Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #698654 > unrolled thread

2-explain dissolve//CO2 comes in 8 isomers// theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  2-explain dissolve//CO2 comes in 8 isomers// theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 18:34 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-16 03:37 +0000
      Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-15 20:59 -0700

#698654 — 2-explain dissolve//CO2 comes in 8 isomers// theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus

Have to explain Dissolve (dissolution) in this new theory of bonding as 1/2torus + 1/2torus = 1full torus

I have to explain Dissolve (dissolution) in this new theory of bonding as 1/2torus + 1/2torus = 1full torus. I think the explanation is real easy, for in this New Chemistry we have several items of force in play. We have the Faraday Law making muon with attendant proton as a big force, a bonding force, then we have the lessor or minor forces of EM of the magnetic monopole, so that the Na atom and the CL atom in salt when dissolved in water is due to the interplay of magnetic monopoles.

Does the 1/2torus of Na + 1/2torus of CL detach and then reattach with the 1/2torus of H or the two 1/2toruses of O ? So that in NaCL we have a full 1 torus, and then in dissolve we have the Na 1/2 torus going with the H2O and the CL 1/2 torus migrating with the H2O. So how to explain dissolution?


On page 69 of Oxtoby Nachtrieb, 1990, shows a picture of NaCL, saying

Figure2-12
The reaction between sodium and chlorine proceeds very slowly until the addition of a drop of water sets it off. Sparks then fly, the reaction vessel becomes hot, and a white powder of sodium chloride form on the walls of the flask.

From the Internet (Middle School Chemistry)
--- quoting ---
Water can dissolve salt because the positive part of water molecules attracts the negative chloride ions and the negative part of water molecules attracts the positive sodium ions. The amount of a substance that can dissolve in a liquid (at a particular temperature) is called the solubility of the substance.
--- end quote ---

CO2 comes in 8 isomers// theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus 


Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:25:39 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full 
 torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:25:40 +0000 

In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers 


Alright so far in experiments we have only a hint that CO2 comes in isomers, from experimental farms where extra CO2 was injected , albeit fire-CO2 and found that the plants did not do so well, as well as expected. But those experiments were all based on there being just one CO2, no isomers. And so we can expect that the humans who conducted the experiments were, every day walking and breathing out CO2 for the plants to nourish. 

What we need is an experiment where we actually eliminate all animal CO2 and have just fire CO2 and see if the plants in fact perish. 

So, now, the theory that Chemical Bonding is the actual joining of 1/2 toruses from unpaired muons to become a full torus sheds light on what CO2 bonding truly is. 

Now, nitrogen has three 1/2 tori with its 3 unpaired muons, so the N2 molecule is a fierce bonded covalent because it has 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 torus, and 1/2+1/2 = 1 torus, and finally 1/2 +1/2 = 1 torus. A fierce covalent muon bonding of making half tori into 3 full toruses. 

Now for the H2 molecule, covalent is simply 1/2 torus of one H add 1/2 torus of second H and you have H2 

Now for O2 molecule, it has two unpaired muons one in P_y and one in P_z So if you have a second O atom, then the 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 and the 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 for both P_y and P_z. 

Now you have Carbon C and it has two unpaired muons ( we still obey Hund's Rule), and you have two oxygen atoms each with two unpaired muons. 

So, how do we combine those six altogether 1/2 tori in order to have three full 1 toruses? 

Well, we have to obey Hund's Rule, so we have three atoms, two of O and one of C depicted with their 1/2 tori as P below, so what is the total different permutations that obey Hund's Rule and make those 6 tori be three full 1 toruses? 


