Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #712831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 44 participants
Thread has 1403 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1403 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Fake News ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800
Re: Fake News ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-15 09:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:03 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 19:10 +0000
Re: Fake News ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-15 14:13 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 20:36 +0000
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:21 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 18:57 -0800
Re: Fake News ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 17:02 -0700
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 20:38 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-15 12:34 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:16 -0800
Kensi's idiot, dice throwing, God. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 11:21 -0800
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-16 10:34 -0500
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:40 -0700
Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-16 14:28 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-17 12:15 -0500
Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-17 12:07 -0800
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:00 -0500
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:56 -0700
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:16 -0600
You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:45 -0800
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 15:52 -0700
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:16 -0500
I'm not mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:03 -0800
Re: I'm not mainstream. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:41 -0500
" this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-20 17:22 -0800
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:16 -0500
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:57 -0600
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:02 -0500
Choose your cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:27 -0800
Re: Choose your cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:46 -0500
Re: Choose your cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:55 -0700
Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-23 14:37 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:39 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:04 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:40 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:55 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:48 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 23:55 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:18 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 22:19 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 06:24 +0000
Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-26 01:31 -0800
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:13 -0500
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-26 09:34 -0600
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 20:55 -0700
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:16 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-26 03:39 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:17 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:19 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:26 +0000
By definition, geniuses are rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: By definition, geniuses are rare. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 05:16 -0500
Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-27 06:33 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:08 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0800
Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 06:37 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 07:44 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0500
99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 07:39 -0800
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 12:00 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0700
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:37 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:36 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:35 -0500
The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 06:19 -0800
Re: The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:21 -0500
We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 08:31 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:11 -0500
Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 05:09 -0800
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:29 -0500
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 +0000
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:27 -0500
Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 13:46 -0800
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 16:41 -0600
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:28 -0500
Kensi is the KoOky one. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:28 -0800
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:33 -0500
See ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:48 -0800
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:55 -0500
I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 07:04 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:13 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:09 +0000
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:18 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 09:31 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:35 -0700
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: See ? ! "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 11:47 -0500
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: See ? ! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:10 +0000
Re: See ? ! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0600
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:44 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:49 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:54 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:02 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:10 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:22 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:43 -0700
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 21:52 -0600
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:09 -0500
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-01 11:48 -0600
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-30 10:34 -0800
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-30 15:09 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:53 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:59 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:23 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:33 -0600
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 15:54 -0500
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 18:51 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 13:54 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 14:57 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:26 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:45 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:17 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:43 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 17:40 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:15 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:17 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 07:46 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 00:55 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:49 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:50 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:19 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:09 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:48 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:48 -0700
Einstein was right. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 10:57 -0800
