Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #705746 > unrolled thread
| Started by | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-01 20:18 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-10-02 17:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 20:18 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Richard Cranium <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-01 20:40 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 22:54 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 23:03 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Randy Cunningham <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-02 00:25 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 04:21 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 03:53 +0000
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 23:27 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:35 +0000
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 01:59 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 04:15 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:21 +0000
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 05:30 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:19 +0000
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 17:35 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 21:52 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 21:55 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 05:17 +0000
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 23:17 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-03 23:27 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-03 23:35 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-04 20:45 -0700
Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Sandy Huntington <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-02 17:13 -0700
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 23:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... |
| Message-ID | <6a97c2ef-908e-4ba1-85db-a316c3dc57ca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706084 |
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 9:27:46 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 8:17:41 AM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 3:35:45 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 4:19:42 PM UTC+3, Od > > >>>>>>>> if we have the formula > > >>>>>>>> F = M a > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> what is that is making the force / acceleration there ? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> is it the Meter (length )? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> is it the Second (Time ) there ? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> or is it the M > > >>>>>>>> masses there > > >>>>>>>> that are making the force ther ?? > > >>>>>>>> (:-) > > >>>>>>>> -------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>> TIA > > >>>>>>>> Y.Porat > > >>>>>>>> ===============================> > >>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Well, in most cases we are familiar with, it is electric charges making the > > >>>>>>> force, since the electromagnetic interaction dominates. > ========================================== > shameless pigg !!! > > we have electromagnetic > magnetic > strong forces > week forces > momentum > etc etc > one among many formula > F=ma > eetc etc > having side by side by physics formula > (that not i invented !! > scientist shave been working on it along decades > and more than decades ) > > MASSES AND FORCES side by side in physics formula > IS IT YOUR CAUSATION ?? > but just your f en correlations > IS IT > just a correlation ??? > in short Bodkin anonymous > that even his identity is crocked ? > while his real identity is Paul Draper P D that faded away from this ng after many years of activity > > or is it physics proven eenless time > proven experimentally !! facts ! > a deep connection between > > FORCES AND MASS ?/!! > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ================> > >>> thank you Bodkin > > >>>>>> it seem that while i open my mouth > > >>>>>> you know good enough from previous experience > > >>>>>> that it might be interesting ..... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> so > > >>>>>> what makes the electric charges ?? > > >>>>>> or magnetic charges ?? > > >>>>>> i thought with my primitive understanding of physics > > >>>>>> that > > >>>>>> electric magnetic forces etc - > > >>>>>> are done by ?? !! > > >>>>>> may be you will tell us ? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> electrons protons quarks ?? > > >>>>>> you name it > > >>>>>> but what are all the above ?? > > >>>>>> if not mass ?? > > >>>>>> can they be /act without mass ?? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Correlation is not causation. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> When two cars have an accident, there is always air present. In every > > >>>>> single case! But the air is not the cause of the car collision. > > >>>> > > >>>> =============================> > > you are smart guying again (OBFUSCATING) > > >>>> we talk about physics theory > > >>>> not on air in car accident !! > > >>>> in that accident > > >>>> you can find the underwear of the driver as well > > >>> > > >>> Exactly. Correlation doesn t imply causation. > > >>> > > >>>> and now the ''coherent' of yours Bodkin : > > >>>> > > >>>> CAN THERE BE A TANGIBLE FORCE > > >>>> WHILE NO MASS IS FOUND THERE ?? > > >>> > > >>> Correlation does not imply causation. > > >>> > > >> ===============================> correlation is a nice impressive word !! > > >> now it is your turn > > >> not to play with words but facts !! > > >> > > >> how do you explain he fact > > >> that*** mass and forces** > > >> come > > >> > > >> ALWAYS*** TOGETHER !1?? > > >> 2 > > >> if we find that > > >> F= ** m **a > > >> is it a correlation or a fact ?? > > >> ===> TIA > > >> Y.P > > > > > > > > > > before being a teacher > > > teach yourself > > > to be > > > a human being !!! > > > ==Y.Porat > > > ====================== > > -- >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 20:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... |
