Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #701921 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-10 00:27 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-11 02:21 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 66 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 00:27 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-10 04:00 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 09:05 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 17:12 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:25 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 17:32 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 11:39 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 19:13 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-10 14:22 -0500
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:15 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 21:07 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 18:06 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 21:07 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 18:26 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 02:38 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 02:06 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 11:58 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 07:07 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 07:54 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 14:03 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 21:35 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 16:39 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 00:35 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 19:12 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 02:14 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 19:38 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 04:31 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 11:02 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 06:53 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 14:47 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 08:22 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 16:19 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 09:48 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 17:43 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 11:07 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 19:18 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 12:34 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 19:50 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 12:58 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 20:56 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 14:04 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 14:26 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 02:13 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:29 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 02:42 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:26 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com> - 2018-09-13 13:08 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 06:36 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 07:33 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 15:30 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 09:18 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 17:26 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 10:38 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:32 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 21:21 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 14:31 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:16 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 18:22 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 02:16 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:30 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:29 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 19:40 +0000
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-11 02:25 -0700
Re: The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-11 02:21 -0700
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 00:27 -0700 |
| Subject | The Cycloid-Parabola Wave, to replace all sine and cosine waves of physics |
| Message-ID | <f933bb87-a129-43df-acd1-d5f534e20780@googlegroups.com> |
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Cycloid Remake wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 06:13:39 +0000 Cycloid Remake wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial Now an interesting function in New Math that looks somewhat similar to what Old Math sine and cosine looked like, with their up and down pattern v^v^v^ only with curved arcs We can admit that the Cycloid is a semiellipse from 0 to 3.14 and further semiellipses along the x axis But, what say you when at x= 1.57 we invert the semiellipse to its U shape So we have a quarter ellipse from 0 to 1.57, then at 1.57 it is the inverted ellipse the 1/x type of shape to that of x=3.14 So here the Cycloid can be said to look like water waves on the beach. You see, the trouble with semicircle waves or sinusoid waves, is that Nature has none of those. Water waves are actually cycloid waves as a recent Scientific American article describes them-- August 2018, page 66. Now, I am going to need three points for the uptick of the cycloid from 0 to 1.57, then three more points for the downtick of the inverted cycloid from 1.57 to 3.14, then I apply my AP method for the Polynomial function, done in a mere few seconds. Now, physics wise, this shape of wave makes a lot of sense in that the highpoint, the maximum (1.57, 1) that the energy is all out of the wave and it comes crashing down in a parabola shaped half U. Now light waves are supposed to be Transverse waves of this up and down (Old Math's sine) but instead of sinusoid, what say you that the wave is this Cycloid Remake wave. AP Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Cycloid Remake wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:00:22 +0000 Re: Cycloid-Parabola Wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 2:17:58 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: - show quoted text - (x-h)^2/ a^2 + (y-k)^2/ b^2 = 1 with center at (h,k) a is x-axis radius, b is y-axis radius a= 1.57 b= 1 (h,k) (1.57, 0) plugging in we have (x - 1.57)^2 / 1.57^2 + (y-0)^2 / 1^2 = 1 (x^2 -3.14x + 2.464) / 2.464 + y^2 = 1 .40x^2 -1.27x + 1 + y^2 = 1 Note : Now I like the above, for remember a true legitimate equation in mathematics must never be 0 on one side of the equation. So, if you are ever having problems, then just add 1 to both sides. So, say we picked x= 0 we have for y = 0 For x= 1 we have .40 -1.27 = -.87 y =.87 For x=2 we have 1.6 - 2.54 = - .94 y = .94 So here I can now do a Polynomial over the Cycloid Remake Wave (will give it a nice name later such as Cycloid-Parabola wave provided a parabola not a hyperbola is involved, for I have to see if the parabola is inverse to ellipse) So now I have six coordinate points to graph a Cycloid Remake wave uptick wave (0,0) (1, .87) (1.57, 1) and the downswing or downtick portion taking the complement of .94 to be .06 (1.57, 1) (2, .06) (3.14, 0) Now I do not feel like doing this for the Generator method of 4graph points, not at the moment. I feel only up to doing the seconds fast speed AP Polynomial Will do this tomorrow-- AP Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Cycloid-parabola wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:11:07 +0000 Cycloid-parabola wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial Alright, using some algebra we can see the parabola is an ellipse with one focal point. So i name my new wave function that is a replacement for both sine and cosine as the Cycloid-Parabola Wave. In science it should replace all waves of physics that sine and cosine had occupied. AP