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:32 +0000
72 robotic alien virgins. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:03 +0000
There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 20:32 -0800
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:46 +0000
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:11 -0500
Kenzi's SciFi cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 12:02 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-23 10:08 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:51 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:56 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:47 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:53 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:57 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:23 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:40 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:48 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:47 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:01 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:41 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 16:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:46 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:42 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:44 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 09:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:14 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:26 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad813b404@gmail.invallid> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:05 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:21 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:26 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:31 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:38 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 20:46 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:23 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-25 00:46 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:49 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 23:23 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:07 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:17 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 20:25 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 17:50 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:55 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 01:44 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:51 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:05 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:20 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 22:37 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:43 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 23:33 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:37 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:16 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:28 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 16:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:46 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:12 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-11-25 06:58 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 09:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:49 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:59 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:16 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:14 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:29 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 20:05 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 06:00 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:48 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:59 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:45 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 23:04 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 16:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:29 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:31 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:53 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:48 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:21 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:51 -0800
qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 04:41 -0800
Re: qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:44 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:10 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:08 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:07 -0500
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:29 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:34 -0700
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0500
Kooky like Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:35 -0800
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:14 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-23 01:36 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:47 -0700
I am crazy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 20:17 -0800
Re: I am crazy. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:30 -0500
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:55 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:24 -0500
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:05 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 14:27 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:29 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:30 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:07 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:02 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:33 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 19:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:30 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:04 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:55 +0000
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:38 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:37 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:30 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:32 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:48 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:37 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:43 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:38 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 15:29 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:47 +0000
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 02:16 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:39 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 18:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:01 -0500
When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:06 -0800
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:21 -0500
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-19 10:53 -0600
The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 13:07 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 12:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:23 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 12:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 17:00 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:38 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:39 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 06:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 13:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 12:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:01 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-22 14:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-20 20:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-20 13:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 18:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-20 18:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 19:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:13 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-20 23:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-21 05:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 23:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 14:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 15:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 22:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 23:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:27 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 22:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:42 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 18:52 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 18:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 00:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 09:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 17:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:02 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-23 16:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:43 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:02 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:08 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:52 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 18:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 21:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 22:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 07:08 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 11:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-26 20:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 07:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 07:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:21 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 03:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 07:47 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 12:40 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 19:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 21:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:20 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 22:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 21:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 21:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 09:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 10:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 08:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:34 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:16 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:04 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:05 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 08:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 14:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:48 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 09:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 15:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2018-11-29 17:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:01 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 11:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 20:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 12:07 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 20:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 00:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 13:09 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 11:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 21:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 02:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 10:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 17:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:46 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:40 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:48 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 15:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 15:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 19:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 20:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 21:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 10:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 23:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-28 12:27 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:21 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:51 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:24 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-01 13:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 13:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:10 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:57 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:22 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 00:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:34 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:04 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 13:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 14:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:55 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:14 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 10:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:03 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 09:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 11:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:03 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:13 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 08:14 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:28 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 20:42 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-30 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:53 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 10:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 11:58 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:16 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 11:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 07:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 08:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:38 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-12-01 18:49 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 07:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 09:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 13:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 12:37 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 16:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:25 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:19 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 12:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 13:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 11:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 07:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 23:36 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:32 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 20:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:14 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 14:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:28 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:11 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:39 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:37 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:26 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 11:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 12:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. AOC <AOC@mineshot.org> - 2018-11-28 16:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500
Page 2 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 50 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 13:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. |
| Message-ID | <pss9b1$rf0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713103 |
