Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702228 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-11 23:55 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-13 02:55 +0000 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi of MIT--total failures says Moroney --cannot correct their mistake ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic for the oval is the conic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 23:55 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 19:18 +0000
Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon of MIT asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 14:34 -0700
Re: Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon of MIT asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 17:39 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 02:55 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 23:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi of MIT--total failures says Moroney --cannot correct their mistake ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic for the oval is the conic |
| Message-ID | <009d2a51-aa4c-43f9-978e-3db674995fec@googlegroups.com> |
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 1:28:06 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: ,,,,, "Total Failure" ,,,,, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi of MIT--total failures says Moroney --cannot correct their mistake ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic for the oval is the conic Harvard & MIT prefers to teach fake math rather than teach true math-- ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section. See AP's PROOF BELOW. On Friday, August 24, 2018 at 8:17:57 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > AP writes:: Moroney, was it not the dumb German Franz that you cobbed > > that above fake proof > > Fake proof? How come you can't prove it wrong? Show us where it is wrong. > > Here it is again for you: > > > Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic > sections are ellipses. > > Some preliminaries: > > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used > in the proof: > > ^ x > | > -+- <= x=h > .' | `. > . | . > | | | > ' | ' > `. | .' > y <----------+ <= x=0 > > Cone (side view): > . > /|\ > / | \ > /b | \ > /---+---' <= x = h > / |' \ > / ' | \ > / ' | \ > x = 0 => '-------+-------\ > / a | \ > > Proof: > > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence > > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2. > > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse > > qed Drs.Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//Volney has a difficult time of percentages of how much is 938 short of 945. But worse yet, why do you keep teaching the ellipse is a conic when it never was, but rather the ellipse is always a cylinder section. On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) MIT math dept. Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush , Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet , Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman , Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans , Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi,* David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman, Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan Harvard Math dept Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb, Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris, Heisuke Hironaka, Michael Hopkins, Arthur Jaffe, David Kazhdan , Mark Kisin, Peter Kronheimer, Jacob Lurie , Eric Maskin, Barry Mazur, Curtis McMullen *, David Mumford, Martin Nowak, Gerald Sacks, Wilfried Schmid, Yum-Tong Siu, Shlomo Sternberg, John Tate, Cliff Taubes, Hugh Woodin, Horng-Tzer Yau, Shing-Tung Yau /\-------/\ \::O:::O::/ (::_ ^ _::) \_`-----'_/ You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston? And, even though you-- professors of math who never want to fix and clean up error filled mathematics, your students deserve better, and you should quit teaching if you cannot come around to admitting a ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section. For it is embarrassing to have students smarter than the math professor who by taking a cone, cylinder can and a round lid, can prove on the spot, in the classroom that the cone yields an oval, never an ellipse. Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by Archimedes Plutonium -------------------- Conics = oval, 2 proofs, synthetic, analytic Synthetic Geometry & Analytical Geometry Proofs that Conic section = Oval, never an ellipse-- World's first proofs thereof by Archimedes Plutonium _Synthetic Geometry proofs that Cylinder section= Ellipse// Conic section= Oval First Synthetic Geometry proofs, later the Analytic Geometry proofs. Alright I need to get this prepared for the MATH ARRAY of proofs, that the Ellipse is a Cylinder section, and that the Conic section is an oval, never an ellipse PROOF that Cylinder Section is an Ellipse, never a Oval:: I would have proven it by Symmetry. Where I indulge the reader to place a circle inside the cylinder and have it mounted on a swivel, a tiny rod fastened to the circle so that you can pivot and rotate the circle. Then my proof argument would be to say--when the circle plate is parallel with base, it is a circle but rotate it slightly in the cylinder and determine what figure is produced. When rotated at the diameter, the extra area added to the upper portion equals the extra area added to bottom portion in cylinder, symmetrical area added, hence a ellipse. QED Now for proof that the Conic section cannot be an ellipse but an oval, I again would apply the same proof argument by symmetry. Proof:: Take a cone in general, and build a circle that rotates on a axis. Rotate the circle just a tiny bit for it is bound to get stuck or impeded by the upward slanted walls of the cone. Rotate as far as you possibly can. Now filling in the area upwards is far smaller than filling in the area downwards. Hence, only 1 axis of symmetry, not 2 axes of symmetry. Define Oval as having 1 axis of symmetry. Thus a oval, never an ellipse. QED The above two proofs are Synthetic Geometry proofs, which means they need no numbers, just some concepts and axioms to make the proof work. A Synthetic geometry proof is where you need no numbers, no coordinate points, no arithmetic, but just using concepts and axioms. A Analytic Geometry proof is where numbers are involved, if only just coordinate points. Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic section = Oval, never ellipse Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the best of all. That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you lose clarity. ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse:: E __ .-' `-. .' `. / \ ; ; | G c | H ; ; \ / `. .' `-. _____ .-' F The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c. Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of cylinder | | | | E | | | | |x c |x | | | | | | |F | | | | | | | So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse:: A ,'" "`. / \ C | c | D \ / ` . ___ .' B The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line). What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD. Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder, only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments- are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB, leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD. / \A x/ c \x B/ \ Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse. QED --Archimedes Plutonium Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 19:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pnbopa$k7g$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #702228 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: <snip> 6 more stalker lists, one cubbyhole critter and one repost of a false proof. Archie is losing it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 14:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon of MIT asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole |
