Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #703300 > unrolled thread

Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-18 05:51 -0400
Last post2018-09-18 11:58 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 52 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:51 -0400
    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:15 -0400
      Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 10:22 -0500
    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 12:52 -0400
      Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 17:58 -0400
      Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:09 +0000
        Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 23:19 +0100
          Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:01 +0000
            Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 19:59 -0400
              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:08 -0400
        Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 20:59 -0400
          Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment ot de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-09-19 11:20 +1000
          Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:31 -0400
            Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 06:46 -0400
              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:00 -0400
                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 13:21 +0100
                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 10:45 -0400
                  Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 13:51 -0500
                    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 20:54 +0100
                      Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 16:50 -0400
                        Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 16:30 -0500
                          Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 18:06 -0400
                            Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:12 -0700
                              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 18:17 -0400
                                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:19 -0700
                              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 04:22 -0700
                        Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 18:08 -0400
                          Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 18:37 -0400
                    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:09 -0400
                      Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 15:44 -0500
                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:13 -0400
                  Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:34 +0000
                    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:30 -0400
                      Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 22:01 -0500
                      Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:34 -0400
                        Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-20 16:13 +0100
              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 10:44 -0400
              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 10:36 -0500
                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:58 -0400
                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:19 -0400
            Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:24 +0000
              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 18:29 -0700
              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 21:35 -0400
                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:53 +0000
                  Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 18:57 -0700
                  Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:37 -0400
                Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 21:12 -0500
                  Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 19:14 -0700
                    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 08:27 +0100
              Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:37 -0400
    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:47 -0700
    Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:58 -0600

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#703300 — Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-18 05:51 -0400
SubjectMayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment
Message-ID<pnqhra$1pd0$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Great cities know the future is renewable:

https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#703316

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-18 09:15 -0400
Message-ID<pnqtq8$fi4$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703300
On 9/18/2018 5:51 AM, kensi wrote:
> Great cities know the future is renewable:
> 
> https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html 
> 
> 
"Treehugger.com"! Bwahahahahahaha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703343

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-09-18 10:22 -0500
Message-ID<pnr579$tkr$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703316
On 9/18/2018 8:15 AM, benj wrote:
> On 9/18/2018 5:51 AM, kensi wrote:
>> Great cities know the future is renewable:
>>
>> https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html
>>
>>
> "Treehugger.com"! Bwahahahahahaha!



    ah.....  kensi pupa is tree worm.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703356

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-18 12:52 -0400
Message-ID<u3b2qd9ih2lva77ut716rkpjsp65loisbd@4ax.com>
In reply to#703300
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 05:51:36 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>Great cities know the future is renewable:
>
>https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html

Treehugger.com.  LOL.  So stupid!  Wood burning
is considered renewable energy.  Fireplaces, wood
stoves, charcoal, fire pits in the back yard, etc. 
all require the sacrifice of trees.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703407

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-18 17:58 -0400
Message-ID<pnrsds$63v$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703356
On 9/18/2018 12:52 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 05:51:36 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Great cities know the future is renewable:
>>
>> https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html
> 
> Treehugger.com.  LOL.  So stupid!  Wood burning
> is considered renewable energy.  Fireplaces, wood
> stoves, charcoal, fire pits in the back yard, etc.
> all require the sacrifice of trees.
> 
And of course the beauty of "renewable" energy is that not only does the 
combustion create CO2 but you have the added benefit that the trees are 
no longer sucking CO2 out of the air and locking into wood! Lose-lose!

Libtards are totally overwhelmed by thinking. To them only emotions count.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703411

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-18 22:09 +0000
Message-ID<pnrt2a$7hs$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#703356
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:52:32 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 05:51:36 -0400, kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Great cities know the future is renewable:
>>
>>https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-
joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html
> 
> Treehugger.com.  LOL.  So stupid!  Wood burning is considered renewable
> energy.  Fireplaces, wood stoves, charcoal, fire pits in the back yard,
> etc.
> all require the sacrifice of trees.

Ignoramus. Never heard of coppicing, it seems ...

