Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #705150 > unrolled thread

Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism

Started byjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
First post2018-09-29 09:12 -0700
Last post2018-10-02 13:04 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 44 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 09:12 -0700
    Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 10:01 -0700
      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 13:26 -0400
    Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:50 +0000
    Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-29 19:22 +0000
    Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-29 13:26 -0700
      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-29 14:01 -0700
        Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:13 -0700
          Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 09:53 -0700
          Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
            Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:00 -0700
              Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:51 +0000
                Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:44 -0700
                  Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-01 01:38 +0000
                  Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:37 +0000
                    Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 08:18 -0700
                      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 08:24 -0700
                        Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-01 15:45 +0000
                        Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:05 +0000
                          Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:21 -0700
                            Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-01 17:56 +0000
                            Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:17 +0000
                      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-01 15:40 +0000
                      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:05 +0000
                  Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:31 -0700
                    Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:05 -0700
                      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:21 -0700
                      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:23 +0000
                      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:02 -0700
              Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-30 17:12 -0500
            Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-30 18:54 -0700
              Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 06:05 -0700
                Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-01 15:36 +0000
          Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:29 -0700
        Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-30 15:20 -0700
          Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
            Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-30 18:52 -0700
        Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-30 18:52 -0700
        Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:25 -0700
      Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 09:19 -0700
        Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 12:17 -0700
          Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 14:35 -0500
            Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 12:45 -0700
          Re: Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:04 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#705150 — Electricity, Gravity, and Magnetism

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-29 09:12 -0700
SubjectElectricity, Gravity, and Magnetism
Message-ID<c9d975cc-cff8-4f48-b368-a785fe73020f@googlegroups.com>
All electrons give off energy. All the time. This is felt as the electric field. They don’t ‘spiral into’ the nucleus because all protons collect energy. This is felt as gravity. Electrons are constantly being re-energized by their protons. This produces magnetism.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#705157

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-29 10:01 -0700
Message-ID<12ffa5ba-ee7f-4749-81e1-2e5004c82335@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705150
On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 9:12:52 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> All electrons give off energy. All the time. This is felt as the electric field. They don’t ‘spiral into’ the nucleus because all protons collect energy. This is felt as gravity. Electrons are constantly being re-energized by their protons. This produces magnetism.

Magnetisum and electricity are two sides to the same coin.Gravity is completly different than a magnet with its two poles .Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705162

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-29 13:26 -0400
Message-ID<poock1$m3d$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705157
On 9/29/2018 1:01 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 9:12:52 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
>> All electrons give off energy. All the time. This is felt as the electric field. They don’t ‘spiral into’ the nucleus because all protons collect energy. This is felt as gravity. Electrons are constantly being re-energized by their protons. This produces magnetism.
> 
> Magnetisum and electricity are two sides to the same coin.Gravity is completly different than a magnet with its two poles .Bert
> 
Bert you senile idiot, don't you know all the "negative" gravity poles 
are all on the other side of universe where we can't see them? This kind 
of thinking will never get you those three Nobels!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705173

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-29 18:50 +0000
Message-ID<poohhq$vmf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705150
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> All electrons give off energy. All the time. This is felt as the electric
> field. They don’t ‘spiral into’ the nucleus because all protons collect
> energy. This is felt as gravity. Electrons are constantly being
> re-energized by their protons. This produces magnetism.
> 

Burbliblubblibubble-boop 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705179

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-09-29 19:22 +0000
Message-ID<poojdq$fpo$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#705150
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

<snip word salad babble>

John, I already told you, don't take the brown acid!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705182

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2018-09-29 13:26 -0700
Message-ID<0f0b84bc-815e-4e1e-b49a-92bfbe19cf1f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705150
All electric particles absorb store and radiate light waves....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705184

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2018-09-29 14:01 -0700
Message-ID<da2765ef-9e0f-434a-b8a0-306a52ec8cf2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705182
On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 1:26:39 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> All electric particles absorb store and radiate light waves....


Do electrons absorb and radiate light waves even when they are not in an atomic orbital?  What would be the implications of that?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705221

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-29 18:13 -0700
Message-ID<dc93c736-e54b-419a-b959-c614fc78204c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705184
AA
“
Do electrons absorb and radiate light waves even when they are not in an atomic orbital?  What would be the implications of that? ”
Electrons give off.
Protons absorb.
Transfer back to electron causes magnetism.

