Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #711412 > unrolled thread
| Started by | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-03 22:25 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-11-07 01:38 -0800 |
| Articles | 18 on this page of 38 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 22:25 -0700
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 22:27 -0700
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 08:52 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:45 +0000
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 12:10 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 22:14 +0000
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 17:08 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 18:23 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 18:55 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 03:00 +0000
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 22:17 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:59 +0000
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 06:46 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 15:26 +0000
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:55 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:42 +0000
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 10:20 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 21:28 +0000
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 16:42 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 10:24 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 10:27 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Davey Jones <djones1998@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:15 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:21 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 21:50 -0500
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 22:34 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 22:32 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-05 13:59 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 16:53 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 13:15 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-06 14:03 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 14:52 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 18:25 -0500
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 22:30 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 22:21 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! "I. Seymour Butts" <invalid@example.com> - 2018-11-04 09:37 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Steve Jones <SJones1995@gmaile.com> - 2018-11-06 19:05 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 22:39 -0800
Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-07 01:38 -0800
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 10:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e95d92da-cf7f-496f-9207-07db9d434bc2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711631 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 5:26:25 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 2:59:08 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 5:00:47 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > >>>>>>>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY > >>>>>>>>>> if so > >>>>>>>>>> can anyone hear tell us > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > >>>>>>>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!> >>>> --and around it > >>>>>>>>>> and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> TIA > >>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>>>>>>> =======================> >>> > >>>>>>>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!! > >>>>>>>>> until now > >>>>>>>>> no one can explain /describe > >>>>>>>>> how curved space > >>>>>>>>> look like at the Edington experiment !!! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations, > >>>>>>>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given > >>>>>>>> answers you went mute. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I man not only in this NG > >>>>>>>>> but in general and everywhere > >>>>>>>>> just mumblings are going on here > >>>>>>>>> and there > >>>>>>>>> ==============> >>> TIA > >>>>>>>>> Y.P > >>>>>>>>> ==============> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> =================> > what is that you don't understand little parrot > >>>>>>> I wanted to show > >>>>>>> that idiots like you > >>>>>>> speak about curved space right ?? > >>>>>>> as the maim actor of gravity > >>>>>>> if so > >>>>>>> I ask you to discrine your 'main hero of gravity > >>>>>>> called CURVED SPACE > >>>>>>> that is doing gravity > >>>>>>> if so > >>>>>>> just go on and tell us how is that curved space of your (AND NOT MASES > >>>>>>> !!) just the great magician > >>>>>>> that you call ''curved space' is creating gravity in that Edington experiment ? > >>>>>>> so > >>>>>>> if it such a big magician (that curved space '') > >>>>>>> tell us > >>>>>>> how is that wizard (curved space ) > >>>>>>> how is took like while so many masses are involved in it _ > >>>>>>> is it just one curve around all involved masses > >>>>>>> is it many different curves around any mass involved with it etc etc > >>>>>>> in short > >>>>>>> you have not the faintest idea about what you are > >>>>>>> mumbling around magic curved space that is actually > >>>>>>> A BIG NOTHING !! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That s wrong. Sorry. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> got it idiot crock ?? > >>>>>>> if you don't understand > >>>>>>> say > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I DONT UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT > >>>>>>> JUST BASIC DECENCY !! