Groups > sci.physics > #714719 > unrolled thread

Apollo 11 was Fake

Started by	carleto4157990662@gmail.com
First post	2018-11-25 15:00 -0800
Last post	2018-11-29 15:20 -0800
Articles	20 on this page of 39 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

  Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:00 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:07 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:25 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:35 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:40 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 00:27 +0000
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 00:45 +0000
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 00:57 +0000
        Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:02 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Steve <invalidz@example.net> - 2018-11-25 16:51 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 17:14 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 02:01 +0000
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:24 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:47 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:42 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:48 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:52 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 19:26 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-25 22:40 -0500
        Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 19:51 -0800
          Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-26 09:20 -0500
          Re: Apollo 11 was Fake john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 07:43 -0800
            Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 16:08 +0000
              Re: Apollo 11 was Fake benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 12:57 -0500
                Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:27 +0000
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-26 13:43 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-26 13:48 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 22:57 +0000
        Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 15:36 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:21 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:26 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-11-29 00:45 +0000
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:27 -0800
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:34 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 15:04 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 15:11 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 09:50 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 14:38 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 15:20 -0800

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

#714719 — Apollo 11 was Fake

From	carleto4157990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 15:00 -0800
Subject	Apollo 11 was Fake
Message-ID	<72617e5a-3b28-49d2-aef1-dcf0d856cf43@googlegroups.com>

On July 20, 1969 20:16 UTC, the moon is not facing Australia.




 https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/moon/light.html?month=07&day=20&year=1969&hour=20&min=17&sec=0&n=&ntxt=Arcata&earth=0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#714721

From	carleto4157990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 15:07 -0800
Message-ID	<d08cd142-1268-4dbd-8308-af80124df80b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

Sunday, July 20, 1969. On this day the Moon was in a Waxing Crescent Phase.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714727

From	consequently7990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 15:25 -0800
Message-ID	<ff272117-e02c-4537-b4e9-5373dc1ab290@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

fgfg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714729

From	carleto4157990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 15:35 -0800
Message-ID	<058a4b0b-b74a-40be-a932-3dccdb0a18dc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

I think this makes me the greatest that ever lived.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714732

From	consequently7990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 15:40 -0800
Message-ID	<321fa044-7e9a-4ecd-bfd7-8dda067b8624@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

There is a chance that the link in incorrect but if not then I am the greatest physicist that every lived which anyone can now see which is the important of it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714735

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date	2018-11-26 00:27 +0000
Message-ID	<ptfekv$h3g$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to	#714719

carleto4157990662@gmail.com writes:


>On July 20, 1969 20:16 UTC, the moon is not facing Australia.

Yeah, so???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714736

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date	2018-11-26 00:45 +0000
Message-ID	<ptffnn$poq$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to	#714719

consequently7990662@gmail.com writes:

>How do you communicate with the Apollo 11 mission from the moon if the 
>moon is on the other side of the Austi. or is that to hard to understand.

Simple. Use the receiver location in California (Goldstone), or the other
one as necessary. I believe there were 3 of them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714740

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date	2018-11-26 00:57 +0000
Message-ID	<ptfge9$1p5$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to	#714736

moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:

>I believe there were 3 of them.

The third is near Madrid, Spain. They are spaced about 120 degrees
apart so that at least one of them would be in view at all times.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714755

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 18:02 -0800
Message-ID	<a21db7f5-9400-47c8-9ee0-5382ad5c4293@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714740

On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 4:57:48 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
> 
> >I believe there were 3 of them.
> 
> The third is near Madrid, Spain. They are spaced about 120 degrees
> apart so that at least one of them would be in view at all times.

Actually, there were 5 of them...

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/alsj-DSNLocations.html

... although the 3 in Australia were pretty close to each other...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714738

From	Steve <invalidz@example.net>
Date	2018-11-25 16:51 -0800
Message-ID	<ptfg1k$429$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#714719

How unusual!

