Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #718965 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-17 05:21 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-21 12:30 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-17 05:21 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-17 08:34 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 09:43 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 09:45 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-17 13:55 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-17 19:00 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 15:22 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Scatboitoy g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-12-17 16:26 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <%> - 2018-12-17 14:33 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-17 21:58 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-17 15:57 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-17 17:32 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-17 18:46 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 04:38 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-18 07:47 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 13:28 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 05:45 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 08:28 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 13:54 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 05:58 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 14:16 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:33 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 06:50 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 09:29 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:18 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:20 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 11:53 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:34 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:55 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 15:13 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:57 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:15 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 17:13 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 17:12 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Greysat <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 08:19 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 08:47 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 08:12 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 16:47 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 17:17 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:20 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:56 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:22 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:54 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:24 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:56 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:12 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 17:18 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:21 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 12:29 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:21 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:26 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:29 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:54 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 09:20 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-18 10:25 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 10:30 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:24 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-18 11:26 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:58 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 14:30 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:33 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:24 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:25 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:33 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 12:15 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:21 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:27 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:28 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:51 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 12:27 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 14:18 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:18 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:50 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:22 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 12:25 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 20:25 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:16 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:37 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 21:42 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:52 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-19 20:07 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:13 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 13:45 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:38 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-20 07:37 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 06:13 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-20 08:22 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-20 12:48 -0800
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 13:57 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 09:18 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:37 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:58 -0500
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 23:37 -0600
Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-21 12:30 +0000
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 09:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvb37j$1hni$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719154 |
On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>> >>>> Both, actually. >>>> >>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>> >> >> Who said they were the same? >> >> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. > > Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert > attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot > make any attempt to refute what was said. > > This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. > > More on Snit's trolling > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html > > Over 100 people ridicule Snit > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html > > Typical Snit trolling methods > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html > Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. -Snit the Emotional- (STE)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 10:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g64i1etkkh04at5vvhl1mu3qfo0qouk5dv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #719164 |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>> >>>>> Both, actually. >>>>> >>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>> >>> Who said they were the same? >>> >>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >> >> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >> make any attempt to refute what was said. >> >> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >> >> More on Snit's trolling >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >> >> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> >> Typical Snit trolling methods >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html > >Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. > > -Snit the Emotional- (STE) How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? -- Everybody here likes... Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 10:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvb7bk$645$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719165 |
On 12/18/2018 9:25 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>> >>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>> >>>> Who said they were the same? >>>> >>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>> >>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>> >>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>> >>> More on Snit's trolling >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>> >>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>> >>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >> >> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >> >> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) > > How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? > Snit - nit + TEM = STEM all good here. nit = nit-wit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7snrjFqrblU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719165 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>> >>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>> >>>> Who said they were the same? >>>> >>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>> >>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>> >>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>> >>> More on Snit's trolling >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>> >>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>> >>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >> >> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >> >> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) > > How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? > Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 11:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvbage$j4u$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719181 |
On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>> >>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>> >>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>> >>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>> >>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>> >>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>> >>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>> >>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>> >>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >>> >>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >> >> How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? >> > > Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. > > > not true, STEM, everyone already knows you prefer to be biased.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 11:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <Ut-dndt4St4psITBnZ2dnUU7-WXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #719195 |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:24:30 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <pvbage$j4u$3@gioia.aioe.org>: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ FREQUENCY. Not location. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Both, actually. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Actually real science says weather is not climate. The weather = climate ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ rule is only true in media non-science screed. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Who said they were the same? Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out, and will now throw a tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ same old. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ make any attempt to refute what was said. This is because Snit is here ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to troll and be humiliated. More on Snit's trolling ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html Over 100 people ridicule Snit ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html Typical Snit trolling ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ methods http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ argument. -Snit the Emotional- (STE) ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ not true, STEM, everyone already knows you prefer to be biased. everyone, eh? -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 12:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvbfvo$1dh6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719197 |
On 12/18/2018 11:26 AM, Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:24:30 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio
> <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <pvbage$j4u$3@gioia.aioe.org>:
>
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ FREQUENCY. Not location.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Both, actually.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Actually real science says weather is not climate. The weather = climate
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ rule is only true in media non-science screed.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Who said they were the same? Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out, and will now throw a tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ same old.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ make any attempt to refute what was said. This is because Snit is here
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to troll and be humiliated. More on Snit's trolling
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html Over 100 people ridicule Snit
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html Typical Snit trolling
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ methods http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ argument. -Snit the Emotional- (STE)
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden?
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted.
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ not true, STEM, everyone already knows you prefer to be biased.
>
> everyone, eh?