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> that is demanded form a real scientist > >>>>>>> we are not here > >>>>>>> in a fish (fishy )market !!! > >>>>>>> ==> > Y.Porat > >>>>>>> ==============================================> > > > >>>>>> ==================I ask you Bodkin > >>>>> a simple question : > >>>>> > >>>>> the EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED > >>>>> a big triumph of 'curves space' > >>>>> in that experiment at least > >>>>> 3 main Msses where involved in it > >>>>> if so > >>>>> a basic needed question has to be explained : > >>>>> > >>>>> how was ''curved space' was looking like > >>>>> even just approximately like -- > >>>>> -- during that famous experiment ?!! > >>>>> that was considered a breakthrough experiment > >>>>> for > >>>>> curved space' story ?? > >>>> > >>>> I already showed you how to calculate the curvature of spacetime in the > >>>> vicinity of the earth s surface, using the simple everyday observation of > >>>> throwing a baseball 30 feet. > > > > =============== > > YOU DINT ANSWR > > HOW DOES YOUR FEN CURVED SPACE > > LOOK LIKE > > AROUND THE 3!!!! MASSES INVOLVED > > SUN > > PLANT > > AND EARTH ??! > > What plant? You mean planet? The only planet involved in the Eddington > experiment was the Earth. If you don’t know what Eddington did, try reading > a book about it. > > There are 4D wells surrounding the sun and the earth, and the one around > the sun dominates the experiment completely for obvious reasons. > > >>>> > >>>> This same kind of calculation can be used to calculate the curvature of > >>>> spacetime near the sun s surface. Just follow the same calculation. > > > > PIGGY > > TELL US HOE IT LOOKS LIKE ALL > > ARUND ALLABOVE 3 MASSES /!!??? > > > > > > > >>>> Substituting the mass and radius of the sun for the mass and radius of the > >>>> earth. > > === > > BUT PIGGY > > YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH ** ALL** OF THEM > > simultaneously !!!! > > because ha was the REALITY THERE qq > > No, you really don’t. The sun was BY FAR the biggest mass in the experiment > and so the effect of any other bodies is negligible. Second, the bending > only is significant if the light is grazing tangentially. The light came in > almost vertically to the earth and so no significant bending happens there. > > > You really have NO idea other than a cartoon version what this experiment > measured and how, do you? > > > > > er > > ======== > > > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2 > >>>>> I was asking another question > >>>>> > >>>>> what are/is the minimal number of basic physical dimensions > >>>>> that are the needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY > >>>>> IN ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD > >>>>> A PHYSICAL ENTITY ??! > >>>> > >>>> There aren t any minimal ones. > > = > > oh o see > > length is good enough for all sound physics? > > but even for length > > you need point of mass there !! > > you did not answer that > > ! > > complicated for a genius like you ??? > > > >>> ================TIA > >>>> ==============================imbecile !!!! > >>> > >>> if just length is goo enough to make it > >>> AN **ACTIVE* PHYSICAL ENRITY !!!???!! > >>> what for were the > >>> M K S or c g s system whee created ?? > >> =============================================== > >> Not for what you think. Not to set a minimum for physical entity. > > ================== > > if so > > FOR WAHT ??!! > > For setting a stable and reproducible standard for unit measures. Period. > That’s ALL its for. >=============================== but dont you notice that it is **a whole ** set unseparated set !! if one of them is missing the whole set collapse !! ie others may be not active but needed even as as passive show me how cant here be a physical phenomenon in which you/we can use only one dimension and assume that only one dimension is acting and all the others are ***unnecessary* there ?? even as passive ?? for instance if you climb on a lather you are active while the lather is passive but you cant do it without that lather! how about that =============================================== I > > UNLESS THERE ARE POINTS OF MASSIN IY ?? !! > > > > == > >> > >>> and used SO LONG AND SO SUCCESFULL YY !!! > >>> 2 > >>> can you > >>> even just detect a physical entity that has > >>> for instance no mass ?? > >>> > >>> sorry my rudeness but there should be a limit > >>> to damaging > >>> > >>> ==Y.P > >>> ============= > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables ====== yes indeed exactly -- toys you could not describe yourself better... at least you Saied something right about yourself ... just a little improvised joke of mine (:-) believe it or not some people find that here and there I have some humor sense ... ==== TIA Y.P ================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davey Jones <djones1998@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 20:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <prog55$u34$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711564 |
Get a brain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 17:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9d456b98-d965-4ab7-b83d-1d9983321352@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711499 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 12:10:37 PM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > >> his 'curved space ''THEORY > > >> if so > > >> can anyone hear tell us > > >> > > >> > > >> --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > >> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > >> --and around it > > >> and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > >> > > >> TIA > > >> Y.Porat > > >> ======================== > > > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > > until now > > > no one can explain /describe > > > how curved space > > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > > > Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations, > > and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given > > answers you went mute. > > > > Now here you are doing it on another topic. > > > > > I man not only in this NG > > > but in general and everywhere > > > just mumblings are going on here > > > and there > > > =============== > > > TIA > > > Y.P > > > =============== > > > > > > > > ================== > what is that you don't understand little