Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #702932 > unrolled thread

Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
Last post2018-09-18 09:11 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 261 — 27 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-16 10:48 -0400
      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:17 -0400
        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:24 -0700
          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:51 -0400
            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:55 -0700
              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 11:09 -0700
    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 10:31 -0700
      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 13:56 -0400
      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:17 -0400
        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:37 -0700
        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:15 -0400
          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:57 -0400
            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:21 -0400
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:27 +0100
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:41 -0700
            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:48 -0600
              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 19:20 +0000
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100
                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 10:33 -0400
                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 17:59 +0100
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:41 -0400
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:47 +0100
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0500
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:48 +0100
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:48 +0000
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:36 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:06 +0000
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:38 -0400
                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:48 +0000
                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:32 -0400
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-25 10:23 +0000
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:31 -0400
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0400
                                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:13 +0000
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 16:23 -0400
                                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:48 +0000
                                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
                                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
                                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
                                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
                                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
                                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
                                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 20:44 +0100
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:47 -0400
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:04 -0400
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:12 +0000
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-20 18:43 -0400
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 16:31 -0700
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-20 22:48 +0000
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:09 -0400
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 09:14 -0400
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:26 -0400
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:15 -0400
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 17:59 +0000
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 23:23 +0000
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 00:02 +0000
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:20 -0700
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 05:08 +0000
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:02 -0700
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:47 -0400
                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:01 +0000
                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:44 +0000
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:51 +0000
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:43 +0000
                                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:06 -0400
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 16:44 +0000
                                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:01 +0000
                                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 20:32 +0100
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:47 -0400
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:29 -0400
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:17 -0400
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:23 -0700
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:28 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:27 -0700
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:58 -0600
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:03 +0000
                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0700
                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:50 -0700
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 14:54 -0400
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:47 +0000
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:00 -0400
                                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:01 -0700
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:35 +0000
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:49 -0700
                                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:17 -0400
                                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:20 -0700
                                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0000
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:33 -0700
                                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:53 +0000
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:32 -0400
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 00:24 +0000
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000
                                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000
                                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500
                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400
                                  Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
                                    Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400
                                      Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600
                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000
                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500
                                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000
                                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500
                                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000
                                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700
                                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400
                                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100
                                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400
                                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:05 -0600
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:52 -0700
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:59 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:02 -0700
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:46 -0500
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:12 -0400
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:53 -0400
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:13 +0000
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 19:39 +0100
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:09 -0600
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:31 -0400
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:55 -0400
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:15 +0000
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:26 -0400
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:52 -0400
              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 14:38 -0500
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-09-18 15:49 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0700
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700
              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400
                                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400
                              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500
                                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500
                          Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700
                            Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400
                        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700
                          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400
                            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400
            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400
              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000
    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600
      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700
        Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 08:13 -0400
          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:15 -0700
          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:43 -0600
          Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:54 -0700
            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:59 -0600
              Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:35 -0700
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:43 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:51 -0700
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 01:36 -0600
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 11:39 -0400
                    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:43 -0700
                      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 13:53 -0600
                Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0400
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 15:00 -0500
                  Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0700
            Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 15:28 -0400
      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:22 -0400
    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:07 -0400
    Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-09-18 01:19 -0400
      Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400

Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14  Next page →


#704572

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
Message-ID<nf9lqd1ceio1eecf8r1lnitvsvn78krksd@4ax.com>
In reply to#704568
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:48:53 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:23:17 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:13:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>On 9/25/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>> On 9/24/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'll be sitting on the front porch sipping bourbon and laughing at
>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You'll be being investigated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/15/sovereign-citizens-
>>>rightwing-terrorism-hate-us-government
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You're a joke. Your bigotry defines you. Your stupidity is your only
>>>>>> character trait.
>>>>>
>>>>>*My* bigotry?
>>>>>
>>>>>You're projecting. You're the only bigot of us two.
>>>> 
>>>> I don't think women are even capable of being bigots.
>>>
>>>So, you're k'laming that Catalina/Miss Shitty/Marilyn Merlot is not a
>>>woman?
>> 
>> No, she's a woman, all right!
>
>Error: contradictory statements. She's a bigot, she's a woman, but women 
>aren't capable of being bigots?!

No, you're the one who said MK was a bigot. I said she
was not as she's not capable of being a bigot. 