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703418

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-18 23:19 +0100
Message-ID<1nvcj3w.16h3uhh1k5j3j7N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#703411
Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume pompously
pontificated:

> Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled:
> 
> > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
> > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:  
> > 
> >> Great cities know the future is renewable:
> >> 
>>> <https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html>
> > 
> > Treehugger.com.  LOL.  So stupid!  Wood burning is considered renewable
> > energy.  Fireplaces, wood stoves, charcoal, fire pits in the back yard,
> > etc.
> > all require the sacrifice of trees.
> 
> Ignoramus. Never heard of coppicing, it seems ...
>

<http://tinyurl.com/yamnjwh8>  resolves to:-
<https://www.theguardian.com/money/2018/may/26/wood-burner-open-fire-pollution-cleaning-up-air-quality>
<http://tinyurl.com/y8att8c3>  resolves to:-
<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/wood-burners-ban-government-legislation-air-pollution-strategy-uk-a8362601.html>
<http://tinyurl.com/y9c3fvy4>  resolves to:-
<https://www.telegraph.co.uk/interiors/home/wood-burning-stoves-do-new-rules-mean-heater/>

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703428

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-18 23:01 +0000
Message-ID<pns040$7hs$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#703418
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:19:33 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:

> Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume pompously
> pontificated:
> 
>> Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled:
>> 
>> > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor "kensi"
>> > Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:
>> > 
>> >> Great cities know the future is renewable:
>> >> 
>>>> <https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-
issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html>
>> > 
>> > Treehugger.com.  LOL.  So stupid!  Wood burning is considered
>> > renewable energy.  Fireplaces, wood stoves, charcoal, fire pits in
>> > the back yard,
>> > etc.
>> > all require the sacrifice of trees.
>> 
>> Ignoramus. Never heard of coppicing, it seems ...
>>
>>
> <http://tinyurl.com/yamnjwh8>  resolves to:-
> <https://www.theguardian.com/money/2018/may/26/wood-burner-open-fire-
pollution-cleaning-up-air-quality>
> <http://tinyurl.com/y8att8c3>  resolves to:-
> <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/wood-burners-ban-
government-legislation-air-pollution-strategy-uk-a8362601.html>
> <http://tinyurl.com/y9c3fvy4>  resolves to:-
> <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/interiors/home/wood-burning-stoves-do-new-
rules-mean-heater/>

Your point being? Glerrzg's erroneous "require the sacrifice of trees" 
statement still lies refuted.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703436

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-18 19:59 -0400
Message-ID<m843qd127nu6maraj6gbvi3i3elju82soj@4ax.com>
In reply to#703428
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:01:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
<...>

>Your point being? Glerrzg's erroneous "require the sacrifice of trees" 
>statement still lies refuted.

You might be right. I recall you saying the trees
were all migrating west. That would mean there's
none left in these here Appalachian parts.

Pretty difficult to sacrifice trees a thousand
miles away.

LOL.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she is offered something which affords a reason for acting in 
accordance with her feelings, she will accept it even on the 
slightest evidence. The origin of PMS is explained in this way." 

-- Capt. Neal ®

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703445

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-18 21:08 -0400
Message-ID<pns7i5$jp8$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703436
On 9/18/2018 7:59 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:01:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> <...>
> 
>> Your point being? Glerrzg's erroneous "require the sacrifice of trees"
>> statement still lies refuted.
> 
> You might be right. I recall you saying the trees
> were all migrating west. That would mean there's
> none left in these here Appalachian parts.
> 
> Pretty difficult to sacrifice trees a thousand
> miles away.
> 
> LOL.
> 
Yep trees dragging themselves westward! EVer see "Day of the Triffids? 
Trees pulling themselves along with their roots just like that! For Nads 
an "kensi": any fantasy is "science" to them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703442

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-18 20:59 -0400
Message-ID<pns71p$jbj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703411
On 9/18/2018 6:09 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:52:32 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 05:51:36 -0400, kensi
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Great cities know the future is renewable:
>>>
>>> https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-
> joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html
>>
>> Treehugger.com.  LOL.  So stupid!  Wood burning is considered renewable
>> energy.  Fireplaces, wood stoves, charcoal, fire pits in the back yard,
>> etc.
>> all require the sacrifice of trees.
> 
> Ignoramus. Never heard of coppicing, it seems ...
> 
Dumb fuck libs. Never heard of modern forest management and fight common 
sense like mad while worshiping some old traditional practice. Who is 
willing  listen to this insane drool? Burning trees creates CO2 
hyopocrite idiot. Get a degree and learn some science.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703449 — Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment ot

