Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #702498 > unrolled thread

2.4- a rectangular torus// What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  2.4- a rectangular torus// What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 14:10 -0700
    geometry of the isomers of CO2 // now we get to the many isomers of CO2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 15:09 -0700
      Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 22:26 +0000
    Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 22:30 +0000

#702498 — 2.4- a rectangular torus// What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2

2.4Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:03:14 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: 2.3- a rectangular torus// What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of 
 Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:03:15 +0000 

2.4- a rectangular torus// What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 

Alright, so using this formula e = B x l x v, let us build the world's superior electricity generator. But humans cannot build such a thing because Atomic subparticles have something engineering by humans can never provide-- perpetual motion. We can never do perpetual motion, so our electric generators will always fall short of the generators that atoms and molecules provide. 

So, think of a cube or rectangular solid and the faces think of those 6 faces as a coil. A coil a bit different because the face has 4 vertices. But we all know that in EM theory, a vertex is not in any way of generating electricity in a Faraday law. 

So each face is a proton coil of 8 windings all looking like this 
___ 
|   | 
--- 

or rectangle 
________ 
|           | 
-------- 

So, each face of an Atom of neon is a square or rectangle of a Proton Coil with 8 windings. The valence muons, those 6 muons in the P orbital of neon are 1 coil of 1 winding, and are far smaller of a coil that goes in and out (or as in a rectangular torus, stays perpetually inside the rectangular torus producing electricity. 

So I am going to build such a device here at home just to see it more clearly. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:53:54 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: 2.1-What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// 
 now we get to the many isomers of CO2 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:53:54 +0000 

2.1-What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 

2.1-What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 

What was holding me back for over a month now, was-- "What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity" for the answer to that tells me how atoms are arranged in chemical bonding. The answer is obvious, it is cube or rectangular solid for you can thence tile entire 3rd dimension. And the 6 faces become the P orbital of its 6 important valence muons with attendant protons. So, all I needed was that one important fact and it dawned on me yesterday, the answer-- cube or rectangular solid geometry. 

This further explains or is enhanced with the mathematics of e = B x l x v  which is a cube or rectangular solid as Cube = Length x Width x Depth 


Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:10:22 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: true geometry of atoms- cubes or rectangular solids, based on 6 
 //Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:10:22 +0000 

Alright, back to Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers. 

I had to assemble the carbon diamond molecule and the graphite molecule. 

I had to finalize in my mind, what is Maximum Electricity Generation, how to build a maximum electricity generator. 

Again quoting EdisonTechCenter.org for their writing style is superior as educational— 

If you take a lot of wire such as in a coil and move it in the field, you create a more powerful "flow" of electrons. The strength of your generator depends on:   

"l"-Length of the conductor in the magnetic field 
"v"-Velocity of the conductor (speed of the rotor) 
"B"-Strength of the electromagnetic field 

You can do calculations using this formula: e = B x l x v 


So, the key idea came to me yesterday, 11September2018. The key idea is that a cube or rectangular solid is 6 faces. Take each face as a muon of the P orbital 

P orbital = 1P_x , 2P_x, 1P_y, 2P_y, 1P_z, 2P_z 

The Metallic Bond is both malleable and ductile, meaning we can hammer into a plane or ductile-- form into a wire. The reason being is a cube or rectangular solid are malleable and ductile 

Each of those P suborbitals forms a face of a rectangular solid. 

This means that Nitrogen atom has 3 faces of a rectangular solid, and when two nitrogens combine N2, the  3 faces of one combines with the 3 faces of the other to form a rectangular solid. And in space, you can form a wire from rectangular solids or form a thin sheet of metal as the solids fill a planar space. 

So, remember the Faraday Law and in simple form, a closed loop (actually 8 loops) as the proton and a bar magnet as the muon. So, each face of a Cube or Rectangular Solid is a P_i suborbital. 

So if all 6 of the P suborbitals is filled then we have a Cube or Rectangular Solid composed of loops (protons) and muons as bar magnets. 

The geometry was what I was missing before, but now I have it -- and it is a great geometry for its utter simplicity-- cube or rectangular solid. It is based upon the number 6 as the Lewis Structure is bogus chemistry for that is based on number 8. 

