Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #714041 > unrolled thread

1-A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  1-A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 12:35 -0800
    Re: 1-A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 17:25 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-23 20:11 +0000

#714041 — 1-A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law

1-A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law


Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:11:57 -0800 (PST) 

Subject: A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: 
 Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:11:57 +0000 

A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law 

- hide quoted text - 
- hide quoted text -
On Thursday, November 22, 2018 at 12:11:11 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Mass of real proton is 840MeV and real electron is 105MeV for a ratio of 8 to 1. 
> 
> Now i need that number 8 in Faraday Law 
> 
> The surface area of torus is 4(pi^2)Rr 
> 
> Volume of torus is 2(pi^2)Rr^2 
> 
> When we take Area times Volume for electricity-magnetism we end up with 
> 
> 8(pi^4)R^2r^3 

I have landed on a brand new concept of Physics, Mathematics and Chemistry. This concept would never work in Old Physics or Old Math because it requires Space be quantized, Space be discrete not a continuum. 

And the idea is that Space has a density. Now in chemistry they use density often, for the atoms of chemical elements have a density, where the most dense are the metals in the middle of the Periodic Table-- osmium, iridium etc 

But Physics saw density concept as secondary not primary. Here we make density of utmost importance as a primary concept. 

Mathematics never had any density in their geometry, probably because they had their idiotic continuum that never allows density. But when you have an infinity borderline and a Space that is discrete, you have a density. For lines in a Discrete Space are thin rectangles and so we can form a density concept. 

And the way I form density in geometry is I multiply the surface area times the volume. 

Now, is the torus the most dense Geometry object in Geometry? So far, it appears to be the most dense, with its density at 8(pi^4)R^2r^3. 

The sphere density would be 4(pi)r^2 * 4/3(pi)r^3 = 16/3(pi^2)r^5 

The cube density would be 6s^2 * s^3 = 6s^5 

Because Physics has electromagnetism and electromagnetism is very much a surface area phenomenon inside a volume of Space (voltage), that Physics needs density of electromagnetism. 

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#714104

On Thursday, November 22, 2018 at 2:36:01 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 1-A new breakthrough in Physics and Mathematics-- GEOMETRY DENSITY Re: Where the 8 comes from, intrinsic in Faraday Law
> 
(snipped)
> On Thursday, November 22, 2018 at 12:11:11 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> > Mass of real proton is 840MeV and real electron is 105MeV for a ratio of 8 to 1. 
> > 
> > Now i need that number 8 in Faraday Law 
> > 
> > The surface area of torus is 4(pi^2)Rr 
> > 
> > Volume of torus is 2(pi^2)Rr^2 
> > 
> > When we take Area times Volume for electricity-magnetism we end up with 
> > 
> > 8(pi^4)R^2r^3 
> 
> I have landed on a brand new concept of Physics, Mathematics and Chemistry. This concept would never work in Old Physics or Old Math because it requires Space be quantized, Space be discrete not a continuum. 
> 
> And the idea is that Space has a density. Now in chemistry they use density often, for the atoms of chemical elements have a density, where the most dense are the metals in the middle of the Periodic Table-- osmium, iridium etc 
> 
> But Physics saw density concept as secondary not primary. Here we make density of utmost importance as a primary concept. 
> 
> Mathematics never had any density in their geometry, probably because they had their idiotic continuum that never allows density. But when you have an infinity borderline and a Space that is discrete, you have a density. For lines in a Discrete Space are thin rectangles and so we can form a density concept. 
> 
> And the way I form density in geometry is I multiply the surface area times the volume. 
> 
> Now, is the torus the most dense Geometry object in Geometry? So far, it appears to be the most dense, with its density at 8(pi^4)R^2r^3. 
> 
> The sphere density would be 4(pi)r^2 * 4/3(pi)r^3 = 16/3(pi^2)r^5 
> 
> The cube density would be 6s^2 * s^3 = 6s^5 
> 
> Because Physics has electromagnetism and electromagnetism is very much a surface area phenomenon inside a volume of Space (voltage), that Physics needs density of electromagnetism. 
> 
>

With this definition of Geometry-Density, is it safe to say the torus is the most dense geometry figure?

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#714245 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>I have landed on a brand new concept of Physics, Mathematics and 
>Chemistry.

> This concept would never work in Old Physics or Old Math because it 
>requires Space be quantized, Space be discrete not a continuum.

>And the idea is that Space has a density. Now in chemistry they use 
>density often, for the atoms of chemical elements have a density, where 
>the most dense are the metals in the middle of the Periodic Table-- 
>osmium, iridium etc

>But Physics saw density concept as secondary not primary. Here we make 
>density of utmost importance as a primary concept.
...
The sphere density would be 4(pi)r^2 * 4/3(pi)r^3 = 16/3(pi^2)r^5

The cube density would be 6s^2 * s^3 = 6s^5

So density is proportional to the fifth power of the length????

And the units don't match: Automatically WRONG. (real density is mass/vol)

And the mass isn't even a factor? So a helium balloon has the same density
as a lead balloon of the same size? Hey Uncle Al, have you ever heard of
*anything* as dumb and stupid as this???


"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean rock-hard
stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.  Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.  
Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape.  Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid."

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web