Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #703430 > unrolled thread

why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2 isomer discovery??

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-09-18 16:05 -0700
Last post2018-09-22 03:08 +0000
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2 isomer discovery?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 16:05 -0700
    Re: why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2 isomer discovery?? Buck Futter <invalid@example.com> - 2018-09-18 20:58 -0700
      Futter loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Richard L. McElroy, Warren S. Warren,Harold Baranger,Steffen Bass love it also?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:40 -0700
      Re: why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2 isomer discovery?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:59 -0700
        Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-22 03:08 +0000

#703430 — why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2 isomer discovery??

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-18 16:05 -0700
Subjectwhy Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2 isomer discovery??
Message-ID<d8f1a3cc-b99f-445e-9808-8d9ec74ecbd6@googlegroups.com>


why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does  Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2 isomer discovery?? 

Malum loves, loves AP theory of CO2 carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas pollutant that not only makes global warming but that FireCO2, derived from fossil fuel is a toxic poison to plants and is causing plants to die back. Plants can only use the CO2 that originates from animals and is a MAJOR REASON to save all animals in the wild. The reason the Baobab tree of Africa is dying is because of Fire CO2 is killing the famous trees. 

Fire produced CO2 is far different in chemistry than the CO2 involved with plants and animals. There are many ISOMERS of CO2, and a recent Minnesota research study showed that plants cannot use the Fire-CO2. 

On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 3:09:30 AM UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote: 
> Definitionally, there are any amount of dimension you want. 

AP writes: yes, definitely as recent proof of AP's Starpower is that Jupiter has a permanent lit up pole of blue light Northern Lights, Aurora Borealis. So Jupiter is already a lit up star. 


Which is AP's 2nd and 3rd best theory? Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms where inside every atom, the muon is thrust through the proton producing magnetic monopoles and creating starpower. Or, AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. 

Stockholm University 
Math logic 
Per Martin-Lof, Erik Palmgren, Tom Britton, Pavel Kurasov 
Alexander Berglund, Jonas Bergstrom*, Rikard Bogvad 
Samuel Lundqvist, Annemarie Luger *, Erik Palmgren 
Torbjorn Tambour 

Stockholm Univ physics 
Tony Hansson, Markus Hennrich, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen *, 

Swedish physics, et al 
Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog *, Lars Bergstrom, Lars Samuelson 
Anders Flodstrom, Hans Ryde, Anders Barany, Gunnar von Heijne 
Claes-Goran Granqvist, Joakim Edsjo, Carl Falthammar, Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser 
Pres. Sigbritt Karlsson (KTH) 


University Gothenburg 
Bernt Wennberg 
Aila Sarkka 

Univ Stockholm Physics dept 

Gunnar Benediktsson, Clas Blomberg, Bo Cartling 
Olle Edholm, Goran Grimvall, Goran Lindblad 
Hakan Snellman, Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren 
John Rundgren 


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Stockholm? 

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, starpower is only 10% fusion, 90% Faraday Law of its atoms. 


And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.  Remain stupid in that the ellipse is never a conic but always a cylinder section. The oval is a conic section. 


Yes, there Malum, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion mixed with fission only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

And of course, AP's greatest all time theory is 231Pu Atom Totality, the whole entire universe is just one big atom. 

What answer did they give? 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.       

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#703456

FromBuck Futter <invalid@example.com>
Date2018-09-18 20:58 -0700
Message-ID<pnshgq$vms$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703430
Shut up, idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703460 — Futter loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Richard L. McElroy, Warren S. Warren,Harold Baranger,Steffen Bass love it also??

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-18 21:40 -0700
SubjectFutter loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Richard L. McElroy, Warren S. Warren,Harold Baranger,Steffen Bass love it also??
Message-ID<77c117f4-2f61-4eec-9d1b-86cf32ff6cfe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#703456
Futter loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Richard L. McElroy, Warren S. Warren 
Harold Baranger 
Steffen Bass love it also??


From: Buck Futter <inv...@example.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many isomers--
 AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS. Does Sven
 Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's CO2
 isomer discovery??
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:58:26 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server

 
Hiding behind Richard L. McElroy's AIOE, and causing sci.physics to be a pollution landscape. I say-- never allow any AIOE posts to enter sci.physics.

Duke Univ physics dept 

Warren S. Warren 
Harold Baranger 
Steffen Bass *
Robert Behringer 
David Beratan 
Robert Brown 
Albert Chang 
Patrick Charbonneau 
James Dobbins 
Glenn Edwards 
Gleb Finkelstein 
Haiyan Gao 
Alfred Goshaw 
Henry Greenside 
Jungsang Kim 
Mark Kruse 
Jian-Guo Liu 
Thomas Mehen 
John Mercer 
Berndt Mueller 
Seog Oh 
M. Plesser 
Kate Scholberg 
David Smith 
Joshua Socolar 
Roxanne Springer 
Stephen Teitsworth 
Christopher Walter 
Ying Wu 




   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in North Carolina? 

And, even though you-- professors of math and physics, want to remain stupid in Physics, your students deserve better. 

Consider, then admit that the Covalent bond of chemistry cannot exist in the world if the electron is considered to be .5MeV for it has not enough Angular Momentum to keep a bond together. The true electron of all atoms has to be of a ratio of 105 MeV to proton of 840MeV in order to have a Covalent bonding in Chemistry.

Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704002

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 18:59 -0700
Message-ID<c151949b-06cd-4251-b2ff-60ae160ba648@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#703456
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 10:58:22 PM UTC-5, Buck Futter wrote:
> Shut up, idiot.


On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 7:09:43 PM UTC-5, Bill Smith wrote:
> Shut up idiot.

From: Bill Smith <inv...@example.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: 2-Futter loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with
 electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Richard L.
 McElroy, Warren S. Warren,Harold Baranger,Steffen Bass love it also??
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:09:55 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server

On Thursday, September 20, 2018 at 6:10:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

AP writes:: yes sir, it takes that discerning eye from AIOE to recognize MM is a babbling idiot. MM needs to pay more attention to his Gay Bed &Breakfast in Boston. Say there, MM, how many feet away is your B&B from the front door of Harvard and the front door of MIT?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704019 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-09-22 03:08 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<po4bn5$567$3@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#704002
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: why Malum loves AP's discovery that CO2 comes in many 
>isomers-- AnimalCO2 versus FireCO2 as a reason to saving ALL WILD ANIMALS.

Something else we need to discuss. Suddenly, your chemistry knowedge, 
while always limited, seems to actually be diminishing. Your chemistry
related posts are all at a dumber/lower level, and you are getting more
stupid things wrong. Like 18F being the same as water??? How dumb and 
stoopid is that?  Fluorine is an extremely reactive halogen. In 
combination with other elements (which is like always), it is a very
electronegative element.  Water isn't even an element, it is a compound.
It's not overly reactive, either.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web