Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #710257 > unrolled thread

Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change

Started bypandora <pandora@peak.org>
First post2018-10-29 17:26 -0500
Last post2018-10-31 11:33 -0400
Articles 19 on this page of 159 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-29 17:26 -0500
    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-29 18:41 -0400
      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 15:43 -0700
      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-29 23:16 +0000
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-29 18:24 -0600
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 19:01 -0700
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:36 -0400
            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 10:39 -0400
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:27 -0600
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 04:16 +0000
                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 22:28 -0600
                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-30 23:49 -0500
                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 23:28 -0600
            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:26 -0600
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 04:17 +0000
                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 12:03 -0400
                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 21:31 +0000
                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 14:33 -0700
                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 16:46 -0600
                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:42 +0000
                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:44 -0700
                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 21:58 -0700
                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:27 -0400
                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-29 20:25 -0500
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 18:59 -0700
    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 18:55 -0700
      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 18:59 -0700
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 17:11 -0700
      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-29 23:26 -0400
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 20:30 -0700
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-30 00:10 -0400
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 10:26 -0700
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-29 20:45 -0700
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-10-29 22:51 -0600
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 10:25 -0700
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 13:31 -0400
            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-30 14:09 -0400
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-30 17:30 -0700
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-30 13:58 -0400
            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 17:25 -0700
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 17:38 -0700
                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 19:11 -0700
                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-31 09:09 +0000
                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 10:00 -0400
                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-31 14:24 +0000
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-31 11:31 -0400
            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-01 00:29 -0400
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:30 -0400
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 10:50 -0400
                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 18:10 +0000
                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 14:35 -0400
                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-01 19:41 +0000
                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 21:35 +0000
      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-30 00:48 -0500
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 10:37 -0700
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-30 13:10 -0500
      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:49 -0400
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-30 10:11 -0700
        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 11:05 -0700
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-30 19:01 +0000
            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 12:08 -0700
              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-30 19:25 +0000
                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 16:05 -0400
                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 18:46 -0700
                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 11:06 -0400
                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-31 11:34 -0400
                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 11:41 -0700
                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 21:33 +0000
                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 17:47 -0400
                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 14:50 -0700
                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 21:54 +0000
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 18:14 -0400
                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:46 +0000
                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:48 -0700
                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 20:29 -0600
                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 22:01 -0700
                                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 10:21 -0400
                                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 10:30 -0400
                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:38 -0600
                                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:40 -0400
                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:43 -0600
                                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:48 -0400
                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:51 -0600
                                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 18:09 +0000
                                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 15:43 -0600
                                                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 21:47 +0000
                                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 16:07 -0600
                                                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:40 +0000
                                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-02 15:48 -0400
                                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 14:40 -0600
                                                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-03 01:43 +0000
                                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 20:09 -0600
                                                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-03 12:49 -0400
                                                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-03 19:04 -0600
                                                                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-04 05:30 +0000
                                                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-04 01:01 -0500
                                                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 08:27 -0700
                                                                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:46 -0500
                                                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:20 -0700
                                                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 23:00 -0800
                                                                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-07 13:07 -0600
                                                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Tin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-05 02:04 -0700
                                                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:56 -0800
                                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-11-02 21:51 -0500
                                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 18:23 -0400
                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
                                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 10:58 -0400
                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:59 -0600
                                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 11:07 -0400
                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 09:13 -0600
                                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 11:33 -0400
                                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 11:36 -0400
                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
                                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:33 -0400
                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:40 -0600
                                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:46 -0400
                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:50 -0600
                                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 18:13 +0000
                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 15:44 -0600
                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
                                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-02 14:24 -0400
                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
                                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-02 14:33 -0400
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 16:44 -0600
                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 15:14 -0700
                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:48 +0000
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:18 -0700
                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 21:55 -0700
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 20:30 -0600
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:41 +0000
                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 14:41 -0600
                                    Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-03 01:44 +0000
                                      Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 20:09 -0600
                                        Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-03 12:51 -0400
                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 13:47 -0400
                                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-04 05:32 +0000
                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 08:28 -0700
                                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-04 11:24 -0500
                                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 09:37 -0700
                                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:48 -0500
                                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:21 -0700
                                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Tin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-05 02:02 -0700
                                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 12:05 -0500
                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-03 19:04 -0600
                                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:58 -0800
                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 15:47 -0700
                          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 16:43 -0600
                            Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:47 +0000
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:49 -0700
                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 21:55 -0700
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 20:29 -0600
                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-31 22:43 -0400
                                Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 02:57 +0000
                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 22:42 -0600
                                  Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
                              Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
          Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-31 11:33 -0400

