Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #710646 > unrolled thread

Porat-- why not post your abstract in sci.physics-- you babbling idiot

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-10-31 18:34 -0700
Last post2018-11-12 13:37 -0800
Articles 6 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Porat-- why not post your abstract in sci.physics-- you babbling idiot Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:34 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 03:18 +0000
      Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-01 04:05 -0700
        Never any physics from this posting fool, just baby talk and accusations of stealing Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 10:40 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 18:59 +0000
    Porat-- why not post your abstract in sci.physics-- you babbling idiot Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 13:37 -0800

#710646 — Porat-- why not post your abstract in sci.physics-- you babbling idiot

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-31 18:34 -0700
SubjectPorat-- why not post your abstract in sci.physics-- you babbling idiot
Message-ID<bdb44ad8-d2df-4a42-9bbd-6d49c12bf9fb@googlegroups.com>
On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 1:51:48 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Antisemitic Failure ,,
> 
> The posters of the sci.* groups have been pestered and harrassed by the
> insane babbling of 

Moroney says of Porat--Ah yes, the short version of the 12 Failures of

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 7:19:41 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure ,,,
> 
> Ah yes, the short version of the 12 Failures of 

AP writes: One of Porat's greatest failings as Moroney points out in his dissertation of bridge building is that the kook Porat claims he has an abstract somewhere. Well, abstracts are only a paragraph or page long, yet Porat has been posting for 10 years now directing everyone to go through a maze of websites for his virus laden abstract. I mean with anyone with a marble of a brain would after 10 years -- simply just post the cotton picking fake abstract of Porat into sci.physics, and why keep up the pretense that it is at some website. But, a microgram brain of Porat cannot understand-- why not post it-- you babbling idiot.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#710665 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-11-01 03:18 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<prdrah$o8q$4@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#710646
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: Porat-- why not post your abstract in sci.physics-- you babbling idiot

Archimedes Plutonium, why not do actual physics-- you babbling idiot

>On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 1:51:48 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Antisemitic Failure Plutonium,,

>> The posters of the sci.* groups have been pestered and harrassed by the
>> insane babbling of Archimedes Plutonium

>Moroney says of Porat--Ah yes, the short version of the 12 Failures of Plutonium

Plutonium, quit projecting! How could the 12 Failures of Plutonium be
about Porat when it is your name right there! And what huge failures the
12 Failures of Plutonium are! All kinds of stoopid false claims about the
unstable muon being parts of atoms! How dumb and stoopid is that???

>On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 7:19:41 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Math Failure Plutonium,,,

>> Ah yes, the short version of the 12 Failures of Plutonium

>AP writes: One of Porat's greatest failings as Moroney points out in his 
>dissertation of bridge building is that the kook Porat claims he has an

Hey, 60 bridges is a decent accomplishment. I can appreciate that as
my father was a civil engineer. What have you accomplished in your
earlier life? The pots were nice and clean and shiny? I vote for the 60 
bridges as a much bigger lifetime accomplishment!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#710711 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-01 04:05 -0700
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<679d2f5a-daa7-4657-ba5c-f56692780d82@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#710665
On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 5:18:44 AM UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
> 
> >Subject: Re: Porat-- why not post your abstract in sci.physics-- you babbling idiot
> 
> Archimedes Plutonium, why not do actual physics-- you babbling idiot
> 
> >On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 1:51:48 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> Antisemitic Failure Plutonium,,
> 
> >> The posters of the sci.* groups have been pestered and harrassed by the
> >> insane babbling of Archimedes Plutonium
> 
> >Moroney says of Porat--Ah yes, the short version of the 12 Failures of Plutonium
> 
> Plutonium, quit projecting! How could the 12 Failures of Plutonium be
> about Porat when it is your name right there! And what huge failures the
> 12 Failures of Plutonium are! All kinds of stoopid false claims about the
> unstable muon being parts of atoms! How dumb and stoopid is that???
> 
> >On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 7:19:41 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> Math Failure Plutonium,,,
> 
> >> Ah yes, the short version of the 12 Failures of Plutonium
> 
> >AP writes: One of Porat's greatest failings as Moroney points out in his 
> >dissertation of bridge building is that the kook Porat claims he has an
> 
> Hey, 60 bridges is a decent accomplishment. I can appreciate that as
> my father was a civil engineer. What have you accomplished in your
> earlier life? The pots were nice and clean and shiny? I vote for the 60 
> bridges as a much bigger lifetime accomplishment!