Bigotry is intentional, intuition is something women have
and it can't be helped. It evolved in lieu of logic.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with 
her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704619

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
Message-ID<poeu3n$mhp$48@dont-email.me>
In reply to#704572
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:20:05 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:48:53 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:23:17 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:13:39 -0000 (UTC),
>>> Nadegda<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>On 9/25/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>> On 9/24/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I'll be sitting on the front porch sipping bourbon and laughing
>>>>>>>>> at you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You'll be being investigated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/15/sovereign-citizens-
>>>>rightwing-terrorism-hate-us-government
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You're a joke. Your bigotry defines you. Your stupidity is your
>>>>>>> only character trait.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*My* bigotry?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're projecting. You're the only bigot of us two.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't think women are even capable of being bigots.
>>>>
>>>>So, you're k'laming that Catalina/Miss Shitty/Marilyn Merlot is not a
>>>>woman?
>>> 
>>> No, she's a woman, all right!
>>
>>Error: contradictory statements. She's a bigot, she's a woman, but women
>>aren't capable of being bigots?!
> 
> No, you're the one who said MK was a bigot. I said she was notXXXXXXX

Process terminated
ERROR: Logic unit failure
Please consult the operations manual

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704663

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
Message-ID<pog333$11dr$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704619
On 9/25/2018 11:23 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:20:05 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:48:53 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:23:17 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:13:39 -0000 (UTC),
>>>> Nadegda<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/25/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> On 9/24/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I'll be sitting on the front porch sipping bourbon and laughing
>>>>>>>>>> at you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You'll be being investigated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/15/sovereign-citizens-
>>>>> rightwing-terrorism-hate-us-government
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a joke. Your bigotry defines you. Your stupidity is your
>>>>>>>> only character trait.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *My* bigotry?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're projecting. You're the only bigot of us two.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think women are even capable of being bigots.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you're k'laming that Catalina/Miss Shitty/Marilyn Merlot is not a
>>>>> woman?
>>>>
>>>> No, she's a woman, all right!
>>>
>>> Error: contradictory statements. She's a bigot, she's a woman, but women
>>> aren't capable of being bigots?!
>>
>> No, you're the one who said MK was a bigot. I said she was notXXXXXXX
> 
> Process terminated
> ERROR: Logic unit failure
> Please consult the operations manual
> 
Shit programming!  No Doubt it says "Error 202" so nobody has any idea 
what the problem is. This is your level of "work", right Nads? Why women 
should avoid STEM and stay in the kitchen. Do it for the good of 
civilization.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704685

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
Message-ID<pog9mq$1eoj$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704663
On 9/26/2018 9:54 AM, benj wrote:
> On 9/25/2018 11:23 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Process terminated
>> ERROR: Logic unit failure
>> Please consult the operations manual
>
> Shit programming!  No Doubt it says "Error 202" so nobody has any idea 
> what the problem is. This is your level of "work", right Nads? Why women 
> should avoid STEM and stay in the kitchen. Do it for the good of 
> civilization.

Nicely melted, misogynist.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704585

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
Message-ID<poebnn$4hk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704568
On 9/25/2018 4:48 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:23:17 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:13:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/25/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>> On 9/24/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'll be sitting on the front porch sipping bourbon and laughing at
>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You'll be being investigated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/15/sovereign-citizens-
>>> rightwing-terrorism-hate-us-government
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a joke. Your bigotry defines you. Your stupidity is your only
>>>>>> character trait.
>>>>>
>>>>> *My* bigotry?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're projecting. You're the only bigot of us two.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think women are even capable of being bigots.
>>>
>>> So, you're k'laming that Catalina/Miss Shitty/Marilyn Merlot is not a
>>> woman?
>>
>> No, she's a woman, all right!
> 
> Error: contradictory statements. She's a bigot, she's a woman, but women
> aren't capable of being bigots?!
> 
Lessee, we can handle this real logic (as opposed to in sane liblogic)
She's a woman. She's a bigot. Women are not capable of being bigots (or 
doing much else except making a lot of useless noise with their mouths).