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

#711454

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-04 09:37 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3648ce1a69c6a901989d83@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#711453
In article <g17utd1pohln4she36pgo84vhrcom7vuj9@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 08:28:41 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
> >https://www.dailywire.com/news/36503/kavanaugh-accuser-lied-about-
> >background-has-ryan-saavedra
> 
> OMG!  Now Skeeter is just like Nads in that he is too stupid
> or lazy to post links that work. Wake up, Skeeter!  Although
> what passes for your mind is in the right place, your methods
> tend to further liberalism because people look at your text
> and ask themselves, "Is that what it means to be right wing?"
> 
> Then they answer, "Well if that's it, then I might as well be
> a leftist and a snowflake."  IOW, you do more harm than good.
> 
> We don't need a bunch of dummies and illiterates here on 
> the right. We need educated patriots who are enlightened
> enough to be able to actually express themselves rightly
> and with literacy.

It worked fine for me cupcake.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711460

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-11-04 11:48 -0500
Message-ID<prn7sr$vm1$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711451
On 11/4/2018 10:28 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <prm093$tqi$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:47:33 -0400, benj wrote:
>>> Sorry Pupa but you are not ready to think yet. Truth is that there was
>>> not ONE part of Blasey's statement (real lefty women do NOT adopt the
>>> names of their toxic male patriarchs) that was corroborated by ANYONE.
>>
>> Do the names "Deborah Ramirez" and "Julie Swetnick" not mean anything to
>> you?
> 
> https://www.dailywire.<SMACKAK00K!>
Right-wing k0oksh1t3.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/

"The Daily Wire presents news with a right wing bias in reporting and 
wording."

Try again?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711475

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-04 11:21 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3648e67942789b0e989d8a@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#711460
In article <prn7sr$vm1$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 11/4/2018 10:28 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <prm093$tqi$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> > says...
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:47:33 -0400, benj wrote:
> >>> Sorry Pupa but you are not ready to think yet. Truth is that there was
> >>> not ONE part of Blasey's statement (real lefty women do NOT adopt the
> >>> names of their toxic male patriarchs) that was corroborated by ANYONE.
> >>
> >> Do the names "Deborah Ramirez" and "Julie Swetnick" not mean anything to
> >> you?
> > 
> > https://www.dailywire.<SMACKAK00K!>
> Right-wing k0oksh1t3.
> 
> https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/
> 
> "The Daily Wire presents news with a right wing bias in reporting and 
> wording."
> 
> Try again?

Just as good as your citations.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711610

FromTin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com>
Date2018-11-05 02:02 -0700
Message-ID<6HTDD.1005262$RN2.342813@fx40.iad>
In reply to#711416
On 11/3/2018 11:32 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:47:33 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 11/3/2018 12:51 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit.
>>>>>>> Proof, kook?

Why is this crossposted to sci.physics?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711644

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-11-05 12:05 -0500
Message-ID<prpt8c$1cl0$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711610
On 11/5/2018 4:02 AM, Tin-Tin wrote:
> On 11/3/2018 11:32 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:47:33 -0400, benj wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/3/2018 12:51 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit.
>>>>>>>> Proof, kook?
> 
> Why is this crossposted to sci.physics?

Probably because the parent article was, and that because *its* parent 
article was, etc.; most people don't trim newsgroups when replying, even 
if the topic has drifted.

As for why the thread was crossposted to sci.physics in the first place, 
you'd have to ask the OP that.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711364

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-03 19:04 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.3647f398597d5ada989d65@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#711240
In article <prkjm6$10f4$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit.
> >>>> Proof, kook?
> >>> If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job.
> >> There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved false",
> >> kooktard.
> > 
> > Well it wasn't proved true so he is now SCOTUS...LOLOL
> 
> Goalpost move DENIED. The statement requiring defense was "Blasey-Ford's 
> story was bullshit", not "Kavanaugh was confirmed". You have failed to 
> defend the former statement. You are now considered to have conceded 
> that that statement was, itself, bullshit, meaning Blasey-Ford was not 
> lying.
> 
> SPNAK!