A moron with a gmail address is posting from google groups!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714742

From	consequently7990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 17:14 -0800
Message-ID	<c921e8ff-d701-467f-b808-1c219dd2f059@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

 The hyperbolic radio antenna is used to receive the radio transmission from the Apollo 11 mission. The sensitivity of a large hyperbolic radio antenna is estimated using a 300 km height satellite that emits a 100 W radio signal which produces a sensitive of  a large hyperbolic radio antenna of approximately 10-8 W that cannot a s-band  3.5 x 10-12 W radio signal that originates from the Apollo 11 mission from the moon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714754

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date	2018-11-26 02:01 +0000
Message-ID	<ptfk66$4l3$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to	#714742

consequently7990662@gmail.com writes:


> The hyperbolic radio antenna is used to receive the radio transmission from

No such thing as a hyperbolic radio antenna, idjit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714761

From	carleto4157990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 18:24 -0800
Message-ID	<4737417a-513c-45bc-9cef-53f1bdf1417b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

The hyperbolic radio antenna is used to receive the radio transmission from the Apollo 11 mission. The sensitivity of a large hyperbolic radio antenna is estimated using a 300 km height satellite that emits a 100 W radio signal which produces a sensitive of a large hyperbolic radio antenna of approximately 10-8 W that is four order of magnitude larger than the  3.5 x 10-12 W s-band radio signal that originates from the Apollo 11 mission from the moon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714763

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 18:47 -0800
Message-ID	<8409e894-8097-44b4-a947-6a4704c78785@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714761

On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-8, carleto4...@gmail.com wrote:

> The hyperbolic radio antenna is used to receive the radio transmission from the Apollo 11 mission.

Well, that's wrong right off the bat...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Deep_Space_Network

"Each complex consists of at least four deep space terminals equipped with ultra-sensitive receiving systems and large parabolic-dish antennas."

Parabolic, not hyperbolic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714762

From	consequently7990662@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 18:42 -0800
Message-ID	<1354c5f1-8a0d-4c01-aa3e-9a09e2f739ae@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

That means you cannot detect a radio signal from the moon or Mars.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714764

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 18:48 -0800
Message-ID	<6a62848e-d52b-4fec-9017-5f8c9e94f5fd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714762

On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 6:42:20 PM UTC-8, consequen...@gmail.com wrote:

> That means you cannot detect a radio signal from the moon or Mars.

Well, not with a hyperbolic dish, you can't. That's why they are not used to detect signals from spacecraft.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714765

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 18:52 -0800
Message-ID	<cdd18f9d-1891-4c24-9b6c-5fb28feebd92@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714762

On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 6:42:20 PM UTC-8, consequen...@gmail.com wrote:

> That means you cannot detect a radio signal from the moon or Mars.

Here...

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720023255.pdf

... the word 'parabolic' appears 32 times in this paper and the word 'hyperbolic' appears zero times. Get a clue...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714767

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 19:26 -0800
Message-ID	<240ffe84-b5da-463f-b5e6-b6b7f8e6425d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714719

On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 7:08:28 PM UTC-8, consequen...@gmail.com wrote:

> NASA what a joke.

Which means what, exactly?

Read this...

https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2008/pdf/spinoff2008.pdf

... start at the bottom of page 24 for a list of all the products and technologies that NASA was responsible for bringing to market. It is an astounding list.

NASA is hardly a joke. Perhaps it is you who is the joke.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714769

From	Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date	2018-11-25 22:40 -0500
Message-ID	<6dqmvd10ucsvqp93l9okmou26kmjk88v9c@4ax.com>
In reply to	#714767

On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:26:49 -0800 (PST), pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:

>On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 7:08:28 PM UTC-8, consequen...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> NASA what a joke.
>
>Which means what, exactly?
>
>Read this...
>
>https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2008/pdf/spinoff2008.pdf
>
>... start at the bottom of page 24 for a list of all the products and technologies that NASA was responsible for bringing to market. It is an astounding list.
>
>NASA is hardly a joke. Perhaps it is you who is the joke.

We should ramp up funding for making fusion power plants.

How many spinoffs would there be from the effort to create fusion
power plants?

How many spinoffs have their been from decades of effort to despoil
the land with a multitude of windmills?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714770

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2018-11-25 19:51 -0800
Message-ID	<a5de9d9e-6f3e-4cc6-b055-b3025f9c21b0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#714769

On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 7:40:35 PM UTC-8, Wally W. wrote:

> We should ramp up funding for making fusion power plants.

I'm pretty sure that fusion power plants are still a long way off...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

csiph-web

Apollo 11 was Fake

Contents

#714719 — Apollo 11 was Fake

#714721

#714727

#714729

#714732

#714735

#714736

#714740

#714755

#714738

#714742

#714754

#714761

#714763

#714762

#714764

#714765

#714767

#714769

#714770