| Message-ID | <75050df2-adef-40b5-bb92-be083aa1796f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #702310 |
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 2:18:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > Math Failure Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon of MIT asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole John Doyle, Gary Feldman of Harvard asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 2:24:06 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: his failure spam Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. MIT math dept. Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet*, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman, Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) MIT physics dept William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau , Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon,* Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole Harvard Physics dept Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, *Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin Harvard Math dept Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb, Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris, Heisuke Hironaka, Michael Hopkins, Arthur Jaffe, David Kazhdan, Mark Kisin, Peter Kronheimer, Jacob Lurie, Eric Maskin, Barry Mazur, Curtis McMullen, David Mumford, Martin Nowak, Gerald Sacks, Wilfried Schmid, Yum-Tong Siu, Shlomo Sternberg, John Tate, Cliff Taubes, Hugh Woodin, Horng-Tzer Yau, Shing-Tung Yau /\-------/\ \::O:::O::/ (::_ ^ _::) \_`-----'_/ You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston? And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. Yes, there Moroney, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. What answer did they give? Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 17:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon of MIT asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole |
| Message-ID | <68181bc3-200b-4451-a488-4b4fbd40ff11@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #702341 |
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 2:34:34 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 2:18:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Math Failure > > > Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon of MIT asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole > > John Doyle, Gary Feldman of Harvard asked by Moroney what is AP's 2nd best theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole > > On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 2:24:06 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: his failure spam > > Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole > > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. > > MIT math dept. > > Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet*, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman, Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan > > President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) > > MIT physics dept > William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau , Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon,* Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young > > Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole > > > Harvard Physics dept > Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai > Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, *Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau > Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine > Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii > David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul > Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson > Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin > > > Harvard Math dept > > > Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb, Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris, Heisuke Hironaka, Michael Hopkins, Arthur Jaffe, David Kazhdan, Mark Kisin, Peter Kronheimer, Jacob Lurie, Eric Maskin, Barry Mazur, Curtis McMullen, David Mumford, Martin Nowak, Gerald Sacks, Wilfried Schmid, Yum-Tong Siu, Shlomo Sternberg, John Tate, Cliff Taubes, Hugh Woodin, Horng-Tzer Yau, Shing-Tung Yau > > /\-------/\ > \::O:::O::/ > (::_ ^ _::) > \_`-----'_/ > You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston? > And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. > > > Yes, there Moroney, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. > > But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. > > What answer did they give? > > Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH > ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu > > > ::\ ::|:: /:: > ::\::|::/:: > _ _ > (:Y:) > - - > ::/::|::\:: > ::/ ::|:: \:: > One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. > . \ . . | . /. > . . \. . .|. . /. . > ..\....|.../... > ::\:::|::/:: > --------------- ------------- > --------------- (Y) ------------- > --------------- -------------- > ::/:::|::\:: > ../....|...\... > . . /. . .|. . \. . > . / . . | . \ . > > > http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe > Archimedes Plutonium The failures of scientists you post about are superficial tests. Why are you interested in judging? You are a failure as a person AP. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 02:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pncjj1$q93$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #702341 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: <snip> It's really too bad your new meds didn't work. You've gotten much worse, your failure index on your attack posts are up to 9 stalker lists per post. That's a lot of failure, Archie. Good thing you have only one cubbyhole critter, he gives you only one failure point per post. Oh how is your new wheelchair for your brain working out? 🧠 ♿ Ir's the latest thing for mental cripples.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web