No proof, he won, simple.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711982

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-06 22:58 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.364c2ce95e2198cf9954bf@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#711240
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <prkjm6$10f4$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


b0rk3r
b0rk3rOn 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote:
b0rk3r>>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit.
b0rk3r>>>> Proof, kook?
b0rk3r>>> If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job.
b0rk3r>> There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved false",
b0rk3r>> kooktard.
b0rk3r> 
b0rk3r> Well it wasn't proved true so he is now SCOTUS...LOLOL
b0rk3r
b0rk3rGoalpost move DENIED. The statement requiring defense was "Blasey-Ford's 
b0rk3rstory was bullshit", not "Kavanaugh was confirmed". You have failed to 
b0rk3rdefend the former statement. You are now considered to have conceded 
b0rk3rthat that statement was, itself, bullshit, meaning Blasey-Ford was not 
b0rk3rlying.
b0rk3r
b0rk3rSPNAK!

Oh, but she was.  So was Havanaughty and his little bitch-for-hire.  Now 
they're both gonna burn big-time.  Maybe Ford will get busted too.  Of 
course she could just plead insanity.

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711127

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-02 15:47 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.364673df6bd4e4539953d3@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#711068
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pri99e$av1$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


===3 
===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
===3 On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 10:16:56 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
===3 
===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
===3 > Checkmate!  In article <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
===3 > @gmail.invalid says...
===3 > 
===3 >> Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk.
===3 > 
===3 > Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit.
===3 
===3 Proof, kook?

Kavanaugh said so, and I believe survivors of character assassination.

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710604

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-10-31 16:43 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.3643de0094e2efd9989c87@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#710578
In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> > 
> > 
> > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
> > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ===3 ===3 <...>
> > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
> > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female.
> > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3
> > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex objects
> > first and thinking beings almost last.
> > 
> > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and
> > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then they get
> > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can see all the pent
> > up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is certainly justified, but
> > some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old Christina Blassey, who decides to hang
> > out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party, and get drunk, doesn't
> > get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later.  Particularly since she
> > wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It doesn't deserve the same compassion
> > and sympathy that a real rape victim is entitled to.
> 
> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled to 
> compassion and sympathy?
> 
> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?

What is wrong with you? It never happened.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710633

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-11-01 00:47 +0000
Message-ID<prdif9$dmm$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#710604
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article
>> > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
>> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
>> > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > ===3 ===3 <...>
>> > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
>> > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female.
>> > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3
>> > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex
>> > objects first and thinking beings almost last.
>> > 
>> > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and
>> > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then they get
>> > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can see all the
>> > pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is certainly
>> > justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old Christina Blassey,
>> > who decides to hang out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party,
>> > and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later. 
>> > Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It doesn't
>> > deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape victim is
>> > entitled to.
>> 
>> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled
>> to compassion and sympathy?
>> 
>> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
> 
> What is wrong with you? It never happened.

That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710636

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-31 17:49 -0700
Message-ID<bna83h.n6c.17.13@news.alt.net>
In reply to#710633
On 2018-10-31 5:47 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>> by Checkmate!  In article
>>>> <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
>>>> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ===3 ===3 <...>
>>>> ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
>>>> ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female.
>>>> ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3
>>>> actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex
>>>> objects first and thinking beings almost last.
>>>>
>>>> I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and
>>>> sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then they get
>>>> angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can see all the
>>>> pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is certainly
>>>> justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old Christina Blassey,
>>>> who decides to hang out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party,
>>>> and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later.
>>>> Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It doesn't
>>>> deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape victim is
>>>> entitled to.
>>>
>>> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled
>>> to compassion and sympathy?
>>>
>>> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
>>
>> What is wrong with you? It never happened.
> 
> That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.
> 
yes it is

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710682

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-31 21:55 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3644273c2a05b699995379@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#710636
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bna83h.n6c.17.13@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


