Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #706328 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-05 19:08 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-10-12 13:32 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 123 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
'Space' is never empty Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 19:08 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-05 21:54 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 22:21 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 23:27 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 14:54 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 17:17 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-06 16:46 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 22:10 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 21:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 12:25 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 05:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 14:30 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 09:07 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 21:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 06:02 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:54 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 10:24 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 12:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 19:44 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 09:00 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 18:58 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:53 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 20:59 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 21:23 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 05:52 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:44 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 06:59 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:12 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 18:01 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 22:14 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:41 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 00:07 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:50 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 23:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:01 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 17:57 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:28 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:52 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 09:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:57 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 22:34 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:45 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:13 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 17:57 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:52 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:56 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 05:55 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:15 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 06:51 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:13 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:07 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:52 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:20 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:11 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 21:49 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 13:35 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 21:59 -0700
You can't _ measure motion if you never stop measuring. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-13 22:51 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:17 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:20 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 09:50 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:24 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:47 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:43 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 00:03 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:29 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:49 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 16:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 18:23 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:27 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 07:39 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:00 -0400
Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-13 22:38 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 23:39 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 14:45 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 08:04 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 09:33 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 20:20 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 13:40 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 21:09 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 18:18 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 05:34 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:24 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 21:44 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Rogue Cormac <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-14 10:58 -0600
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 19:06 +0200
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-14 14:49 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 23:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:34 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 09:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:48 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:35 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:29 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 11:10 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-17 14:33 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 18:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 23:54 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 13:22 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:42 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 13:21 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:55 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 09:47 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-08 11:51 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 09:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 17:13 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:04 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 17:39 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Ivan Smith <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-11 08:28 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 18:20 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-11 19:43 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 10:20 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 11:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:13 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:51 -0400
'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 07:55 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:32 -0700