O1 =  Py1     Pz1 

O2 = Py2    Pz2 

C  =  Px      Py3 


One isomer is Py1+Py2 with Pz1+Px with Pz2 + Py3 

a Second isomer is Py1 + Pz2 with Py2 + Px with Pz1+ Py3 

a Third isomer is Py1 + Px with Pz1 + Py2 with Pz1 + Py3 

a Fourth isomer is Py1 + Py3 with Pz1 + Py2 with Pz2 + Px 

This would go faster if I numbered them as 

1     2 
3    4 
5    6 

so the possibilities using Hund's Rule is 
1-3, 2-5, 4-6 
1-4, 2-5, 3-6 
1-5, 2-3, 4-6 
1-6, 2-3, 4-5 

2-4, 1-6, 3-5 
2-4, 1-5, 3-6 
2-6, 1-4, 3-5 
2-6, 1-3, 4-5 

Is that all? Is there 8 permutations possible and hence 8 isomers of CO2 possible. 

Then we have to consider the energy levels of each of these isomers, the animal CO2 should be the smallest amount of energy to bind the O,O,C atoms. The high temperature burning produced fire CO2 should be in those higher energy level CO2 molecules. 

AP 


Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: all three or more atom molecules are triangular shaped, never linear 
 // CO2 comes in 8 isomers 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:56:40 +0000 


all three or more atom molecules are triangular shaped, never linear // CO2 comes in 8 isomers 

- show quoted text - 
> Then we have to consider the energy levels of each of these isomers, the animal CO2 should be the smallest amount of energy to bind the O,O,C atoms. The high temperature burning produced fire CO2 should be in those higher energy level CO2 molecules. 
> 

Now in all bonding of Chemistry, covalent bonding, if my theory is correct and it probably is so, that it is impossible to have a linear bonded molecule which has 3 or more atoms. Linear bonding would only occur for two atoms, such as Nitrogen N2 or Oxygen O2 because in those bonded molecules the 1/2 torus of one atom binds with the 1/2 torus of the other atom. 

But then when you get to molecules of 3 or more atoms, you are going to form triangle shapes of molecules, so the CO2 was never a linear O-C-O 

but rather always a triangle of 

O     C 
    / 
O 

or 

C     O 
    / 
O 

So, now, I look into this D and L amino acid forms, to see if the CO2 isomers agree with amino acid isomers. If memory holds, I think only L amino acids are utilized by life. 

So, is there a connection to CO2 as having 8 isomers and L amino acids isomer? 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.       

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#698668 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>What we need is an experiment where we actually eliminate all animal CO2
>and have just fire CO2 and see if the plants in fact perish.

Sorry, Archie, my brother, a research biochemist, inadvertantly has done
that "experiment" hundreds, if not thousands of times by now.

You see, he does research with photosynthesis. He often feeds his plants
additional CO2 as part of his research. When he obtains bottled CO2 it may
come from any of multiple sources. One of them is a byproduct of beer
brewing. Many breweries capture and sell the CO2 from the fermentation of
beer. What you would call "animal CO2", except it really comes from yeast.
Another supplier would provide CO2 from combustion. And guess what? No
differences whatsoever! If ANYONE would have noticed a difference related
to the source of the CO2, HE would have! So would the thousands of other
biologists/biochemists who work with plants. So would greenhouse owners,
many of whom introduce CO2 into their greenhouses to help their plants
along.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#698670 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test

On 8/15/2018 8:37 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
> 
>> What we need is an experiment where we actually eliminate all animal CO2
>> and have just fire CO2 and see if the plants in fact perish.
> 
> Sorry, Archie, my brother, a research biochemist, inadvertantly has done
> that "experiment" hundreds, if not thousands of times by now.
> 
> You see, he does research with photosynthesis. He often feeds his plants
> additional CO2 as part of his research. When he obtains bottled CO2 it may
> come from any of multiple sources. One of them is a byproduct of beer
> brewing. Many breweries capture and sell the CO2 from the fermentation of
> beer. What you would call "animal CO2", except it really comes from yeast.
> Another supplier would provide CO2 from combustion. And guess what? No
> differences whatsoever! If ANYONE would have noticed a difference related
> to the source of the CO2, HE would have! So would the thousands of other
> biologists/biochemists who work with plants. So would greenhouse owners,
> many of whom introduce CO2 into their greenhouses to help their plants
> along.
> 

Impurities aside for a moment, yes: CO2 is CO2.

For instance, think of automotive vs. food vs. medical grade N2O.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web