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 04:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b0a8c5b6-3538-4996-a65a-956a036ed3d2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701921 |
On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 10:27:51 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:13:39 -0700 (PDT) > > Subject: Cycloid Remake wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing > AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 06:13:39 +0000 > > Cycloid Remake wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial > > Now an interesting function in New Math that looks somewhat similar to what Old Math sine and cosine looked like, with their up and down pattern > > v^v^v^ only with curved arcs > > We can admit that the Cycloid is a semiellipse from 0 to 3.14 and further semiellipses along the x axis > > But, what say you when at x= 1.57 we invert the semiellipse to its U shape > > So we have a quarter ellipse from 0 to 1.57, then at 1.57 it is the inverted ellipse the 1/x type of shape to that of x=3.14 > > So here the Cycloid can be said to look like water waves on the beach. > > You see, the trouble with semicircle waves or sinusoid waves, is that Nature has none of those. Water waves are actually cycloid waves as a recent Scientific American article describes them-- August 2018, page 66. > > Now, I am going to need three points for the uptick of the cycloid from 0 to 1.57, then three more points for the downtick of the inverted cycloid from 1.57 to 3.14, then I apply my AP method for the Polynomial function, done in a mere few seconds. > > Now, physics wise, this shape of wave makes a lot of sense in that the highpoint, the maximum (1.57, 1) that the energy is all out of the wave and it comes crashing down in a parabola shaped half U. > > Now light waves are supposed to be Transverse waves of this up and down (Old Math's sine) but instead of sinusoid, what say you that the wave is this Cycloid Remake wave. > > AP > > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:20 -0700 (PDT) > > Subject: Re: Cycloid Remake wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing > AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:00:22 +0000 > > Re: Cycloid-Parabola Wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial > > On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 2:17:58 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > - show quoted text - > (x-h)^2/ a^2 + (y-k)^2/ b^2 = 1 with center at (h,k) > > a is x-axis radius, b is y-axis radius > > a= 1.57 > b= 1 > (h,k) (1.57, 0) > > plugging in we have > > (x - 1.57)^2 / 1.57^2 + (y-0)^2 / 1^2 = 1 > (x^2 -3.14x + 2.464) / 2.464 + y^2 = 1 > > .40x^2 -1.27x + 1 + y^2 = 1 > > Note : Now I like the above, for remember a true legitimate equation in mathematics must never be 0 on one side of the equation. So, if you are ever having problems, then just add 1 to both sides. > > So, say we picked x= 0 we have for y = 0 > For x= 1 we have .40 -1.27 = -.87 y =.87 > For x=2 we have 1.6 - 2.54 = - .94 y = .94 > > So here I can now do a Polynomial over the Cycloid Remake Wave (will give it a nice name later such as Cycloid-Parabola wave provided a parabola not a hyperbola is involved, for I have to see if the parabola is inverse to ellipse) > > So now I have six coordinate points to graph a Cycloid Remake wave > > uptick wave > (0,0) (1, .87) (1.57, 1) > > and the downswing or downtick portion taking the complement of .94 to be .06 > > (1.57, 1) (2, .06) (3.14, 0) > > Now I do not feel like doing this for the Generator method of 4graph points, not at the moment. I feel only up to doing the seconds fast speed AP Polynomial > > Will do this tomorrow-- > > AP > > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT) > > Subject: Cycloid-parabola wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing > AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:11:07 +0000 > > Cycloid-parabola wave to replace sine and cosine Re: Comparing AP-polynomial versus Graph-polynomial > > Alright, using some algebra we can see the parabola is an ellipse with one focal point. > > So i name my new wave function that is a replacement for both sine and cosine as the Cycloid-Parabola Wave. In science it should replace all waves of physics that sine and cosine had occupied. > > AP =================================== much simpler just A HELIX !! provided you know aht is a helix .... ================ Y.P ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 09:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <30b4b001-3f62-4d6a-96aa-15aa50024579@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701926 |
porat This is a photon; a mixture of curtate-cycloid and curl- just call it curling-cycloid :) http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/PHOTON.GIF
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 17:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn68mf$c7j$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #701942 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >porat >This is a photon; a mixture of curtate-cycloid and curl- just call it curling-cycloid :) > http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/PHOTON.GIF John, you have the axis of the retarded precessing spinny thing on the left aligned with the axis of the retarded spinny thing on the right. What happens when the axes are not aligned? Also what evidence of thi...wait, you don't believe in evidence, so never mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 10:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e49e4ca-b043-43a9-b908-e31e191e131e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701944 |
MM “John, you have the axis of the retarded precessing spinny thing on the left aligned with the axis of the retarded spinny thing on the right. What happens when the axes are not aligned? ” This represents two photons in a wavetrain. Wavetrains come from the sun in groups of many hundreds. They exactly follow each other. Your theory doesn’t like to talk about wavetrains or full-spectrum emr because if your theory were correct, these things would not exist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 17:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn69rc$155m$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #701946 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > MM > “John, you have the axis of the retarded precessing spinny thing on the > left aligned with the axis of the retarded spinny thing on the right. What > happens when the axes are not aligned? > ” > This represents two photons in a wavetrain. > Wavetrains come from the sun in groups of many hundreds. > They exactly follow each other. > > Your theory doesn’t like to talk about wavetrains or full-spectrum emr > because if your theory were correct, these things would not exist. > Lol. Whaaaat? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 11:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <92eb225a-87bf-4b83-8769-bd0018f60dc3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701947 |
