Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #706609 > unrolled thread

Moroney seems to think autism creeping into Nobel physics awards Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Moroney seems to think autism creeping into Nobel physics awards Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:41 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-08 13:58 +0000
      Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 13:35 -0700
        Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-08 20:48 +0000
          Moroney says: Racist Physicists, Peter Higgs, Francois Englert, Adam Riess, Brian P. Schmidt, Saul Perlmutter, Toshihide Maskawa, Makoto Kobayashi, George Smoot, John C. Mather// fail in Chemistry bonding for it cannot exist when proton=938MeV, elect Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 15:19 -0700
            Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-09 06:58 +0000
              Jerome Friedman, PHYSICS RACISTS George Zweig, Murray Gell-Mann,Adam Riess, Henry Kendall, Richard Taylor, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, George F. Smoot//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 03:24 -0700
                Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-09 14:48 +0000
                  stop Racist math and physics organizations from hiring these pathetic stalking imps like kibo,shein,Moroney, std of Boston Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:55 -0700
                    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-09 23:12 +0000

#706609 — Moroney seems to think autism creeping into Nobel physics awards Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

Moroney must be autistic to call everyone else such

On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 11:29:08 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael 
> >Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's 
> >monopole
> 
> >Michael Moroney wrote:
> >6:04 PM (53 minutes ago)
> 
> >>Archie may be making progress with his autism.
> 
> >AP writes: AP does math in sci.math, does physics in sci.physics.
> 
> No, AP does not "do math" in sci.math.  AP does not "do physics" in
> sci.physics.  AP babbles nonsense in sci.math.  AP babbles more nonsense
> in sci.physics. Posting a claim and then saying "it's true because I say
> so!" is not "doing math" or "doing physics".  Not without a formal math
> proof or following the scientific method for physics.  Attacking people
> who disagree or point out flaws is not "doing math" or "doing physics".
> Character assassination is not "doing math" or "doing physics".  And
> especially, saying "X is false because I say so!" when formal math proofs
> exist that X is true and you can't disprove them, is not "doing math".  
> (Can you say "conic sections" and "ellipse", boys and girls?)
> 
> 
> >> That cracked me up as well. Mr. Plutonium is one of the most illogical
> >> posters here, and that's saying a lot.
> 
> >> One of the most absurd examples of Plutonium illogic:
> 
> >> 1) All matter is made of atoms.    (OK, disregarding potential exotic matter)
> >> 2) The universe is made up of all matter.   (OK.)
> >> 3) Therefore, the universe is a single atom.  (Say WHAT????)
> 
> >> So according to Plutonium, Large Number + Large Number + Large Number + ... = 1!
> >> How illogical. Must be that new redefined Plutonium math.
> 
> >Moroney is so insane, he cannot even do percentages correctly, and never 
> >admits mistakes-- his only posts are I hate your guts-- why should I or 
> >anyone have to put up with a insane stalker for 26 years
> 
> Discussing things in a discussion group is not stalking.
> 
> >It is no wonder that in 1993, most posts to sci.math and sci.physics 
> >were by people in colleges and had college ID's, but by 1999 you rarely 
> >saw any true full name nor a college where the post came from. Why? 
> 
> Because nonsense posters such as yourself chased all the scientists away.
> 
> I can think of *just one* known scientist who currently posts in
> sci.physics. Tom from (I think) Fermilab. And not so much from him.
> 
> Let's look at all the "physics" posted to sci.physics by looking at some
> recent topics:
> 
> "She hurt me back in 1999 and I have to write about it again and again!"
> "There is no such thing as gaseous water below the boiling point!"
> "All planets are red, even the ones that aren't red."
> "The electron is a muon because I say so!"
> "I don't have a cell phone."
> "My Greatness Explained"
> "Einstein is wrong because I don't understand what he said"
> "<random university> <random staff member>, is this your spammer robot?"
> "What's wrong with negroes?"
> "Everything is fractal precessing spinny things"
> [plus much babbling]
> 
> That is physics???
> 
> 
> >Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- 
> >Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV
> >= Dirac's monopole
> 
> I'll remind you that I never attended Harvard nor MIT. A hint: Right 
> country, wrong state.
> 
> <snip crap>
> 
> And here the autism kicks in. The professor stalker list and that bizarre
> owl/cat thing. But at least no repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"
> so things have improved. However you double posted it, then again before
> you would have posted it multiple times, so still somewhat improved.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#706625 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Autistic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

> Moroney must be autistic to call everyone else such

Pluto, you _demonstrate_ your autism by REPEATEDLY reposting the same old
crap with stalker lists, poor ascii art and non-proofs. Why else would you
be so illogical? Your autism (plus maybe OCD) OWNS you!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706737 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:58:25 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
Michael Moroney 	
8:53 AM (6 hours ago)

Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails: 

>AP wrote: 

>Don't you think Dr. Gell-Mann knows all that and far better than your 
>crank dull mind. 

