Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #710801 > unrolled thread

Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 18:42 +0000

#710801 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: why does Moroney talk to Dr Meyer's as if a baby? is it 

There you go, projecting again. FAIL.

>Why does Moroney talk to Dr. Meyer as if some baby? Is it because Meyer is
>in denial the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder section,

Oh you want to see the ellipse proof Again!!!

Here you go!


Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic 
sections are ellipses.

Some preliminaries:

Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used 
in the proof:

              ^ x
              |
             -+- <= x=h
         .'   |   `.
        .     |     .
        |     |     |
        '     |     '      
         `.   |   .'
 y <----------+ <= x=0
             
Cone (side view):
                 .
                /|\
               / | \
              /b |  \
             /---+---' <= x = h
            /    |'   \
           /   ' |     \
          / '    |      \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
        /    a   |        \

Proof:

r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x  and  d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x,  hence

y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1  ...equation of an ellipse

qed



>Michael Moroney writes:
>Oct 31 (10 hours ago)
>>[Plutonium's posts are nothing but] 25 years of babbling and
>>attacking other posters, no math, no physics, only attacks and babble.

No comment, Failure Plutonium?


>On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> >>No answer?
>> >>
>> >>Can you round off 105.658 to three digits?
>> >>What is 106*9?
>> >>What is 105.658*9?
>> >>What is 105.658*9-938?
>> >>If someone owed you $900.00 and he gave you $888.00, would you be
>> >>satisfied that he paid you back in full?

Thanks for reminding me! You never did answer these simple questions!

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web