On 11/17/2018 3:07 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >> In effect, the world [ continuously duplicates ] itself, >> [ immeasurably fast ], and the copies [diverge]. > > Why believe in such an unprovable, useless dream ? Why believe there's a galaxy past the cosmological horizon? Because the math says there is, and for there not to be you'd have to add epicycles to a theory that doesn't need those epicycles to explain the observational data. Adding epicycles to explain the observational data is already something to be done cautiously; you should rethink the original theory in case there's a more elegant one that also better fits the data. Though sometimes an epicycle is correct; adding the concept of dark matter seems to be the simplest way to explain galactic cluster motions and galaxy rotation curves, now that all the efforts to modify general relativity to add fudge-factors to fit these data have failed, and all of those efforts actually amounted to even uglier epicycle-adding anyway. Adding epicycles to a theory that nicely fits all of the observational data simply to remove an uncomfortable implication or prevent it contradicting a preconceived, but observationally-unsupported, notion is invariably wrong. This means, in particular, grafting any kind of ugly "collapse mechanism" onto the side of QM when QM fits the observational data nicely without one. It also includes Einstein's cosmological constant, added to preserve the preconceived notion of a static, "steady-state" cosmos. It turns out there is something resembling a cosmological constant, but it's likely to be a Higgs-like quantum field rather than an innate fudge factor in GR. The most you can say for the cosmological constant is that it was accidentally almost-right. Adding epicycles to a theory that add what is then the only non-unitary, non-local, nondeterministic, CPT-violating, acausal etc. etc. phenomenon in all of physics is not only invariably wrong, it also doesn't have a snowball's chance on Venus of even being accidentally almost-right. > Bell's Theorem is a pollster, > asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Ko0kiness level: somewhere north of a googolplex. > If you know a pair of gloves were shipped out, > one hand to you, and the other to me; > then, when you open the package, and you see the left hand, > you _ immediately know I got the right hand. That's what QM theorists call "hidden variables". Local hidden variables are ruled out by the Aspect experiment data and subsequent, more-refined experiments, and nonlocal hidden variables ... well, see above about adding non-unitary, non-local, nondeterministic, CPT-violating, acausal etc. etc. epicycles to a theory. > All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: > randomness is ignorance, nothing more. But not ignorance about the spin of that electron over yonder. Ignorance about which of the many yous you are. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 13:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.365b7fe33193138198a161@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #713235 |
In article <pss9b1$rf0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 11/17/2018 3:07 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi replied: >>> In effect, the world [ continuously duplicates ] itself, >>> [ immeasurably fast ], and the copies [diverge]. >> >> Why believe in such an unprovable, useless dream ? > >Why believe there's a galaxy past the cosmological horizon? Because the >math says there is, and for there not to be you'd have to add epicycles >to a theory that doesn't need those epicycles to explain the >observational data. > >Adding epicycles to explain the observational data is already something >to be done cautiously; you should rethink the original theory in case >there's a more elegant one that also better fits the data. Though >sometimes an epicycle is correct; adding the concept of dark matter >seems to be the simplest way to explain galactic cluster motions and >galaxy rotation curves, now that all the efforts to modify general >relativity to add fudge-factors to fit these data have failed, and all >of those efforts actually amounted to even uglier epicycle-adding anyway. > >Adding epicycles to a theory that nicely fits all of the observational >data simply to remove an uncomfortable implication or prevent it >contradicting a preconceived, but observationally-unsupported, notion is >invariably wrong. This means, in particular, grafting any kind of ugly >"collapse mechanism" onto the side of QM when QM fits the observational >data nicely without one. > >It also includes Einstein's cosmological constant, added to preserve the >preconceived notion of a static, "steady-state" cosmos. It turns out >there is something resembling a cosmological constant, but it's likely >to be a Higgs-like quantum field rather than an innate fudge factor in >GR. The most you can say for the cosmological constant is that it was >accidentally almost-right. > >Adding epicycles to a theory that add what is then the only non-unitary, >non-local, nondeterministic, CPT-violating, acausal etc. etc. phenomenon >in all of physics is not only invariably wrong, it also doesn't have a >snowball's chance on Venus of even being accidentally almost-right. > >> Bell's Theorem is a pollster, >> asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. > >Ko0kiness level: somewhere north of a googolplex. > >> If you know a pair of gloves were shipped out, >> one hand to you, and the other to me; >> then, when you open the package, and you see the left hand, >> you _ immediately know I got the right hand. > >That's what QM theorists call "hidden variables". Local hidden variables >are ruled out by the Aspect experiment data and subsequent, more-refined >experiments, and nonlocal hidden variables ... well, see above about >adding non-unitary, non-local, nondeterministic, CPT-violating, acausal >etc. etc. epicycles to a theory. > >> All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: >> randomness is ignorance, nothing more. > >But not ignorance about the spin of that electron over yonder. Ignorance >about which of the many yous you are. Your frothnozzle is on full today. -- Nads and Kensi official leash holder-Self Appointed 2018 "Checky (tm) award #111318". The *MOOT* award. Owner and Leash holder of [ Tor ] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus Sweetness Seal of Approval AUK Offishal Tinfoil Sombrero award 05/07 St. Lamey - Patron Saint Of Bridges, Underpasses and Caves Co-inventer of the "Prongtard Yap-Dog Award" #3 Usenet asshole #6 Lits Slut #9 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine <Approved by Lionel> #11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007 #1 Disenfranchised AUK Kookologist. #1 AUK Galactic Killfile Award Winner of the % "Test award" 2013. Winner of the % "Everybody gets an award award" 2013-2015 Winner of the % "The trout catcher award for proficient trolling award" Winner of the % "KOTM" award July 2015. Winner of the " I don't want an award" award. July 4, 2015 Winner of the % "We talk about food" award-2015 Winner of the "the biggest sig" award 12/2015 <this space for rent>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 12:16 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. |
| Message-ID | <pt47ea$1tg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713261 |
On 11/18/2018 2:56 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pss9b1$rf0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> On 11/17/2018 3:07 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Kensi replied: >>>> In effect, the world [ continuously duplicates ] itself, >>>> [ immeasurably fast ], and the copies [diverge]. >>> >>> Why believe in such an unprovable, useless dream ? >> >> Why believe there's a galaxy past the cosmological horizon? Because the >> math says there is, and for there not to be you'd have to add epicycles >> to a theory that doesn't need those epicycles to explain the >> observational data. >> >> Adding epicycles to explain the observational data is already something >> to be done cautiously; you should rethink the original theory in case >> there's a more elegant one that also better fits the data. Though >> sometimes an epicycle is correct; adding the concept of dark matter >> seems to be the simplest way to explain galactic cluster motions and >> galaxy rotation curves, now that all the efforts to modify general >> relativity to add fudge-factors to fit these data have failed, and all >> of those efforts actually amounted to even uglier epicycle-adding anyway. >> >> Adding epicycles to a theory that nicely fits all of the observational >> data simply to remove an uncomfortable implication or prevent it >> contradicting a preconceived, but observationally-unsupported, notion is >> invariably wrong. This means, in particular, grafting any kind of ugly >> "collapse mechanism" onto the side of QM when QM fits the observational >> data nicely without one. >> >> It also includes Einstein's cosmological constant, added to preserve the >> preconceived notion of a static, "steady-state" cosmos. It turns out >> there is