Well he certainly knows better than _your_ crank dull mind! He knows muons 
only last about 2.2 microseconds!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706749 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 9:03:24 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Michael Moroney         
>8:53 AM (6 hours ago)

>Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

>Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium_archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>>AP wrote:

>>Don't you think Dr. Gell-Mann knows all that and far better than your
>>crank dull mind.

>Well he certainly knows better than _your_ crank dull mind! He knows muons
>only last about 2.2 microseconds!

So how will you fix this glaring mistake?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706770 — Moroney says: Racist Physicists, Peter Higgs, Francois Englert, Adam Riess, Brian P. Schmidt, Saul Perlmutter, Toshihide Maskawa, Makoto Kobayashi, George Smoot, John C. Mather// fail in Chemistry bonding for it cannot exist when proton=938MeV, elect

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 3:48:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
Moroney the std Boston stalker

Moroney says: Racist Physicists, Peter Higgs, Francois Englert, Adam Riess, Brian P. Schmidt, Saul Perlmutter, Toshihide Maskawa, Makoto Kobayashi, George Smoot, John C. Mather// fail in Chemistry bonding for it cannot exist when proton=938MeV, electron=.5MeV


The knowledge that Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840 MeV, and the .5MeV was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole is going on 2 years now in the public eye starting 2017. Yet why are no physicists debating the issue?? Because they are racists at heart, they hate the idea that Archimedes Plutonium discovered this,and so they deny and reject this truth, and not really true genuine scientists. Much as we despise those modern day so called scientists who reject and deny Global Warming-- racist scientists and never really scientists at all.


On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 10:02:30 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
Boston's std 26 year long stalkers shein,kibo,Moroney -- just another stalk---

Moroney says: Racist Physicists, Barry Barish, Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss, John M. Kosterlitz, F Duncan M. Haldane, David J. Thouless, Arthur B. McDonald, Takaaki Kajita// fail in Chemistry bonding for it cannot exist when proton=938MeV, electron=.5MeV


DEFINITION of a racist-scientist , racist-mathematician 
Racist Mathematician & Scientist definition— this is a person or group of people who reject a idea or proof or experiment on simply the grounds of __who the person was__ that gave/discovered the idea___, proof, or experiment. Hatred of the source. Hatred of the author/s. Racists ignore or deny the truth because they hate the source. And racists would rather keep on teaching a fakery or wrong science than to change to the true science. 

Most people think Racist Mathematicians and Physicists are rare. But sci.math and sci.physics from 1993 to 2018 is proving that the majority of physics and math professors around the world are Racists, for example-- the AP proof ellipse is never a conic cut, but rather a cylinder cut. And the AP discovery that the Real Electron = muon = 105MeV, real proton = 840MeV, and the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole. 

Help stop Physics Racists by stopping their hired stalking hands on Internet

shein,std,kibo, Moroney 26 year virulent stalker harasser and pest 

                              .. 
            .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```....'`-.. 
           ,      . `.'            '        `. 
         .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ; 
         .   ;  .'                     . `.    ; 
         ;   . '                       `.  .   ' 
          . '                            ` `.  | 
        . '.                                  ' 
       .          0              0            ' `. 
      '                                          ` 
     ;                                            ` 
    .'                                             ` 
    ;                      U                        ` 
    ;    ';                                         ` 
    :   | ;..                                 :`     ` 
    :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    ' 
    '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    ' 
     ;       `        ;'..          ..-''    '     '  I am Moroney, stupid in physics, but a pestering hired bully by math and physics racists, trying to scrape together a joke off of another person by destroying their character and never doing any physics or math
      `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    ' 
       `       `        ;            ;      '    ' 
        `       `        ;          ;      '    ' 
         `       `.       ````''''''      '    ' 
           `       .                     '    ' 
         /  `       `.                  '    '        . 
        /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...' 
       /   .`   `       ``........-'     .'` .....''' 
      / .'' ;     `                    .'   ` 
  ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      ` 
   ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       ` 
           ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       ` 
           :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     ` 
                  |    '     `      '     `.    ` 
                  `   '       `     ;       `.  | 
                  `.'          `    ;         `-' 
                                `...' 