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-17 14:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pq82ra$24k$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707712 |
On 10/13/2018 1:10 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 2:29:03 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
>> On 10/12/2018 4:35 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-7, benj wrote:
>>>> On 10/12/2018 12:33 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj
>>>>>>>> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his
>>>>>>>> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ”
>>>>>>>> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated.
>>>>>>> Something’s gonna stick, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks
>>>>>> you do science by arguing about words. He's even worse than the people
>>>>>> who think science is all about how complex and indecipherable your
>>>>>> mathematics are. Odd doesn't even have mathematics. Just words.
>>>>>
>>>>> Einstein and I agree."Space is the most dynamic part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert
>>>>>
>>>> It is not SPACE that is dynamic. Space is "empty" it is the Aether in
>>>> Space where it all is created. That is a given!
>>>
>>> No. Only God is a given for any creation...
>>>
>>> Space is expanding. And there is more than aether...
>>>
>>>
>>> Mitchell Raemsch
>>>
>> Space is NOT expanding. That is a bogus error. Aether is the TOE! That
>> is a given!
>
> You are wrong on both accounts Roy Masters.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch
>
Kneel Before ZOD !
http://www.relatably.com/q/img/superman-quotes-kneel-before-zod/download-106769.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 18:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bce80c30-4389-462a-ba4b-ec4d7c3cdd4e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707464 |
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 7:48:15 PM UTC+3, benj wrote: > On 10/12/2018 12:33 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > >> On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> benj > >>>> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his > >>>> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ” > >>>> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle > >>>> > >>> > >>> Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated. > >>> Something’s gonna stick, right? > >>> > >> Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks > >> you do science by arguing about words. He's even worse than the people > >> who think science is all about how complex and indecipherable your > >> mathematics are. Odd doesn't even have mathematics. Just words. > > > > Einstein and I agree."Space is the most dynamic part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert > > > It is not SPACE that is dynamic. Space is "empty" it is the Aether in > Space where it all is created. That is a given! ======================== why Aether ? why not witches on brooms ?? ================================ TIA Y.P ==============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 23:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a5840332-1ce4-4bfc-a716-ff8eb79cb900@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707576 |
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 4:58:09 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 7:48:15 PM UTC+3, benj wrote: > > On 10/12/2018 12:33 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > > >> On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> benj > > >>>> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his > > >>>> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ” > > >>>> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated. > > >>> Something’s gonna stick, right? > > >>> > > >> Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks > > >> you do science by arguing about words. He's eve part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert > > > > > It is not SPACE that is dynamic. Space is "empty" it is the Aether in > > Space where it all is created. That is a given! > ======================== > why Aether ? > why not witches on brooms ?? > ================================ > TIA > Y.P > ============================== 1 what are the physical Dimensions of Aether ? 2 can a photon move in space that is NOT EMPTY ?! 2 what are the physical dimension of empty space or aether ?? 3 can the above photon do it in straight lines ?? ============================ TIA Y.P ==========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-10 13:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppkuf5$1aov$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706925 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “Your understanding of science and how it works borders on childlike. > ” > You’re a Lib? > What’s a Lib in this context? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-10 09:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ppkvjd$1cbh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706997 |
On 10/10/2018 9:22 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: >> Odd >> “Your understanding of science and how it works borders on childlike. >> ” >> You’re a Lib? >> > > What’s a Lib in this context? > Someone with no understanding of science who desperately clings to the lib philosophy that reality is determined entirely by one's thoughts and objective reality does not exist. That's you, Odd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-10 15:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppl7lt$1sdq$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707000 |
benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/10/2018 9:22 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Odd >>> “Your understanding of science and how it works borders on childlike. >>> ” >>> You’re a Lib? >>> >> >> What’s a Lib in this context? >> > Someone with no understanding of science who desperately clings to the > lib philosophy that reality is determined entirely by one's thoughts and > objective reality does not exist. That's you, Odd. > What the heck is “lib philosophy”? Is that just a label you made up? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 13:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppfll5$moq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706613 |
<poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> pass through other matter. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>> >>>>> ========================== >>>>> as far as i understand English >>>>> in principle /basically >>>>> solids and matter >>>>> is the same >>>> >>>> Uh no. >>>> Not at all. >>>> >>>>> the difference is only by >>>>> different concentration of matter /mass >>>>> ===== >>>>> Y.Porat >>>>> ====================== >>> >>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference >>> scientifically >> >> There are more states of matter than solid. >> ================================== > there are more states of matter as > protons neutrons quarks etc > now there is my table before me > so ?? Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. Nor are those particles solids. > > that table is composed of > protons neutrons quarks > you name it > so ?? > it is jut another composition > of componements > ins t that so ? > > 2 > you did not answer my important assertion /prove about > > /explanation > about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! > do you get it ?? > -------------------- > indeed unprecedented and surprising .. but ...?? > ======================= >>> ========================================== >>> HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! >>> NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! >>> ============================================= >>> indeed not written in any book >>> can you get it ?? >>> or more explanations are needed ? >>> >>> yet from when on >>> all my findings are been written in any book ?! >>> -- >>> iow >>> i have an'' illness'' of >>> not being a parrot !! .... >>> ============== >>> Y.P > ================================== > > TIA > Y.P > ======================= > > > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 11:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ppfulc$17me$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706621 |
