Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #704519 > unrolled thread

Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-25 11:13 -0400
Last post2018-09-30 15:22 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 59 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:13 -0400
    Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:19 -0400
      Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 10:36 -0500
        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:04 -0700
          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:56 -0500
    Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:11 -0400
      Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 13:50 -0500
        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:01 -0400
          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:59 -0500
    Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-29 12:17 +0000
      Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:49 -0400
        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 13:24 -0400
        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-30 11:32 +0000
          You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 06:15 -0700
            Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-30 13:17 +0000
              Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-30 19:23 +0000
                Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0400
                  Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-10-01 20:31 +0000
                    Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-10-01 19:06 -0400
                    Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 01:59 +0000
                      Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:09 -0400
                      Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:21 -0400
                      Capitalists are nicer to the poor because they can afford it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:29 -0700
                        Re: Capitalists are nicer to the poor because they can afford it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:16 +0000
                          Who would you rather marry ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 15:52 -0700
                            Re: Who would you rather marry ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:58 +0000
                            Re: Who would you rather marry ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 22:33 -0500
                Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 +0000
            Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:01 -0400
              Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:25 -0700
              Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-30 17:17 -0500
        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-02 00:38 -0400
          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 05:05 -0400
            Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-02 10:36 +0000
              Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-02 19:20 -0400
                Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 05:04 -0400
                  Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 11:38 -0400
                    Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0500
                    Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:18 -0400
                  Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:44 -0400
                    Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:19 -0400
                      Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 09:11 -0400
                        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 08:40 -0700
                          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 11:45 -0400
                      Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-04 13:51 +0000
                        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 11:35 -0400
                          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 11:43 -0400
                            Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 12:49 -0700
                  Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-04 13:49 +0000
                    Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 11:18 -0400
                      Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-05 18:32 +0000
                        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:13 -0700
        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-02 10:37 +0000
          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-02 20:16 -0400
      Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 13:28 -0400
        Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-30 11:33 +0000
          Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-30 17:15 -0500
            Re: Forests as Climate Change Solution Focus of Summit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:22 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →


#705728 — Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-10-01 22:09 -0400
SubjectRe: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.
Message-ID<qlk5rd14pv42jgctbe1ksb5hn40mkd31ae@4ax.com>
In reply to#705726
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 01:59:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:31:15 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On 2018-10-01, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> Avenging Angel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote innews:g14sD.262995$_V.126688@fx32.am4:
>>>>> On 2018-09-30, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mao was tring to save China, so he murdered how many millions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the 1930s, rural China rose up ( under Mao, with Soviet help ),
>>>>>> to push out Japanese incursions.  Mao became _ thee hero of the day.
>>>>>> He then killed off "the rich", so everyone was starving, freezing --
>>>>>> equally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Such is the politics of jealousy.
>>>>>> You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.
>>>>> You can't make poor rich, but enough to live normaly...
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. And where has tat happened? Americans on welfare live better
>>>> than the "middle class" in communist countries.
>>>
>>> And that's bad?
>> 
>> History shown that capitalist countries (developed) are more socialist
>> then socialist countries in it's name. This is because only way to get
>> rich in communist/real socialist countries is corruption. Other thing is
>> dictatorship. When you supress free thought and encourage poltrons,
>> society deteriate.
>
>Nicely burbled. But can we please hear from someone actually *literate*?

"Can we please hear . . ."  Of course you can but what
you're really asking is "May we please hear . . ."  

Nice foot bullet there, functionally illiterate Paulette!

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with 
her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705732 — Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-01 22:21 -0400
SubjectRe: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.
Message-ID<poukms$i8q$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705726
On 10/1/2018 9:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:31:15 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-10-01, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> Avenging Angel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote in
>>>> news:g14sD.262995$_V.126688@fx32.am4:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-09-30, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mao was tring to save China, so he murdered how many millions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the 1930s, rural China rose up ( under Mao, with Soviet help ),
>>>>>> to push out Japanese incursions.  Mao became _ thee hero of the day.
>>>>>> He then killed off "the rich", so everyone was starving, freezing --
>>>>>> equally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Such is the politics of jealousy.
>>>>>> You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.
>>>>> You can't make poor rich, but enough to live normaly...
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. And where has tat happened? Americans on welfare live better
>>>> than the "middle class" in communist countries.
>>>
>>> And that's bad?
>>
>> History shown that capitalist countries (developed) are more socialist
>> then socialist countries in it's name. This is because only way to get
>> rich in communist/real socialist countries is corruption. Other thing is
>> dictatorship. When you supress free thought and encourage poltrons,
>> society deteriate.
> 
> Nicely burbled. But can we please hear from someone actually *literate*?
> 
In other words as usual you have nothing but grade school drool to offer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705778 — Capitalists are nicer to the poor because they can afford it.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-10-01 21:29 -0700
SubjectCapitalists are nicer to the poor because they can afford it.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--9.29pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#705726
> > History has shown that capitalist countries are more socialist
> 
> can we please hear from someone actually *literate*?