Can someone in the Boston area make sure this numbskull is never a science teacher in Boston-- and the damage he can do to a classroom 

Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first e.e. in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly 

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
  Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
  of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston?   

Yes, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

In that manner,  physics departments  are racist physicists for the knowledge that Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840 MeV, and the .5MeV was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole is going on 2 years now in the public eye starting 2017, yet none of these physicists (these poor physicists lacking understanding of angular momentum has raised a single peep). The reason they keep their mouths shut, is because they are so poor in physics, they do not want to be embarrassed. These gentlemen are not physicists, for a real physicist would debate the issue, not hide and run from the issue. And real physicist would not discount a discovery because of the person-- Archimedes Plutonium who discovered it. 


TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV , by Archimedes Plutonium 

page1 

History Preface:: 

A history Preface to this textbook Re: TRUE CHEMISTRY, textbook, 2018 

Alright, this textbook is written as a Memoir, in that I am writing it as a notebook, my daily activity, an historical accounting, along with a textbook of facts of True Chemistry. Both a textbook on True Chemistry and a historical accounting, both combined into one. So you will see many dates of posts throughout this Memoir. 

Now this book needs a Preface, to sort of tell people what it was like in the time period of 1897 when JJ Thomson discovered a .5MeV particle and then going on to believe he discovered the "electron of atoms", when in fact, what he discovered was the Magnetic Monopole of atoms. Yet the entire Scientific Community, whether physics, chemistry, biology, all were duped into thinking this .5MeV particle was the integral electron of atoms. So from 1897 until 2017 when I discovered the Real Electron = muon = 105 MeV, that community of scientists all fell duped to thinking electron= .5 MeV. 

Of course, that changes all of electricity, as we understood it in 1897 through 2017. So some time in the future, few people will understand what took place from 1897 through 2017, when all scientists thought the atom was a proton at 938MeV, neutron 940MeV and electron at .5MeV. Of course, my very first proof of the Real Electron is 105 MeV was instantaneous to my mind--chemical bonding, chemical bonding-- is it possible to have covalent bonding with 938 to .5 ??  For if the Real Electron is 105 MeV then the Real Proton cannot be 938, but had to be 840MeV, and then, chemical bonding covalent of 105 versus 840, all makes sense. 

This entire discovery was caused by a noting in 2016, that it takes 9 muons to make a proton (plus or minus less than 1%) To me, in science, I know all physics has outside "noise" and so when you say plus or minus less than 1%, means to me, anyway, that 9 muons = 1 proton. Now, sorry, but it took me another year from 2016 to 2017, to say-- Real Proton = 840 MeV. Sadly, to discover that 9 muons = 1 proton in 2016, took another year in 2017 to subtract 105 from 945 to see that the Real Proton was 840MeV. 

And the instantaneous proof that came to my mind, is, well, you just cannot have Chemistry, the Chemical bond of covalent, if the electron is .5MeV and the proton 938MeV, for the angular-momentum is just not there to make covalent bonding. If the Real Electron is 105MeV and Real Proton is 840MeV then you have sufficient numbers of MeV for angular momentum to create covalent bonding in atoms. 

But let me in this preface tell the story of how Electricity was imagined to be from 1897 to 2017. Electricity with the electron assumed as .5 MeV and proton at 938 MeV, that electricity in this view was seen as a electron particle that is wishy washy, here now, gone a second later flowing in a wire as electricity. In the new true view of electricity, electron = 105 MeV, proton = 840 MeV, it is rare for that electron of hydrogen atoms to ever leave its proton, and what electricity is-- is this monopole particle that assumes either a +1 or -1 charge and is fickle, for it can be attached to a hydrogen atom and with little to no encouragement, go flying off along a copper wire. Only, flying is a metaphor, for the Monopole is a photon or a neutrino dressed up (superposition) with .5MeV charge energy. So the monopole is a wave, a closed loop wave that becomes the shape of the closed loop wire itself. At the moment, I am rebuilding a crystal radio set I had as a Xmas gift from my father way back in about 1968. You see, the radio wave is a magnetic monopole, it is not an electron out of some atom. 