===3 
===3 On 2018-10-31 5:47 PM, Nadegda wrote:
===3 > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
===3 > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
===3 > 
===3 >> In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
===3 >> says...
===3 >>>
===3 >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
===3 >>> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
===3 >>>
===3 >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
===3 >>>> by Checkmate!  In article
===3 >>>> <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
===3 >>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
===3 >>>>
===3 >>>>
===3 >>>> ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
===3 >>>> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
===3 >>>> ===3 ===3 <...>
===3 >>>> ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
===3 >>>> ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female.
===3 >>>> ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3
===3 >>>> actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex
===3 >>>> objects first and thinking beings almost last.
===3 >>>>
===3 >>>> I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and
===3 >>>> sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then they get
===3 >>>> angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can see all the
===3 >>>> pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is certainly
===3 >>>> justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old Christina Blassey,
===3 >>>> who decides to hang out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party,
===3 >>>> and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later.
===3 >>>> Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It doesn't
===3 >>>> deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape victim is
===3 >>>> entitled to.
===3 >>>
===3 >>> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled
===3 >>> to compassion and sympathy?
===3 >>>
===3 >>> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
===3 >>
===3 >> What is wrong with you? It never happened.
===3 > 
===3 > That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.
===3 > 
===3 yes it is

Oh, yes indeedy!

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710655

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-10-31 20:29 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.36441309fabd5b10989ca9@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#710633
In article <prdif9$dmm$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> > says...
> >> 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> >> > by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
> >> > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > ===3 ===3 <...>
> >> > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
> >> > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female.
> >> > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3
> >> > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex
> >> > objects first and thinking beings almost last.
> >> > 
> >> > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and
> >> > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then they get
> >> > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can see all the
> >> > pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is certainly
> >> > justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old Christina Blassey,
> >> > who decides to hang out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party,
> >> > and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later. 
> >> > Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It doesn't
> >> > deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape victim is
> >> > entitled to.
> >> 
> >> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled
> >> to compassion and sympathy?
> >> 
> >> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
> > 
> > What is wrong with you? It never happened.
> 
> That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.

Yea? So what? People lie, she lied.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710659

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-10-31 22:43 -0400
Message-ID<prdp8o$67i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#710655
On 10/31/2018 10:29 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <prdif9$dmm$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>> says...
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>>> by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>> <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>>>
>>>>> ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
>>>>> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> ===3 ===3 <...>
>>>>> ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
>>>>> ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female.
>>>>> ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3
>>>>> actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex
>>>>> objects first and thinking beings almost last.
>>>>>
>>>>> I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and
>>>>> sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then they get
>>>>> angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can see all the
>>>>> pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is certainly
>>>>> justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old Christina Blassey,
>>>>> who decides to hang out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party,
>>>>> and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later.
>>>>> Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It doesn't
>>>>> deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape victim is
>>>>> entitled to.
>>>>
>>>> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled
>>>> to compassion and sympathy?
>>>>
>>>> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
>>>
>>> What is wrong with you? It never happened.
>>
>> That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.
> 
> Yea? So what? People lie, she lied.

She should be the next president if she can prove that she's a very 
great liar!

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710662

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-11-01 02:57 +0000
Message-ID<prdq3b$dmm$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#710655
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 20:29:54 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <prdif9$dmm$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> 
>> > In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> > says...
>> >> 
>> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
>> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
>> >> > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > ===3 ===3 <...>
>> >> > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
>> >> > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American
>> >> > female. ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome
>> >> > their ===3 actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being
>> >> > ===3 sex objects first and thinking beings almost last.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks
>> >> > and sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then
>> >> > they get angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can
>> >> > see all the pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is
>> >> > certainly justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old
>> >> > Christina Blassey, who decides to hang out with an older crowd at
>> >> > an unsupervised party,
>> >> > and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years
>> >> > later. Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It
>> >> > doesn't deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape
>> >> > victim is entitled to.
>> >> 
>> >> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not
>> >> entitled to compassion and sympathy?
>> >> 
>> >> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
>> > 
>> > What is wrong with you? It never happened.
>> 
>> That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.
> 
> Yea? So what? People lie, she lied.

Proof, kook?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710677

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-10-31 22:42 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.3644320b7ea88b3c989cb1@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#710662
In article <prdq3b$dmm$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 20:29:54 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <prdif9$dmm$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> > says...
> >> 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> 
> >> > In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> >> > says...
> >> >> 
> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
> >> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
> >> >> > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > ===3 ===3 <...>
> >> >> > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
> >> >> > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American
> >> >> > female. ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome
> >> >> > their ===3 actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being
> >> >> > ===3 sex objects first and thinking beings almost last.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks
> >> >> > and sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then
> >> >> > they get angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can
> >> >> > see all the pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is
> >> >> > certainly justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old
> >> >> > Christina Blassey, who decides to hang out with an older crowd at
> >> >> > an unsupervised party,
> >> >> > and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years
> >> >> > later. Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It
> >> >> > doesn't deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape
> >> >> > victim is entitled to.
> >> >> 
> >> >> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not
> >> >> entitled to compassion and sympathy?
> >> >> 
> >> >> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
> >> > 
> >> > What is wrong with you? It never happened.
> >> 
> >> That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.
> > 
> > Yea? So what? People lie, she lied.
> 
> Proof, kook?

