Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702286 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-12 10:18 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-12 18:54 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
true geometry of atoms- cubes or rectangular solids, based on 6 //Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 10:18 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 18:54 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 10:18 -0700 |
| Subject | true geometry of atoms- cubes or rectangular solids, based on 6 //Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers |
| Message-ID | <3ec590de-f173-4231-8f0a-98e8143934be@googlegroups.com> |
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: true geometry of atoms- cubes or rectangular solids, based on 6 //Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:10:22 +0000 Alright, back to Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers. I had to assemble the carbon diamond molecule and the graphite molecule. I had to finalize in my mind, what is Maximum Electricity Generation, how to build a maximum electricity generator. Again quoting EdisonTechCenter.org for their writing style is superior as educational— If you take a lot of wire such as in a coil and move it in the field, you create a more powerful "flow" of electrons. The strength of your generator depends on: "l"-Length of the conductor in the magnetic field "v"-Velocity of the conductor (speed of the rotor) "B"-Strength of the electromagnetic field You can do calculations using this formula: e = B x l x v So, the key idea came to me yesterday, 11September2018. The key idea is that a cube or rectangular solid is 6 faces. Take each face as a muon of the P orbital P orbital = 1P_x , 2P_x, 1P_y, 2P_y, 1P_z, 2P_z The Metallic Bond is both malleable and ductile, meaning we can hammer into a plane or ductile-- form into a wire. The reason being is a cube or rectangular solid are malleable and ductile Each of those P suborbitals forms a face of a rectangular solid. This means that Nitrogen atom has 3 faces of a rectangular solid, and when two nitrogens combine N2, the 3 faces of one combines with the 3 faces of the other to form a rectangular solid. And in space, you can form a wire from rectangular solids or form a thin sheet of metal as the solids fill a planar space. So, remember the Faraday Law and in simple form, a closed loop (actually 8 loops) as the proton and a bar magnet as the muon. So, each face of a Cube or Rectangular Solid is a P_i suborbital. So if all 6 of the P suborbitals is filled then we have a Cube or Rectangular Solid composed of loops (protons) and muons as bar magnets. The geometry was what I was missing before, but now I have it -- and it is a great geometry for its utter simplicity-- cube or rectangular solid. It is based upon the number 6 as the Lewis Structure is bogus chemistry for that is based on number 8. I recently bought two science kits from "Thames Kosmos" and sadly, they are based on Lewis 8 structure, so I had to cut away two of the appendages on all its atoms, except for hydrogen which had the correct amount of appendages-- just 1. So, now, I can proceed to correctly identify the carbon diamond molecule and compare it to the carbon graphite molecule, knowing the solid structure is either a cube or rectangular solid and we envision that solid as loops of wire for the faces, the 6 faces. Of course, well, this destroys the Rutherford model of the atom with its idea 99% of the mass of each and every atom is in a tightly filled nucleus. Atoms do have a nucleus, but not all the protons reside in that nucleus, for the valence muons are attended to by valence protons. So today, in modern physics, we have to re-do the Rutherford Experiment proving that although there are nuclei in atoms, that they contain perhaps 60% to 50% of the mass while 40% to 50% of the mass is outside the nuclear region. For an atom like neon with 10 protons, 6 of those 10 protons are outside the nucleus, and those 6 protons are forming the faces of a cube or a rectangular solid. AP
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 18:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pnbndi$c4i$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #702286 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Newsgroups: sci.math >Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:10:22 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: true geometry of atoms- cubes or rectangular solids, based on 6 > //Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its many isomers >From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> >Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:10:22 +0000 >Alright, back to Chemistry Physics, and the true CO2 molecule with its >many isomers. Evidence of these isomers? Oh that's right, you don't believe in evidence, you believe in "If Archie Plutonium babbled it, it must be true!"
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web