I need to build this Preface into a good logical history expose of how feeble was the understanding and teaching of What the Real Electron was in science from 1897 to 2017. 

How utterly feeble it is, to have millions of students around the world sitting in classes, hearing the teacher, the instructor saying that the electron is a .5MeV particle that runs along copper wires and yields electricity. 

When the real truth is, that electrons are very heavy particles of 105 MeV, 1/8 the mass of the proton at 840 MeV, and it is rare, extremely rare that this massive Real Electron ever leaves its proton, but that these magnetic monopoles flit around, flit here, flit there, flit almost everywhere, and these monopoles are electricity. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:32:28 -0800 (PST) 

Subject: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- 
 Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 21:32:28 +0000 

Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all 

Experimental PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 
by Archimedes Plutonium 

PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 

1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV 
Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy. 

Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:28:06 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: short history of subatomic particles of Physics Re: True Chemistry-- 
 2018 textbook 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:28:07 +0000 

short history of subatomic particles of Physics Re: True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook 

In my textbook True Chemistry, those new early pages, I need a chronology of history of how we viewed atoms, their constituent elementary particles, and electricity. For the blame as to not knowing the .5MeV particle was not the electron but a magnetic monopole, is the conceit of the minds of physicists, or should be say the naivety of the minds of physicists is that they were blown away by +1 and -1 charge. If we had taken off the table the electric charge. Then when JJ Thomson discovered this 1897 particle of .5MeV, if electric charge was not a issue, then Thomson, in my opinion would have realized it could not be the electron. 

So let me make a rough sketch of the history involved, the pertinent history. 

1861-1864, Maxwell wrote " A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field"-- a complete theory of electricity tying together magnetism, as EM, electromagnetism theory. Perhaps the single greatest physics book, or book in general, before the Atom Totality textbook. 

1897, J.J. Thomson discovers a .5MeV particle, with a -1 charge, which he names as electron, thinking it is the electron of atoms, which, it turns out by 2017 is the Dirac magnetic monopole, and the muon is the real-electron. 

1913, the Bohr model of the Atom, which gives no working role for its elementary subatomic particles of proton, electron, neutron, photon (of which the magnetic monopole is a photon with a charge energy-- or a neutrino with charge energy). Sadly, the Bohr model is lacking any sort of physical role for these subatomic particles, other than to say, let there exist a proton, let there exist a electron. It is this lack of a job or role or working marching order for subatomic particles that should have alerted all chemists, all physicists, that they have a looney tune model of the atom. In the true model of the Atom, come 2017, is that the elementary particles are doing a Faraday Law and Ampere Law sort of like a dance, a job, a commitment for their existence, inside the Atom, conducted by those protons and muons. Where protons as a coil and muon electron as a bar magnet creates new monopoles, converting Space into monopoles, and stored in neutrons as capacitors, which a hydrogen atom grows to become a deuterium atom etc etc. In other words, the creation of new atoms and heavier atoms is the job of existing atoms. 

1917-1920, Rutherford discovers the proton of what he thought was 938 MeV 

1931, Dirac with a paper on magnetic monopoles which in order to satisfy the quantization of electricity, which implies that monopoles must exist. 

1932, Chadwick discovered the neutron of 945 MeV. Now they discovered these particles, like the neutron and proton but would have to wait years before they refined their masses on how much mass they had. 

1936, Anderson & Neddermeyer discover the muon particle of 105 MeV. I do not know what year they found out it weighed 105 MeV. 

Now, the big question is why are the minds of physicists so backwards, so empty of Logical thought, because when the proton was discovered by Rutherford in 1917 and could measure its mass to be roughly 940 MeV and then Thomson's particle of .5MeV. So, the puzzling question is from 1917 to 2017 is a span of time of 100 years, and the astonishment that in those 100 years, every physicist, every chemist knew of the Covalent bond of chemistry, every one of them knew what angular momentum was, or had a reasonable notion of what angular momentum means-- at least we thought they knew, yet not a single scientist ever had the thought run through their mind-- stop a minute-- how can a covalent bond of chemistry exist if the proton was 938 versus .5MeV electron ?? How, how is that possible. When that is only possible if the proton was 840 versus 105 MeV. Is the simple and short answer-- no physicist in the 20th century had a good decent logical mind to think straight, to think clear. 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.       
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706803 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>A few clowns short of a circus.