Capitalists are nicer to the poor because they can afford it.

The Unibomber makes mainstream environmentalists look like
Donald Trump on steroids -- and they remind me of Jim Jones
( I'm not drinking their KoolAid ).

Ask them for a working example of "progressive collectivism",
and they don't mention JonesTown, or Venezuela, or North Korea;
no, they say BlueEyed Norway -- very Hitleresque.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705923 — Re: Capitalists are nicer to the poor because they can afford it.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-10-02 22:16 +0000
SubjectRe: Capitalists are nicer to the poor because they can afford it.
Message-ID<pp0qod$1of$13@dont-email.me>
In reply to#705778
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:29:24 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

>> > History has shown that capitalist countries are more socialist
>> 
>> can we please hear from someone actually *literate*?
> 
> Capitalists are nicer to the poor

[citation needed]

> because they can afford it.
> 
> The Unibomber makes mainstream environmentalists look like Donald Trump
> on steroids -- and they remind me of Jim Jones ( I'm not drinking their
> KoolAid ).
> 
> Ask them for a working example of "progressive collectivism", and they
> don't mention JonesTown, or Venezuela, or North Korea;
> no, they say BlueEyed Norway -- very Hitleresque.

I think that stuff you've been doing is cut with something nasty. It's 
causing brain damage.

<snicker>

You might want to hook yourself up with a different supplier ...

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705929 — Who would you rather marry ?

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-10-02 15:52 -0700
SubjectWho would you rather marry ?
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.2--3.52pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#705923
You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
> > Capitalists are nicer to the poor
> 
> [citation needed]

Who would you rather marry ? 
a capitalist like Jeff Bezos or a Marxist like Jim Jones ? 

You're selling it but no one is buying it.

> > Ask them for a working example of "progressive collectivism", and they
> > don't mention JonesTown, or Venezuela, or North Korea;
> > no, they say BlueEyed Norway -- very Hitleresque.
> 
> I think that stuff you've been doing is cut with something nasty. 
> It's causing brain damage.

" By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis.  Again and again. 
  I'm with you, Jeff." -- Mike Godwin, Oct 2, 2018, 3:44pm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705943 — Re: Who would you rather marry ?

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-10-03 00:58 +0000
SubjectRe: Who would you rather marry ?
Message-ID<pp147h$1of$21@dont-email.me>
In reply to#705929
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 15:52:53 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>> > Capitalists are nicer to the poor
>> 
>> [citation needed]
> 
> Who would you rather marry ?
> a capitalist like Jeff Bezos or a Marxist like Jim Jones ?
> 
> You're selling it but no one is buying it.

So, no citation then. Gotcha.

>> > Ask them for a working example of "progressive collectivism", and
>> > they don't mention JonesTown, or Venezuela, or North Korea;
>> > no, they say BlueEyed Norway -- very Hitleresque.
>> 
>> I think that stuff you've been doing is cut with something nasty.
>> It's causing brain damage.
> 
> " By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis.  Again and again.
>   I'm with you, Jeff." -- Mike Godwin, Oct 2, 2018, 3:44pm

By "shitheads" he meant the alt-right, i.e. what *you* are, stupid.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705954 — Re: Who would you rather marry ?

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-10-02 22:33 -0500
SubjectRe: Who would you rather marry ?
Message-ID<pp1d9v$1495$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705929
On 10/2/2018 5:52 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>> Capitalists are nicer to the poor
>>
>> [citation needed]
> 
> Who would you rather marry ? 
> a capitalist like Jeff Bezos or a Marxist like Jim Jones ? 
> 
> You're selling it but no one is buying it.


Nads is an old apple 'lady' from the 1930's selling a dead, and proven
dead idea -socialism is DOA -