>
100% of the earths population
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvbld0$840$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719209 |
On 12/18/2018 12:58 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/18/2018 11:26 AM, Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:24:30 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio >> <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great >> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >> <pvbage$j4u$3@gioia.aioe.org>: >> >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ FREQUENCY. Not location. >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Both, actually. >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Actually real science says weather is not climate. The weather = climate >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ rule is only true in media non-science screed. >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Who said they were the same? Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out, and will now throw a tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ same old. >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ make any attempt to refute what was said. This is because Snit is here >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to troll and be humiliated. More on Snit's trolling >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html Over 100 people ridicule Snit >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html Typical Snit trolling >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ methods http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ argument. -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ >> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ not true, STEM, everyone already knows you prefer to be biased. >> >> everyone, eh? >> > 100% of the earths population > ALL OF GODS MFs ! even the new ones....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvbtss$1hfu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719220 |
On 12/18/2018 2:30 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/18/2018 12:58 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/18/2018 11:26 AM, Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:24:30 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio >>> <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great >>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <pvbage$j4u$3@gioia.aioe.org>: >>> >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ FREQUENCY. Not location. >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Both, actually. >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Actually real science says weather is not climate. The weather = climate >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Who said they were the same? Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ out, and will now throw a tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ same old. >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ make any attempt to refute what was said. This is because Snit is here >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to troll and be humiliated. More on Snit's trolling >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html Typical Snit trolling >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ methods http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ argument. -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ >>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ not true, STEM, everyone already knows you prefer to be biased. >>> >>> everyone, eh? >>> >> 100% of the earths population >> > > ALL OF GODS MFs ! even the new ones.... > dont get emotional, son,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 10:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7spa1Fr5jaU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719195 |
On 12/18/18 10:24 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>> >>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>> >>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>> >>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>> >>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>> >>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>> >>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>> >>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >>>> >>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>> >>> How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? >>> >> >> Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. >> >> >> > > not true, STEM, everyone already knows you prefer to be biased. > What is driving the right wingers crazy: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 ----- In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in southern-tier states. ----- There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3683159e3ac056765f1@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #719181 |
In article <g7snrjFqrblU3@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>> >>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>> >>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>> >>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>> >>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>> >>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>> >>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>> >>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>> >>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >>> >>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >> >> How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? >> > >Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. Why don't you change the topic to yams before you embarrass yourself?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvbttq$1hfu$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719247 |
On 12/18/2018 3:33 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <g7snrjFqrblU3@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>> >>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>> >>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>> >>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>> >>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>> >>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>> >>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>> >>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >>>> >>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>> >>> How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? >>> >> >> Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. > > Why don't you change the topic to yams before you embarrass yourself? > his mammie was a yammie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 16:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7tdsoF1116U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719247 |
On 12/18/18 2:33 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <g7snrjFqrblU3@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On 18 Dec 2018, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>> >>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>> >>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>> >>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>> >>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>> >>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>> >>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>> >>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >>>> >>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>> >>> How about STEM for Snit the Emotional Maiden? >>> >> >> Amazing how right wingers freak out when studies are quoted. > > Why don't you change the topic to yams before you embarrass yourself? > You just freaked out. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g7snrjFqrblU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719164 |
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>> >>>>> Both, actually. >>>>> >>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>> >>> >>> Who said they were the same? >>> >>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >> >> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >> make any attempt to refute what was said. >> >> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >> >> More on Snit's trolling >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >> >> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> >> Typical Snit trolling methods >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >> > > Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. > > -Snit the Emotional- (STE) > I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what you do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 11:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pvbaj6$j4u$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #719180 |
On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>> >>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Who said they were the same? >>>> >>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>> >>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>> >>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>> >>> More on Snit's trolling >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>> >>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>> >>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>> >> >> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >> >> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >> > > I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what > you do. > from "treehugger" STEM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 10:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7spaqFr5jaU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719196 |
On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact >>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>> >>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a tantrum >>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>> >>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>> >>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>> >>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>> >>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>> >>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>> >>> >>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the argument. >>> >>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>> >> >> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what >> you do. >> > > from "treehugger" STEM > What is driving the right wingers crazy: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 ----- In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in southern-tier states. ----- There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 12:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <br86h3.2ec.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #719201 |
On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote: > On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>> >>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a >>>>>> tantrum >>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>> >>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot >>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>> >>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>> >>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>> >>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>> >>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>> >>>> >>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>> argument. >>>> >>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>> >>> >>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what >>> you do. >>> >> >> from "treehugger" STEM >> > > > What is driving the right wingers crazy: > > https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 > ----- > In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s > consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this > organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in > southern-tier states. > ----- > > There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is > impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. > did you snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7t6nlFtufrU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719210 |
On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science >>>>>>>> screed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw >>>>>>> a tantrum >>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- >>>>>> cannot >>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>> >>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>> argument. >>>>> >>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is >>>> what >>>> you do. >>>> >>> >>> from "treehugger" STEM >>> >> >> >> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >> >> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >> ----- >> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in >> Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 >> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk >> only in southern-tier states. >> ----- >> >> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >> > did you snit Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does not seem to make sense either way. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <br8e8p.cbh.19.28@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #719240 |
On 2018-12-18 2:21 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER >>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could >>>>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science >>>>>>>>> screed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw >>>>>>>> a tantrum >>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- >>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>>> argument. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is >>>>> what >>>>> you do. >>>>> >>>> >>>> from "treehugger" STEM >>>> >>> >>> >>> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >>> >>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >>> ----- >>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in >>> Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 >>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure >>> risk only in southern-tier states. >>> ----- >>> >>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >>> >> did you snit > > Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does not > seem to make sense either way. > neither does snit but did you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-18 14:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7t74lFu5koU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #719243 |
On 12/18/18 2:27 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-18 2:21 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL >>>>>>>>>>>> WEATHER >>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change >>>>>>>>>>>> could impact >>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate. >>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science >>>>>>>>>> screed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now >>>>>>>>> throw a tantrum >>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert >>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- >>>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods >>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the >>>>>>> argument. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Snit the Emotional- (STE) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It >>>>>> is what >>>>>> you do. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> from "treehugger" STEM >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy: >>>> >>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592 >>>> ----- >>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in >>>> Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 >>>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure >>>> risk only in southern-tier states. >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is >>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence. >>>> >>> did you snit >> >> Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does >> not seem to make sense either way. >> > neither does snit but did you You are out order of. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web