>     A few clues shy of a solution.

>     A few brains short of a mind.

>     A few centimeters short of a meter.

>     A few kernels short of an ear.

>     A few links shy of a chain.

>     A few open splices.

>     A few peas short of a casserole.

>     A few pickles short of a jar.

>     A few pies short of a holiday.

>     99 short of 100

>     A few points short of a polygon.

Once again, Archie, you describe yourself perfectly!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706833 — Jerome Friedman, PHYSICS RACISTS George Zweig, Murray Gell-Mann,Adam Riess, Henry Kendall, Richard Taylor, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, George F. Smoot//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV

On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 1:58:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
same stalker b.s. from this 26 year long Boston jack o lantern-stalker

Jerome Friedman, PHYSICS RACISTS George Zweig, Murray Gell-Mann,Adam Riess, Henry Kendall, Richard Taylor, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, George F. Smoot//Chemistry bonding cannot exist when proton =938MeV, electron = .5MeV 


DEFINITION of a racist-scientist , racist-mathematician 
Racist Mathematician & Scientist definition— this is a person or group of people who reject a idea or proof or experiment on simply the grounds of __who the person was that gave/discovered the idea___, proof, or experiment. Hatred of the source. Hatred of the author/s. Racists ignore or deny the truth because they hate the source. And racists would rather keep on teaching a fakery or wrong science than to change to the true science. 

Most people think Racist Mathematicians and Physicists are rare. But sci.math and sci.physics from 1993 to 2018 is proving that the majority of physics and math professors around the world are Racists, for example-- the AP proof ellipse is never a conic cut, but rather a cylinder cut. And the AP discovery that the Real Electron = muon = 105MeV, real proton = 840MeV, and the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole. 

Help stop Physics Racists by stopping their hired hands on Internet, of hired stalkers: 
Michael Moroney writes: 
5:23 PM (3 hours ago) 
>Come on, Archie,   

shein,std,kibo, Moroney 26 year virulent stalker harasser and pest 

                              .. 
            .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```....'`-.. 
           ,      . `.'            '        `. 
         .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ; 
         .   ;  .'                     . `.    ; 
         ;   . '                       `.  .   ' 
          . '                            ` `.  | 
        . '.                                  ' 
       .          0              0            ' `. 
      '                                          ` 
     ;                                            ` 
    .'                                             ` 
    ;                      U                        ` 
    ;    ';                                         ` 
    :   | ;..                                 :`     ` 
    :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    ' 
    '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    ' 
     ;       `        ;'..          ..-''    '     '  I am Moroney, stupid in physics, but a pestering hired bully by math and physics racists, trying to scrape together a joke off of another person by destroying their character 
      `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    ' 
       `       `        ;            ;      '    ' 
        `       `        ;          ;      '    ' 
         `       `.       ````''''''      '    ' 
           `       .                     '    ' 
         /  `       `.                  '    '        . 
        /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...' 
       /   .`   `       ``........-'     .'` .....''' 
      / .'' ;     `                    .'   ` 
  ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      ` 
   ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       ` 
           ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       ` 
           :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     ` 
                  |    '     `      '     `.    ` 
                  `   '       `     ;       `.  | 
                  `.'          `    ;         `-' 
                                `...' 



Can someone in the Boston area make sure this numbskull is never a science teacher in Boston-- and the damage he can do to a classroom 

Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first ee in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly 

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
  Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
  of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) 

MIT physics dept 
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young   

Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole 

Harvard Physics dept 
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai 
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau 
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine 
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii 
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul 
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson 
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin 


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston?   

Yes, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

In that manner,  physics departments are racist physicists for the knowledge that Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840 MeV, and the .5MeV was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole is going on 2 years now in the public eye starting 2017, yet none of these physicists (these poor physicists lacking understanding of angular momentum has raised a single peep). The reason they keep their mouths shut, is because they are so poor in physics, they do not want to be embarrassed. These gentlemen are not physicists, for a real physicist would debate the issue, not hide from the issue. And real physicist would not discount a discovery because of the person-- Archimedes Plutonium who discovered it. 


TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV , by Archimedes Plutonium 

page1 

History Preface:: 

A history Preface to this textbook Re: TRUE CHEMISTRY, textbook, 2018 

Alright, this textbook is written as a Memoir, in that I am writing it as a notebook, my daily activity, an historical accounting, along with a textbook of facts of True Chemistry. Both a textbook on True Chemistry and a historical accounting, both combined into one. So you will see many dates of posts throughout this Memoir. 