something resembling a cosmological constant, but it's likely >> to be a Higgs-like quantum field rather than an innate fudge factor in >> GR. The most you can say for the cosmological constant is that it was >> accidentally almost-right. >> >> Adding epicycles to a theory that add what is then the only non-unitary, >> non-local, nondeterministic, CPT-violating, acausal etc. etc. phenomenon >> in all of physics is not only invariably wrong, it also doesn't have a >> snowball's chance on Venus of even being accidentally almost-right. >> >>> Bell's Theorem is a pollster, >>> asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. >> >> Ko0kiness level: somewhere north of a googolplex. >> >>> If you know a pair of gloves were shipped out, >>> one hand to you, and the other to me; >>> then, when you open the package, and you see the left hand, >>> you _ immediately know I got the right hand. >> >> That's what QM theorists call "hidden variables". Local hidden variables >> are ruled out by the Aspect experiment data and subsequent, more-refined >> experiments, and nonlocal hidden variables ... well, see above about >> adding non-unitary, non-local, nondeterministic, CPT-violating, acausal >> etc. etc. epicycles to a theory. >> >>> All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: >>> randomness is ignorance, nothing more. >> >> But not ignorance about the spin of that electron over yonder. Ignorance >> about which of the many yous you are. > > Your frothnozzle is on full today. > no worries, head is empty
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 14:45 -0800 |
| Subject | You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.18--2.45pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #713235 |
Kensi replied: > > > [ The Known Universe continuously duplicates itself, > > > immeasurably fast, and the copies diverge ] > > > > Why believe in such an unprovable, useless dream ? > > [Because] Adding epicycles to a theory [...] doesn't have a > snowball's chance on Venus of even being accidentally almost-right. You don't have to change the math; it's enough to just realize that it's lame, acausal statistics. Einstein called this "the ensemble interpretation". > > Bell's Theorem is a pollster, > > asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. > > Ko0kiness level: somewhere north of a googolplex. No, it's quite apt; as you never know if your quantum "measurement" might true or not. How would you know if you're measuring the right thing or not ? ! > > If you know a pair of gloves were shipped out, > > one hand to you, and the other to me; > > then, when you open the package, and you see the left hand, > > you _ immediately know I got the right hand. > > That's what QM theorists call "hidden variables". You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. " one could imagine that the photons' properties are determined in the crystal before their emission " -- Alain Aspect, 2015, Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123 > > All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: > > randomness is ignorance, nothing more. > > Ignorance about which of the many yous you are. Your (pseudo)pride demands that your drunk DemiGod has a shadow to hide in. Your multiverse is that shadow.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-18 15:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. |
| Message-ID | <bopg02.6bd.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #713278 |
On 2018-11-18 3:45 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>>> [ The Known Universe continuously duplicates itself, >>>> immeasurably fast, and the copies diverge ] >>> >>> Why believe in such an unprovable, useless dream ? >> >> [Because] Adding epicycles to a theory [...] doesn't have a >> snowball's chance on Venus of even being accidentally almost-right. > > You don't have to change the math; > it's enough to just realize that it's lame, acausal statistics. > Einstein called this "the ensemble interpretation". > >>> Bell's Theorem is a pollster, >>> asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. >> >> Ko0kiness level: somewhere north of a googolplex. > > No, it's quite apt; as you never know > if your quantum "measurement" might true or not. > How would you know if you're measuring the right thing or not ? ! > >>> If you know a pair of gloves were shipped out, >>> one hand to you, and the other to me; >>> then, when you open the package, and you see the left hand, >>> you _ immediately know I got the right hand. >> >> That's what QM theorists call "hidden variables". > > You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. > > " one could imagine that the photons' properties > are determined in the crystal before their emission " > -- Alain Aspect, 2015, Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123 > >>> All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: >>> randomness is ignorance, nothing more. >> >> Ignorance about which of the many yous you are. > > Your (pseudo)pride demands that your drunk DemiGod > has a shadow to hide in. Your multiverse is that shadow. > here comes the sequel to apocalypse now , it's called , the pack of lips now
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-19 11:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. |
| Message-ID | <psunko$o45$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713278 |
On 11/18/2018 5:45 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >> That's what QM theorists call "hidden variables". > > You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. Sure you can -- Alain Aspect did. >>> All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: >>> randomness is ignorance, nothing more. >> >> Ignorance about which of the many yous you are. > > Your (pseudo)pride demands that your drunk DemiGod > has a shadow to hide in. Your multiverse is that shadow. KOokiness level: somewhere between Graham's number and TREE(3). -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-19 14:03 -0800 |
| Subject | I'm not mainstream. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.19--2.03pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #713336 |
Kensi replied: > > You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. > > Sure you can -- Alain Aspect did. If only he agreed with you. " one could imagine that the photons' properties are determined in the crystal before their emission " -- Alain Aspect, 2015, Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123 > > Your (pseudo)pride demands that your drunk DemiGod > > has a shadow to hide in. Your multiverse is that shadow. > > KOokiness Yes, I'm not mainstream. Your "God" was created in man's image: a drunken fool. VERY mainstream. Like Einstein, I say "God" is _ Nature ( nothing more, nothing less ).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 12:41 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I'm not mainstream. |
| Message-ID | <pt1h0i$1g2c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713410 |
On 11/19/2018 5:03 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. >> >> Sure you can -- Alain Aspect did. > > If only he agreed with you. > > " one could imagine that the photons' properties > are determined in the crystal before their emission " > -- Alain Aspect, 2015, Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123 "By closing two loopholes at once, three experimental tests of Bell’s inequalities remove the last doubts that we should renounce local realism" -- same bloody article. Also, "Far fetched as it is, this residual loophole cannot be ignored, but there are proposals for how to address it [30]." And http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.110405 ... > I'm not mainstream. That much is certain. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-20 17:22 -0800 |
| Subject | " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.20--5.22pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #713530 |
Alain Aspect, 2015, "Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123":
" By closing two loopholes at once, three experimental tests of Bell’s
inequalities remove the last doubts that we should renounce local realism "
" one could imagine that the photons' properties
are determined in the crystal before their emission "
" Far fetched as it is, this residual loophole cannot be ignored,
but there are proposals for how to address it [30]."
