Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702932 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 261 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-16 10:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:24 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 11:09 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 13:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:57 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:27 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:41 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:48 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 19:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 10:33 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 17:59 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:41 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:47 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:48 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:36 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:06 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-25 10:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 20:44 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-20 18:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-20 22:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 09:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 17:59 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 23:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 00:02 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 05:08 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:51 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:06 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 20:32 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:27 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:58 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:03 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:50 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 14:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:47 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:33 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400
Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:05 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:46 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:12 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 19:39 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:09 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:15 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 14:38 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-09-18 15:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500
Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700
Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:15 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:43 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:54 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:59 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:35 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 01:36 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 11:39 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 13:53 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 15:00 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 15:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-09-18 01:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400
Page 9 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 14 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pobb8r$v9e$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704166 |
On 9/22/2018 4:37 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, >>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are >>>>>>>> clearly well >>>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many >>>>>>>> times, >>>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to >>>>>>>> recharge >>>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are >>>>>>>> rubbed in >>>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>>> the battery. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>>> electrolytes. >>>> >>>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>>> >>>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >>>> are toxic and caustic. >>> >>> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla >>> cells >>> about the size of AA batteries? >>> >> >> I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. >> > > changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive > a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new > charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the electrolyte! > > Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to me. I'm sure there is a you tube video that shows them crushing all the 22,000 AA battories to get out the valuable electrolites, and using the leftovers as lawn fertilizer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pobtb8$1qj2$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704389 |
On 9/24/2018 2:43 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/22/2018 4:37 PM, benj wrote: >> On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, >>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are >>>>>>>>> clearly well >>>>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many >>>>>>>>> times, >>>>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to >>>>>>>>> recharge >>>>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are >>>>>>>>> rubbed in >>>>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>>>> the battery. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>>>> electrolytes. >>>>> >>>>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>>>> >>>>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >>>>> are toxic and caustic. >>>> >>>> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla >>>> cells >>>> about the size of AA batteries? >>>> >>> >>> I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. >>> >> >> changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive >> a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new >> charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the electrolyte! >> >> Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to me. > > I'm sure there is a you tube video that shows them crushing all the > 22,000 AA battories to get out the valuable electrolites, and using the > leftovers as lawn fertilizer. > If you've ever taken a Li-Ion cell apart, you'd know that the electrolyte would doubtless kill any lawn and im experience does not smell too healthy for humans either. That is what makes electric cars "green". Ask Nads.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <poc4ld$mhp$41@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704437 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:52:10 -0400, benj wrote: > If you've ever taken a Li-Ion cell apart, you'd know that the > electrolyte would doubtless kill any lawn and im experience does not > smell too healthy for humans either. That is what makes electric cars Guess what happens if you pour gasoline over a lawn? At least Li-Ion electrolyte is normally in a sealed container, rather than being sloshed all over the place in little red containers or being squirted out of nozzles and shipped about in giant tanker trucks that occasionally get involved in traffic accidents. Did you know that, unlike a typical place where an electrical socket used to reside, when a filling station closes down they have to clean up the lot in hazmat gear like a mini Superfund site and cart the soil and stuff off for special disposal and then bring in new fresh soil and other crap just to make it a vacant lot again before something else can be built there? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <poe33e$1if3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704437 |
