Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #710257 > unrolled thread
| Started by | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-29 17:26 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-10-31 11:33 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 159 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-29 17:26 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-29 18:41 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-29 23:16 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-29 18:24 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 19:01 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:36 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 10:39 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:27 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 04:16 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 22:28 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-30 23:49 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 23:28 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:26 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 04:17 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 12:03 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 21:31 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 14:33 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 16:46 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:42 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:44 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 21:58 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:27 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-29 20:25 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 18:55 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 17:11 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-29 23:26 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 20:30 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-30 00:10 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 10:26 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-29 20:45 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-10-29 22:51 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 10:25 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 13:31 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-30 14:09 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-30 17:30 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-30 13:58 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 17:38 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 19:11 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-31 09:09 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 10:00 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-31 14:24 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-31 11:31 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-01 00:29 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:30 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 10:50 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 18:10 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 14:35 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-01 19:41 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 21:35 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-30 00:48 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 10:37 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-30 13:10 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:49 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-30 10:11 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 11:05 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-30 19:01 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 12:08 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-30 19:25 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 16:05 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 18:46 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 11:06 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-31 11:34 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 11:41 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 21:33 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 17:47 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 14:50 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-31 21:54 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-31 18:14 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:46 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:48 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 20:29 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 22:01 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 10:21 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 10:30 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:38 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:40 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:43 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:48 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:51 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 18:09 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 15:43 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 21:47 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 16:07 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:40 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-02 15:48 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 14:40 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-03 01:43 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 20:09 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-03 12:49 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-03 19:04 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-04 05:30 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-04 01:01 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 08:27 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:46 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:20 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 23:00 -0800
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-07 13:07 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Tin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-05 02:04 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:56 -0800
