Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #715653 > unrolled thread

WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!!

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 23:04 -0800
    Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!! Ebenezer Snodgras <invaolidz@example.net> - 2018-11-30 07:45 -0800
      Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-11-30 16:40 -0800
        Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-11-30 21:53 -0800
    Re: WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-01 13:58 -0800
      Re: WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 16:23 -0800
        Re: WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 22:54 -0800
        Re: WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-02 13:47 -0800
          Re: WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-02 15:24 -0800
            Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!! Betty Rooble <btfkr@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-03 18:53 -0800
      Re: WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 15:51 -0800
        Re: WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-12-02 16:03 -0800
    WHY      E =MC^2     **  IS**   RIGHT    !!! Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 16:58 -0800

#715653 — WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!!

There are some 'smart people   here 
that claim   that  E=mc^2 is not right 
their claim is based on the  assumption /fact? that velocity  of light is not constant  
now my New   claim is :a
no mater if velocity of light is constant  or   not !!

for me 
as one who  understand one or ''2' things  about  nuclear physics 


THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED 

IT IS CONATANT !
iow
the start velocity of em   wave IS constant at its creation 
why ??
because  if you  now one or two things    about nuclear structure
and **inner binding energies  of the nuc 
you know that they are absolutely       CONSTANT !! 
and if so 
the start velocity of photon bursting out the nuc 
is
constant as could   be  !!
now what happened   with  that em  wave   
God almighty   know  ..
but the main thing to  understand is
THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave 
IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created 

so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
2
indeed  here are cases of **a mixture   between  energy plus! particles **
but that  is ''another   opera  ''to formulate
====================
see something about nuclear energies etc 
(it is only the abstract of a book)!!    in

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

===========================================================  

TIA
======
Eng
Yehiel Porat  
30 /11/2018  
======================   
   

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#715694 — Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!!

> THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED

"VALOCITY"?  Learn English you idiot.
> 
> IT IS CONATANT !

"CONATANT"?  Learn English you moron.

> THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave
> IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created
> 
> so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!

"ANYTING"? Learn English, you ass.

"ELESE"? Learn English, you imbecile.

> Yehiel Porat

Get a brain you retarded mouthload of gay dog shit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#715804 — Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!!

On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 5:45:29 PM UTC+2, Ebenezer Snodgras wrote:
> > THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED
> 
> "VALOCITY"?  Learn English you idiot.
> > 
> > IT IS CONATANT !
> 
> "CONATANT"?  Learn English you moron.
> 
> > THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave
> > IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created
> > 
> > so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> 
> "ANYTING"? Learn English, you ass.
> 
> "ELESE"? Learn English, you imbecile.
> 
> > Yehiel Porat
> 
> Get a brain you retarded mouthload of gay dog shit.
===================================
what is  your real identity COWARD  piggy ??
I do spelling ,-
-actually more 
typing mistakes 
so what ?!!

ANYONE WHO WAHNT TO KNOW /UNDERSTAND MY **PHYSICS **
WILL UMDERSTAMD IT EASY    

this is not a 'William Shakespeare ng' !!
so
other people here  please get in with physics arguments 
or remarks !!
and   don't disturb like that above anonymous   piggy
who die of envy !!!
-=======================
TIA
Y.P
====

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#715860 — Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!!

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 2:40:38 AM UTC+2, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 5:45:29 PM UTC+2, Ebenezer Snodgras wrote:
> > > THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED
> > 
> > "VALOCITY"?  Learn English you idiot.
> > > 
> > > IT IS CONATANT !
> > 
> > "CONATANT"?  Learn English you moron.
> > 
> > > THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave
> > > IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created
> > > 
> > > so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> > 
> > "ANYTING"? Learn English, you ass.
> > 
> > "ELESE"? Learn English, you imbecile.
> > 
> > > Yehiel Porat
> > 
> > Get a brain you retarded mouthload of gay dog shit.
> ===================================
> what is  your real identity COWARD  piggy ??
> I do spelling ,-
> -actually more 
> typing mistakes 
> so what ?!!
> 
> ANYONE WHO WAHNT TO KNOW /UNDERSTAND MY **PHYSICS **
> WILL UMDERSTAMD IT EASY    
> 
> this is not a 'William Shakespeare ng' !!
> so
> other people here  please get in with physics arguments 
> or remarks !!
> and   don't disturb like that above anonymous   piggy
> who die of envy !!!
> -=======================
> TIA
> Y.P
> ====

and much    further !!
========================================================
MASS **!!  IS THE CREATOR OF ALL*** FORCES INCLUDING GRAVITY!!
==========================================================