Fromde chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com>
Date2018-09-19 11:20 +1000
SubjectRe: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment ot
Message-ID<TtGdnf8iRajIOTzGnZ2dnUU7-UFi4p2d@westnet.com.au>
In reply to#703442
On 19/09/2018 10:59 AM, benj wrote:
> On 9/18/2018 6:09 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:52:32 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 05:51:36 -0400, kensi
>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great cities know the future is renewable:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue- 
>>>>
>> joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html
>>>
>>> Treehugger.com.  LOL.  So stupid!  Wood burning is considered renewable
>>> energy.  Fireplaces, wood stoves, charcoal, fire pits in the back yard,
>>> etc.
>>> all require the sacrifice of trees.
>>
>> Ignoramus. Never heard of coppicing, it seems ...
>>
> Dumb fuck libs. Never heard of modern forest management and fight common 
> sense like mad while worshiping some old traditional practice. Who is 
> willing  listen to this insane drool? Burning trees creates CO2 
> hyopocrite idiot.

and when the resource is renewed it takes up CO2Get a degree and learn 
some science.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703485

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 06:31 -0400
Message-ID<pnt8i9$4tt$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703442
On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote:
> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!>
Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was 
growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net 
deforestation of land.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703487

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-19 06:46 -0400
Message-ID<pnt9ej$7eg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703485
On 9/19/2018 6:31 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote:
>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!>
> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was 
> growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net 
> deforestation of land.
> 
Burning trees is " carbon Neutral?
Bwahahahha! That means all fossil use is "neutral" too!
I urge you and Nads to go to college and get degrees in science.

Talking to you and Nads is like a visit to an insane asylum (were it no 
all you libtards closed them and turned all the nutjobs out on the 
streets years ago.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703490

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 08:00 -0400
Message-ID<pntdoe$et3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703487
On 9/19/2018 6:46 AM, benj wrote:
> On 9/19/2018 6:31 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote:
>>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!>
>> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it 
>> was growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net 
>> deforestation of land.
>
> Burning trees is " carbon Neutral?

Yes.

> Bwahahahha! That means all fossil use is "neutral" too!

No. Fossil use is something like ten orders of magnitude faster than the 
processes that replenish fossil fuels. Carbon release is thus comparably 
greater than carbon draw-down there.

> I urge you and Nads to go to college and get degrees in science.

I have a Ph.D. in physics, you nitwit.

> Talking to you and Nads is like a visit to an insane asylum

With us being the ones doing the visiting.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703491

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-19 13:21 +0100
Message-ID<1nvdmcl.1ouo18jbgt3a2N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#703490
Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
"kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:  

> On 9/19/2018 6:46 AM, benj wrote:

> > I urge you and Nads to go to college and get degrees in science.
> 
> I have a Ph.D. in physics, you nitwit.

Fu.D you mean - Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt.

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703504

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-19 10:45 -0400
Message-ID<07o4qdpb2s9ds5vimurbo59oatd9ck3ro9@4ax.com>
In reply to#703490
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:00:11 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:


>I have a Ph.D. in physics, you nitwit.

Post proof or it isn't so!

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she is offered something which affords a reason for acting in 
accordance with her feelings, she will accept it even on the 
slightest evidence. The origin of PMS is explained in this way." 

-- Capt. Neal ®

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703528

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-09-19 13:51 -0500
Message-ID<pnu5rv$1tdg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703504
On 9/19/2018 9:45 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:00:11 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
>> I have a Ph.D. in physics, you nitwit.
> 
> Post proof or it isn't so!
> 

bad, naughty  kensi pupa!!

a Google search did NOT find any Ph.D for you !

there are less than 30,000 phds in Physics in the USA, kensi pupa, and
you are not one of them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703532

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-19 20:54 +0100
Message-ID<1nve7ch.rwl17z1v08hfsN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#703528
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

> Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled:
>
> > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
> > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: 
> > 
> >> I have a Ph.D. in physics, you nitwit.
> > 
> > Post proof or it isn't so!
> > 
> 
> bad, naughty  kensi pupa!!
> 
> a Google search did NOT find any Ph.D for you !
> 
> there are less than 30,000 phds in Physics in the USA,
> kensi pupa, and you are not one of them.

lol

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703542

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-19 16:50 -0400
Message-ID<pnucr3$ai9$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703532
On 9/19/2018 3:54 PM, Sn!pe wrote:
> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>> Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled:
>>
>>> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor
>>> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:
>>>
>>>> I have a Ph.D. in physics, you nitwit.
>>>
>>> Post proof or it isn't so!
>>>
>> bad, naughty  kensi pupa!!
>>
>> a Google search did NOT find any Ph.D for you !
>>
>> there are less than 30,000 phds in Physics in the USA,
>> kensi pupa, and you are not one of them.
> 
> lol

There's only 120,000 members left in the AIP and only half of them 
living in the USA with physics PhDs.  We're going extinct.  Dying like 
flies.  Nobody learning physics anymore.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web