Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #706479 > unrolled thread

Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-07 06:31 -0400
    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-07 12:07 +0000
      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-07 08:23 -0400
        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-07 12:50 +0000
          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-07 10:40 -0400
            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-07 15:36 +0000
              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-08 12:32 -0400
                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-08 19:56 +0000
            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-10-07 12:55 -0500
              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-07 14:01 -0400
                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-10-07 13:17 -0500
                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-07 14:35 -0400
                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-07 19:38 +0100
                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-08 16:42 -0500
                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-09 07:55 +0100
                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 12:44 -0700
                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-07 13:48 -0600
                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-07 14:59 -0500
                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-08 12:34 -0400
                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:26 -0700
                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-08 19:42 +0000
                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 12:59 -0700
                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-08 20:22 +0000
                            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-08 14:50 -0600
                              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-08 21:04 +0000
                                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-08 15:29 -0600
                                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-08 19:19 -0400
                                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 16:23 -0700
                                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-08 22:34 -0400
                                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-08 19:40 -0700
                                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 20:12 -0700
                                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-09 05:25 -0400
                                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-09 10:30 -0600
                                      How Real Is Fake News? "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-10-09 13:51 -0400
                                        Re: How Real Is Fake News? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 16:15 -0400
                                          Re: How Real Is Fake News? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-09 16:27 -0500
                                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-09 19:14 +0100
                                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-09 16:29 -0500
                                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 12:06 -0700
                                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-09 15:07 -0400
                                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-09 16:32 -0500
                                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 15:02 -0700
                            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-10-09 02:24 -0600
                              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-09 05:27 -0400
                                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-09 10:29 -0600
                                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-09 12:32 -0400
                                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-09 20:22 +0000
                                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:27 -0700
                                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:36 -0700
                                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-10-09 20:53 +0000
                                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-10 03:37 +0000
                                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-10-10 05:11 +0000
                                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 22:51 -0700
                                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 10:44 -0700
                                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-09 13:02 -0500
                              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 10:43 -0700
                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-08 14:30 -0600
                            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 13:43 -0700
                              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-08 15:06 -0600
                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-08 14:25 -0600
                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 14:36 -0400
                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-08 19:53 +0000
                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-08 16:06 -0400
                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-08 20:33 +0000
                            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-08 16:37 -0400
                              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-08 20:54 +0000
                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-08 14:29 -0600
                          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-08 15:39 -0500
              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-08 16:40 -0500
                Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-09 05:28 -0400
                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-09 09:31 +0000
                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-09 05:57 -0400
                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-09 10:00 +0000
                        Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-09 06:09 -0400
                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-09 10:31 -0600
                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:08 -0700
                            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-09 20:23 +0000
                              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:31 -0700
                          Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-09 18:33 -0400
                            Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-09 19:29 -0400
                              Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-10 03:38 +0000
                      Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-09 10:31 -0600
                  Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-09 10:30 -0600
                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-09 12:38 -0400
                    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-09 13:01 -0500
    Re: Climate change effects surfacing faster in Gulf of St. Lawrence benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:28 -0400

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

#706924

On 10/9/2018 2:07 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:06:01 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <pphs6e$8p2$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>
>>>>>> I saw the video where that moron was teaching them what to say, how to
>>>>>> say it and how to start trouble.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did you see this alleged "video"? Infowars? Breitbart?
>>>>
>>>> On TV
>>>
>>> Ah, so, Fox then.
>>
>> So you're implying this didn't happen?  I saw two different videos where 
>> the organizer gave their crowd of mindless zombies instructions, a few 
>> words at a time, and made them repeat back those instructions word for 
>> word... like mindless zombies.  One of those coaches was a man, whose 
>> name I don't know.  This took place in a hallway of a building.  The 
>> other was a woman, in full muzzie garb, whose name I DO know.  That 
>> person was a muslim activist by the name of Linda Sarsour... a well-known 
>> troublemaker, who's been arrested numerous times, including during the 
>> Kavanaugh vote.  Ignorant American Millennials being indoctrinated by a 
>> sworn enemy of the State.  Here's what Sarsour REALLY thinks of women, 
>> and their genitals:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/JDzCWDdfMhI?t=158
> 
> Fucking libtards are often their own worst enemy.
> 

they should "save the planet" by completly stopping their exhaling
deadly CO2 globall Worming Gas.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706767

