Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #706328 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-05 19:08 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-10-12 13:32 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 123 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
'Space' is never empty Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 19:08 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-05 21:54 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 22:21 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 23:27 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 14:54 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 17:17 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-06 16:46 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 22:10 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 21:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 12:25 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 05:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 14:30 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 09:07 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 21:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 06:02 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:54 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 10:24 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 12:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 19:44 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 09:00 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 18:58 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:53 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 20:59 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 21:23 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 05:52 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:44 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 06:59 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:12 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 18:01 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 22:14 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:41 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 00:07 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:50 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 23:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:01 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 17:57 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:28 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:52 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 09:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:57 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 22:34 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:45 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:13 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 17:57 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:52 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:56 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 05:55 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:15 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 06:51 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:13 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:07 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:52 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:20 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:11 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 21:49 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 13:35 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 21:59 -0700
You can't _ measure motion if you never stop measuring. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-13 22:51 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:17 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:20 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 09:50 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:24 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:47 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:43 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 00:03 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:29 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:49 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 16:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 18:23 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:27 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 07:39 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:00 -0400
Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-13 22:38 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 23:39 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 14:45 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 08:04 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 09:33 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 20:20 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 13:40 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 21:09 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 18:18 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 05:34 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:24 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 21:44 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Rogue Cormac <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-14 10:58 -0600
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 19:06 +0200
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-14 14:49 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 23:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:34 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 09:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:48 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:35 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:29 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 11:10 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-17 14:33 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 18:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 23:54 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 13:22 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:42 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 13:21 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:55 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 09:47 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-08 11:51 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 09:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 17:13 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:04 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 17:39 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Ivan Smith <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-11 08:28 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 18:20 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-11 19:43 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 10:20 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 11:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:13 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:51 -0400
'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 07:55 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:32 -0700
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 19:08 -0700 |
| Subject | 'Space' is never empty |
| Message-ID | <306f57bf-0a4f-4e2d-a8f1-8da0a5480642@googlegroups.com> |
Other masses can or cannot move through space. Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 21:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pp9864$aii$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706328 |