I recently bought two science kits from "Thames Kosmos" and sadly, they are based on Lewis 8 structure, so I had to cut away two of the appendages on all its atoms, except for hydrogen which had the correct amount of appendages-- just 1. 

So, now, I can proceed to correctly identify the carbon diamond molecule and compare it to the carbon graphite molecule, knowing the solid structure is either a cube or rectangular solid and we envision that solid as loops of wire for the faces, the 6 faces. 

Of course, well, this destroys the Rutherford model of the atom with its idea 99% of the mass of each and every atom is in a tightly filled nucleus. Atoms do have a nucleus, but not all the protons reside in that nucleus, for the valence muons are attended to by valence protons. So today, in modern physics, we have to re-do the Rutherford Experiment proving that although there are nuclei in atoms, that they contain perhaps 60% to 50% of the mass while 40% to 50% of the mass is outside the nuclear region. 

For an atom like neon with 10 protons, 6 of those 10 protons are outside the nucleus, and those 6 protons are forming the faces of a cube or a rectangular solid. 



Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#702516 — geometry of the isomers of CO2 // now we get to the many isomers of CO2

On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 4:10:37 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 2.4Newsgroups: sci.math 
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:03:14 -0700 (PDT) 
> 
> Subject: 2.3- a rectangular torus// What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of 
>  Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
> Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:03:15 +0000 
> 
> 2.4- a rectangular torus// What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 
> 
> Alright, so using this formula e = B x l x v, let us build the world's superior electricity generator. But humans cannot build such a thing because Atomic subparticles have something engineering by humans can never provide-- perpetual motion. We can never do perpetual motion, so our electric generators will always fall short of the generators that atoms and molecules provide. 
> 


I am using paper clips to build these miniature cubes or rectangular solids. I take a individual paper clip and bend it in half, so that one half appears | and the other half appears ___

|__


Now I call that single paper clip a One Muon of Six Muons that fill the P orbital.

Now as I build a cube or rectangular solid from bent paper clips, if they overlap on a face, means it is a 2 winding, or a number of windings, but the cube or rectangle solid is the geometry outcome. Actually this is what the Dirac Equation and Schrodinger Equations amount to in the Cubic Solutions. The Elements Beyond Urananium, Seaborg, Loveland, page 73, 1990.

So now, Neon, the single atom has a filled P orbital and forms a cube of its P_x, P_y, P_z filled and is a inert gas because it is filled P orbital-- never wants to bond, for why bond when you have the perfect cube geometry.

Next we have what comes closest to neon as a perfect cube and that is either N2 or CO.

Where we have 6 valence muons, those six muons forming almost a perfect cube.

I have them sitting in front of me right now, from the Thames &Kosmos education kit, only I cut off two of the tentacles on most of the atoms they provided because Chemistry bonding is based on the number 6, not 8 Lewis Structure. Each tentacle is a valence muon. So for N2, I have 3tentacles on one N and 3 on the other N and N2 is where all 6 tentacles, 6 muons are shared.

Now, CO also has 6 valence muons, 4 from the O and 2 from the C. Now, in the CO bond, the 2 muons of C share with the solo muons of O, but what is different between CO and N2, is that the two filled P_x suborbital, that entire suborbital is shared by C, for C has no more muon to give. Unlike N2, each of the P_x, P_y, P_z is given a contribution by both N, but in CO, a entire suborbital of P_x is surrendered over to the C atom from the O atom.

And this is why N2 has a lower dissociation energy than does CO for the C atom bond of the entire P_x is stronger. We have 1076 versus 946 (see below)

source: chem.ucsb.edu 

in kJ/mol 

CO 1076 
C2H2 962 
N2  946 
HCN  937 
CN 770 
H2OC  732 
CO2 532 
ON2 480 
CH4 431 
CH  337 
O2  498 
ON  630 
H2  436 
HD  439 
D2  443 

ozone O3 is 142.7 kJ/mol (source Univ Waterloo)