parrot > I wanted to show > that idiots like you > speak about curved space right ?? > as the maim actor of gravity > if so > I ask you to discrine your 'main hero of gravity > called CURVED SPACE > that is doing gravity > if so > just go on and tell us how is that curved space of your (AND NOT MASES !!) just the great magician > that you call ''curved space' is creating gravity in that Edington experiment ? > so > if it such a big magician (that curved space '') > tell us > how is that wizard (curved space ) > how is took like while so many masses are involved in it _ > is it just one curve around all involved masses > is it many different curves around any mass involved with it etc etc > in short > you have not the faintest idea about what you are > mumbling around magic curved space that is actually > A BIG NOTHING !! > > got it idiot crock ?? > if you don't understand > say > > I DONT UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT > JUST BASIC DECENCY !! > > that is demanded form a real scientist > we are not here > in a fish (fishy )market !!! > === > Y.Porat > =============================================== Gravity is the reason that going from A to B can not be a straight line.Reason why nature loves the circle.Why spin is in.Orbit etc.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 21:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <prqvhl$15i9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711776 |
On 11/5/2018 8:21 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 12:10:37 PM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about >>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY >>>>> if so >>>>> can anyone hear tell us >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE >>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= >>>>> --and around it >>>>> and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? >>>>> >>>>> TIA >>>>> Y.Porat >>>>> ======================== >>>> >>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!! >>>> until now >>>> no one can explain /describe >>>> how curved space >>>> look like at the Edington experiment !!! >>> >>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations, >>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given >>> answers you went mute. >>> >>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. >>> >>>> I man not only in this NG >>>> but in general and everywhere >>>> just mumblings are going on here >>>> and there >>>> =============== >>>> TIA >>>> Y.P >>>> =============== >>>> >>>> >> >> ================== >> what is that you don't understand little parrot >> I wanted to show >> that idiots like you >> speak about curved space right ?? >> as the maim actor of gravity >> if so >> I ask you to discrine your 'main hero of gravity >> called CURVED SPACE >> that is doing gravity >> if so >> just go on and tell us how is that curved space of your (AND NOT MASES !!) just the great magician >> that you call ''curved space' is creating gravity in that Edington experiment ? >> so >> if it such a big magician (that curved space '') >> tell us >> how is that wizard (curved space ) >> how is took like while so many masses are involved in it _ >> is it just one curve around all involved masses >> is it many different curves around any mass involved with it etc etc >> in short >> you have not the faintest idea about what you are >> mumbling around magic curved space that is actually >> A BIG NOTHING !! >> >> got it idiot crock ?? >> if you don't understand >> say >> >> I DONT UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT >> JUST BASIC DECENCY !! >> >> that is demanded form a real scientist >> we are not here >> in a fish (fishy )market !!! >> === >> Y.Porat >> =============================================== > > Gravity is the reason that going from A to B can not be a straight line.Reason why nature loves the circle.Why spin is in.Orbit etc.Bert > Bert has given a lecture in the Eddington Wing of MIT and showed how he stops light three inches from its source. Hoo Rah!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 22:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d6fa2a46-9a93-41f3-b761-42b4092a0e35@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711794 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 4:50:35 AM UTC+2, benj wrote: > On 11/5/2018 8:21 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 12:10:37 PM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>> one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > >>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY > >>>>> if so > >>>>> can anyone hear tell us > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > >>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > >>>>> --and around it > >>>>> and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > >>>>> > >>>>> TIA > >>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>> ======================== > >>>> > >>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!! > >>>> until now > >>>> no one can explain /describe > >>>> how curved space > >>>> look like at the Edington experiment !!! > >>> > >>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations, > >>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given > >>> answers you went mute. > >>> > >>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. > >>> > >>>> I man not only in this NG > >>>> but in general and everywhere > >>>> just mumblings are going on here > >>>> and there > >>>> =============== > >>>> TIA > >>>> Y.P > >>>> =============== > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> ================== > >> what is that you don't understand little parrot > >> I wanted to show > >> that idiots like you > >> speak about curved space right ?? > >> as the maim actor of gravity > >> if so > >> I ask you to discrine your 'main hero of gravity > >> called CURVED SPACE > >> that is doing gravity > >> if so > >> just go on and tell us how is that curved space of your (AND NOT MASES !!) just the great magician > >> that you call ''curved space' is creating gravity in that Edington