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <ppggpb$1dc$49@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> > I saw the video where that moron was teaching them what to say, how to
> > say it and how to start trouble.
> 
> Where did you see this alleged "video"? Infowars? Breitbart?
> 

I can't speak for Skeeter, but I saw it on Fox.  I doubt that CNN or 
MSNBC would want you to see it.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706816

On 10/8/2018 2:22 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 12:59:13 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

>> Zombie chanters and elevator screamers are anarchy.
> 
> No, they're people exercising their First Amendment rights.
> 
>> Guilt by accusation is anarchy.
> 
> What is erecting strawmen?
> 
>> Violating the civil rights of Americans to enjoy dining out
>> or being in public without harassment is anarchy.
> 
> No, they're people exercising their First Amendment rights.
The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free
speech.  That means you can't always say anything you want,
whenever you want, wherever you want.  You don't have a
first amendment right to say whatever you want on someone
else's private property, which a restaurant is.  You might
have to content yourself with protesting on the public
sidewalk outside the establishment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706822

On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
> The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
> There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free
> speech.  That means you can't always say anything you want,
> whenever you want, wherever you want.  You don't have a
> first amendment right to say whatever you want on someone
> else's private property, which a restaurant is.  You might
> have to content yourself with protesting on the public
> sidewalk outside the establishment.

That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner is 
a Democrat?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706865

In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free
> > speech.  That means you can't always say anything you want,
> > whenever you want, wherever you want.  You don't have a
> > first amendment right to say whatever you want on someone
> > else's private property, which a restaurant is.  You might
> > have to content yourself with protesting on the public
> > sidewalk outside the establishment.
> 
> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner is 
> a Democrat?

Then he needs to be shot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706870

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
>> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free
>> > speech.  That means you can't always say anything you want,
>> > whenever you want, wherever you want.  You don't have a
>> > first amendment right to say whatever you want on someone
>> > else's private property, which a restaurant is.  You might
>> > have to content yourself with protesting on the public
>> > sidewalk outside the establishment.
>> 
>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner is 
>> a Democrat?
>
>Then he needs to be shot.

I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Sometimes it's hard to tell them apart.
When he drowns in his shit bucket, I plan 
to nominate him for a Darwin." 
--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706906

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:32:48 -0400, Stinky Gerglly Hell,  Rapist wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>>In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
>>> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech.  That
>>> > means you can't always say anything you want, whenever you want,
>>> > wherever you want.  You don't have a first amendment right to say
>>> > whatever you want on someone else's private property, which a
>>> > restaurant is.  You might have to content yourself with protesting
>>> > on the public sidewalk outside the establishment.
>>> 
>>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner
>>> is a Democrat?
>>
>>Then he needs to be shot.
> 
> I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...

You two wannabe domestic terrorists have just been reported to the FBI.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706909

On 2018-10-09 1:22 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:32:48 -0400, Stinky Gerglly Hell,  Rapist wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>> In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>> The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
>>>>> There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech.  That
>>>>> means you can't always say anything you want, whenever you want,
>>>>> wherever you want.  You don't have a first amendment right to say
>>>>> whatever you want on someone else's private property, which a
>>>>> restaurant is.  You might have to content yourself with protesting
>>>>> on the public sidewalk outside the establishment.
>>>>
>>>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner
>>>> is a Democrat?
>>>
>>> Then he needs to be shot.
>>
>> I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...
> 
> You two wannabe domestic terrorists have just been reported to the FBI.
> 
the fbi isn't the department that handles terrorism

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706913

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <ppj2m0$1dc$55@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:32:48 -0400, Stinky Gerglly Hell,  Rapist wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >>In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >>kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> >>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
> >>> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
> >>> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech.  That
> >>> > means you can't always say anything you want, whenever you want,
> >>> > wherever you want.  You don't have a first amendment right to say
> >>> > whatever you want on someone else's private property, which a
> >>> > restaurant is.  You might have to content yourself with protesting
> >>> > on the public sidewalk outside the establishment.
> >>> 
> >>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner
> >>> is a Democrat?
> >>
> >>Then he needs to be shot.
> > 
> > I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...
> 
> You two wannabe domestic terrorists have just been reported to the FIB.