  send 'her' to Valenzuela to poop on the ground with Whoopie and MS13



> 
>>> Ask them for a working example of "progressive collectivism", and they
>>> don't mention JonesTown, or Venezuela, or North Korea;
>>> no, they say BlueEyed Norway -- very Hitleresque.
>>
>> I think that stuff you've been doing is cut with something nasty. 
>> It's causing brain damage.
> 
> " By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis.  Again and again. 
>   I'm with you, Jeff." -- Mike Godwin, Oct 2, 2018, 3:44pm
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705665 — Re: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
SubjectRe: You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.
Message-ID<04d99b3b-8053-4c0a-ae06-e530399dbe73@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705350
On Sunday, September 30, 2018 at 12:23:53 PM UTC-7, Avenging Angel wrote:
> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote in
> news:g14sD.262995$_V.126688@fx32.am4: 
> 
> > On 2018-09-30, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >>> Mao was tring to save China, so he murdered how many millions?
> >>
> >> In the 1930s, rural China rose up ( under Mao, with Soviet help ),
> >> to push out Japanese incursions.  Mao became _ thee hero of the day.
> >> He then killed off "the rich", so everyone was starving, freezing --
> >> equally. 
> >>
> >> Such is the politics of jealousy.
> >> You can kill "the rich" but you can't make the poor rich.
> > You can't make poor rich, but enough to live normaly...
> > 
> 
> Yeah. And where has tat happened? Americans on welfare live better than the 
> "middle class" in communist countries.


Americans on welfare are lucky dogs.  The streets are full of people around here who can't even get welfare!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705353

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-30 19:48 +0000
Message-ID<por9ad$mhp$105@dont-email.me>
In reply to#705296
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:32:00 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote:

> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pooaea$i6c$3
> @gioia.aioe.org:
> 
>> On 9/29/2018 8:17 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:podjbj$klj$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>> 
>>>> International environmental groups gathering this week will try to
>>>> devise a plan to use trees to save the planet:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/news-forests-
cli
>>>> mate-summit-sustainability/
>>> 
>>> International environmental groups should be gathered up and jailed.
>>> As enemies of civilization.
>> 
>> They're trying to *save* civilization from its own short-sightedness.
>
> The excuse of every murdering tyrant.

If you're going to accuse kensi of murder, it behooves you to furnish a 
link to her police record to prove your allegation. If, of course, she has 
no such record, you will be wanting to retract that scurrilous lie before 
I retract some of your teeth down your throat. Capisce?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705358

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-30 16:01 -0400
Message-ID<3na2rdht96rucq6ipb3rurs9762vn8l08s@4ax.com>
In reply to#705353
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Avenging Angel wrote:

>> The excuse of every murdering tyrant.
>
>If you're going to accuse kensi of murder, it behooves you to furnish a 
>link to her police record to prove your allegation. If, of course, she has 
>no such record, you will be wanting to retract that scurrilous lie before 
>I retract some of your teeth down your throat. Capisce?

LOL, you girls are so cute when you make such
idle threats as this.  

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with 
her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705371

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 13:25 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.361ad135eb4ccbfd994ce5@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#705358
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <3na2rdht96rucq6ipb3rurs9762vn8l08s@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
> 
> >> The excuse of every murdering tyrant.
> >
> >If you're going to accuse kensi of murder, it behooves you to furnish a 
> >link to her police record to prove your allegation. If, of course, she has 
> >no such record, you will be wanting to retract that scurrilous lie before 
> >I retract some of your teeth down your throat. Capisce?
> 
> LOL, you girls are so cute when you make such
> idle threats as this.  

Today's Catch of the Day, is a big squirmy Nadsington Trout!  Tomorrow, 
it gets thrown in with the chowder.  NEVER order the chowder!

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705418

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-09-30 17:17 -0500
Message-ID<pori1i$1jvd$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705358
On 9/30/2018 3:01 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
> 
>>> The excuse of every murdering tyrant.
>>
>> If you're going to accuse kensi of murder, it behooves you to furnish a 
>> link to her police record to prove your allegation. If, of course, she has 
>> no such record, you will be wanting to retract that scurrilous lie before 
>> I retract some of your teeth down your throat. Capisce?
> 
> LOL, you girls are so cute when you make such
> idle threats as this.  
> 

Nards says;

 "...retract that scurrilous lie..."  wtf ?
this is not the 1800's, soyboy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705787

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-10-02 00:38 -0400
Message-ID<poutkr$nfe$12@dont-email.me>
In reply to#705155

"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:pooaea$i6c$3@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 9/29/2018 8:17 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>> news:podjbj$klj$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>> International environmental groups gathering this week will try to
>>> devise a plan to use trees to save the planet:
>>>
>>> https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/news-forests-cli
>>> mate-summit-sustainability/
>>
>> International environmental groups should be gathered up and jailed. As
>> enemies of civilization.
>
> They're trying to *save* civilization from its own short-sightedness.

You mean the short-sightedness of the environmentalists?

Heck, I still remember when they made us give up our renewable, sustainable, 
all natural, organic, recyclable, biodegradable, and reusable bags for what 
they claim was the far more ecologically sound choice......single use 
plastic bags.

