Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #717475 > unrolled thread

The world is full of self-righteous morons

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2018-12-09 09:46 -0800
Last post2018-12-11 16:26 -0800
Articles 15 on this page of 35 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The world is full of self-righteous morons James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-09 09:46 -0800
    Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons % <%> - 2018-12-09 10:49 -0700
    Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-09 14:34 -0800
      Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-09 23:56 -0800
        Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-10 13:20 +0000
        Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 17:18 -0800
          Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-11 05:20 +0000
            Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 22:45 -0800
            Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 22:54 -0800
              Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 23:18 -0800
              Re: "Einstein's Bad" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 12:55 +0000
              Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-11 14:12 +0000
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 06:56 -0800
                Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 06:59 -0800
                  Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 07:21 -0800
                    Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-11 16:14 +0000
                      Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 09:27 -0800
                        Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-11 23:49 +0000
                          Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 16:09 -0800
                          Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 19:29 -0800
                            Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 22:24 -0800
                              Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-13 06:34 +0000
                                Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 22:58 -0800
                  Re: "Einstein's Bad" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-11 15:42 +0000
                    Re: "Einstein's Bad" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 07:50 -0800
                    Re: "Einstein's Bad" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 10:10 -0600
            Re: "Einstein's Bad" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 10:17 -0600
        Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 13:24 -0800
      Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 00:04 -0800
      Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-10 11:08 -0600
        Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 19:36 +0000
    Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 07:28 -0800
    Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-11 10:00 -0800
      Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-11 14:02 -0600
      Re: The world is full of self-righteous morons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-12-11 16:26 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#718113 — Re: "Einstein's Bad"

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-12 22:24 -0800
SubjectRe: "Einstein's Bad"
Message-ID<aa52fc5f-a005-41bf-90d2-020bfbbb0cc4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#718083
On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 11:56:39 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: 
> On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 9:46:22 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: 
> 
> > ... Recently I had a Twitter argument with Patrick Moore (formerly of Green Peace). He stubbornly insisted that it was my responsibility to show him proof positive that moisture in clear, moist air (at ambient temps) contains liquid and not gaseous H2O. 
> 
> And he is correct to do this. 
> 
> JMcG: 
> Was he correct to ignore the H2O phase diagram? 

Answer my question, you evasive twit. 

JMcG:
When, in science, is it ever a good idea to ignore evidence?

Can you at least answer this question?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#718116 — Re: "Einstein's Bad"

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-12-13 06:34 +0000
SubjectRe: "Einstein's Bad"
Message-ID<pusuhc$ejv$3@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#718113
James McGinn wrote:
>JMcG:
>When, in science, is it ever a good idea to ignore evidence? 

Asks the guy who ignores the evidence of Dalton's Gas Law and refuses
to answer what happens when 20 C water is introduced into 20 C dry air?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#718119 — Re: "Einstein's Bad"

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-12 22:58 -0800
SubjectRe: "Einstein's Bad"
Message-ID<e6ae1a5e-e4e8-49f8-af61-5c0b4f4b538f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#718116
Moronic:
Go walk your cat or something.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717677 — Re: "Einstein's Bad"

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-12-11 15:42 +0000
SubjectRe: "Einstein's Bad"
Message-ID<puolta$b8c$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#717671
James McGinn writes:

>And yet you have no proof of your own model. 

Why are you referring to yourself in the second person?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717680 — Re: "Einstein's Bad"

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-11 07:50 -0800
SubjectRe: "Einstein's Bad"
Message-ID<6d894478-3ddb-445e-bea5-1fa52a1c10ff@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#717677
Dolt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717683 — Re: "Einstein's Bad"

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-12-11 10:10 -0600
SubjectRe: "Einstein's Bad"
Message-ID<puonhd$135h$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#717677
On 12/11/2018 9:42 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> James McGinn writes:
> 
>> And yet you have no proof of your own model. 
> 
> Why are you referring to yourself in the second person?
> 

McGinn does physk projection all the time,


"And yet you have no proof of your own model."


he means;


"And yet I have no proof of my own model."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717686 — Re: "Einstein's Bad"

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-12-11 10:17 -0600
SubjectRe: "Einstein's Bad"
Message-ID<puonun$149d$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#717649
On 12/10/2018 11:20 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> James McGinn writes:
> 
>>>> Was he correct to ignore the H2O phase diagram?
> 
>>> He was correct to tell you that it is up to YOU to prove your kooky
>>> claims, not up to him to prove standard science just because you show up
>>> and throw something at him.
> 
>> Answer my question you evasive twit.  Was it cirrect for Saykally to 
>> ignore the h2o phase diagram?
> 
> It was correct of Saykally to ignore you, at least until you prove your 
> claim. As I already stated.
> 



it is also cirrect for Saykally to label McGinn as fool, troll, and
unthinking pest.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717952

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-12 13:24 -0800
Message-ID<948d0a6f-8311-43c7-8dd5-f78f9f156672@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#717544
On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 11:56:39 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 9:46:22 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: 
> 
> > ... Recently I had a Twitter argument with Patrick Moore (formerly of Green Peace). He stubbornly insisted that it was my responsibility to show him proof positive that moisture in clear, moist air (at ambient temps) contains liquid and not gaseous H2O. 
> 
> And he is correct to do this. 
> 
> JMcG:
> Was he correct to ignore the H2O phase diagram?