> So, think of a cube or rectangular solid and the faces think of those 6 faces as a coil. A coil a bit different because the face has 4 vertices. But we all know that in EM theory, a vertex is not in any way of generating electricity in a Faraday law. 
> 
> So each face is a proton coil of 8 windings all looking like this 
> ___ 
> |   | 
> --- 
> 
> or rectangle 
> ________ 
> |           | 
> -------- 
> 
> So, each face of an Atom of neon is a square or rectangle of a Proton Coil with 8 windings. The valence muons, those 6 muons in the P orbital of neon are 1 coil of 1 winding, and are far smaller of a coil that goes in and out (or as in a rectangular torus, stays perpetually inside the rectangular torus producing electricity. 
> 
> So I am going to build such a device here at home just to see it more clearly. 
> 

Now, let me introduce a new term in Chemistry Physics, of the Antennae Bond of valence muons.

Putting together CO2 from the Thames&Kosmos education kit (remember, I cut off 2 tentacles on most atoms for true chemistry is based on 6 not on 8)

And putting together CO2 we see the 6 tentacles (6 muons shared) between C and O and O. However, in the end we have two tentacles of the P_x of the first O and the two tentacles of the second O of its P_x have them sticking up like a antennae. These two antennae are fully closed loops able to do the Faraday Law but these two antennae are not part of the bonding of C with O and with O.

CO2 532 kJ/mol of dissociation energy

Now, the reason it is easier to pull apart CO2 than it is to pull apart CO or N2, is because of these 2 pairs of Antennae of the P_x orbitals of the two Os in CO2. Then stick out, and when they come into contact with something of a stronger attraction, it is easy to rip apart CO2 to form some other compound. This is why CO is twice as strong as is CO2

CO is 1076 and CO2 is 532, virtually twice as strong for CO with a sigma error of 1076/1064 = 1% sigma error.

The underlying reason for twice as strong of CO than CO2 is that those 2 Antennae closed loops stick out and make it easier to dissociate.






> 
> Newsgroups: sci.physics 
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:53:54 -0700 (PDT) 
> 
> Subject: 2.1-What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// 
>  now we get to the many isomers of CO2 
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
> Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:53:54 +0000 
> 
> 2.1-What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 
> 
> 2.1-What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity// now we get to the many isomers of CO2 
> 
> What was holding me back for over a month now, was-- "What Geometry maximizes Space in terms of Space and Electricity" for the answer to that tells me how atoms are arranged in chemical bonding. The answer is obvious, it is cube or rectangular solid for you can thence tile entire 3rd dimension. And the 6 faces become the P orbital of its 6 important valence muons with attendant protons. So, all I needed was that one important fact and it dawned on me yesterday, the answer-- cube or rectangular solid geometry. 
> 
> This further explains or is enhanced with the mathematics of e = B x l x v  which is a cube or rectangular solid as Cube = Length x Width x Depth 
> 
> 
> Newsgroups: sci.math 
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:10:22 -0700 (PDT) 
> 
> Subject: true geometry of atoms- cubes or rectangular solids, based on 6 
>  //Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers 
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
> Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:10:22 +0000 
> 
> Alright, back to Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers. 
> 
> I had to assemble the carbon diamond molecule and the graphite molecule. 
> 
> I had to finalize in my mind, what is Maximum Electricity Generation, how to build a maximum electricity generator. 
> 
> Again quoting EdisonTechCenter.org for their writing style is superior as educational— 
> 
> If you take a lot of wire such as in a coil and move it in the field, you create a more powerful "flow" of electrons. The strength of your generator depends on:   
> 
> "l"-Length of the conductor in the magnetic field 
> "v"-Velocity of the conductor (speed of the rotor) 
> "B"-Strength of the electromagnetic field 
> 
> You can do calculations using this formula: e = B x l x v 
> 
> 
> So, the key idea came to me yesterday, 11September2018. The key idea is that a cube or rectangular solid is 6 faces. Take each face as a muon of the P orbital 
> 
> P orbital = 1P_x , 2P_x, 1P_y, 2P_y, 1P_z, 2P_z 
> 
> The Metallic Bond is both malleable and ductile, meaning we can hammer into a plane or ductile-- form into a wire. The reason being is a cube or rectangular solid are malleable and ductile 
> 
> Each of those P suborbitals forms a face of a rectangular solid. 
> 
> This means that Nitrogen atom has 3 faces of a rectangular solid, and when two nitrogens combine N2, the  3 faces of one combines with the 3 faces of the other to form a rectangular solid. And in space, you can form a wire from rectangular solids or form a thin sheet of metal as the solids fill a planar space. 
> 
> So, remember the Faraday Law and in simple form, a closed loop (actually 8 loops) as the proton and a bar magnet as the muon. So, each face of a Cube or Rectangular Solid is a P_i suborbital. 
> 
> So if all 6 of the P suborbitals is filled then we have a Cube or Rectangular Solid composed of loops (protons) and muons as bar magnets. 
> 
> The geometry was what I was missing before, but now I have it -- and it is a great geometry for its utter simplicity-- cube or rectangular solid. It is based upon the number 6 as the Lewis Structure is bogus chemistry for that is based on number 8. 
> 
> I recently bought two science kits from "Thames Kosmos" and sadly, they are based on Lewis 8 structure, so I had to cut away two of the appendages on all its atoms, except for hydrogen which had the correct amount of appendages-- just 1. 
> 
> So, now, I can proceed to correctly identify the carbon diamond molecule and compare it to the carbon graphite molecule, knowing the solid structure is either a cube or rectangular solid and we envision that solid as loops of wire for the faces, the 6 faces. 
> 
> Of course, well, this destroys the Rutherford model of the atom with its idea 99% of the mass of each and every atom is in a tightly filled nucleus. Atoms do have a nucleus, but not all the protons reside in that nucleus, for the valence muons are attended to by valence protons. So today, in modern physics, we have to re-do the Rutherford Experiment proving that although there are nuclei in atoms, that they contain perhaps 60% to 50% of the mass while 40% to 50% of the mass is outside the nuclear region. 
> 
> For an atom like neon with 10 protons, 6 of those 10 protons are outside the nucleus, and those 6 protons are forming the faces of a cube or a rectangular solid. 
> 