experiment ? > >> so > >> if it such a big magician (that curved space '') > >> tell us > >> how is that wizard (curved space ) > >> how is took like while so many masses are involved in it _ > >> is it just one curve around all involved masses > >> is it many different curves around any mass involved with it etc etc > >> in short > >> you have not the faintest idea about what you are > >> mumbling around magic curved space that is actually > >> A BIG NOTHING !! > >> > >> got it idiot crock ?? > >> if you don't understand > >> say > >> > >> I DONT UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT > >> JUST BASIC DECENCY !! > >> > >> that is demanded form a real scientist > >> we are not here > >> in a fish (fishy )market !!! > >> === > >> Y.Porat > >> =============================================== > > > > Gravity is the reason that going from A to B can not be a straight line.Reason why nature loves the circle.Why spin is in.Orbit etc.Bert > > > Bert has given a lecture in the Eddington Wing of MIT and showed how he > stops light three inches from its source. Hoo Rah! ================== ???? Y.P ====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 22:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1f34bc4c-edee-41dc-b8e6-0b4f8a1fadd7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711776 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 3:21:21 AM UTC+2, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 12:10:37 PM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > > >> his 'curved space ''THEORY > > > >> if so > > > >> can anyone hear tell us > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > > >> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > > >> --and around it > > > >> and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > >> > > > >> TIA > > > >> Y.Porat > > > >> ======================== > > > > > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > > > until now > > > > no one can explain /describe > > > > how curved space > > > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > > > > > Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations, > > > and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given > > > answers you went mute. > > > > > > Now here you are doing it on another topic. > > > > > > > I man not only in this NG > > > > but in general and everywhere > > > > just mumblings are going on here > > > > and there > > > > =============== > > > > TIA > > > > Y.P > > > > =============== > > > > > > > > > > > > ================== > > what is that you don't understand little parrot > > I wanted to show > > that idiots like you > > speak about curved space right ?? > > as the maim actor of gravity > > if so > > I ask you to discrine your 'main hero of gravity > > called CURVED SPACE > > that is doing gravity > > if so > > just go on and tell us how is that curved space of your (AND NOT MASES !!) just the great magician > > that you call ''curved space' is creating gravity in that Edington experiment ? > > so > > if it such a big magician (that curved space '') > > tell us > > how is that wizard (curved space ) > > how is took like while so many masses are involved in it _ > > is it just one curve around all involved masses > > is it many different curves around any mass involved with it etc etc > > in short > > you have not the faintest idea about what you are > > mumbling around magic curved space that is actually > > A BIG NOTHING !! > > > > got it idiot crock ?? > > if you don't understand > > say > > > > I DONT UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT > > JUST BASIC DECENCY !! > > > > that is demanded form a real scientist > > we are not here > > in a fish (fishy )market !!! > > === > > Y.Porat > > =============================================== > > Gravity is the reason that going from A to B can not be a straight line.Reason why nature loves the circle.Why spin is in.Orbit etc.Bert ===================== it is not spin it is CURVED MOTION AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM ==== Y.Porat =================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 13:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0eec75b8-3806-4827-a279-7e951ef0ecd3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711461 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > his 'curved space ''THEORY > > if so > > can anyone hear tell us > > > > > > --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > --and around it > > and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ======================== > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > until now > no one can explain /describe > how curved space > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > I man not only in this NG > but in general and everywhere > just mumblings are going on here > and there > =============== > TIA > Y.P > =============== I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 16:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ae353c02-d69f-4542-93d2-c3674066c24e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711708 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 11:59:23 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote: > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > > his 'curved space ''THEORY > > > if so > > > can anyone hear tell us > > > > > > > > > --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > > DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > > --and around it > > > and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > ======================== > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > until now > > no one can explain /describe > > how curved space > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > I man not only in this NG > > but in general and everywhere > > just mumblings are going on here > > and there > > =============== > > TIA > > Y.P > > =============== > > > I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" > > Double-A ================================== thank you again and again of coarse !! LIGHT (EM WAVES) HAS MASS- THE ONLY MASS