Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #710571 > unrolled thread

Steve, you do understand if proton is really 840 Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-10-31 13:12 -0700
Last post2018-11-01 13:55 +0000
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Steve, you do understand if proton is really 840 Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 13:12 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 00:26 +0000
      Dr. Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 22:37 -0700
        Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 13:55 +0000

#710571 — Steve, you do understand if proton is really 840 Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-31 13:12 -0700
SubjectSteve, you do understand if proton is really 840 Re: Physics lifelong-generation Test & Steven Weinberg flunked it
Message-ID<644c8f51-df53-48c5-ad25-43f641a712d3@googlegroups.com>
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 10:36:47 PM UTC-6, Steve BH wrote:
> On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 3:41:59 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never.
> > 
> > Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.
> > 
> > PHYSICS TEST::
> > 
> > 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5?
> > 
> > So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron.
> > 
> > Steven Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test.
> > 
> > AP
> 
> You do realize that the charge to mass ratio of electrons was known (roughly) to Thomson before the turn of the century. If electrons weighed 200 times what they do, we'd have know about it in 1900.

Hi Steve, you do realize that when the real proton is 840MeV and the real electron is 105MeV, you cannot distinguish the two from the idiotic idea that proton is 938, electron .5 or thereabouts.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#710624 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-11-01 00:26 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<prdh7j$og3$6@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#710571
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>> of other professors. What would he do? He'll sneer "What a complete
>> nutcase!" and lrave, and never give you or your ideas another thought.

So is it true you never thought to stop and think how dumb and stoopid
your off-topic attack posts are?  You aren't very smart, are you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#710688 — Dr. Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-31 22:37 -0700
SubjectDr. Weinberg flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<f163870c-721a-4026-8bc4-fc6eb8db6628@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#710624
Why you talk of Dr Weinberg as a baby? Is it because he is ignorant foolish that real electron is 105 MeV proton is 840MeV inorder to have chemistry bonding

Michael Moroney
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails: 

>Discussion 
>Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker 
>By Zelos Malum 8 posts 61 views updated 10:48 PM 

>Discussion 
>Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test 
>By Michael Moroney 1 post 7 views updated 10:27 PM 

>Discussion 
>Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test (1) 
>By Jan 54 posts 1625 views updated 9:57 PM 

>Discussion 
>Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1) 
>By Michael Moroney 16 posts 159 views updated 9:50 PM 

>Discussion 
>WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim 
>By Dan Christensen 2 posts 10 views updated 9:00 PM 
... 

Stoopid Plutonium, it is you who is "clogging up sci.math". 
You started every single one of those topics in order to "clog up 
sci.math". Every single one. Just because someone else shows up on 
Google's broken list when you delete Google's copy of your initial post 
doesn't change the fact that you clog up sci.math by repeatedly posting 
attack posts. 

Also notice something else, Stoopid Plutonium? The word "Discussion" 
next to every single topic. Which means that it's for discussing things. 
People discussing your posts can't be stalkers. 

Do you have a problem with the English language? You don't seem to 
understand the following words: Discussion, stalk, we, proof/prove, 
racist, hate, fail etc. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#710717 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-11-01 13:55 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<prf0jn$21j$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#710688
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Why you talk of Dr. Conway as a baby, is it because he cannot tell a 
>ellipse from a oval?

Failure Plutonium, what is this with replying to my post in a completely 
different topic and then projecting your beliefs onto me about the subject
of the topic? Is that dumb or stoopid or what?

>Michael Moroney
>Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails: 

>>Discussion 
>>Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker 
>>By Zelos Malum 8 posts 61 views updated 10:48 PM 

>>Discussion 
>>Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test 
>>By Michael Moroney 1 post 7 views updated 10:27 PM 

>>Discussion 
>>Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test (1) 
>>By Jan 54 posts 1625 views updated 9:57 PM 

>>Discussion 
>>Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1) 
>>By Michael Moroney 16 posts 159 views updated 9:50 PM 

>>Discussion 
>>WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim 
>>By Dan Christensen 2 posts 10 views updated 9:00 PM 
>... 

>Stoopid Plutonium, it is you who is "clogging up sci.math". 
>You started every single one of those topics in order to "clog up 
>sci.math". Every single one. Just because someone else shows up on 
>Google's broken list when you delete Google's copy of your initial post 
>doesn't change the fact that you clog up sci.math by repeatedly posting 
>attack posts. 

>Also notice something else, Stoopid Plutonium? The word "Discussion" 
>next to every single topic. Which means that it's for discussing things. 
>People discussing your posts can't be stalkers. 

>Do you have a problem with the English language? You don't seem to 
>understand the following words: Discussion, stalk, we, proof/prove, 
>racist, hate, fail etc. 

Hey Uncle Al, is this autistic behavior of Archie's the sign of a
super duper genius or of a loser?


"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean rock-hard
stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.  Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.  
Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape.  Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid."

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web