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-11-02 21:51 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 18:23 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 10:58 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:59 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 11:07 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 09:13 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-01 11:33 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-01 11:36 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:33 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:40 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-01 10:46 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 08:50 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 18:13 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-01 15:44 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-02 14:24 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-02 14:33 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 16:44 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 15:14 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:48 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:18 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 21:55 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 20:30 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:41 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 14:41 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-03 01:44 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 20:09 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-03 12:51 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 13:47 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-04 05:32 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 08:28 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-04 11:24 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 09:37 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:48 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-04 11:21 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Tin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-05 02:02 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 12:05 -0500
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-03 19:04 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:58 -0800
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 15:47 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 16:43 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 00:47 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:49 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 21:55 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 20:29 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-31 22:43 -0400
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-01 02:57 +0000
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 22:42 -0600
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Dozens of World Heritage sites are endangered by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-31 11:33 -0400
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36459341ee06cc269953ac@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #710748 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <prf3l1$9i9$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ===3 ===3 On 11/1/2018 10:40 AM, Skeeter wrote: ===3 > his background says nothing, ===3 ===3 His background says everything. Here, read this again, maybe the clue ===3 will sink in all the way with one more reading: ===3 ===3 https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2OO9/ll/l2/meat-the-predators/ It doesn't say anything about Kavanaugh being guilty, Dooshbag. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 14:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pri4on$17hu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711021 |
On 11/2/2018 1:16 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <prf3l1$9i9$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > ===3 On 11/1/2018 10:40 AM, Skeeter wrote: > ===3 > his background says nothing, > ===3 > ===3 His background says everything. Here, read this again, maybe the clue > ===3 will sink in all the way with one more reading: > ===3 > ===3 https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2OO9/ll/l2/meat-the-predators/ > > It doesn't say anything about Kavanaugh being guilty, Dooshbag. You don't have to say anything about that. He looks guilty. Same as Lying Ted or Little Jerk Graham or Low Energy Jeb or Little Marco Rubio. Kavanaugh just didn't annoy the President yet, so he's not formally convicted. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.364595f9791e73549953b0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #710732 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <prf2r6$7h2$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ===3 ===3 On 11/1/2018 1:01 AM, Checkmate wrote: ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article <prdidf$dmm$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 ===3 > @gmail.invalid says... ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 Rest deleted as it's pure speculation *and* it's wrong. ===3 > ===3 ===3 > ===3 > Was it speculation on your part when you pronounced Kavanaugh "guilty"? ===3 > If not, you must have some "proof" that no one else knows about. Would ===3 > you care to share that proof with the rest of the class? ===3 ===3 The fact pattern around Kavanaugh is consistent with his being a serial ===3 predator of the classic type, from his own background, to multiple ===3 accusers having come forward (and the lack of evidence that anyone was ===3 paying people to accuse him, unlike the case with Mueller), to the ===3 described behaviors. ===3 ===3 Classic entitled fratboy creeper right out of that "Meet the Predators" ===3 article. ===3 ===3 Classic. You sure don't think like a scientist... or even an adult. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 14:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <s16ptd962hl308rlo9167ufpc8si61m715@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #711024 |
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:16:53 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <prf2r6$7h2$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... <...> >===3 Classic entitled fratboy creeper right out of that "Meet the Predators" >===3 article. >===3 >===3 Classic. > >You sure don't think like a scientist... or even an adult. LOL! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall 14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. --Theodore Kaczynski, Ph.D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 16:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3643de292472af38989c88@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #710592 |
In article <prd8aq$ndv$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:47:09 -0400, Stinky Glerrgzlz Hell, Fleabitten > Rapist gurgled: > > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 21:33:11 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > > > <...> > > > >>So, just because she (Blah Blah Ford) got lucky and managed to escape > >>she's not entitled to compassion and sympathy? > >> > >>What the fuck is *wrong* with you? > > > > Managed to *escape*? LOL. Since when does a woman have to escape from a > > situation she voluntarily placed herself in? > > Except she didn't, rape apologist and confessed rapist. Proof? I didn't think so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 15:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3643c92cf693fd3399536c@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #710578 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... ===3 ===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote: ===3 ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>, ===3 > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate ===3 > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: ===3 > ===3 ===3 <...