not relativistic and nor schmelativistic I proved it long ago by analyzing the E=hf formula NOTHNGIN in IT- HAS A ZERO MULTIPLYER NOR A RELATIVISTIC Multiplayer to the M dimension there in the h factor !!!!! it is well documented in Google sci. physics many years ago !! TIA Y.Porat ============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 13:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c9b7e6f8-1199-4737-bbf9-61b8b5f49141@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711708 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > > his 'curved space ''THEORY > > > if so > > > can anyone hear tell us > > > > > > > > > --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > > DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > > --and around it > > > and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > ======================== > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > until now > > no one can explain /describe > > how curved space > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > I man not only in this NG > > but in general and everywhere > > just mumblings are going on here > > and there > > =============== > > TIA > > Y.P > > =============== > > > I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" When light is absorbed into the atom it creates the lightest weight difference. That Heaviness manifests at the atomic solid surface. > > Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 14:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <03f67c0c-2e9b-4329-8818-44b4acf8bc95@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711858 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 1:15:40 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > > > his 'curved space ''THEORY > > > > if so > > > > can anyone hear tell us > > > > > > > > > > > > --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > > > DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > > > --and around it > > > > and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > Y.Porat > > > > ======================== > > > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > > until now > > > no one can explain /describe > > > how curved space > > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > > I man not only in this NG > > > but in general and everywhere > > > just mumblings are going on here > > > and there > > > =============== > > > TIA > > > Y.P > > > =============== > > > > > > I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" > > When light is absorbed into the atom it creates the > lightest weight difference. That Heaviness manifests at > the atomic solid surface. > > > > > Double-A Yes, an atom gains weight when it absorbs a photon. Even Einstein argued that when he said that it's inertia is increased. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 14:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <70892b32-5115-49b2-900a-41b4f4eed64b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711866 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 2:03:33 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 1:15:40 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > > > > his 'curved space ''THEORY > > > > > if so > > > > > can anyone hear tell us > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > > > > DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > > > > --and around it > > > > > and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > Y.Porat > > > > > ======================== > > > > > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > > > until now > > > > no one can explain /describe > > > > how curved space > > > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > > > I man not only in this NG > > > > but in general and everywhere > > > > just mumblings are going on here > > > > and there > > > > =============== > > > > TIA > > > > Y.P > > > > =============== > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" > > > > When light is absorbed into the atom it creates the > > lightest weight difference. That Heaviness manifests at > > the atomic solid surface. > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > Yes, an atom gains weight when it absorbs a photon. Even Einstein argued that when he said that it's inertia is increased. > > Double-A No the atomic doesn't speed up Einstein... But light energy weighs at the atom surface. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 18:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <prt7t9$ufv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711875 |
On 11/6/2018 5:52 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 2:03:33 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 1:15:40 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: >>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about >>>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY >>>>>> if so >>>>>> can anyone hear tell us >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE >>>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= >>>>>> --and around it >>>>>> and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> TIA >>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>> ======================== >>>>> >>>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!! >>>>> until now >>>>> no one can explain /describe >>>>> how curved space >>>>> look like at the Edington experiment !!! >>>>> I man not only in this NG >>>>> but in general and everywhere >>>>> just mumblings are going on here >>>>> and there >>>>> =============== >>>>> TIA >>>>> Y.P >>>>> =============== >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" >>> >>> When light is absorbed into the atom it creates the >>> lightest weight difference. That Heaviness manifests at >>> the atomic solid surface. >>> >>>> >>>> Double-A >> >> >> Yes, an atom gains weight when it absorbs a photon. Even Einstein argued that when he said that it's inertia is increased. >> >> Double-A > > No the atomic doesn't speed up Einstein... > But light energy weighs at the atom surface. > > Mitchell Raemsch > Babbling