The answer is obvious. Since she is not capable of being a bigot on her 
own, she obviously needed the help of some alpha male to do the 
difficult work of making her a bigot for her. QED.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704584

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.36145134f58bad3a994c2a@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#704564
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <u46lqd5ec2ftr552sl66oieid1k2qrugr5@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:13:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >>>On 9/25/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
> >>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
> >>>>> On 9/24/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
> >>>>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
> >>>>>>> On 9/23/2018, Avenging Angel wrote:
> >>>>>> I'll be sitting on the front porch sipping bourbon and laughing at
> >>>>>> you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You'll be being investigated.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/15/sovereign-citizens-
> >rightwing-terrorism-hate-us-government
> >>>> 
> >>>> You're a joke. Your bigotry defines you. Your stupidity is your only
> >>>> character trait.
> >>>
> >>>*My* bigotry?
> >>>
> >>>You're projecting. You're the only bigot of us two.
> >> 
> >> I don't think women are even capable of being bigots.
> >
> >So, you're k'laming that Catalina/Miss Shitty/Marilyn Merlot is not a 
> >woman?
> 
> No, she's a woman, all right!   It's just that her intuition is 
> grounded more in reality and less on emotions.  She's a rare
> breed. 

That's for sure...

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704560

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
Message-ID<poe424$1k6c$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704219
On 9/23/2018 7:06 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:po58kt$182a$1
> @gioia.aioe.org:
> 
>> Trying to evade accepting the truth won't work in the long run. 
> Besides, 
>> isn't it obvious? Since the right wing is hostile to women's bodily, 
>> financial, and social autonomy, there is a strong added reason for 
> women 
>> to lean left that does not exist for men, who are advantaged rather 
> than 
>> disadvantaged by patriarchy.
>>
>> That the voting gap isn't even wider just shows how much social 
>> brainwashing and spousal voter intimidation (or even spousal voter 
>> suppression) is going on.
> 
> It could be that the majority of women are smarter than you and don't buy 
> into your moronic, power hungry agenda. Maybe they lov and respect thier 
> husbands, brother, fathers, etc and find your anti male rants without 
> basis.
> 
> The best evidence of that might be that according to a Huffington Post 
> Poll Only 25% of Women Believe Kavanaugh Accuser.
> 
> https://thepoliticalinsider.com/do-women-believe-kavanaugh-accuser/
> 
> A notable quote from the article : "But is anybody buying it? 
> Surprisingly, a poll from the Huffington Post of all places found that 
> the overwhelming majority of Americans don’t find these 11th-hour 
> accusations credible, and women are less likely than men to believe 
> them."
> 
> Essentially, the shrill shreieking of the insane does not convince sane 
> Americans of anything except that the insane should be confined for thier 
> and society's safety.
> 
> And honey, you qualify.
> 
> No cunt, you'll have to wage your revolution, your usurpation of the 
> Constitution of the fundemental human rights of Americans the old 
> fashioned way - with violence. 
> 
> And how I wich you would start. I have a list of the top 100 I would like 
> to see knocked off. Don't worry, you aren't on it, you aren't of great 
> enough interest. But don't worry, if this shrieking stupidity of yours 
> has been going on for a while, I'm sure you've made someone's list.
> 

      knock off her tater tots !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703481

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
Message-ID<pnt7rm$3sa$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703446
On 9/18/2018 9:11 PM, benj wrote: (and jimp, and klaus, and puddles)
> Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards

Misogyny noted. Anti-intellectualism noted. Get back to us when you have 
a real argument to make.

> There is a reason women don't do any science or engineering. They only 
> understand emotions.

Misogyny noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

Despite all your blather and denial, EV range on a full "tank" is 
approaching parity with gas-guzzlers. Deal with it.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703977

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.360f350d8733e655994b5d@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#703481
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pnt7rm$3sa$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


> Subject: Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling
> From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
> Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
> 
> On 9/18/2018 9:11 PM, benj wrote: (and jimp, and klaus, and puddles)
> > Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards
> 
> Misogyny noted. Anti-intellectualism noted. Get back to us when you have 
> a real argument to make.
> 

Do you and your sister sock ever wonder why all the men you talk to are 
misogynists?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703994

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
Message-ID<po46m0$d3v$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#703977
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:04:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pnt7rm$3sa$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> 
>> Subject: Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After
>> Stalling From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
>> Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
>> 
>> On 9/18/2018 9:11 PM, benj wrote: (and jimp, and klaus, and puddles)
>> > Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards
>> 
>> Misogyny noted. Anti-intellectualism noted. Get back to us when you
>> have a real argument to make.
> 
> Do you and your sister sock ever wonder why all the men you talk to are
> misogynists?