> ===3 > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang" LOL... ===3 > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American female. ===3 > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome their ===3 ===3 > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 sex objects ===3 > first and thinking beings almost last. ===3 > ===3 > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks and ===3 > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos. Then they get ===3 > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them. You can see all the pent ===3 > up anger in the Me Too movement. Some of it is certainly justified, but ===3 > some of it isn't. A 15-year-old Christina Blassey, who decides to hang ===3 > out with an older crowd at an unsupervised party, and get drunk, doesn't ===3 > get a lot of sympathy from me 36 years later. Particularly since she ===3 > wasn't raped, or even undressed. It doesn't deserve the same compassion ===3 > and sympathy that a real rape victim is entitled to. ===3 ===3 So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not entitled to ===3 compassion and sympathy? ===3 ===3 What the fuck is *wrong* with you? You have to wonder how she could so easily "escape" from two older guys, if they were actually intending to forcibly rape her. Her story has more holes than a cheese grater. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 00:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #710600 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:14:40 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > ===3 ===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > snowflakes, melt! ===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate > wrote: > ===3 ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when > reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>, ===3 > > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > ===3 > > ===3 > > ===3 > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate ===3 > > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > ===3 > ===3 ===3 <...> > ===3 > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang" LOL... > ===3 > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American > female. ===3 > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome > their ===3 ===3 > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being > ===3 sex objects ===3 > first and thinking beings almost last. > ===3 > > ===3 > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks > and ===3 > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos. Then > they get ===3 > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them. You can > see all the pent ===3 > up anger in the Me Too movement. Some of it is > certainly justified, but ===3 > some of it isn't. A 15-year-old > Christina Blassey, who decides to hang ===3 > out with an older crowd at > an unsupervised party, and get drunk, doesn't ===3 > get a lot of > sympathy from me 36 years later. Particularly since she ===3 > wasn't > raped, or even undressed. It doesn't deserve the same compassion ===3 > > and sympathy that a real rape victim is entitled to. > ===3 ===3 So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not > entitled to ===3 compassion and sympathy? > ===3 ===3 What the fuck is *wrong* with you? > > You have to wonder how she could so easily "escape" from two older guys, Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 18:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bna9qb.4a2.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #710634 |
On 2018-10-31 5:48 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:14:40 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> ===3 ===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> snowflakes, melt! ===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate >> wrote: >> ===3 ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >> reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article >> <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>, ===3 > >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> ===3 > >> ===3 > >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate ===3 > >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 <...> >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang" LOL... >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American >> female. ===3 > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome >> their ===3 ===3 > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being >> ===3 sex objects ===3 > first and thinking beings almost last. >> ===3 > >> ===3 > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks >> and ===3 > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos. Then >> they get ===3 > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them. You can >> see all the pent ===3 > up anger in the Me Too movement. Some of it is >> certainly justified, but ===3 > some of it isn't. A 15-year-old >> Christina Blassey, who decides to hang ===3 > out with an older crowd at >> an unsupervised party, and get drunk, doesn't ===3 > get a lot of >> sympathy from me 36 years later. Particularly since she ===3 > wasn't >> raped, or even undressed. It doesn't deserve the same compassion ===3 > >> and sympathy that a real rape victim is entitled to. >> ===3 ===3 So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not >> entitled to ===3 compassion and sympathy? >> ===3 ===3 What the fuck is *wrong* with you? >> >> You have to wonder how she could so easily "escape" from two older guys, > > Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. > so was she
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 21:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3644270a7bf444c8995378@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #710644 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bna9qb.4a2.17.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... ===3 ===3 On 2018-10-31 5:48 PM, Nadegda wrote: ===3 > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ===3 > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:14:40 -0700, Checkmate wrote: ===3 > ===3 >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ===3 >> Checkmate! In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 ===3 >> @gmail.invalid says... ===3 >> ===3 >> ===3 >> ===3 ===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, ===3 >> snowflakes, melt! ===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate ===3 >> wrote: ===3 >> ===3 ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when ===3 >> reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article ===3 >> <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>, ===3 > ===3 >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... ===3 >> ===3 > ===3 >> ===3 > ===3 >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate ===3 > ===3 >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: ===3 >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 <...