A proposal to address something isn't the same thing as addressing it;
" this loophole cannot be ignored ".
If we can't _ measure local realism then, yes,
we have to "renounce" it ( too often, things can't be properly measured );
still, I'm quite sure that it exists, even if we can't measure it.
> > I'm not mainstream.
>
> That much is certain.
Even today, Einstein isn't mainstream.
People might be in awe of him, but they don't understand him.
Whenever I see a supposed quote from Einstein, it's _ always a misattribution.
Very, very few have a clue ( it's damn close to zero );
if it wasn't so, he'd just be an ordinary guy, not a genius.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 11:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. |
| Message-ID | <pt40dm$1knf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713649 |
On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Alain Aspect, 2015, "Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123": > > " By closing two loopholes at once, three experimental tests of Bell’s > inequalities remove the last doubts that we should renounce local realism " On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > we should renounce local realism On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > we should renounce local realism On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > we should renounce local realism On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > we should renounce local realism Good of you to finally admit that. > If we can't _ measure local realism then, yes, > we have to "renounce" it ( too often, things can't be properly measured ); > still, I'm quite sure that it exists, even if we can't measure it. That puts you in the same category as people who believe in an intervening god without evidence. God, Allah, wavefunction collapse, Thor, Zeus ... all different names for the same nonexistent thing. And only one of them manages at least to be the basis for fun MCU movies starring a hunky guy, and it's not wavefunction collapse. *snicker* >>> I'm not mainstream. >> >> That much is certain. > > Even today, Einstein isn't mainstream. > People might be in awe of him, but they don't understand him. > Whenever I see a supposed quote from Einstein, it's _ always a misattribution. > > Very, very few have a clue ( it's damn close to zero ); > if it wasn't so, he'd just be an ordinary guy, not a genius. Ko0k1n3s5 l3v3l: TREE(TREE(3)) -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-21 11:57 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. |
| Message-ID | <q37bvd1gs7udjedbfgr68bich9d0a64a1f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #713742 |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:16:52 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Alain Aspect, 2015, "Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123": >> >> " By closing two loopholes at once, three experimental tests of Bell’s >> inequalities remove the last doubts that we should renounce local realism " > >On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> we should renounce local realism > >On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> we should renounce local realism > >On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> we should renounce local realism > >On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> we should renounce local realism > >Good of you to finally admit that. > >> If we can't _ measure local realism then, yes, >> we have to "renounce" it ( too often, things can't be properly measured ); >> still, I'm quite sure that it exists, even if we can't measure it. > >That puts you in the same category as people who believe in an >intervening god without evidence. God, Allah, wavefunction collapse, >Thor, Zeus ... all different names for the same nonexistent thing. And >only one of them manages at least to be the basis for fun MCU movies >starring a hunky guy, and it's not wavefunction collapse. > >*snicker* > >>>> I'm not mainstream. >>> >>> That much is certain. >> >> Even today, Einstein isn't mainstream. >> People might be in awe of him, but they don't understand him. >> Whenever I see a supposed quote from Einstein, it's _ always a misattribution. >> >> Very, very few have a clue ( it's damn close to zero ); >> if it wasn't so, he'd just be an ordinary guy, not a genius. > >Ko0k1n3s5 l3v3l: TREE(TREE(3)) If it wasn't for the drugs you take you wouldn't exist at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 13:02 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. |
| Message-ID | <pt6r0b$dpq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #713762 |
On 11/21/2018 12:57 PM, Bob Robertson wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:16:52 -0500, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/20/2018 8:22 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>> I'm not mainstream. >>>> >>>> That much is certain. >>> >>> Even today, Einstein isn't mainstream. >>> People might be in awe of him, but they don't understand him. >>> Whenever I see a supposed quote from Einstein, it's _ always a misattribution. >>> >>> Very, very few have a clue ( it's damn close to zero ); >>> if it wasn't so, he'd just be an ordinary guy, not a genius. >> >> Ko0k1n3s5 l3v3l: TREE(TREE(3)) > > If it wasn't for the drugs you take you wouldn't exist at all. You misplaced this post in the thread. Obviously it should be a direct followup to one of Relf's droolings. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 14:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Choose your cult. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.22--2.27pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #714007 |
Kensi replied:
> > If it wasn't for the drugs you take you wouldn't exist at all.