Y.Porat
=========

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716011

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 11:04:23 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> There are some 'smart people   here 
> that claim   that  E=mc^2 is not right 
> their claim is based on the  assumption /fact? that velocity  of light is not constant  
> now my New   claim is :a
> no mater if velocity of light is constant  or   not !!
> 
> for me 
> as one who  understand one or ''2' things  about  nuclear physics 
> 
> 
> THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED 
> 
> IT IS CONATANT !
> iow
> the start velocity of em   wave IS constant at its creation 
> why ??
> because  if you  now one or two things    about nuclear structure
> and **inner binding energies  of the nuc 
> you know that they are absolutely       CONSTANT !! 
> and if so 
> the start velocity of photon bursting out the nuc 
> is
> constant as could   be  !!
> now what happened   with  that em  wave   
> God almighty   know  ..
> but the main thing to  understand is
> THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave 
> IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created 
> 
> so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> 2
> indeed  here are cases of **a mixture   between  energy plus! particles **
> but that  is ''another   opera  ''to formulate
> ====================
> see something about nuclear energies etc 
> (it is only the abstract of a book)!!    in
> 
> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> 
> ===========================================================  
> 
> TIA
> ======
> Eng
> Yehiel Porat  
> 30 /11/2018  
> ======================


The c as used in the equation is just a units conversion factor anyway.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716070

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:58:49 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 11:04:23 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> > There are some 'smart people   here 
> > that claim   that  E=mc^2 is not right 
> > their claim is based on the  assumption /fact? that velocity  of light is not constant  
> > now my New   claim is :a
> > no mater if velocity of light is constant  or   not !!
> > 
> > for me 
> > as one who  understand one or ''2' things  about  nuclear physics 
> > 
> > 
> > THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED 
> > 
> > IT IS CONATANT !
> > iow
> > the start velocity of em   wave IS constant at its creation 
> > why ??
> > because  if you  now one or two things    about nuclear structure
> > and **inner binding energies  of the nuc 
> > you know that they are absolutely       CONSTANT !! 
> > and if so 
> > the start velocity of photon bursting out the nuc 
> > is
> > constant as could   be  !!
> > now what happened   with  that em  wave   
> > God almighty   know  ..
> > but the main thing to  understand is
> > THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave 
> > IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created 
> > 
> > so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> > 2
> > indeed  here are cases of **a mixture   between  energy plus! particles **
> > but that  is ''another   opera  ''to formulate
> > ====================
> > see something about nuclear energies etc 
> > (it is only the abstract of a book)!!    in
> > 
> > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> > 
> > ===========================================================  
> > 
> > TIA
> > ======
> > Eng
> > Yehiel Porat  
> > 30 /11/2018  
> > ======================
> 
> 
> The c as used in the equation is just a units conversion factor anyway.
> 
> Double-A
==================
??

what  is that ''conversion''   ?
from what to what ??