> ===3 >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang" LOL... ===3 >> ===3 > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American ===3 >> female. ===3 > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome ===3 >> their ===3 ===3 > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 >> ===3 sex objects ===3 > first and thinking beings almost last. ===3 >> ===3 > ===3 >> ===3 > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks ===3 >> and ===3 > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos. Then ===3 >> they get ===3 > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them. You can ===3 >> see all the pent ===3 > up anger in the Me Too movement. Some of it is ===3 >> certainly justified, but ===3 > some of it isn't. A 15-year-old ===3 >> Christina Blassey, who decides to hang ===3 > out with an older crowd at ===3 >> an unsupervised party, and get drunk, doesn't ===3 > get a lot of ===3 >> sympathy from me 36 years later. Particularly since she ===3 > wasn't ===3 >> raped, or even undressed. It doesn't deserve the same compassion ===3 > ===3 >> and sympathy that a real rape victim is entitled to. ===3 >> ===3 ===3 So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not ===3 >> entitled to ===3 compassion and sympathy? ===3 >> ===3 ===3 What the fuck is *wrong* with you? ===3 >> ===3 >> You have to wonder how she could so easily "escape" from two older guys, ===3 > ===3 > Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. ===3 > ===3 so was she And... there's the SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) <people applauding> -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 20:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.364413269c74f8ec989caa@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #710634 |
In article <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:14:40 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > ===3 ===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > > snowflakes, melt! ===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate > > wrote: > > ===3 ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when > > reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article > > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>, ===3 > > > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > ===3 > > > ===3 > > > ===3 > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate ===3 > > > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > ===3 > ===3 ===3 <...> > > ===3 > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang" LOL... > > ===3 > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American > > female. ===3 > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome > > their ===3 ===3 > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being > > ===3 sex objects ===3 > first and thinking beings almost last. > > ===3 > > > ===3 > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks > > and ===3 > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos. Then > > they get ===3 > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them. You can > > see all the pent ===3 > up anger in the Me Too movement. Some of it is > > certainly justified, but ===3 > some of it isn't. A 15-year-old > > Christina Blassey, who decides to hang ===3 > out with an older crowd at > > an unsupervised party, and get drunk, doesn't ===3 > get a lot of > > sympathy from me 36 years later. Particularly since she ===3 > wasn't > > raped, or even undressed. It doesn't deserve the same compassion ===3 > > > and sympathy that a real rape victim is entitled to. > > ===3 ===3 So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not > > entitled to ===3 compassion and sympathy? > > ===3 ===3 What the fuck is *wrong* with you? > > > > You have to wonder how she could so easily "escape" from two older guys, > > Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. Or the fact that it never happened.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 10:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.364596f677ebc9fe9953b2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #710634 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... ===3 ===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:14:40 -0700, Checkmate wrote: ===3 ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article <prd72n$ndv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 ===3 > @gmail.invalid says... ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 ===3 Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, ===3 > snowflakes, melt! ===3 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:41:05 -0700, Checkmate ===3 > wrote: ===3 > ===3 ===3 > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when ===3 > reading posts by ===3 > Checkmate! In article ===3 > <o2hjtd1vgvvr34apqnbctn60a44lfbj7o0@4ax.com>, ===3 > ===3 > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 ===3 On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:46:53 -0700, Checkmate ===3 > ===3 > <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: ===3 > ===3 > ===3 ===3 <...> ===3 > ===3 > ===3 ===3 >"she-bang" LOL... ===3 > ===3 > ===3 ===3 I kinda feel sorry for the plight of the American ===3 > female. ===3 > ===3 ===3 Try as they might, they simply cannot overcome ===3 > their ===3 ===3 > actions which actions pretty much *out* them as being ===3 > ===3 sex objects ===3 > first and thinking beings almost last. ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > ===3 > I won't say all of them, but a great many of them use their looks ===3 > and ===3 > sex appeal to manipulate men and stoke their own egos. Then ===3 > they get ===3 > angry and bitter if the wrong men hit on them. You can ===3 > see all the pent ===3 > up anger in the Me Too movement. Some of it is ===3 > certainly justified, but ===3 > some of it isn't. A 15-year-old ===3 > Christina Blassey, who decides to hang ===3 > out with an older crowd at ===3 > an unsupervised party, and get drunk, doesn't ===3 > get a lot of ===3 > sympathy from me 36 years later. Particularly since she ===3 > wasn't ===3 > raped, or even undressed. It doesn't deserve the same compassion ===3 > ===3 > and sympathy that a real rape victim is entitled to. ===3 > ===3 ===3 So, just because she got lucky and managed to escape she's not ===3 > entitled to ===3 compassion and sympathy? ===3 > ===3 ===3 What the fuck is *wrong* with you? ===3 > ===3 > You have to wonder how she could so easily "escape" from two older guys, ===3 ===3 Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 19:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pri99e$av1$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #711026 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 10:16:56 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > >> Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. > > Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. Proof, kook? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 14:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3646645f3f0c7a78989d39@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #711068 |
In article <pri99e$av1$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 10:16:56 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. > > > > Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. > > Proof, kook? If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job. SPNAK!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 01:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <priuie$av1$19@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #711092 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:41:25 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pri99e$av1$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 10:16:56 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> > @gmail.invalid says... >> > >> >> Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. >> > >> > Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. >> >> Proof, kook? > > If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job. > > S<MACKAKOOK!> There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved false", kooktard. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 20:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3646b15edec616c8989d4f@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #711167 |