| Message-ID | <eb404cf4-a5bd-45d7-9586-d547f1dfe48b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #706085 |
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 9:35:07 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 9:27:46 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 8:17:41 AM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 3:35:45 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 4:19:42 PM UTC+3, Od > > > >>>>>>>> if we have the formula > > > >>>>>>>> F = M a > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>> what is that is making the force / acceleration there ? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> is it the Meter (length )? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> is it the Second (Time ) there ? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> or is it the M > > > >>>>>>>> masses there > > > >>>>>>>> that are making the force ther ?? > > > >>>>>>>> (:-) > > > >>>>>>>> -------------------------------- > > > >>>>>>>> TIA > > > >>>>>>>> Y.Porat > > > >>>>>>>> ===============================> > >>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Well, in most cases we are familiar with, it is electric charges making the > > > >>>>>>> force, since the electromagnetic interaction dominates. > > ========================================== > > shameless pigg !!! > > > > we have electromagnetic > > magnetic > > strong forces > > week forces > > momentum > > etc etc > > one among many formula > > F=ma > > eetc etc > > having side by side by physics formula > > (that not i invented !! > > scientist shave been working on it along decades > > and more than decades ) > > > > MASSES AND FORCES side by side in physics formula > > IS IT YOUR CAUSATION ?? > > but just your f en correlations > > IS IT > > just a correlation ??? > > in short Bodkin anonymous > > that even his identity is crocked ? > > while his real identity is Paul Draper P D that faded away from this ng after many years of activity > > > > or is it physics proven eenless time > > proven experimentally !! facts ! > > a deep connection between > > > > FORCES AND MASS ?/!! > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> ================> > >>> thank you Bodkin > > > >>>>>> it seem that while i open my mouth > > > >>>>>> you know good enough from previous experience > > > >>>>>> that it might be interesting ..... > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> so > > > >>>>>> what makes the electric charges ?? > > > >>>>>> or magnetic charges ?? > > > >>>>>> i thought with my primitive understanding of physics > > > >>>>>> that > > > >>>>>> electric magnetic forces etc - > > > >>>>>> are done by ?? !! > > > >>>>>> may be you will tell us ? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> electrons protons quarks ?? > > > >>>>>> you name it > > > >>>>>> but what are all the above ?? > > > >>>>>> if not mass ?? > > > >>>>>> can they be /act without mass ?? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Correlation is not causation. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> When two cars have an accident, there is always air present. In every > > > >>>>> single case! But the air is not the cause of the car collision. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> =============================> > > you are smart guying again (OBFUSCATING) > > > >>>> we talk about physics theory > > > >>>> not on air in car accident !! > > > >>>> in that accident > > > >>>> you can find the underwear of the driver as well > > > >>> > > > >>> Exactly. Correlation doesn t imply causation. > > > >>> > > > >>>> and now the ''coherent' of yours Bodkin : > > > >>>> > > > >>>> CAN THERE BE A TANGIBLE FORCE > > > >>>> WHILE NO MASS IS FOUND THERE ?? > > > >>> > > > >>> Correlation does not imply causation. > > > >>> > > > >> ===============================> correlation is a nice impressive word !! > > > >> now it is your turn > > > >> not to play with words but facts !! > > > >> > > > >> how do you explain he fact > > > >> that*** mass and forces** > > > >> come > > > >> > > > >> ALWAYS*** TOGETHER !1?? > > > >> 2 > > > >> if we find that > > > >> F= ** m **a > > > >> is it a correlation or a fact ?? > > > >> ===> TIA > > > >> Y.P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > before being a teacher > > > > teach yourself > > > > to be > > > > a human being !!! > > > > ==Y.Porat > > > > ====================== as usual fading away while **pushed to the corner ** F=ma is correlation ??!!! one must be a real shameless crock to say that !!! or may be a professional thief ??!! ================== Y.P ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandy Huntington <invalid@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 17:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... |
| Message-ID | <pp11ib$lam$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #705828 |
>>> thank you Bodkin >>> it seem that while i open my mouth >>> you know good enough from previous experience >>> that it might be interesting ..... You always open your mouth... ...for goat bottom meal!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web