TIA
Y.P
=============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716142

On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 2:23:45 AM UTC+2, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:58:49 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 11:04:23 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > There are some 'smart people   here 
> > > that claim   that  E=mc^2 is not right 
> > > their claim is based on the  assumption /fact? that velocity  of light is not constant  
> > > now my New   claim is :a
> > > no mater if velocity of light is constant  or   not !!
> > > 
> > > for me 
> > > as one who  understand one or ''2' things  about  nuclear physics 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED 
> > > 
> > > IT IS CONATANT !
> > > iow
> > > the start velocity of em   wave IS constant at its creation 
> > > why ??
> > > because  if you  now one or two things    about nuclear structure
> > > and **inner binding energies  of the nuc 
> > > you know that they are absolutely       CONSTANT !! 
> > > and if so 
> > > the start velocity of photon bursting out the nuc 
> > > is
> > > constant as could   be  !!
> > > now what happened   with  that em  wave   
> > > God almighty   know  ..
> > > but the main thing to  understand is
> > > THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave 
> > > IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created 
> > > 
> > > so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> > > 2
> > > indeed  here are cases of **a mixture   between  energy plus! particles **
> > > but that  is ''another   opera  ''to formulate
> > > ====================
> > > see something about nuclear energies etc 
> > > (it is only the abstract of a book)!!    in
> > > 
> > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> > > 
> > > ===========================================================  
> > > 
> > > TIA
> > > ======
> > > Eng
> > > Yehiel Porat  
> > > 30 /11/2018  
> > > ======================
> > 
> > 
> > The c as used in the equation is just a units conversion factor anyway.
> > 
> > Double-A
> ==================
> ??
> 
> what  is that ''conversion''   ?
> from what to what ??
> 
> TIA
> Y.P
> =============================

conversion of mass to  Energy ?/ EM   waves ?-  
if you say that
you  started** to get it !!
some mass   of the Atom !!!
and  it takes only a fraction of a Second   !!
and while it is out (of the Atom )--
''''''only God knows'''' (:-) ??
not easy     
========================
TIA
Y.P
========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716269

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:23:45 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:58:49 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 11:04:23 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > There are some 'smart people   here 
> > > that claim   that  E=mc^2 is not right 
> > > their claim is based on the  assumption /fact? that velocity  of light is not constant  
> > > now my New   claim is :a
> > > no mater if velocity of light is constant  or   not !!
> > > 
> > > for me 
> > > as one who  understand one or ''2' things  about  nuclear physics 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED 
> > > 
> > > IT IS CONATANT !
> > > iow
> > > the start velocity of em   wave IS constant at its creation 
> > > why ??
> > > because  if you  now one or two things    about nuclear structure
> > > and **inner binding energies  of the nuc 
> > > you know that they are absolutely       CONSTANT !! 
> > > and if so 
> > > the start velocity of photon bursting out the nuc 
> > > is
> > > constant as could   be  !!
> > > now what happened   with  that em  wave   
> > > God almighty   know  ..
> > > but the main thing to  understand is
> > > THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave 
> > > IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created 
> > > 
> > > so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> > > 2
> > > indeed  here are cases of **a mixture   between  energy plus! particles **
> > > but that  is ''another   opera  ''to formulate
> > > ====================
> > > see something about nuclear energies etc 
> > > (it is only the abstract of a book)!!    in
> > > 
> > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> > > 
> > > ===========================================================  
> > > 
> > > TIA
> > > ======
> > > Eng
> > > Yehiel Porat  
> > > 30 /11/2018  
> > > ======================
> > 
> > 
> > The c as used in the equation is just a units conversion factor anyway.
> > 
> > Double-A
> ==================
> ??
> 
> what  is that ''conversion''   ?
> from what to what ??
> 
> TIA
> Y.P
> =============================