Answer my question, you evasive twit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717545

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-10 00:04 -0800
Message-ID<3741bfbe-72da-46ea-ba6b-9992b627f774@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#717519
> I pointed him to phase diagrams (based on experiments done in laboratories) that clearly indicate that I am right and he is wrong. 

This only reinforces the fact that you do not understand phase diagrams. 

JMcG:
I wisht I wuz more smartyr lyke yiouw. 

Please point out where your magical 'cold steam' can be found on the h2o phase diagram. Or is it your special church lady secret?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717557

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-12-10 11:08 -0600
Message-ID<pum6hr$1ma4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#717519
On 12/9/2018 4:34 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 9:46:22 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> 
>> ... Recently I had a Twitter argument with Patrick Moore (formerly of Green Peace). He stubbornly insisted that it was my responsibility to show him proof positive that moisture in clear, moist air (at ambient temps) contains liquid and not gaseous H2O. 
> 
> And he is correct to do this. After all...
> 
> "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." - Dr. Richard Saykally 
> 
> ... and you have yet to provide a single shred of evidence to support your position. Why is that?
> 
>> I pointed him to phase diagrams (based on experiments done in laboratories) that clearly indicate that I am right and he is wrong. 
> 
> This only reinforces the fact that you do not understand phase diagrams.
> 
>> He refused to acknowledge this evidence. Instead this self-righteous moron kept blabbing on and eventually blocked me from his twitter. 
> 
> It is not too hard to determine who the actual self-righteous moron is here.
>  
>> The world is full of self-righteous morons...
> 
> And you are certainly one of the best examples!
> 

poor McGinn,   his brain is almost fully desiccated.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717581

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-10 19:36 +0000
Message-ID<pumf79$d5r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#717557
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 12/9/2018 4:34 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 9:46:22 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> 
>>> ... Recently I had a Twitter argument with Patrick Moore (formerly of
>>> Green Peace). He stubbornly insisted that it was my responsibility to
>>> show him proof positive that moisture in clear, moist air (at ambient
>>> temps) contains liquid and not gaseous H2O. 
>> 
>> And he is correct to do this. After all...
>> 
>> "The way our business works is that one who argues that a given model is
>> incorrect and proposes a new one to replace it must also propose an
>> experimental test that can clearly evidence the claims." - Dr. Richard Saykally 
>> 
>> ... and you have yet to provide a single shred of evidence to support
>> your position. Why is that?
>> 
>>> I pointed him to phase diagrams (based on experiments done in
>>> laboratories) that clearly indicate that I am right and he is wrong. 
>> 
>> This only reinforces the fact that you do not understand phase diagrams.
>> 
>>> He refused to acknowledge this evidence. Instead this self-righteous
>>> moron kept blabbing on and eventually blocked me from his twitter. 
>> 
>> It is not too hard to determine who the actual self-righteous moron is here.
>> 
>>> The world is full of self-righteous morons...
>> 
>> And you are certainly one of the best examples!
>> 
> 
> poor McGinn,   his brain is almost fully desiccated.
> 

McGinn is mentally ill. He knows he is. However, this brings shame and so
he protects himself. He does this by asserting himself as a genius. His
rationale for the assertion is that he thinks differently, geniuses think
differently, and therefore he is a genius. The gap in logic there (dogs are
all mammals, but not all mammals are dogs) is not something he’s willing to
acknowledge. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717552

FromEdward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-10 07:28 -0800
Message-ID<c3248a4d-d01f-4631-bf86-3138d120d888@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#717475
On Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 12:46:22 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
> Consensus based arrogance is the norm anytime you are dealing with
> humans. People fool themselves into thinking they are independent
> thinkers. This is the delusion. This is our deepest misconception.
> The reality is that people that actually are independent thinkers,
> like myself,[]

ROTFLMAO

great joke JM.

I really enjoyed it
Ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717702

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-11 10:00 -0800
Message-ID<9de00134-2191-45e8-8f10-1d8d9b6a9c11@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#717475
God loving people are first to smite.All wars have their Gods in the backgound.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717719

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-12-11 14:02 -0600
Message-ID<pup54p$1cmf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#717702
On 12/11/2018 12:00 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> God loving people are first to smite.All wars have their Gods in the backgound.Bert
> 


     James McGinn smites Water Vapor, says Claudius Denk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#717789

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2018-12-11 16:26 -0800
Message-ID<pupkl4$agj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#717702
"homo-reber G=emc^2" <herbertgay-lazier0@gmail.com>  is
not only a self-righteous Jewish moron, Bert is sanctimonious
and  phony, and posts anything to  draw attention to SwineBert's
ONLY achievement, namely to shit into other posters mouth, 
have them murdered for him to be able to piss onto their graves, 
as  <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>   who is 
characterized by  the eminent Jewish scholars HWR in the epic 
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>, that shows
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent>, O ya. Bert.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web