In article <priuie$av1$19@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:41:25 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <pri99e$av1$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 10:16:56 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <prdigk$dmm$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > >> > > >> >> Irrelevant. But most likely it helped that they were drunk. > >> > > >> > Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. > >> > >> Proof, kook? > > > > If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job. > > > > S<MACKAKOOK!> > > There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved false", > kooktard. Well it wasn't proved true so he is now SCOTUS...LOLOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 12:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <prkjm6$10f4$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711172 |
On 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. >>>> Proof, kook? >>> If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job. >> There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved false", >> kooktard. > > Well it wasn't proved true so he is now SCOTUS...LOLOL Goalpost move DENIED. The statement requiring defense was "Blasey-Ford's story was bullshit", not "Kavanaugh was confirmed". You have failed to defend the former statement. You are now considered to have conceded that that statement was, itself, bullshit, meaning Blasey-Ford was not lying. SPNAK! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 13:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <prkmvk$16gb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711240 |
On 11/3/2018 12:51 PM, kensi wrote: > On 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. >>>>> Proof, kook? >>>> If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job. >>> There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved false", >>> kooktard. >> >> Well it wasn't proved true so he is now SCOTUS...LOLOL > > Goalpost move DENIED. The statement requiring defense was "Blasey-Ford's > story was bullshit", not "Kavanaugh was confirmed". You have failed to > defend the former statement. You are now considered to have conceded > that that statement was, itself, bullshit, meaning Blasey-Ford was not > lying. > > SPNAK! > Sorry Pupa but you are not ready to think yet. Truth is that there was not ONE part of Blasey's statement (real lefty women do NOT adopt the names of their toxic male patriarchs) that was corroborated by ANYONE. That does not prove she was lying but it leaves not even a hint that what she said was true. You on the other hand are always lying (as proved above) so there is no doubt about you. Come back when you have even ONE witness who remembers that party and Blasey even being there. In your commie world the ends always justifies the means. That's how 100 million people were murdered without a second thought. Ruining a man's life and that of his family and kids is small potatoes in comparison.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 05:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prm093$tqi$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #711251 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:47:33 -0400, benj wrote: > On 11/3/2018 12:51 PM, kensi wrote: >> On 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. >>>>>> Proof, kook? >>>>> If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job. >>>> There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved >>>> false", >>>> kooktard. >>> >>> Well it wasn't proved true so he is now SCOTUS...LOLOL >> >> Goalpost move DENIED. The statement requiring defense was >> "Blasey-Ford's story was bullshit", not "Kavanaugh was confirmed". You >> have failed to defend the former statement. You are now considered to >> have conceded that that statement was, itself, bullshit, meaning >> Blasey-Ford was not lying. >> >> SPNAK! > > Sorry Pupa but you are not ready to think yet. Truth is that there was > not ONE part of Blasey's statement (real lefty women do NOT adopt the > names of their toxic male patriarchs) that was corroborated by ANYONE. Do the names "Deborah Ramirez" and "Julie Swetnick" not mean anything to you? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 08:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3648be117233b5b5989d74@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #711416 |
In article <prm093$tqi$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:47:33 -0400, benj wrote: > > > On 11/3/2018 12:51 PM, kensi wrote: > >> On 11/2/2018 10:09 PM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>> Oh, it's relevant, alright, because her "hole" story was bullshit. > >>>>>> Proof, kook? > >>>>> If they proved they are true Kavanaugh wouldn't have a job. > >>>> There's a lot of middle ground between "proved true" and "proved > >>>> false", > >>>> kooktard. > >>> > >>> Well it wasn't proved true so he is now SCOTUS...LOLOL > >> > >> Goalpost move DENIED. The statement requiring defense was > >> "Blasey-Ford's story was bullshit", not "Kavanaugh was confirmed". You > >> have failed to defend the former statement. You are now considered to > >> have conceded that that statement was, itself, bullshit, meaning > >> Blasey-Ford was not lying. > >> > >> SPNAK! > > > > Sorry Pupa but you are not ready to think yet. Truth is that there was > > not ONE part of Blasey's statement (real lefty women do NOT adopt the > > names of their toxic male patriarchs) that was corroborated by ANYONE. > > Do the names "Deborah Ramirez" and "Julie Swetnick" not mean anything to > you? https://www.dailywire.com/news/36503/kavanaugh-accuser-lied-about- background-has-ryan-saavedra
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 11:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g17utd1pohln4she36pgo84vhrcom7vuj9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #711451 |
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 08:28:41 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: <...> >https://www.dailywire.com/news/36503/kavanaugh-accuser-lied-about- >background-has-ryan-saavedra OMG! Now Skeeter is just like Nads in that he is too stupid or lazy to post links that work. Wake up, Skeeter! Although what passes for your mind is in the right place, your methods tend to further liberalism because people look at your text and ask themselves, "Is that what it means to be right wing?" Then they answer, "Well if that's it, then I might as well be a leftist and a snowflake." IOW, you do more harm than good. We don't need a bunch of dummies and illiterates here on the right. We need educated patriots who are enlightened enough to be able to actually express themselves rightly and with literacy. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall 14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. --Theodore Kaczynski, Ph.D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web