Now this book needs a Preface, to sort of tell people what it was like in the time period of 1897 when JJ Thomson discovered a .5MeV particle and then going on to believe he discovered the "electron of atoms", when in fact, what he discovered was the Magnetic Monopole of atoms. Yet the entire Scientific Community, whether physics, chemistry, biology, all were duped into thinking this .5MeV particle was the integral electron of atoms. So from 1897 until 2017 when I discovered the Real Electron = muon = 105 MeV, that community of scientists all fell duped to thinking electron= .5 MeV. 

Of course, that changes all of electricity, as we understood it in 1897 through 2017. So some time in the future, few people will understand what took place from 1897 through 2017, when all scientists thought the atom was a proton at 938MeV, neutron 940MeV and electron at .5MeV. Of course, my very first proof of the Real Electron is 105 MeV was instantaneous to my mind--chemical bonding, chemical bonding-- is it possible to have covalent bonding with 938 to .5 ??  For if the Real Electron is 105 MeV then the Real Proton cannot be 938, but had to be 840MeV, and then, chemical bonding covalent of 105 versus 840, all makes sense. 

This entire discovery was caused by a noting in 2016, that it takes 9 muons to make a proton (plus or minus less than 1%) To me, in science, I know all physics has outside "noise" and so when you say plus or minus less than 1%, means to me, anyway, that 9 muons = 1 proton. Now, sorry, but it took me another year from 2016 to 2017, to say-- Real Proton = 840 MeV. Sadly, to discover that 9 muons = 1 proton in 2016, took another year in 2017 to subtract 105 from 945 to see that the Real Proton was 840MeV. 

And the instantaneous proof that came to my mind, is, well, you just cannot have Chemistry, the Chemical bond of covalent, if the electron is .5MeV and the proton 938MeV, for the angular-momentum is just not there to make covalent bonding. If the Real Electron is 105MeV and Real Proton is 840MeV then you have sufficient numbers of MeV for angular momentum to create covalent bonding in atoms. 

But let me in this preface tell the story of how Electricity was imagined to be from 1897 to 2017. Electricity with the electron assumed as .5 MeV and proton at 938 MeV, that electricity in this view was seen as a electron particle that is wishy washy, here now, gone a second later flowing in a wire as electricity. In the new true view of electricity, electron = 105 MeV, proton = 840 MeV, it is rare for that electron of hydrogen atoms to ever leave its proton, and what electricity is-- is this monopole particle that assumes either a +1 or -1 charge and is fickle, for it can be attached to a hydrogen atom and with little to no encouragement, go flying off along a copper wire. Only, flying is a metaphor, for the Monopole is a photon or a neutrino dressed up (superposition) with .5MeV charge energy. So the monopole is a wave, a closed loop wave that becomes the shape of the closed loop wire itself. At the moment, I am rebuilding a crystal radio set I had as a Xmas gift from my father way back in about 1968. You see, the radio wave is a magnetic monopole, it is not an electron out of some atom. 

I need to build this Preface into a good logical history expose of how feeble was the understanding and teaching of What the Real Electron was in science from 1897 to 2017. 

How utterly feeble it is, to have millions of students around the world sitting in classes, hearing the teacher, the instructor saying that the electron is a .5MeV particle that runs along copper wires and yields electricity. 

When the real truth is, that electrons are very heavy particles of 105 MeV, 1/8 the mass of the proton at 840 MeV, and it is rare, extremely rare that this massive Real Electron ever leaves its proton, but that these magnetic monopoles flit around, flit here, flit there, flit almost everywhere, and these monopoles are electricity. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:32:28 -0800 (PST) 

Subject: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- 
 Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 21:32:28 +0000 

Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all 

Experimental PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 
by Archimedes Plutonium 

PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 

1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV 
Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy. 

Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:28:06 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: short history of subatomic particles of Physics Re: True Chemistry-- 
 2018 textbook 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:28:07 +0000 

short history of subatomic particles of Physics Re: True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook 

In my textbook True Chemistry, those new early pages, I need a chronology of history of how we viewed atoms, their constituent elementary particles, and electricity. For the blame as to not knowing the .5MeV particle was not the electron but a magnetic monopole, is the conceit of the minds of physicists, or should be say the naivety of the minds of physicists is that they were blown away by +1 and -1 charge. If we had taken off the table the electric charge. Then when JJ Thomson discovered this 1897 particle of .5MeV, if electric charge was not a issue, then Thomson, in my opinion would have realized it could not be the electron. 