On 10/5/2018 9:08 PM, Musatov wrote: > Other masses can or cannot move through space. zug! what if it can do niether ? > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. unless one is a liquid matter or gas matter and the other is a solid matter, no matter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 22:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ba91c059-f169-4372-b6e8-3231a5ea2fec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706334 |
On Friday, October 5, 2018 at 7:55:06 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 10/5/2018 9:08 PM, Musatov wrote: > > Other masses can or cannot move through space. > > zug! what if it can do niether ? > > > > > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. > > unless one is a liquid matter or gas matter and the other is a solid > matter, no matter. It is a double sided whole... Empty gravity with filled... Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 23:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <13a9f1cb-72e9-45e9-8a6c-9c90b518b764@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706328 |
On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:08:30 AM UTC+3, Musatov wrote: > Other masses can or cannot move through space. > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. ======================= you op post is wrong !! now let us see if you are able to understand my assertion : ===== HAD THERE NOT BEEN LOCATIONS OF**#ABNSOLUTE EMPTINESS --**NO MOTION WHATSORVRT - COULD BE DONE *!!! can you understand that or is it too complicated for you ?? == TIA Y.Porat =======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-06 14:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppaibi$boj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706328 |
Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: > Other masses can or cannot move through space. > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. > You confuse matter with solids. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-06 17:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ppb8p1$1hgi$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706391 |
On 10/6/2018 10:54 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: >> Other masses can or cannot move through space. >> >> Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. >> > > You confuse matter with solids. > Odd, matter at the fundamental level is frozen aether. frozen aether cannot pass through frozen aether. What you view as space is aether super gas. It is a superfluid and frozen aether passes through it with ZERO losses. It's simple as that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-06 16:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ppbagq$1kdi$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706436 |
On 10/6/2018 4:17 PM, benj wrote: > On 10/6/2018 10:54 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Other masses can or cannot move through space. >>> >>> Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. >>> >> >> You confuse matter with solids. >> > Odd, matter at the fundamental level is frozen aether. frozen aether > cannot pass through frozen aether. What you view as space is aether > super gas. It is a superfluid and frozen aether passes through it with > ZERO losses. It's simple as that. yea, I boiled some frozen aether on the stove once, wife said I was nuts, I didn't see anything happen, and then it was GONE !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-06 22:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ppbpv7$9hj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706446 |
On 10/6/2018 5:46 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 10/6/2018 4:17 PM, benj wrote: >> On 10/6/2018 10:54 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Other masses can or cannot move through space. >>>> >>>> Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. >>>> >>> >>> You confuse matter with solids. >>> >> Odd, matter at the fundamental level is frozen aether. frozen aether >> cannot pass through frozen aether. What you view as space is aether >> super gas. It is a superfluid and frozen aether passes through it with >> ZERO losses. It's simple as that. > > yea, I boiled some frozen aether on the stove once, wife said I was > nuts, I didn't see anything happen, and then it was GONE ! > Speaking of Going, going, GONE! Did you see that a painting by Banksy sold for 1.4 million bucks and after the sale it shredded itself with a shredder built into the frame! As cool as boiling aether! https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/arts/design/uk-banksy-painting-sothebys.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-06 21:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <526f2b76-f744-41a5-8c8c-347fe59bd1df@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706391 |
On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:54:45 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: > > Other masses can or cannot move through space. > > > > Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. > > > > You confuse matter with solids. > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables ========================== as far as i understand English in principle /basically solids and matter is the same the difference is only by different concentration of matter /mass ===== Y.Porat ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-07 12:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppctv6$1ss6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706474 |
<poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:54:45 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Other masses can or cannot move through space. >>> >>> Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. >>> >> >> You confuse matter with solids. >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > ========================== > as far as i understand English > in principle /basically > solids and matter > is the same Uh no. Not at all. > the difference is only by > different concentration of matter /mass > ===== > Y.Porat > ====================== > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-07 05:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c6c5c249-eba4-4f90-99f0-f90b658839f2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706502 |
Odd “as far as i understand English > in principle /basically > solids and matter > is the same Uh no. Not at all. ” And ‘spin’ doesn’t mean spin. It has no translation. It’s what ‘point’ particles do, giving thrm angular momentum, but of course since they have no dimensions they can’t have a rotation value. And th th th that’s QM, folks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-07 14:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppd5b2$kgu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706505 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “as far as i understand English >> in principle /basically >> solids and matter >> is the same > > Uh no. > Not at all. ” > Never has. You breathe matter. You don’t breathe a solid. Idiot. > And ‘spin’ doesn’t mean spin. Quantum mechanical spin doesn’t mean ball spin, that’s right. > It has no translation. Sure it does. Just not into something familiar from everyday experience. So? > It’s what ‘point’ particles do, giving thrm angular momentum, but of > course since they have no dimensions they can’t have a rotation value. > And th th th that’s QM, folks. > Yup. Requires reading. Something you think is unfair. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-07 09:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fb5ea589-f706-4e21-81ad-f2af42a332ba@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706502 |