No. It's obvious. Most men are misogynists, because they were brought up 
by misogynists in the midst of structural patriarchy.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703996

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
Message-ID<uv7bqd1u0juefv6sc22f3gj7vhjhhdihml@4ax.com>
In reply to#703994
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:42:25 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:04:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <pnt7rm$3sa$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>> 
>> 
>>> Subject: Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After
>>> Stalling From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
>>> Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
>>> 
>>> On 9/18/2018 9:11 PM, benj wrote: (and jimp, and klaus, and puddles)
>>> > Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards
>>> 
>>> Misogyny noted. Anti-intellectualism noted. Get back to us when you
>>> have a real argument to make.
>> 
>> Do you and your sister sock ever wonder why all the men you talk to are
>> misogynists?
>
>No. It's obvious. Most men are misogynists, because they were brought up 
>by misogynists in the midst of structural patriarchy.

You can't even say woman hater without getting wet. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704059

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.360f96f37dd1e5b7994b82@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#703994
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <po46m0$d3v$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:04:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <pnt7rm$3sa$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> > @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> >> Subject: Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After
> >> Stalling From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
> >> Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
> >> 
> >> On 9/18/2018 9:11 PM, benj wrote: (and jimp, and klaus, and puddles)
> >> > Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards
> >> 
> >> Misogyny noted. Anti-intellectualism noted. Get back to us when you
> >> have a real argument to make.
> > 
> > Do you and your sister sock ever wonder why all the men you talk to are
> > misogynists?
> 
> No. It's obvious. Most men are misogynists, because they were brought up 
> by misogynists in the midst of structural patriarchy.

I learned it from women who treat men like shit... misandrists like you.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704073

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
Message-ID<po58ng$182a$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704059
On 9/22/2018 4:02 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <po46m0$d3v$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
>> No. It's obvious. Most men are misogynists, because they were brought up
>> by misogynists in the midst of structural patriarchy.
> 
> I learned it from women who treat men like shit... misandrists like you.

In actuality Nadegda is not a misandrist, just an egalitarian rather 
than a male supremacist. But to the privileged, equality looks like 
oppression, and anyone who isn't a male supremacist looks like a 
misandrist in particular.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704097

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
Message-ID<1nvjbqv.yglqyxi19n1yN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#704073
Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
"kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:  

> On 9/22/2018 4:02 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>
> > Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume 
> > pompously pontificated:
> > 
> >> No. It's obvious. Most men are misogynists, because they were brought up
> >> by misogynists in the midst of structural patriarchy.
> > 
> > I learned it from women who treat men like shit... misandrists like you.
> 
> In actuality Nadegda is not a misandrist, just an egalitarian rather 
> than a male supremacist. But to the privileged, equality looks like 
> oppression, and anyone who isn't a male supremacist looks like a 
> misandrist in particular.
>

There you have it folks, straight from the whoreses mouth:- 
 
Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume 
is "an egalitarian rather than a male supremacist." 

- thereby putting his gender beyond doubt.

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704104

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
Message-ID<po5m0m$1se6$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704097
On 9/22/2018 10:21 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> There you have it folks, straight from the whoreses mouth:-
>   
> Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume
> is "an egalitarian rather than a male supremacist."
> 
> - thereby putting his gender beyond doubt.

That stuff you're on ... is it legal in your state?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704117

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
Message-ID<po5tim$djc$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#704097
x-no-archive: yes

On 9/22/2018 7:21 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor
> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:
> 
>> On 9/22/2018 4:02 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>
>>> Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume
>>> pompously pontificated:
>>>
>>>> No. It's obvious. Most men are misogynists, because they were brought up
>>>> by misogynists in the midst of structural patriarchy.
>>>
>>> I learned it from women who treat men like shit... misandrists like you.
>>
>> In actuality Nadegda is not a misandrist, just an egalitarian rather
>> than a male supremacist. But to the privileged, equality looks like
>> oppression, and anyone who isn't a male supremacist looks like a
>> misandrist in particular.
>>
> 
> There you have it folks, straight from the whoreses mouth:-
>   
> Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume
> is "an egalitarian rather than a male supremacist."
> 
> - thereby putting his gender beyond doubt.

Smackdown!