Kilograms to Joules.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716297

On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 11:47:03 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 4:23:45 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:58:49 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 11:04:23 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > There are some 'smart people   here 
> > > > that claim   that  E=mc^2 is not right 
> > > > their claim is based on the  assumption /fact? that velocity  of light is not constant  
> > > > now my New   claim is :a
> > > > no mater if velocity of light is constant  or   not !!
> > > > 
> > > > for me 
> > > > as one who  understand one or ''2' things  about  nuclear physics 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED 
> > > > 
> > > > IT IS CONATANT !
> > > > iow
> > > > the start velocity of em   wave IS constant at its creation 
> > > > why ??
> > > > because  if you  now one or two things    about nuclear structure
> > > > and **inner binding energies  of the nuc 
> > > > you know that they are absolutely       CONSTANT !! 
> > > > and if so 
> > > > the start velocity of photon bursting out the nuc 
> > > > is
> > > > constant as could   be  !!
> > > > now what happened   with  that em  wave   
> > > > God almighty   know  ..
> > > > but the main thing to  understand is
> > > > THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave 
> > > > IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created 
> > > > 
> > > > so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> > > > 2
> > > > indeed  here are cases of **a mixture   between  energy plus! particles **
> > > > but that  is ''another   opera  ''to formulate
> > > > ====================
> > > > see something about nuclear energies etc 
> > > > (it is only the abstract of a book)!!    in
> > > > 
> > > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> > > > 
> > > > ===========================================================  
> > > > 
> > > > TIA
> > > > ======
> > > > Eng
> > > > Yehiel Porat  
> > > > 30 /11/2018  
> > > > ======================
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The c as used in the equation is just a units conversion factor anyway.
> > > 
> > > Double-A
> > ==================
> > ??
> > 
> > what  is that ''conversion''   ?
> > from what to what ??
> > 
> > TIA
> > Y.P
> > =============================
> 
> 
> Kilograms to Joules.
> 
> Double-A
====================

thank you
you mean
mass to energy ??

yes 
we can say that
right at its creation
the speed of light is constant 
further w=--
may be velocity of lihht
might change ..
==
Y.P
=============== 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716504 — Re: WHY E =MC^2 ** IS** RIGHT !!!

> we can say that
> right at its creation
> the speed of light is constant
> further w=--
> may be velocity of lihht
> might change ..

Learn how to spell "light" you brainless idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716299

On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 1:58:49 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 11:04:23 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> > There are some 'smart people   here 
> > that claim   that  E=mc^2 is not right 
> > their claim is based on the  assumption /fact? that velocity  of light is not constant  
> > now my New   claim is :a
> > no mater if velocity of light is constant  or   not !!
> > 
> > for me 
> > as one who  understand one or ''2' things  about  nuclear physics 
> > 
> > 
> > THE VALOCITY OF LIGHT AT THE FRACTION OF SECOND    BEING CREATED 
> > 
> > IT IS CONATANT !
> > iow
> > the start velocity of em   wave IS constant at its creation 
> > why ??
> > because  if you  now one or two things    about nuclear structure
> > and **inner binding energies  of the nuc 
> > you know that they are absolutely       CONSTANT !! 
> > and if so 
> > the start velocity of photon bursting out the nuc 
> > is
> > constant as could   be  !!
> > now what happened   with  that em  wave   
> > God almighty   know  ..
> > but the main thing to  understand is
> > THE At velocity of a photon  /em wave 
> > IS CONSTANT**  at the moment it was created 
> > 
> > so no  need to  add   on E=mc^2  ANYTING ELESE !!
> > 2
> > indeed  here are cases of **a mixture   between  energy plus! particles **
> > but that  is ''another   opera  ''to formulate
> > ====================
> > see something about nuclear energies etc 
> > (it is only the abstract of a book)!!    in
> > 
> > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> > 
> > ===========================================================  
> > 
> > TIA
> > ======
> > Eng
> > Yehiel Porat  
> > 30 /11/2018  
> > ======================
> 
> 
> The c as used in the equation is just a units conversion factor anyway.
> 
> Double-A

Right c^2 makes a very large amount of energy.That is why Einstein used it for.My G=EMC^2 shows the force of gravity the same way(being great).I use it to create.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716302

"Why am I posting this, it's making me cry as it always does".Bert


because "I have become a Mental Cadaver." Bert  
as "I daily post "My Stupid Palaver" ( = MSP). Bert
... so that "I can park & bark in the dark". Bert
>
>
"Get the picture", "Go figure", "O ya",  "I know why" said Bert
who is <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
as <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-s-de-Minting > is happening
& <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker> proves
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent>. Bert
"That says it all". Bert    ---    That is a given. Bert
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true". Bert
>
>
Hmmm-<snicker>-<chuckle>-<chortle>- ROTFLMAO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#716313

So why is e=mcc right for those not born or brought-up imbeciles?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web