On 10/8/2018 9:21 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> pass through other matter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>> >>>>>> ========================== >>>>>> as far as i understand English >>>>>> in principle /basically >>>>>> solids and matter >>>>>> is the same >>>>> >>>>> Uh no. >>>>> Not at all. >>>>> >>>>>> the difference is only by >>>>>> different concentration of matter /mass >>>>>> ===== >>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>> ====================== >>>> >>>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference >>>> scientifically >>> >>> There are more states of matter than solid. >>> ================================== >> there are more states of matter as >> protons neutrons quarks etc >> now there is my table before me >> so ?? > > Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. > Nor are those particles solids. Yes they are. Idiot. It is electrons that are "less than nothing". >> that table is composed of >> protons neutrons quarks >> you name it >> so ?? >> it is jut another composition >> of componements >> ins t that so ? >> >> 2 >> you did not answer my important assertion /prove about >> >> /explanation >> about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! >> do you get it ?? >> -------------------- >> indeed unprecedented and surprising .. but ...?? >> ======================= >>>> ========================================== >>>> HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! >>>> NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! >>>> ============================================= >>>> indeed not written in any book >>>> can you get it ?? >>>> or more explanations are needed ? >>>> >>>> yet from when on >>>> all my findings are been written in any book ?! >>>> -- >>>> iow >>>> i have an'' illness'' of >>>> not being a parrot !! .... >>>> ============== >>>> Y.P >> ================================== >> >> TIA >> Y.P >> ======================= >> >> >> >> > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 09:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <da913717-8a4b-4ad2-bbd0-b8f0dd5673ca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706647 |
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:55:29 AM UTC-7, benj wrote: > On 10/8/2018 9:21 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> pass through other matter. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ========================== > >>>>>> as far as i understand English > >>>>>> in principle /basically > >>>>>> solids and matter > >>>>>> is the same > >>>>> > >>>>> Uh no. > >>>>> Not at all. > >>>>> > >>>>>> the difference is only by > >>>>>> different concentration of matter /mass > >>>>>> ===== > >>>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>>> ====================== > >>>> > >>>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference > >>>> scientifically > >>> > >>> There are more states of matter than solid. > >>> ================================== > >> there are more states of matter as > >> protons neutrons quarks etc > >> now there is my table before me > >> so ?? > > > > Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. > > Nor are those particles solids. > > Yes they are. Idiot. It is electrons that are "less than nothing". > > >> that table is composed of > >> protons neutrons quarks > >> you name it > >> so ?? > >> it is jut another composition > >> of componements > >> ins t that so ? > >> > >> 2 > >> you did not answer my important assertion /prove about > >> > >> /explanation > >> about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! > >> do you get it ?? > >> -------------------- > >> indeed unprecedented and surprising .. but ...?? > >> ======================= > >>>> ========================================== > >>>> HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! > >>>> NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! > >>>> ============================================= > >>>> indeed not written in any book > >>>> can you get it ?? > >>>> or more explanations are needed ? > >>>> > >>>> yet from when on > >>>> all my findings are been written in any book ?! > >>>> -- > >>>> iow > >>>> i have an'' illness'' of > >>>> not being a parrot !! .... > >>>> ============== > >>>> Y.P > >> ================================== > >> > >> TIA > >> Y.P > >> ======================= > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > There is no quantity below zero Roy Masters. Just as there is No North of the North pole... Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 11:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ppg1ui$1efs$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706647 |
On 10/8/2018 10:55 AM, benj wrote:
> On 10/8/2018 9:21 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> pass through other matter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You confuse matter with solids.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==========================
>>>>>>> as far as i understand English
>>>>>>> in principle /basically
>>>>>>> solids and matter
>>>>>>> is the same
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh no.
>>>>>> Not at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the difference is only by
>>>>>>> different concentration of matter /mass
>>>>>>> =====
>>>>>>> Y.Porat
>>>>>>> ======================
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference
>>>>> scientifically
>>>>
>>>> There are more states of matter than solid.
>>>> ==================================
>>> there are more states of matter as
>>> protons neutrons quarks etc
>>> now there is my table before me
>>> so ??
>>
>> Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter.
>> Nor are those particles solids.
>
> Yes they are. Idiot. It is electrons that are "less than nothing".
I have billions of electrons stored in my android cellphone !!
they come out and make images on the screen !!
they also vibrate at 866,125,000.1 +-5 Hz when transmitting data to
Google(NSA) behind my back! (I keep cellie in back pocket, and Butt sit
on the NSA.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 09:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <92e182aa-a2c2-4801-bc99-5b63fdaa54e4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706621 |