Sn!pe = 1
Paul = ko0k of the century

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704220

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA966538922AD3greyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#704073
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:po58ng$182a$2@gioia.aioe.org: 

> On 9/22/2018 4:02 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by Checkmate!  In article <po46m0$d3v$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>> 
>>> No. It's obvious. Most men are misogynists, because they were
>>> brought up by misogynists in the midst of structural patriarchy.
>> 
>> I learned it from women who treat men like shit... misandrists like
>> you. 
> 
> In actuality Nadegda is not a misandrist, just an egalitarian rather 
> than a male supremacist. But to the privileged, equality looks like 
> oppression, and anyone who isn't a male supremacist looks like a 
> misandrist in particular.
> 

Egalatarian? That's just a nicer word for socialist/communist.

All humans are NOT equal. Some are smarter, some are more attractive, 
some will work harder to achieve success. And no amount of poltical 
posturing can change that without getting into the gene pool and editing 
it.

Face it, you are a slave to a failed philosophy. And we will NOT allow 
you or anyone else to impose it on us again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704229

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Message-ID<po88kb$1pii$8@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704220
On 9/23/2018 8:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> All humans are NOT equal. Some are smarter, some are more attractive,
> some will work harder to achieve success. And no amount of poltical
> posturing can change that without getting into the gene pool and editing
> it.

At least you're more honest about your odious underlying beliefs than 
most rightards.

Advocacy for eugenics noted, BTW. No surprise coming from a neo-Nazi 
like you, but noted anyway.

> a slave to a failed philosophy.

That you are.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703665

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.360d8aa77f394746994ab2@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#703426
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pnrvg8$7hs$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:20:53 +0000, jimp wrote:
> 
> > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote:
> >> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote:
> >>>> Solar?
> >>>>
> >>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels,
> >>> 
> >>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory.
> >>> 
> >>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment
> >>> 
> >>> For now but eventually these should be electric.
> >> 
> >> Eventually being the key word.  How many years away is eventually?
> > 
> > When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel,
> > which right now looks like never.
> 
> Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-wheels 
> efficiency to consider. For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be around 
> 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs.
> 
> Citations:
> 
> https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2-
> gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure 
> electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. The best batteries, lithium 
> nickel manganese cobalt oxide, have 90% charging efficiency, so 10% is 
> lost on the way from socket to tank, rather than from tank to wheels. This 
> efficiency is given at:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_commercial_battery_types
> 
> The latter link also establishes the energy density of a lithium nickel 
> manganese cobalt oxide at 2.1 MJ/L.
> 
> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the tank 
> to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, so what actually gets to 
> the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can 
> deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but 
> diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, a fat, stationary target.

If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting fossil fuel 
energy into chemical energy, then into electrical energy, then into 
mechanical energy.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703668

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
Message-ID<po0rda$e0i$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#703665
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:45:33 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <pnrvg8$7hs$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
>> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:20:53 +0000, jimp wrote:
>> 
>> > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote:
>> >> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote:
>> >>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote:
>> >>>> Solar?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels,
>> >>> 
>> >>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory.
>> >>> 
>> >>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment
>> >>> 
>> >>> For now but eventually these should be electric.
>> >> 
>> >> Eventually being the key word.  How many years away is eventually?
>> > 
>> > When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel,
>> > which right now looks like never.
>> 
>> Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-
wheels 
>> efficiency to consider. For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be 
around 
>> 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs.
>> 
>> Citations:
>> 
>> https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2-
>> gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure 
>> electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. The best batteries, 
lithium 
>> nickel manganese cobalt oxide, have 90% charging efficiency, so 10% is 
>> lost on the way from socket to tank, rather than from tank to wheels. 
This 
>> efficiency is given at:
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_commercial_battery_types
>> 
>> The latter link also establishes the energy density of a lithium nickel 
>> manganese cobalt oxide at 2.1 MJ/L.
>> 
>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the 
tank 
>> to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, so what actually gets to 
>> the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV 
can 
>> deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but 
>> diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, a fat, stationary 
target.
> 
> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting fossil fuel 
> energy into chemical energy, then into electrical energy, then into 
> mechanical energy.

First of all, fossil fuel energy *is* chemical energy. And second, these 
inefficiencies (other than the last one, which happens for any vehicle not 
powered by something's legs) can be eliminated in large part by using 
renewable energy instead of fossil fuels.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web