>
> You misplaced this post in the thread. Obviously it should
> be a direct followup to one of Relf's droolings.
Choose your cult:
SuperDeterminism ( Einstein and Me ):
Apparent randomness is merely a measurement problem;
nothing more, nothing less.
MultiVerse ( Stephen Hawking and Brian Greene ):
Before EachAndEvery NanoChange, a universe duplicates itself;
because ComicCon SciFi pays better than real science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 12:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Choose your cult. |
| Message-ID | <pt9edq$kid$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #714062 |
On 11/22/2018 5:27 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> If it wasn't for the drugs you take you wouldn't exist at all. >> >> You misplaced this post in the thread. Obviously it should >> be a direct followup to one of Relf's droolings. > > Choose your cult: > > SuperDeterminism ( Einstein and Me ): > > Apparent randomness is merely a measurement problem; > nothing more, nothing less. I've changed my mind. The cosmological constant was Einstein's *second* biggest blunder. > MultiVerse ( Stephen Hawking and Brian Greene ): > > Before EachAndEvery NanoChange, a universe duplicates itself; > because ComicCon SciFi pays better than real science. Don't forget Everett and Wheeler. Face it, ko0ky, Einstein is yesterday's news, just as, in 1915, he'd made Newton yesterday's news. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 10:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Choose your cult. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3661ed15e51008ff32@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #714180 |
In article <pt9edq$kid$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 11/22/2018 5:27 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi replied: >>>> If it wasn't for the drugs you take you wouldn't exist at all. >>> >>> You misplaced this post in the thread. Obviously it should >>> be a direct followup to one of Relf's droolings. >> >> Choose your cult: >> >> SuperDeterminism ( Einstein and Me ): >> >> Apparent randomness is merely a measurement problem; >> nothing more, nothing less. > >I've changed my mind. Translation: I was wrong again. >> MultiVerse ( Stephen Hawking and Brian Greene ): >> >> Before EachAndEvery NanoChange, a universe duplicates itself; >> because ComicCon SciFi pays better than real science. > >Don't forget Everett and Wheeler. > >Face it, ko0ky, Einstein is yesterday's news, just as, in 1915, he'd >made Newton yesterday's news. So you self entitled brats are the new news?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 14:37 -0800 |
| Subject | Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23--2.37pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #714180 |
Kensi replied:
> > Apparent randomness is merely a measurement problem;
> > nothing more, nothing less.
>
> I've changed my mind.
> The cosmological constant was Einstein's *second* biggest blunder.
The "biggest blunder" thing is apocryphal; Einstein never said it.
What's more, the cosmological constant is _ extremely mainstream;
it's the Lambda in " Lambda, Cold Dark Matter ".
Einstein's Cosmological Constant ( 1.11 * 10^−52 / Meters^2 ) tells us
that outer space is growing EXPONENTIALLY, gravity is dying off;
-- i.e. the "Heat Death" predicted by Lord Kelvin, 1852,
is the most likley outcome.
> > Before EachAndEvery NanoChange, a universe duplicates itself;
> > because ComicCon SciFi pays better than real science.
>
> Don't forget Everett and Wheeler.
The simple truth: Quantum behavior isn't fully measured/understood.
" The attempt to conceive the quantum-theoretical description as
the complete description of the individual systems leads to
unnatural theoretical interpretations, which become
immediately unnecessary if one accepts the interpretation
that the description refers to ensembles of systems
and not to individual systems. "
—- Einstein in "Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist", 1957.
" Whether you can observe a thing or not
depends on the theory which you use.