So let me make a rough sketch of the history involved, the pertinent history. 

1861-1864, Maxwell wrote " A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field"-- a complete theory of electricity tying together magnetism, as EM, electromagnetism theory. Perhaps the single greatest physics book, or book in general, before the Atom Totality textbook. 

1897, J.J. Thomson discovers a .5MeV particle, with a -1 charge, which he names as electron, thinking it is the electron of atoms, which, it turns out by 2017 is the Dirac magnetic monopole, and the muon is the real-electron. 

1913, the Bohr model of the Atom, which gives no working role for its elementary subatomic particles of proton, electron, neutron, photon (of which the magnetic monopole is a photon with a charge energy-- or a neutrino with charge energy). Sadly, the Bohr model is lacking any sort of physical role for these subatomic particles, other than to say, let there exist a proton, let there exist a electron. It is this lack of a job or role or working marching order for subatomic particles that should have alerted all chemists, all physicists, that they have a looney tune model of the atom. In the true model of the Atom, come 2017, is that the elementary particles are doing a Faraday Law and Ampere Law sort of like a dance, a job, a commitment for their existence, inside the Atom, conducted by those protons and muons. Where protons as a coil and muon electron as a bar magnet creates new monopoles, converting Space into monopoles, and stored in neutrons as capacitors, which a hydrogen atom grows to become a deuterium atom etc etc. In other words, the creation of new atoms and heavier atoms is the job of existing atoms. 

1917-1920, Rutherford discovers the proton of what he thought was 938 MeV 

1931, Dirac with a paper on magnetic monopoles which in order to satisfy the quantization of electricity, which implies that monopoles must exist. 

1932, Chadwick discovered the neutron of 945 MeV. Now they discovered these particles, like the neutron and proton but would have to wait years before they refined their masses on how much mass they had. 

1936, Anderson & Neddermeyer discover the muon particle of 105 MeV. I do not know what year they found out it weighed 105 MeV. 

Now, the big question is why are the minds of physicists so backwards, so empty of Logical thought, because when the proton was discovered by Rutherford in 1917 and could measure its mass to be roughly 940 MeV and then Thomson's particle of .5MeV. So, the puzzling question is from 1917 to 2017 is a span of time of 100 years, and the astonishment that in those 100 years, every physicist, every chemist knew of the Covalent bond of chemistry, every one of them knew what angular momentum was, or had a reasonable notion of what angular momentum means-- at least we thought they knew, yet not a single scientist ever had the thought run through their mind-- stop a minute-- how can a covalent bond of chemistry exist if the proton was 938 versus .5MeV electron ?? How, how is that possible. When that is only possible if the proton was 840 versus 105 MeV. Is the simple and short answer-- no physicist in the 20th century had a good decent logical mind to think straight, to think clear. 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.       
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706849 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Help stop Physics Racists by stopping their hired hands on Internet, of
>hired stalkers:

Hired stalkers? Too bad I'm not stalking anyone.

That sounds delusional, and paranoid.  You should talk to a mental health
professional and tell him that you are showing symptoms of paranoid
schizophrenia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706917 — stop Racist math and physics organizations from hiring these pathetic stalking imps like kibo,shein,Moroney, std of Boston

On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 9:49:02 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
same old 26 year long hatred missive-- for the creep can't even do percentage correctly with his 938 is 12% short of 945

Why Are Gods so Evil?#1
1 post by 1 author  



reber G=emc^2 	
3:11 PM (36 minutes ago)


#1 They come out of our id.#2 Our fear of death.#3 are fear of lightning #4 Are fear of each other.#5 Fear of fire.Gods bring out the worse in man.God wars.Burning humans in the name of God.Hanging humans in the name of god.Nailing people to crosses in the name of God. Many will hate me for posting this reality.I say shame on them,for I'm just coming up with what I read in history books. Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706933 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 9:49:02 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>same old 26 year long hatred missive-- for the creep can't even do 

I know you want me to tell you what a failure are, otherwise you just 
wouldn't keep asking me to respond!

So I respond, just like you asked me to!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web