argument for the existence of these invisible 
poles, you evasive twit.” 

JMcG:
Oddness, why don't you and Moronic get together with Pnaling and help him flesh out his theory that there is such thing as a triple point of air and it, somehow,  substantiates the existence of 'cold steam' (a form of gaseous H2O that purportedly occurs at temperatures below the boiling temperature of H2O)?

James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719469

On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:28:22 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:01:52 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: 
> 
> Odd Bodkin: 
> It is NOT called the boiling point because gas cannot exist below it. 
> Gas does exist at temperatures below the boiling point, as has been 
> shown extensively in experimental data. 
> 
> Jim McGinn: 
> Where is this extensive experimental data? 
> 
> Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 
> 
> Do you think they are hiding it from us?  Why would they do that?

Please spoonfeed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719562

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:28:22 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:01:52 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: 
>> 
>> Odd Bodkin: 
>> It is NOT called the boiling point because gas cannot exist below it. 
>> Gas does exist at temperatures below the boiling point, as has been 
>> shown extensively in experimental data. 
>> 
>> Jim McGinn: 
>> Where is this extensive experimental data? 
>> 
>> Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 
>> 
>> Do you think they are hiding it from us?  Why would they do that?
> 
> Please spoonfeed.
> 

Not a frickin chance. Go to the library on public transportation. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719574

Odd
“Not a frickin chance. Go to the library on public transportation”
You constantly demand answers on what I believe, and consistently refuse to put your alleged ‘understanding ‘ into words.
I’m starting to think you don’t understand jack-shit.
Is that true, swarming gravitrons man?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719587

Bodkin is a believer.  Not a thinker. 

Belief is eternal. 

They say the difference between genius and dumb is that the first has its limits. 

James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719642

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “Not a frickin chance. Go to the library on public transportation”
> You constantly demand answers on what I believe, 

Right, because you are the ONLY source for what you believe. Your beliefs
can ONLY be explained by you. 

But for what is known in physics, you are literally surrounded by quality
resources at your fingertips. And yet you somehow think this should be
explained to you in plain language in short snippets on a newsgroup. Why? 

> and consistently refuse to put your alleged ‘understanding ‘ into words.
> I’m starting to think you don’t understand jack-shit.
> Is that true, swarming gravitrons man?
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719669

Odd
You can’t explain ur crap simply because without the mathematical  smoke and mirrors it simply sounds like what it is- crap

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719692

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> You can’t explain ur crap simply because without the mathematical  smoke
> and mirrors it simply sounds like what it is- crap
> 

Sorry, John, but you’re the one blowing smoke. Physics is written in two
intertwined languages, prose and mathematics, one of those languages being
one you’re illiterate in. This pisses you off, and so you attempt to smear
it without even understanding any of it. And I mean, any of it. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719589

Not a frickin chance. Go to the library on public transportation. 

JMcG:
Then what do I do? 

Can you provide a title?
Do you remember anything specific about this reference. Author? Anything?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719590

Odd Bodkin: 
It is NOT called the boiling point because gas cannot exist below it. 
Gas does exist at temperatures below the boiling point, as has been 
shown extensively in experimental data. 

Jim McGinn: 
Where is this extensive experimental data? 

Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 

Do you think they are hiding it from us?  Why would they do that? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719606

>Jim McGinn:
>Where is this extensive experimental data?

>Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 

Just because you can't find it, and because you are a nobody, doesn't make
"nobody can find it" a true statement.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719636

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 10:30:31 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >Jim McGinn:
> >Where is this extensive experimental data?
> 
> >Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 
> 
> Just because you can't find it, and because you are a nobody, doesn't make
> "nobody can find it" a true statement.

Nobody is saying you are not allowed to believe whatever you want to believer.  Just don't call it science and everything will be fine.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719659

James McGinn writes:

>>>Jim McGinn:
>>>Where is this extensive experimental data?

>>>Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? 

>>Just because you can't find it, and because you are a nobody, doesn't make
>>"nobody can find it" a true statement.

>Nobody is saying you are not allowed to believe whatever you want to 
>believer.  Just don't call it science and everything will be fine.

So why are you here claiming that your "cold steam"/"no such thing as
water vapor below 100 C" crap is science, that you are the only one in the
world with correct science and that every single other scientist is wrong?
Just believe what you want to believe, don't call it science as you said.
Meanwhile real science will continue on without you, generating weather
reports and all kinds of other stuff that depends on actual observations
and experimental results.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web