You can't even spell it, much less do it.




j

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706918

In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:32:48 -0400, Stinky Gerglly Hell,  Rapist wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>>In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
>>>> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech.  That
>>>> > means you can't always say anything you want, whenever you want,
>>>> > wherever you want.  You don't have a first amendment right to say
>>>> > whatever you want on someone else's private property, which a
>>>> > restaurant is.  You might have to content yourself with protesting
>>>> > on the public sidewalk outside the establishment.
>>>> 
>>>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner
>>>> is a Democrat?
>>>
>>>Then he needs to be shot.
>> 
>> I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...
> 
> You two wannabe domestic terrorists have just been reported to the FBI.
 
There are federal officials on pins and needles waiting for the latest
semi-coherent USENET babble.

BTW, since 9/11 terrorism is the purview of DHS.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706961

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:53:32 +0000, jimp wrote:

> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:32:48 -0400, Stinky Gerglly Hell,  Rapist wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>>In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>>>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
>>>>> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech. 
>>>>> > That means you can't always say anything you want, whenever you
>>>>> > want, wherever you want.  You don't have a first amendment right
>>>>> > to say whatever you want on someone else's private property, which
>>>>> > a restaurant is.  You might have to content yourself with
>>>>> > protesting on the public sidewalk outside the establishment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the
>>>>> owner is a Democrat?
>>>>
>>>>Then he needs to be shot.
>>> 
>>> I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...
>> 
>> You two wannabe domestic terrorists have just been reported to the FBI.
>  
> There are federal officials on pins and needles waiting for the latest
> semi-coherent USENET babble.
> 
> BTW, since 9/11 terrorism is the purview of DHS.

International, maybe, but domestic?

https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism

----------
To counter terrorism, the FBI's top investigative priority, we use our 
investigative and intelligence capabilities to neutralize domestic 
extremists
----------

Are you people planning to be correct about *anything*, *anytime* soon, or 
is that against the rules and you'll have your Rapepublican membership 
cards taken away and shredded if you ever get caught making an accurate 
factual statement in public?

<snicker>

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/dt

Hmm, interesting, one of these dudes strongly resembles Skeeter!

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706971

In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:53:32 +0000, jimp wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:32:48 -0400, Stinky Gerglly Hell,  Rapist wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>>kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>>>>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
>>>>>> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech. 
>>>>>> > That means you can't always say anything you want, whenever you
>>>>>> > want, wherever you want.  You don't have a first amendment right
>>>>>> > to say whatever you want on someone else's private property, which
>>>>>> > a restaurant is.  You might have to content yourself with
>>>>>> > protesting on the public sidewalk outside the establishment.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the
>>>>>> owner is a Democrat?
>>>>>
>>>>>Then he needs to be shot.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...
>>> 
>>> You two wannabe domestic terrorists have just been reported to the FBI.
>>  
>> There are federal officials on pins and needles waiting for the latest
>> semi-coherent USENET babble.
>> 
>> BTW, since 9/11 terrorism is the purview of DHS.
> 
> International, maybe, but domestic?
> 
> https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism
> 
> ----------
> To counter terrorism, the FBI's top investigative priority, we use our 
> investigative and intelligence capabilities to neutralize domestic 
> extremists
> ----------

https://www.dhs.gov/topic/preventing-terrorism

"Protecting the American people from terrorist threats is the reason DHS
was created, and remains our highest priority."

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706975

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <ppjs58$1dc$64@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:53:32 +0000, jimp wrote:
> 
> > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:32:48 -0400, Stinky Gerglly Hell,  Rapist wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:14 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >>>>kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> >>>>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
> >>>>> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
> >>>>> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech. 
> >>>>> > That means you can't always say anything you want, whenever you
> >>>>> > want, wherever you want.  You don't have a first amendment right
> >>>>> > to say whatever you want on someone else's private property, which
> >>>>> > a restaurant is.  You might have to content yourself with
> >>>>> > protesting on the public sidewalk outside the establishment.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the
> >>>>> owner is a Democrat?
> >>>>
> >>>>Then he needs to be shot.
> >>> 
> >>> I'd rather see him publicly drawn and quartered...
> >> 
> >> You two wannabe domestic terrorists have just been reported to the FBI.
> >  
> > There are federal officials on pins and needles waiting for the latest
> > semi-coherent USENET babble.
> > 
> > BTW, since 9/11 terrorism is the purview of DHS.
> 
> International, maybe, but domestic?
> 
> https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism
> 
> ----------
> To counter terrorism, the FBI's top investigative priority, we use our 
> investigative and intelligence capabilities to neutralize domestic 
> extremists
> ----------
> 
> Are you people planning to be correct about *anything*, *anytime* soon, or 
> is that against the rules and you'll have your Rapepublican membership 
> cards taken away and shredded if you ever get caught making an accurate 
> factual statement in public?
> 
> <snicker>
> 
> https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/dt
> 
> Hmm, interesting, one of these dudes strongly resembles Skeeter!
> 
> <snicker>