======================
THANK YOU  Moroney MY Friend

50   sixty bridges should be a nice achieving
for a lifetime
but as you  know 
I am a ** creator** in physics as well
 the  unprecedented model
of 3D nuclear structure 
etc etc 
the finding that
mass**  is the creator of ***all* forces 
INCLUDING GRAVITY!!
 that
curved space'' is nonsense   physics 

the y circlon mechanism
instead  of ''curved space''
etc etc 

oops 
 I sole all   that from
Archimedes Plutonium Uranium   Rectum ..
=====
TIA
Y.P
=======================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#711483 — Never any physics from this posting fool, just baby talk and accusations of stealing

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-04 10:40 -0800
SubjectNever any physics from this posting fool, just baby talk and accusations of stealing
Message-ID<88ac01a7-cc30-4540-a26a-fcbd35ef008d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#710711
On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:05:20 AM UTC-5, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:

> 
> ======================
> THANK YOU  Moroney MY Friend
> 
> 50   sixty bridges should be a nice achieving
> for a lifetime
> but as you  know 
> I am a ** creator** in physics as well
>  the  unprecedented model
> of 3D nuclear structure 
> etc etc 
> the finding that
> mass**  is the creator of ***all* forces 
> INCLUDING GRAVITY!!
>  that
> curved space'' is nonsense   physics 
> 
> the y circlon mechanism
> instead  of ''curved space''
> etc etc 
> 
> oops 
>  I sole all   that from
> Archimedes Plutonium Uranium   Rectum ..
> =====
> TIA
> Y.P
> =======================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#710808 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-11-01 18:59 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<prfiet$2pb$3@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#710646
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Why does Moroney and Christensen talk to Terry Tao as if a baby? Is it 
>because of ellipse or Calculus?

There you go, projecting again. FAIL.

>Why does Moroney talk to Dr. Meyer as if some baby? Is it because Meyer is
>in denial the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder 
section,

Oh you want to see the ellipse proof Again!!!

Here you go!


Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
sections are ellipses.

Some preliminaries:

Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:

              ^ x
              |
             -+- <= x=h
         .'   |   `.
        .     |     .
        |     |     |
        '     |     '      
         `.   |   .'
 y <----------+ <= x=0
             
Cone (side view):
                 .
                /|\
               / | \
              /b |  \
             /---+---' <= x = h
            /    |'   \
           /   ' |     \
          / '    |      \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
        /    a   |        \

Proof:

r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x  and  d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x,  hence

y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1  ...equation of an ellipse

qed



>Michael Moroney writes:
>Oct 31 (10 hours ago)
>>[Plutonium's posts are nothing but] 25 years of babbling and
>>attacking other posters, no math, no physics, only attacks and babble.

No comment, Failure Plutonium?


>On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> >>No answer?
>> >>
>> >>Can you round off 105.658 to three digits?
>> >>What is 106*9?
>> >>What is 105.658*9?
>> >>What is 105.658*9-938?
>> >>If someone owed you $900.00 and he gave you $888.00, would you be
>> >>satisfied that he paid you back in full?

Thanks for reminding me! You never did answer these simple questions!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712567

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-12 13:37 -0800
Message-ID<7b9fb168-67a9-4233-b80c-d9b1809dab5d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#710646
Apparently the sci.physics vandal— Porat thinks this is a science abstract— below— when all it is is insane murmuring
4:52 AMypor...@gmail.com
- show quoted text -
= 
===================== 
and you can add to it 
anonymous   Y.Porat 
with   his 
'no curvature and no schmervature of space ~~~ 
========================================================= 
mass is the creator of all ** forces including  gravity ! 
========================================================== 
that  is an   invention of Archimedes  Uranium Rectum 
I y p stile it from him as well ...   
  
'sorry  you have to addon that shit 'Time'' as   well !! 
it makes it more impressive !!! 

and   not 
f en    ****psychopaths ****** 
that don't stop promoting me 
Thank you psychopath   RECTUN URANIUM       
(:-) 
================================== 
Y.P 
================ 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web