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:21:47 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> pass through other matter. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>>>> > >>>>> ========================== > >>>>> as far as i understand English > >>>>> in principle /basically > >>>>> solids and matter > >>>>> is the same > >>>> > >>>> Uh no. > >>>> Not at all. > >>>> > >>>>> the difference is only by > >>>>> different concentration of matter /mass > >>>>> ===== > >>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>> ====================== > >>> > >>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference > >>> scientifically > >> > >> There are more states of matter than solid. > >> ================================== > > there are more states of matter as > > protons neutrons quarks etc > > now there is my table before me > > so ?? > > Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. > Nor are those particles solids. ================================ BUT THEY ARE MASS !!! ======== y.p ======================== > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 17:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppg38c$1gvv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706662 |
<poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:21:47 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> pass through other matter. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ========================== >>>>>>> as far as i understand English >>>>>>> in principle /basically >>>>>>> solids and matter >>>>>>> is the same >>>>>> >>>>>> Uh no. >>>>>> Not at all. >>>>>> >>>>>>> the difference is only by >>>>>>> different concentration of matter /mass >>>>>>> ===== >>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>> ====================== >>>>> >>>>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference >>>>> scientifically >>>> >>>> There are more states of matter than solid. >>>> ================================== >>> there are more states of matter as >>> protons neutrons quarks etc >>> now there is my table before me >>> so ?? >> >> Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. >> Nor are those particles solids. > ================================ > BUT THEY ARE MASS !!! Yes they have mass. But your contention was that solid and matter mean the same thing. They don’t. > ======== > y.p > ======================== >> >>> >> > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-17 12:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f45ac495-29df-46c1-8544-78353d06a35c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706666 |
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:13:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:21:47 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> pass through other matter. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ========================== > >>>>>>> as far as i understand English > >>>>>>> in principle /basically > >>>>>>> solids and matter > >>>>>>> is the same > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Uh no. > >>>>>> Not at all. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> the difference is only by > >>>>>>> different concentration of matter /mass > >>>>>>> ===== > >>>>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>>>> ====================== > >>>>> > >>>>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference > >>>>> scientifically > >>>> > >>>> There are more states of matter than solid. > >>>> ================================== > >>> there are more states of matter as > >>> protons neutrons quarks etc > >>> now there is my table before me > >>> so ?? > >> > >> Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. > >> Nor are those particles solids. > > ================================ > > BUT THEY ARE MASS !!! > > Yes they have mass. > > But your contention was that solid and matter mean the same thing. They > don’t. > > > ======== > > y.p > > ======================== all of them has mass but empty space has no mass .. and if so space has no curvature and no schmervature ===== Y.P ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-10 17:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3f281988-21b9-4380-8ce6-7fffb2ca1f4c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706621 |
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:21:47 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> pass through other matter. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>>>> > >>>>> ========================== > >>>>> as far as i understand English > >>>>> in principle /basically > >>>>> solids and matter > >>>>> is the same > >>>> > >>>> Uh no. > >>>> Not at all. > >>>> > >>>>> the difference is only by > >>>>> different concentration of matter /mass > >>>>> ===== > >>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>> ====================== > >>> > >>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference > >>> scientifically > >> > >> There are more states of matter than solid. > >> ================================== > > there are more states of matter as > > protons neutrons quarks etc > > now there is my table before me > > so ?? > > Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. > Nor are those particles solids. > > > > > that table is composed of > > protons neutrons quarks > > you name it > > so ?? > > it is jut another composition > > of componements > > ins t that so ? > > > > 2 > > you did not answer my important assertion /prove about > > > > /explanation > > about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! > > do you get it ?? > > -------------------- > > indeed unprecedented and surprising .. but ...?? > > ======================= > >>> ========================================== > >>> HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! > >>> NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! > >>> ============================================= > >>> indeed not written in any book > >>> can you get it ?? > >>> or more explanations are needed ? > >>> > >>> yet from when on > >>> all my findings are been written in any book ?! > >>> -- > >>> iow > >>> i have an'' illness'' of > >>> not being a parrot !! .... > >>> ============== > >>> Y.P > > ================================== > > > > TIA > > Y.P > > ======================= ======================= i will bring it again until even all the blockhead parrot will have to understand it understand it and not wast precious human assets on endless bubblings " ===================================================== HAD THERE NOT BE LOCATIONS OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS - NO MOTION WAHTSPEVER == COULD BE DONE !!! =================================================== and now i will try sort of a mathemathical prove : if physical entity A has to be able to move- entity B that on its way has to move to another location ok ? but now entity B has ebrity C on its way so entity c has to move to another location ! but if it finds entity D on its way (entity E that is blocking its way has to move to another location etc etc etc like that until even entity entity X has to find an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE !! got it blockheads parrots ??!! == NO 2 PHYSICAL ENTITIES - CAN BE AT THE SAME LOCATION -AT THE SAME TIME !!! remember the Pauli exclusion law ??? === historic copyright by Y Porat from long ago ===========================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ivan Smith <invalid@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-11 08:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ppnq5u$3j2$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707060 |
