Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #698515 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-15 00:52 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-08-15 15:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
CO2 comes in 8 isomers// theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 00:52 -0700
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 15:58 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 00:52 -0700 |
| Subject | CO2 comes in 8 isomers// theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus |
| Message-ID | <a09335d3-4d14-4cc5-83a3-c7fa7918af56@googlegroups.com> |
CO2 comes in 8 isomers// theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full
torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:25:40 +0000
In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers
Alright so far in experiments we have only a hint that CO2 comes in isomers, from experimental farms where extra CO2 was injected , albeit fire-CO2 and found that the plants did not do so well, as well as expected. But those experiments were all based on there being just one CO2, no isomers. And so we can expect that the humans who conducted the experiments were, every day walking and breathing out CO2 for the plants to nourish.
What we need is an experiment where we actually eliminate all animal CO2 and have just fire CO2 and see if the plants in fact perish.
So, now, the theory that Chemical Bonding is the actual joining of 1/2 toruses from unpaired muons to become a full torus sheds light on what CO2 bonding truly is.
Now, nitrogen has three 1/2 tori with its 3 unpaired muons, so the N2 molecule is a fierce bonded covalent because it has 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 torus, and 1/2+1/2 = 1 torus, and finally 1/2 +1/2 = 1 torus. A fierce covalent muon bonding of making half tori into 3 full toruses.
Now for the H2 molecule, covalent is simply 1/2 torus of one H add 1/2 torus of second H and you have H2
Now for O2 molecule, it has two unpaired muons one in P_y and one in P_z So if you have a second O atom, then the 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 and the 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 for both P_y and P_z.
Now you have Carbon C and it has two unpaired muons ( we still obey Hund's Rule), and you have two oxygen atoms each with two unpaired muons.
So, how do we combine those six altogether 1/2 tori in order to have three full 1 toruses?
Well, we have to obey Hund's Rule, so we have three atoms, two of O and one of C depicted with their 1/2 tori as P below, so what is the total different permutations that obey Hund's Rule and make those 6 tori be three full 1 toruses?
O1 = Py1 Pz1
O2 = Py2 Pz2
C = Px Py3
One isomer is Py1+Py2 with Pz1+Px with Pz2 + Py3
a Second isomer is Py1 + Pz2 with Py2 + Px with Pz1+ Py3
a Third isomer is Py1 + Px with Pz1 + Py2 with Pz1 + Py3
a Fourth isomer is Py1 + Py3 with Pz1 + Py2 with Pz2 + Px
This would go faster if I numbered them as
1 2
3 4
5 6
so the possibilities using Hund's Rule is
1-3, 2-5, 4-6
1-4, 2-5, 3-6
1-5, 2-3, 4-6
1-6, 2-3, 4-5
2-4, 1-6, 3-5
2-4, 1-5, 3-6
2-6, 1-4, 3-5
2-6, 1-3, 4-5
Is that all? Is there 8 permutations possible and hence 8 isomers of CO2 possible.
Then we have to consider the energy levels of each of these isomers, the animal CO2 should be the smallest amount of energy to bind the O,O,C atoms. The high temperature burning produced fire CO2 should be in those higher energy level CO2 molecules.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: all three or more atom molecules are triangular shaped, never linear
// CO2 comes in 8 isomers
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:56:40 +0000
all three or more atom molecules are triangular shaped, never linear // CO2 comes in 8 isomers
- show quoted text -
> Then we have to consider the energy levels of each of these isomers, the animal CO2 should be the smallest amount of energy to bind the O,O,C atoms. The high temperature burning produced fire CO2 should be in those higher energy level CO2 molecules.
>
Now in all bonding of Chemistry, covalent bonding, if my theory is correct and it probably is so, that it is impossible to have a linear bonded molecule which has 3 or more atoms. Linear bonding would only occur for two atoms, such as Nitrogen N2 or Oxygen O2 because in those bonded molecules the 1/2 torus of one atom binds with the 1/2 torus of the other atom.
But then when you get to molecules of 3 or more atoms, you are going to form triangle shapes of molecules, so the CO2 was never a linear O-C-O
but rather always a triangle of
O C
/
O
or
C O
/
O
So, now, I look into this D and L amino acid forms, to see if the CO2 isomers agree with amino acid isomers. If memory holds, I think only L amino acids are utilized by life.
So, is there a connection to CO2 as having 8 isomers and L amino acids isomer?
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu
::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y:)
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy.
. \ . . | . /.
. . \. . .|. . /. .
..\....|.../...
::\:::|::/::
--------------- -------------
--------------- (Y) -------------
--------------- --------------
::/:::|::\::
../....|...\...
. . /. . .|. . \. .
. / . . | . \ .
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 15:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pl1ij9$nb7$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #698515 |
Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >Moroney writes: >> percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945 Archie, you math and physics failure, you may be interested in the fact that I am about to put down a significant down payment for a brand new Fossil Solar Heating system. The first part is a 450' borehole/well system to tap the fossil solar heat from hundreds or even thousands of years ago. Since it is a long term average over all winters and all summers (Northeast US), the temperature of this depth is expected to be a constant 52 degrees Fahrenheit, summer and winter. As there has been no volcanic activity here for millions of years, since even before the time of the dinosaurs, there is only a trivial amount (1%) of heat from the actual heat of the interior of the earth, according to the company I am working with. So keep in mind all your future rants about the heat of the earth will only be 99% wrong, not 100% wrong, in my case. I will keep you and anyone else interested updated, however, I only expect babbling, lies and misunderstanding from you, Archie, since it apparently is your job to fail and fail here. Time to score Archie's post! ☑ Archie responds to criticism but refuses to discuss the issue... ☐ ...Zero new content, in fact... ☐ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted... ☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic... ☑ ...and to the wrong newsgroup... ☑ ...multiple times... ☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam... ☐ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so... ☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam... ☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people... ☐ ...who are university math or physics professors... ☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie... ☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong... ☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'... ☑ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic... ☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed... ☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable... ☐ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers... ☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"... ☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost... ☐ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☑ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago... ☑ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... ☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)... ☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke... ☑ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short... ☑ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. ☑ ...because he's too stoopid to configure a newsreader with killfile... The Failure Score of Archie's post: 16 plutoniums! Low score today; perhaps Archie is back on his meds? (The plutonium is the new SI unit of failure)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web