Have you started making moving arrangements yet, or are you over that 
tantrum now?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706879

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


> 
> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
> > The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
> > There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free
> > speech.  That means you can't always say anything you want,
> > whenever you want, wherever you want.  You don't have a
> > first amendment right to say whatever you want on someone
> > else's private property, which a restaurant is.  You might
> > have to content yourself with protesting on the public
> > sidewalk outside the establishment.
> 
> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner is 
> a Democrat?

Stupid answer.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706885

On 10/9/2018 12:44 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <pphsa9$8p2$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On 10/9/2018 4:24 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
>>> There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free
>>> speech.  That means you can't always say anything you want,
>>> whenever you want, wherever you want.  You don't have a
>>> first amendment right to say whatever you want on someone
>>> else's private property, which a restaurant is.  You might
>>> have to content yourself with protesting on the public
>>> sidewalk outside the establishment.
>>
>> That depends on the establishment's owner's wishes. What if the owner is 
>> a Democrat?
> 
> Stupid answer.
> 

Stupid answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706878

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <UAZuD.99064$MJ2.4901@fx12.iad>, JW@me.com says...


> 
> On 10/8/2018 2:22 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 12:59:13 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> >> Zombie chanters and elevator screamers are anarchy.
> > 
> > No, they're people exercising their First Amendment rights.
> > 
> >> Guilt by accusation is anarchy.
> > 
> > What is erecting strawmen?
> > 
> >> Violating the civil rights of Americans to enjoy dining out
> >> or being in public without harassment is anarchy.
> > 
> > No, they're people exercising their First Amendment rights.
> The First Amendment does not give you a right to accost diners.
> There are time, place, and manner restrictions on free
> speech.  That means you can't always say anything you want,
> whenever you want, wherever you want.  You don't have a
> first amendment right to say whatever you want on someone
> else's private property, which a restaurant is.  You might
> have to content yourself with protesting on the public
> sidewalk outside the establishment.

SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706733

In article <MPG.362556f1e1b23e9d994ee8@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <ppgbvu$1dc$37@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 11:26:53 -0700, Checkmate gurgled:
> > 
> > > kensi brought the pain:
> > >> On 10/7/2018 3:44 PM, Checkmate foamed:
> > >> > It's funny... a few years ago, I was totally fed up with where this
> > >> > country was headed.
> > >> 
> > >> Toward blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake?
> > >> 
> > >> Bigot.
> > >> 
> > >> > Since Trump got elected, I've realized that we're not beyond
> > >> > salvation.
> > >> > In fact, he's exposed just how badly we need to root out the enemies
> > >> > within and save the country from the damage that's been done right
> > >> > under our noses.
> > >> 
> > >> Pictured above: Fascism.
> > > 
> > > Pictured above: Anarchy.
> > 
> > Blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake is "anarchy" to you??
> > 
> > Wow, your elevator really doesn't go to the top floor. No wonder you have 
> > all those Looney Maroon trophies racked up ...
> 
> Zombie chanters and elevator screamers are anarchy.  Guilt by accusation 
> is anarchy.  Violating the civil rights of Americans to enjoy dining out 
> or being in public without harassment is anarchy.  Sending lawmakers 
> death threats is anarchy.