Adios, dork-nose.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-11 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e45c8e40-dcf9-47c0-8ab2-4823cf0afa3a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707167 |
On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 6:28:03 PM UTC+3, Ivan Smith wrote: > Adios, dork-nose. ---=== little dreck shit coward hired gengster next !! to human beings === Y.P ================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-11 19:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ppoqp7$1mtr$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707060 |
On 10/10/2018 7:39 PM, poraty149@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:21:47 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> pass through other matter. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You confuse matter with solids. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ========================== >>>>>>> as far as i understand English >>>>>>> in principle /basically >>>>>>> solids and matter >>>>>>> is the same >>>>>> >>>>>> Uh no. >>>>>> Not at all. >>>>>> >>>>>>> the difference is only by >>>>>>> different concentration of matter /mass >>>>>>> ===== >>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>> ====================== >>>>> >>>>> 1 may be you tell me what is the difference >>>>> scientifically >>>> >>>> There are more states of matter than solid. >>>> ================================== >>> there are more states of matter as >>> protons neutrons quarks etc >>> now there is my table before me >>> so ?? >> >> Protons, neutrons, quarks, are not states of matter. >> Nor are those particles solids. >> >>> >>> that table is composed of >>> protons neutrons quarks >>> you name it >>> so ?? >>> it is jut another composition >>> of componements >>> ins t that so ? >>> >>> 2 >>> you did not answer my important assertion /prove about >>> >>> /explanation >>> about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! >>> do you get it ?? >>> -------------------- >>> indeed unprecedented and surprising .. but ...?? >>> ======================= >>>>> ========================================== >>>>> HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! >>>>> NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! >>>>> ============================================= >>>>> indeed not written in any book >>>>> can you get it ?? >>>>> or more explanations are needed ? >>>>> >>>>> yet from when on >>>>> all my findings are been written in any book ?! >>>>> -- >>>>> iow >>>>> i have an'' illness'' of >>>>> not being a parrot !! .... >>>>> ============== >>>>> Y.P >>> ================================== >>> >>> TIA >>> Y.P >>> ======================= > > ======================= > i will bring it again > until even all the blockhead parrot will > have to understand it understand it > and not wast precious human assets on endless bubblings " > ===================================================== > > HAD THERE NOT BE LOCATIONS OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS > - NO MOTION WAHTSPEVER == COULD BE DONE !!! > =================================================== > and now i will try > sort of a mathemathical prove : > > if physical entity A has to be able to move- > entity B that on its way has to move > to another location ok ? > but now entity B has ebrity C on its way > so > entity c has to move to another location ! > but if it finds entity D on its way > (entity E that is blocking its way > has to move to another location > > etc etc etc like that until even entity > entity X has to find an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE !! > > got it blockheads parrots ??!! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBb7naxXcAEnEcZ.jpg > == > NO 2 PHYSICAL ENTITIES - CAN BE AT THE SAME LOCATION -AT THE SAME TIME !!! > > remember the Pauli exclusion law ??? > === > historic copyright > by Y Porat > from long ago > =========================================== > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c7f1c416-1993-4554-ac8f-fb81e3028139@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706474 |
On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 12:31:54 AM UTC-4, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:54:45 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Other masses can or cannot move through space. > > > > > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. > > > > > > > You confuse matter with solids. > > > > -- > > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > ========================== > as far as i understand English > in principle /basically > solids and matter > is the same > the difference is only by > different concentration of matter /mass > ===== > Y.Porat > ====================== So liquids are not matter? So gases are not matter? So Plasmas are not matter ???????????????????? Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-17 11:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8ddca584-27f9-4461-9c7d-4241d13b4980@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706667 |
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:20:13 PM UTC+3, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 12:31:54 AM UTC-4, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:54:45 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Other masses can or cannot move through space. > > > > > > > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. > > > > > > > > > > You confuse matter with solids. > > > > > > -- > > > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > ========================== > > as far as i understand English > > in principle /basically > > solids and matter > > is the same > > the difference is only by > > different concentration of matter /mass > > ===== > > Y.Porat > > ====================== > > So liquids are not matter? > So gases are not matter? > So Plasmas are not matter > > ???????????????????? > > Ed ================= all of them has mass !! and dimensions of mass =========== TIA Y.P ================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-17 12:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <af69233e-ee5e-4944-8bd7-fd870886d2cc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #708629 |
On Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 11:58:26 AM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:20:13 PM UTC+3, Edward Prochak wrote: > > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 12:31:54 AM UTC-4, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:54:45 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Other masses can or cannot move through space. > > > > > > > > > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You confuse matter with solids. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > > > ========================== > > > as far as i understand English > > > in principle /basically > > > solids and matter > > > is the same > > > the difference is only by > > > different concentration of matter /mass > > > ===== > > > Y.Porat > > > ====================== > > > > So liquids are not matter? > > So gases are not matter? > > So Plasmas are not matter > > > > ???????????????????? > > > > Ed > ================= > all of them has mass !! > and dimensions of mass > =========== > TIA > Y.P > ================ All atoms are solids.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web