Soon as you prove he's guilty.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711012

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.364525f34ddd3dcb99539a@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#710662
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <prdq3b$dmm$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


===3 
===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 20:29:54 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
===3 
===3 > In article <prdif9$dmm$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
===3 > says...
===3 >> 
===3 >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
===3 >> melt!
===3 >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
===3 >> 
===3 >> > In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
===3 >> > says...
===3 >> >> 
===3 >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
===3 >> >> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
===3 >> >> 
===3 >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
===3 >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article
===3 >> >> > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
===3 >> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
===3 >> >> > 
===3 >> >> > 
===3 >> >> > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
===3 >> >> > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
===3 >> >> > ===3 ===3 <...>
===3 >> >> > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
===3 >> >> > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American
===3 >> >> > female. ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome
===3 >> >> > their ===3 actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being
===3 >> >> > ===3 sex objects first and thinking beings almost last.
===3 >> >> > 
===3 >> >> > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks
===3 >> >> > and sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then
===3 >> >> > they get angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can
===3 >> >> > see all the pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is
===3 >> >> > certainly justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old
===3 >> >> > Christina Blassey, who decides to hang out with an older crowd at
===3 >> >> > an unsupervised party,
===3 >> >> > and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years
===3 >> >> > later. Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It
===3 >> >> > doesn't deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape
===3 >> >> > victim is entitled to.
===3 >> >> 
===3 >> >> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not
===3 >> >> entitled to compassion and sympathy?
===3 >> >> 
===3 >> >> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
===3 >> > 
===3 >> > What is wrong with you? It never happened.
===3 >> 
===3 >> That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.
===3 > 
===3 > Yea? So what? People lie, she lied.
===3 
===3 Proof, kook?

Prove she didn't lie, Ko0k.  That's how it works.

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711025

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3645968d54c736ac9953b1@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#710633
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <prdif9$dmm$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


===3 
===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:43:37 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
===3 
===3 > In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
===3 > says...
===3 >> 
===3 >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
===3 >> melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
===3 >> 
===3 >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
===3 >> > by Checkmate!  In article
===3 >> > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>,
===3 >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
===3 >> > 
===3 >> > 
===3 >> > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate
===3 >> > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
===3 >> > ===3 ===3 <...>
===3 >> > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang"  LOL...
===3 >> > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female.
===3 >> > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3
===3 >> > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex
===3 >> > objects first and thinking beings almost last.
===3 >> > 
===3 >> > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and
===3 >> > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos.  Then they get
===3 >> > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them.  You can see all the
===3 >> > pent up anger in the Me Too movement.  Some of it is certainly
===3 >> > justified, but some of it isn't.  A 15-year-old Christina Blassey,
===3 >> > who decides to hang out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party,
===3 >> > and get drunk, doesn't get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later. 
===3 >> > Particularly since she wasn't raped, or even undressed.  It doesn't
===3 >> > deserve the same compassion and sympathy that a real rape victim is
===3 >> > entitled to.
===3 >> 
===3 >> So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled
===3 >> to compassion and sympathy?
===3 >> 
===3 >> What the fuck is *wrong* with you?
===3 > 
===3 > What is wrong with you? It never happened.
===3 
===3 That's not what Christine Blasey-Ford said, kooktard.

She lied through her dooshbag.

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710529

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-10-31 11:33 -0400
Message-ID<prci0d$qr$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#710408
On 10/30/2018 2:05 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pr9r1m$1kvp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> ===3 "Overall, the mantle is essentially in the SOLID state."
> ===3
> ===3 SPNAK!
> 
> Spank denied.  "essentially" doesn't mean solid.  Again, I refer you to
> the convection currents.  Solids don't have convection currents.

Clay-like solids do. And non-solids don't support shear stresses.

SPNAK! reinstated.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web