Are you trying to use facts and logic on a lib? Stop making me laugh so 
hard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706743

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36256c5a7e68c15f9896c4@news.eternal-
september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> In article <MPG.362556f1e1b23e9d994ee8@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> @gmail.com says...
> > 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> > Checkmate!  In article <ppgbvu$1dc$37@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > > On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 11:26:53 -0700, Checkmate gurgled:
> > > 
> > > > kensi brought the pain:
> > > >> On 10/7/2018 3:44 PM, Checkmate foamed:
> > > >> > It's funny... a few years ago, I was totally fed up with where this
> > > >> > country was headed.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Toward blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake?
> > > >> 
> > > >> Bigot.
> > > >> 
> > > >> > Since Trump got elected, I've realized that we're not beyond
> > > >> > salvation.
> > > >> > In fact, he's exposed just how badly we need to root out the enemies
> > > >> > within and save the country from the damage that's been done right
> > > >> > under our noses.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Pictured above: Fascism.
> > > > 
> > > > Pictured above: Anarchy.
> > > 
> > > Blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake is "anarchy" to you??
> > > 
> > > Wow, your elevator really doesn't go to the top floor. No wonder you have 
> > > all those Looney Maroon trophies racked up ...
> > 
> > Zombie chanters and elevator screamers are anarchy.  Guilt by accusation 
> > is anarchy.  Violating the civil rights of Americans to enjoy dining out 
> > or being in public without harassment is anarchy.  Sending lawmakers 
> > death threats is anarchy.
> 
> Are you trying to use facts and logic on a lib? Stop making me laugh so 
> hard.

It's not even worth the time and effort to respond to her on this topic.  
She lacks the ability to accept reason, if it doesn't suit her agenda.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706759

In article <MPG.3625613987ab0cb8994ef9@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36256c5a7e68c15f9896c4@news.eternal-
> september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > In article <MPG.362556f1e1b23e9d994ee8@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> > @gmail.com says...
> > > 
> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> > > Checkmate!  In article <ppgbvu$1dc$37@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > > @gmail.invalid says...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > > > On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 11:26:53 -0700, Checkmate gurgled:
> > > > 
> > > > > kensi brought the pain:
> > > > >> On 10/7/2018 3:44 PM, Checkmate foamed:
> > > > >> > It's funny... a few years ago, I was totally fed up with where this
> > > > >> > country was headed.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Toward blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake?
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Bigot.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> > Since Trump got elected, I've realized that we're not beyond
> > > > >> > salvation.
> > > > >> > In fact, he's exposed just how badly we need to root out the enemies
> > > > >> > within and save the country from the damage that's been done right
> > > > >> > under our noses.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Pictured above: Fascism.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Pictured above: Anarchy.
> > > > 
> > > > Blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake is "anarchy" to you??
> > > > 
> > > > Wow, your elevator really doesn't go to the top floor. No wonder you have 
> > > > all those Looney Maroon trophies racked up ...
> > > 
> > > Zombie chanters and elevator screamers are anarchy.  Guilt by accusation 
> > > is anarchy.  Violating the civil rights of Americans to enjoy dining out 
> > > or being in public without harassment is anarchy.  Sending lawmakers 
> > > death threats is anarchy.
> > 
> > Are you trying to use facts and logic on a lib? Stop making me laugh so 
> > hard.
> 
> It's not even worth the time and effort to respond to her on this topic.  
> She lacks the ability to accept reason, if it doesn't suit her agenda.

That demo text guy this morning started sounding just like her, when I 
would ask a straight forward question he would spin or change the 
subject.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706729

In article <ppgbvu$1dc$37@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 11:26:53 -0700, Checkmate gurgled:
> 
> > kensi brought the pain:
> >> On 10/7/2018 3:44 PM, Checkmate foamed:
> >> > It's funny... a few years ago, I was totally fed up with where this
> >> > country was headed.
> >> 
> >> Toward blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake?
> >> 
> >> Bigot.
> >> 
> >> > Since Trump got elected, I've realized that we're not beyond
> >> > salvation.
> >> > In fact, he's exposed just how badly we need to root out the enemies
> >> > within and save the country from the damage that's been done right
> >> > under our noses.
> >> 
> >> Pictured above: Fascism.
> > 
> > Pictured above: Anarchy.
> 
> Blacks, gays, and women getting a fair shake is "anarchy" to you??
> 
> Wow, your elevator really doesn't go to the top floor. No wonder you have 
> all those Looney Maroon trophies racked up ...

<TANT>


there are no trophys

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web