And now we come to the question of isomers of CO2.

Two possible isomers would be much like the CO molecule where the P_x of O those two muons bond directly unto the C atom. In the case of CO2, produced from hot fire, one of the P_x of either O_1 or O_2 can directly bond to the missing P_z of Carbon.

Or, many combinations of the P_x of Oxygen, can bond with the missing P_z of carbon in CO2

The trouble with CO2 that was no trouble for CO, is that CO has its carbon atom of its P_x, P_y,P_z fully covered, while in CO2, the carbon atom P_z is totally empty. So, depending on the Energy Environment that the CO2 molecule is created in, if in biology respiration the CO2 is in lowest energy form, where it has 2 antennae of the P_x, and it has a totally absent P_z of its carbon atom. Whilst CO2 produced in hot fires, that CO2 is likely to have contributions of the antennae muons to filling or partial filling of the P_z of Carbon atom.

So, if all true, means that plants can only use the CO2 that animals breathe out, and that plants will suffocate from CO2 that is produced in fires.


> 
> 
> Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
> ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 
> 
> 
>                 ::\ ::|:: /:: 
>                  ::\::|::/:: 
>                      _ _ 
>                     (:Y:) 
>                      - - 
>                  ::/::|::\:: 
>                 ::/ ::|:: \:: 
> One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
>             . \ .  . | .   /. 
>            . . \. . .|. . /. . 
>               ..\....|.../... 
>                ::\:::|::/:: 
> ---------------      ------------- 
> --------------- (Y) ------------- 
> ---------------      -------------- 
>                ::/:::|::\:: 
>               ../....|...\... 
>            . . /. . .|. . \. . 
>             . / .  . | .   \ . 
> 
>   
> http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 
> 
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      
> 
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
> Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#702520 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>>Can you show the research papers which identify all those

>AP writes:  yes, sad situation in world mathematics and science, that it 
>is easier for the liaring president Donald Trump to tell the truth about his 

I take that as "no".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#702522 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>>Can you show the research papers which identify all those

>AP writes:  yes, sad situation in world mathematics and science, that it
>is easier for the liaring president Donald Trump to tell the truth about 
his

I take that as "no".

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web