So, excuse me if I do NOT take the claims of environmentalists for very 
much, given how many green energy projects they have stood in the way of. 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705810

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-10-02 05:05 -0400
Message-ID<povcdb$1l2e$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705787
On 10/2/2018 12:38 AM, Scout wrote:
> I still remember when they made us give up our renewable, 
> sustainable, all natural, organic, recyclable, biodegradable, and 
> reusable bags for what they claim was the far more ecologically sound 
> choice......single use plastic bags.

[citation needed]

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705819

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-10-02 10:36 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA96F434B7CE2greyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#705810
On 02 Oct 2018, you wrote in talk.politics.guns:

> On 10/2/2018 12:38 AM, Scout wrote:
>> I still remember when they made us give up our renewable, 
>> sustainable, all natural, organic, recyclable, biodegradable, and 
>> reusable bags for what they claim was the far more ecologically sound 
>> choice......single use plastic bags.
> 
> [citation needed]
> 

Reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705936

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-10-02 19:20 -0400
Message-ID<pp12n7$nus$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#705819

"Avenging Angel" <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> wrote in message 
news:XnsA96F434B7CE2greyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223...
> On 02 Oct 2018, you wrote in talk.politics.guns:
>
>> On 10/2/2018 12:38 AM, Scout wrote:
>>> I still remember when they made us give up our renewable,
>>> sustainable, all natural, organic, recyclable, biodegradable, and
>>> reusable bags for what they claim was the far more ecologically sound
>>> choice......single use plastic bags.
>>
>> [citation needed]
>>
>
> Reality.

Something kensi apparently knows very little about.

Or, he could check himself and look at the discussion that drove the change 
from brown paper bags to the plastic bags used today.

Primary reason was to "save the trees"......as if that ever worked.
 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705979

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-10-03 05:04 -0400
Message-ID<pp20me$1jh$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705936
On 10/2/2018 7:20 PM, Scout wrote:
> Something kensi apparently knows very little about.
> 
> Or, he

She! She! For the thousandth time, SHE!

> could check himself and look at the discussion that drove the 
> change from brown paper bags to the plastic bags used today.

[citation needed] that it was anything other than "plastic was cheaper".

> Primary reason was to "save the trees"......as if that ever worked.

[citation needed]

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#706000

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-03 11:38 -0400
Message-ID<pp2npg$1cka$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705979
On 10/3/2018 5:04 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 10/2/2018 7:20 PM, Scout wrote:
>> Something kensi apparently knows very little about.
>>
>> Or, he
> 
> She! She! For the thousandth time, SHE!

Remember Scout that Paul "identifies" with the female gender when 
posting as 'kensi" so it is a felony to refer to "her" with the wrong 
pronoun!

>> could check himself and look at the discussion that drove the change 
>> from brown paper bags to the plastic bags used today.
> 
> [citation needed] that it was anything other than "plastic was cheaper".

Citation needed. These screeching leftists always are demanding 
"citations" but never provide any and worse won't even read yours when 
you post them. They are just evil killers.
>> Primary reason was to "save the trees"......as if that ever worked.
> 
> [citation needed]

Citation needed, yourself.  You are a waste of perfectly good food.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#706021

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-10-03 15:35 -0500
Message-ID<pp396p$cnt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#706000
On 10/3/2018 10:38 AM, benj wrote:
> On 10/3/2018 5:04 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 10/2/2018 7:20 PM, Scout wrote:
>>> Something kensi apparently knows very little about.
>>>
>>> Or, he
>>
>> She! She! For the thousandth time, SHE!
> 
> Remember Scout that Paul "identifies" with the female gender when
> posting as 'kensi" so it is a felony to refer to "her" with the wrong
> pronoun!


but kensi pupa is so little,
'she' cute larvae not growed up yet,
    does not know about "sex",
kensi pupa has to finish pupation by 'her' own self,
no help from anyone else.
No soy sauce!


> 
>>> could check himself and look at the discussion that drove the change
>>> from brown paper bags to the plastic bags used today.
>>
>> [citation needed] that it was anything other than "plastic was cheaper".
> 
> Citation needed. These screeching leftists always are demanding
> "citations" but never provide any and worse won't even read yours when
> you post them. They are just evil killers.
>>> Primary reason was to "save the trees"......as if that ever worked.
>>
>> [citation needed]
> 
> Citation needed, yourself.  You are a waste of perfectly good food.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#706098

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-10-04 05:18 -0400
Message-ID<pp4lsv$ekb$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#706000
On 10/3/2018 11:38 AM, benj wrote:
> On 10/3/2018 5:04 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 10/2/2018 7:20 PM, Scout wrote:
>>> Something kensi apparently knows very little about.
>>>
>>> Or, he
>>
>> She! She! For the thousandth time, SHE!
> 
> Remember Scout that Paul

Who?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web