Odd “Lol. Whaaaat? ” I said (lol) use your theory to explain continuous-spectrum emission, and the existence of wavetrains of ANY frequency. Go for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 19:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn6fpm$d35$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #701961 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >I said (lol) >use your theory to explain continuous-spectrum emission, and the existence >of wavetrains of ANY frequency. >Go for it. You didn't answer my question. What happens if the axis of the retarded precessing spinny thing on the left is not aligned with the axis of the retarded precessing spinny thing on the right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 14:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pn6g8q$1h5j$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #701964 |
On 9/10/2018 2:13 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > >> I said (lol) >> use your theory to explain continuous-spectrum emission, and the existence >> of wavetrains of ANY frequency. >> Go for it. > > You didn't answer my question. What happens if the axis of the retarded > precessing spinny thing on the left is not aligned with the axis of the > retarded precessing spinny thing on the right? > looks like a line through two points, and the two retards are already lined up, pre-cessing or post-cessing, but spinny for sure. (?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a98c056b-7bd9-4cac-91ed-8bdc471593cd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701964 |
MM “You didn't answer my question.” I answered. They are two members of a wavetrain. If the second isn’t in phase, it makes a different track. Now you. Explain how your explanation of how photons form can make wavetrains of ANY frequency
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 21:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn6mf8$6ue$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #701977 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >"You didn't answer my question." >I answered. >They are two members of a wavetrain. >If the second isn't in phase, it makes a different track. Now you answered it. >Now you. Explain Why won't you answer any of my questions? Such as where is the evidence of any of this? Or why are zero volume point particles "illogical"? I'll answer your question anyway. >Now you. Explain how your explanation of how photons form can make >wavetrains of ANY frequency I'll try to decypher your word salad and give you something to read. First, photons are bosons, multiple photons can be in the same state. Second, do you mean this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulated_emission#Overview
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 18:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3140a3b4-418a-4f66-a4b5-b309724e0a18@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701988 |
MM “Second, do you mean this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulated_emission#Overview ” Read a book on light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 21:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn6mf5$1rtt$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #701961 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “Lol. Whaaaat? ” > I said (lol) > use your theory to explain continuous-spectrum emission, and the > existence of wavetrains of ANY frequency. > Go for it. > Good grief, John. Your approach is: 1. Know nothing about the theory. 2. Put out some random bullshit about where the theory fails. 3. When someone laughs at (2), demand that the explanation of how the theory accounts for it be provided. Tell you what, why don’t you claim that current physics cannot possibly account for parabolic trajectories of tossed baseballs. That way you’d at least be starting with physics at your level. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 18:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4af74b2d-04d2-4815-9b0b-71f30382d25d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701987 |
Odd “Tell you what,” Instead of telling me, draw me a picture of what light is doing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 02:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn79qf$lor$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #702025 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “Tell you what,” > Instead of telling me, draw me a picture of what light is doing. > How about a picture of a parabola for a tossed baseball? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 02:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2e984791-754d-4ad0-84af-780779b8aae4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #702034 |
Odd “ How about a picture of a parabola for a tossed baseball? “ Here’s a picture I want: A high-speed picture of a coin spinning on a flat surface- does the coin rotate as it is spinning? Yes. Is that rotation consistent in any way with the spin? Send me those.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 11:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn8alq$8e6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #702075 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “ > How about a picture of a parabola for a tossed baseball? > “ > Here’s a picture I want: > A high-speed picture of a coin spinning on a flat surface- does the coin > rotate as it is spinning? Yes. Is that rotation consistent in any way with the spin? > > Send me those. > https://youtu.be/cfe7BR9tOD0 Because you can’t google from your phone, for some reason. See the 2:1? Me neither. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 07:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4d74c7ce-7852-4902-bb41-a7cf3735fb1a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #702083 |
Odd “ https://youtu.be/cfe7BR9tOD0 Because you can’t google from your phone, for some reason. See the 2:1? Me “ Cool. Now do a bunch of them in a controlled way. I doubt if you can take things like ‘2:1’ from the atomic realm and have them perform exactly the same at our size, though. Is that what QM tells you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 07:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ca15bf96-b559-4110-88b8-3bbc4d5bdfb6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #702087 |
Odd You’re sure fast with a picture when you have one. Guess you don’t understand your ‘model’ well-enough to ‘picture’ it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn8u3a$1ce5$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #702092 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > You’re sure fast with a picture when you have one. > Guess you don’t understand your ‘model’ well-enough to ‘picture’ it > Every now and again I like to shame you into facing your stark incompetence at doing a bonehead simple google search. I do this to provoke you into trying it yourself rather than begging like a baby bird. See John? It’s easy. Bonehead easy. Now you try. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web