It is the theory which decides what can be observed. "
—- Einstein to Werner Heisenberg,
objecting to placing observables at the heart of the new quantum mechanics,
during Heisenberg's 1926 lecture at Berlin; related by Heisenberg in 1968,
quoted by Abdus Salam, Unification of Fundamental Forces,
Cambridge University Press (1990) ISBN 0521371406, pp 98-101
> Face it, ko0ky, Einstein is yesterday's news, just as,
> in 1915, he'd made Newton yesterday's news.
Who has replaced him, in your mind, Steven Spielberg ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-25 05:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? |
| Message-ID | <ptdu5h$1fji$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #714313 |
On 11/23/2018 5:37 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> Apparent randomness is merely a measurement problem; >>> nothing more, nothing less. >> >> I've changed my mind. >> The cosmological constant was Einstein's *second* biggest blunder. > > The "biggest blunder" thing is apocryphal; Einstein never said it. > What's more, the cosmological constant is _ extremely mainstream; > it's the Lambda in " Lambda, Cold Dark Matter ". Nobody expects it to actually be a fundamental constant, though. Most likely the cause is some Higgs-like field giving the vacuum a positive energy density. It doesn't then belong as a fundamental term in Einstein's field equation but instead gets there by way of the vacuum's contribution to the stress-energy tensor. > It is the theory which decides what can be observed. " > —- Einstein to Werner Heisenberg, > objecting to placing observables at the heart of the new quantum mechanics, MWI avoids doing so: the wavefunction is fundamental, and "observables" are in the eye of the beholder. >> Face it, ko0ky, Einstein is yesterday's news, just as, >> in 1915, he'd made Newton yesterday's news. > > Who has replaced him, in your mind, Steven Hawking? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-25 10:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? |
| Message-ID | <q5elvdli2hidj95btb0phf9fbtnchin1gc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #714618 |
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 05:39:45 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 11/23/2018 5:37 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Who has replaced him,(Einstein) in your mind, Steven > >Hawking? I lost all respect for Stephen Hawking when he got old and senile and turned into a freaking leftist who proclaimed there is no God. What an arrogant little twat. Was he grateful for a relative long life when all the odds were against him. NOOOO! Instead, he succumbed to the sin of pride and turned political. Sad. We don't wish to hear politics from rock singers, actors or physicists. All are uniquely unqualified to comment thereon. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-25 15:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? |
| Message-ID | <snzKD.419797$8Q.302070@fx36.am4> |
| In reply to | #714650 |
On 2018-11-25, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 05:39:45 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>On 11/23/2018 5:37 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > >>> Who has replaced him,(Einstein) in your mind, Steven >> >>Hawking? > > I lost all respect for Stephen Hawking when > he got old and senile and turned into a freaking > leftist who proclaimed there is no God. What an > arrogant little twat. > > Was he grateful for a relative long life when all > the odds were against him. NOOOO! Instead, > he succumbed to the sin of pride and turned > political. Sad. > > We don't wish to hear politics from rock singers, > actors or physicists. All are uniquely unqualified to > comment thereon. > Who is qualified to talk politics? -- press any key to continue or any other to quit...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-25 10:44 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? |
| Message-ID | <qoglvdhb2ihqi6a2p6viqg4gp5aaor94gv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #714654 |
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:40:08 GMT, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >On 2018-11-25, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 05:39:45 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>On 11/23/2018 5:37 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> >>>> Who has replaced him,(Einstein) in your mind, Steven >>> >>>Hawking? >> >> I lost all respect for Stephen Hawking when >> he got old and senile and turned into a freaking >> leftist who proclaimed there is no God. What an >> arrogant little twat. >> >> Was he grateful for a relative long life when all >> the odds were against him. NOOOO! Instead, >> he succumbed to the sin of pride and turned >> political. Sad. >> >> We don't wish to hear politics from rock singers, >> actors or physicists. All are uniquely unqualified to >> comment thereon. >> >Who is qualified to talk politics? Only those who know of which they speak. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web