On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:54:45 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Other masses can or cannot move through space. > >>> > >>> Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. > >>> > >> > >> You confuse matter with solids. > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > ========================== > > as far as i understand English > > in principle /basically > > solids and matter > > is the same > > Uh no. > Not at all. > > > the difference is only by > > different concentration of matter /mass > > ===== > > Y.Porat > > ====================== 1 may be you tell me what is the difference scientifically 2 much more important : do you get my following assertion or whatever you may call it ; ========================================== HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! ============================================= indeed not written in any book can you get it ?? or more explanations are needed ? yet from when on all my findings are been written in any book ?! -- iow i have an'' illness'' of not being a parrot !! .... ============== Y.P ================================== > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppdqp1$1r7s$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706523 |
<poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 5:54:45 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Other masses can or cannot move through space. >>>>> >>>>> Most matter can pass through space but not pass through other matter. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You confuse matter with solids. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >>> ========================== >>> as far as i understand English >>> in principle /basically >>> solids and matter >>> is the same >> >> Uh no. >> Not at all. >> >>> the difference is only by >>> different concentration of matter /mass >>> ===== >>> Y.Porat >>> ====================== > > 1 may be you tell me what is the difference > scientifically There are more states of matter than solid. > 2 > much more important : > do you get my following assertion > or whatever you may call it ; > ========================================== > HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! > NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! > ============================================= > indeed not written in any book > can you get it ?? > or more explanations are needed ? > > yet from when on > all my findings are been written in any book ?! > -- > iow > i have an'' illness'' of > not being a parrot !! .... > ============== > Y.P > ================================== >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-07 21:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a0a88c17-7cb6-404e-8ac8-1b51cae7f617@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706563 |
On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 11:36:54 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, October 7, 2018 at 3:25:14 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > pass through other matter. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> You confuse matter with solids. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>> > >>> ========================== > >>> as far as i understand English > >>> in principle /basically > >>> solids and matter > >>> is the same > >> > >> Uh no. > >> Not at all. > >> > >>> the difference is only by > >>> different concentration of matter /mass > >>> ===== > >>> Y.Porat > >>> ====================== > > > > 1 may be you tell me what is the difference > > scientifically > > There are more states of matter than solid. > ================================== there are more states of matter as protons neutrons quarks etc now there is my table before me so ?? that table is composed of protons neutrons quarks you name it so ?? it is jut another composition of componements ins t that so ? 2 you did not answer my important assertion /prove about /explanation about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! do you get it ?? -------------------- indeed unprecedented and surprising .. but ...?? ======================= > > ========================================== > > HAD THERE NOT BEEN **LOCATION* IN SPACE - OF ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS !! > > NO MOTION WHAT SOEVER COULD BE DON !! > > ============================================= > > indeed not written in any book > > can you get it ?? > > or more explanations are needed ? > > > > yet from when on > > all my findings are been written in any book ?! > > -- > > iow > > i have an'' illness'' of > > not being a parrot !! .... > > ============== > > Y.P ================================== TIA Y.P =======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 06:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6b3add03-a240-422b-a462-66a9338c69ea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706613 |
YP “about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! ” If there were one cubic millimeter of Space with nothing in it, the pressure of the Universe would clap it shut so fast it would be like atomic bombs going off.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 11:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ppfujf$17me$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706620 |
On 10/8/2018 9:02 AM, john wrote: > YP > “about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! ” > > If there were one cubic millimeter of Space with nothing in it, the pressure of the Universe would clap it shut so fast it would be like atomic bombs going off. > Actually not true. Tesla learned hot to create true vacuum and did not create atomic explosions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 10:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d6000282-9c1d-4759-8313-a29855985a2f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706620 |
On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 9:03:02 AM UTC-4, john wrote: > YP > “about ijavitable existence ** of absolute emptiness **of space ! ” > > If there were one cubic millimeter of Space with nothing in it, the pressure of the Universe would clap it shut so fast it would be like atomic bombs going off. I really enjoy watching cranks talk to each other. Really bizarre. Thanks guys! Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 12:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <03d10580-d6fc-41ac-a61a-f21c38319de3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706668 |
ed ed ed “I really enjoy watching cranks talk to each other. Really bizarre. Thanks guys! Ed ” Believers in QM and Standard Model- with their cherished DM all but gone- still smug.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-08 19:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ppgc3r$1me$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706694 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > ed ed ed > “I really enjoy watching cranks talk to each other. > Really bizarre. Thanks guys! > Ed ” > Believers in QM and Standard Model- with their cherished DM all but gone- still smug. > John, I think you should know that dark matter is not a feature of quantum mechanics, and not an element of the Standard Model of particle interactions. It is something that is based on comparison between GR and observations of astronomical motions. Note that GR is not part of the Standard Model and there is no quantum mechanical account of GR. So what you are describing is like saying you’re going to overthrow Belgium by attacking Sweden, under the premise that some Swedes visit Belgium. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web