gibberish, Roy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 22:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <adf7541d-35c6-4126-a0ef-c8c88565374f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711875 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 12:52:43 AM UTC+2, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 2:03:33 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 1:15:40 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: > > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > > > > > his 'curved space ''THEORY > > > > > > if so > > > > > > can anyone hear tell us > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > > > > > DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > > > > > --and around it > > > > > > and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > Y.Porat > > > > > > ======================== > > > > > > > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > > > > until now > > > > > no one can explain /describe > > > > > how curved space > > > > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > > > > I man not only in this NG > > > > > but in general and everywhere > > > > > just mumblings are going on here > > > > > and there > > > > > =============== > > > > > TIA > > > > > Y.P > > > > > =============== > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" > > > > > > When light is absorbed into the atom it creates the > > > lightest weight difference. That Heaviness manifests at > > > the atomic solid surface. > > > > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > Yes, an atom gains weight when it absorbs a photon. Even Einstein argued that when he said that it's inertia is increased. > > > > Double-A > > No the atomic doesn't speed up Einstein... > But light energy weighs at the atom surface. ===================== not clear ! 'energy weights at the Atom surface' but how ??? ?? what to you know about atom surface ?? in general sounds more of less reasonable but ] the devil and angle are in the details'' ATB Y.P ============================ > > Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 22:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <aa93aad5-3ebc-4e1c-825b-de6d7e63a28b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711866 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 12:03:33 AM UTC+2, Double-A wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 1:15:40 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:52:26 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > one of the big' Triumphs' of Einstein about > > > > > his 'curved space ''THEORY > > > > > if so > > > > > can anyone hear tell us > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --HOW WAS 'CURVED SOPACE' LOOK LIKE > > > > > DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!= > > > > > --and around it > > > > > and even if difficult - just in general lines ?? > > > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > Y.Porat > > > > > ======================== > > > > > > > > no answer is an answer as well !!!! > > > > until now > > > > no one can explain /describe > > > > how curved space > > > > look like at the Edington experiment !!! > > > > I man not only in this NG > > > > but in general and everywhere > > > > just mumblings are going on here > > > > and there > > > > =============== > > > > TIA > > > > Y.P > > > > =============== > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure Eddington was really into curved space. He kept making statements like "Light has weight!" > > > > When light is absorbed into the atom it creates the > > lightest weight difference. That Heaviness manifests at > > the atomic solid surface. > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > Yes, an atom gains weight when it absorbs a photon. Even Einstein argued that when he said that it's inertia is increased. > > Double-A ===================== indeed a pity that s many parrots do not get it !! never mind it is inevitable !! time -if not quick wit -- will do it!!! real revolutions always- took time sooner or later Thanks A A == Y.Porat ===========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "I. Seymour Butts" <invalid@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 09:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <prnap7$15em$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711412 |
No brain for posting just impotent boasting
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Jones <SJones1995@gmaile.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 19:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <prtkp5$1ea7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711412 |
Learn how to spell "Eddington" you boring lunatic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 22:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <aec8a12b-c36b-4e15-8d57-3656d66144d1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711944 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 5:05:14 AM UTC+2, Steve Jones wrote: > Learn how to spell "Eddington" you boring lunatic. ========================== little dreCK pig shit - miserable creature -hired gangster this is not a Shakespeare literature ng if you can comment physics -do it- if not than Fuick of !! or may be others here will fuck of ==== Y.P ========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 01:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3a4b8f73-b37e-4eff-930f-e4d1ee86e9af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711977 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 8:40:02 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 5:05:14 AM UTC+2, Steve Jones wrote: > > Learn how to spell "Eddington" you boring lunatic. > > ========================== > little dreCK pig shit - miserable creature -hired gangster > this is not a Shakespeare literature ng > if you can comment physics -do it- if not > than Fuick of !! > or may be others here will fuck you of > ==== > Y.P > ======================== next ! to human laver decent human beings it is more than time for it == Y.P ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web