When are electrons never associated with protons?
Good question

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705328

FromAlan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 09:53 -0700
Message-ID<d98cc18d-11ce-453b-b200-6231f3758ce2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705221
On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 3:13:44 PM UTC-10, john wrote:
> AA
> “
> Do electrons absorb and radiate light waves even when they are not in an atomic orbital?  What would be the implications of that? ”
> Electrons give off.
> Protons absorb.
> Transfer back to electron causes magnetism.
> 
> When are electrons never associated with protons?
> Good question

Excellent question. "When are electrons never associated with protons?"

Colliders and laboratories should study that instead of quarks.
I expect that each proton is paired with one electron, 
except in dark matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705351

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
Message-ID<por83m$14ft$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705221
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> AA
> “
> Do electrons absorb and radiate light waves even when they are not in an
> atomic orbital?  What would be the implications of that? ”
> Electrons give off.
> Protons absorb.
> Transfer back to electron causes magnetism.
> 
> When are electrons never associated with protons?

? What do you think an atom is?


> Good question
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705356

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 13:00 -0700
Message-ID<b302b970-a316-4067-a2eb-d06c184c728f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705351
Odd
“..atom...”

Yes, they ARE associated with a proton in the atom.

‘The electric field is caused by the discharging of the electron, which happens continually. The magnetic field is caused by the re-charging of the electron, which happens sporadically.’ (when in association with a proton.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705410

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 21:51 +0000
Message-ID<porgh3$1i26$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705356
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “..atom...”
> 
> Yes, they ARE associated with a proton in the atom.
> 
> ‘The electric field is caused by the discharging of the electron, which
> happens continually. The magnetic field is caused by the re-charging of
> the electron, which happens sporadically.’ (when in association with a proton.)
> 

You know an electron beam (no protons nearby) has a magnetic field? 

No, of course you don’t. Why would you know basics?

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705434

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 16:44 -0700
Message-ID<bb664f3f-d535-4ff3-b998-c569683144c8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705410
Odd
“You know an electron beam (no protons nearby) has a magnetic fie”
Where are there no protons?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705446

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-10-01 01:38 +0000
Message-ID<portqb$tmf$3@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#705434
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Odd
>"You know an electron beam (no protons nearby) has a magnetic fie"
>Where are there no protons?

Ever own an old-style CRT television or computer monitor? Inside its
picture tube. Inside is a vacuum with an electron beam (when operating).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705558

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-01 14:37 +0000
Message-ID<potben$dn4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705434
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “You know an electron beam (no protons nearby) has a magnetic fie”
> Where are there no protons?
> 

In an electron beam, with the nearest proton a billion atomic diameters
away. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705563

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-01 08:18 -0700
Message-ID<c1652079-a735-4741-b9fe-b269b99e9cbb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705558
Odd
“In an electron beam, with the nearest proton a billion atomic diameters 
away. 
”
Yah
But I’ll bet there’s an actual proton sheath surrounding it. And burnt-out bits of electron are sucked in like mad and magnetism is off the charts.

The electric field is caused by radiations from electrons being emitted by electrons.
Gravity is caused by radiations from electrons being absorbed by protons- it is a ‘backward’ field.
Both are long range.
Magnetism is caused by bits of burnt out electrons falling into the protons spin and being shot out as jets of high-energy particles.
It is short range.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705566

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-01 08:24 -0700
Message-ID<99622df2-3278-44d8-97d3-80211e36abed@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705563
Odd
“with the nearest proton a billion atomic diameters 
away. ”
And this is known for sure....how?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705570

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-10-01 15:45 +0000
Message-ID<potfep$d17$3@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#705566
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Odd
>"with the nearest proton a billion atomic diameters
>away. "
>And this is known for sure....how?

Ummm, because electron beams are produced in a vacuum? And a good vacuum
has very few (ideally no) atoms in it?? And that is done because electron
beams striking stray atoms produce undesired effects??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705574

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-01 16:05 +0000
Message-ID<potgkq$ofg$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#705566
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “with the nearest proton a billion atomic diameters 
> away. ”
> And this is known for sure....how?
> 

Vacuum pipe, John.  All the protons sucked out of it. 

My, you are clueless. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#705600

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-01 10:21 -0700
Message-ID<d0075225-c3ee-4af5-a4ca-12a81570819e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#705574
Odd 
“Vacuum pipe, John.  All the protons sucked out of it. ”
No protons making up the pipe?
Oh!!
Dark Matter!!!
The pipe smokes dark Matter?
Of course- your go-to answer. Very handy. How?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web