On 9/24/2018 6:52 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/24/2018 2:43 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 9/22/2018 4:37 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, >>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are >>>>>>>>>> clearly well >>>>>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many >>>>>>>>>> times, >>>>>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of >>>>>>>>>> amps to >>>>>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to >>>>>>>>>> recharge >>>>>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are >>>>>>>>>> rubbed in >>>>>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically >>>>>>>> rebuilding >>>>>>>> the battery. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>>>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>>>>> electrolytes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>>>>> >>>>>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull >>>>>> batteries >>>>>> are toxic and caustic. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla >>>>> cells >>>>> about the size of AA batteries? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. >>>> >>> >>> changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive >>> a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new >>> charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the >>> electrolyte! >>> >>> Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to >>> me. >> >> I'm sure there is a you tube video that shows them crushing all the >> 22,000 AA battories to get out the valuable electrolites, and using the >> leftovers as lawn fertilizer. >> > If you've ever taken a Li-Ion cell apart, you'd know that the > electrolyte would doubtless kill any lawn and im experience does not > smell too healthy for humans either. That is what makes electric cars > "green". Ask Nads. a company I worked for about 1980, we used the first lithium D cells, the did not have a diode or vent in them, so occasionally one would blow up, like a 1/4 stick of dynomite. we had square electronic signposts in LA, and a cop broght one back, now spherical, and said looks like someone blew this up ! we agreeded. had a few go off at the plant too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po47cp$d3v$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703891 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000, chimp wrote: > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>> their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". >>>>> Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery >>>>> chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I >>>>> have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do quantity. >>>>> To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the >>>>> massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so >>>>> mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are utter >>>>> nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink. >>>> >>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>> >>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly- rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid- automobiles.html >>>> >>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>> >>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>> the battery. Proof you don't understand flow batteries. That *is* how you recharge flow batteries, dolt. >> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure to store, >> collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those electrolytes. The article quite clearly states that the existing fossil fuel transport infrastructure could be repurposed to deal with their proposed chemistry. > Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. > > Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries > are toxic and caustic. And gasoline, its additives, and other chemicals used and transported by the fossil fuel industry are all nice and safe such that you would have no problem with a baby taking a bath in the stuff? <eyeroll> I don't even know why kensi continues to stick around this place. *I* can barely understand the more technical bits of the things she's interested in, and everyone else here is evidently a top-tier candidate for a learning disability diagnosis. If *I* get this frustrated trying to explain things to the dunces who have taken over sci.physics I can only imagine how much worse it must be for her... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <s4mg7f-bkm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703998 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000, chimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>> their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". >>>>>> Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery >>>>>> chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I >>>>>> have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do quantity. >>>>>> To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the >>>>>> massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so >>>>>> mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are utter >>>>>> nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink. >>>>> >>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly- > rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid- > automobiles.html >>>>> >>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>> >>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>> the battery. > > Proof you don't understand flow batteries. That *is* how you recharge flow > batteries, dolt. Replacing part of a battery would be called rebuilding the battery, illiterate dolt. >>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure to store, >>> collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those electrolytes. > > The article quite clearly states that the existing fossil fuel transport > infrastructure could be repurposed to deal with their proposed chemistry. Sure it could, all it would take is sufficient pixie dust. >> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >> >> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >> are toxic and caustic. > > And gasoline, its additives, and other chemicals used and transported by > the fossil fuel industry are all nice and safe such that you would have no > problem with a baby taking a bath in the stuff? What moron said anything about a baby taking a bath in anything? > <eyeroll> > > I don't even know why kensi continues to stick around this place. Because it is an obsessed eco warrior with a savior delusion. <snip babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po4aqs$d3v$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704009 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:31:24 +0000, chimp wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000, chimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>> their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". >>>>>>> Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery >>>>>>> chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as >>>>>>> I have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do >>>>>>> quantity. >>>>>>> To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the >>>>>>> massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so >>>>>>> mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are >>>>>>> utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly- >> rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid- >> automobiles.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>> the battery. >> >> Proof you don't understand flow batteries. That *is* how you recharge >> flow batteries, dolt. > > Replacing part of a battery would be called rebuilding the battery, > illiterate dolt. Yeah, sure. Oh, and a helpful reminder: on your way to work Monday morning, don't forget to stop at a Texaco to rebuild your car's gas tank ... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pl1h7f-11o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #704013 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:31:24 +0000, chimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000, chimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>>> their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". >>>>>>>> Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery >>>>>>>> chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as >>>>>>>> I have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do >>>>>>>> quantity. >>>>>>>> To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the >>>>>>>> massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so >>>>>>>> mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are >>>>>>>> utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly- >>> rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid- >>> automobiles.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>>> the battery. >>> >>> Proof you don't understand flow batteries. That *is* how you recharge >>> flow batteries, dolt. >> >> Replacing part of a battery would be called rebuilding the battery, >> illiterate dolt. > > Yeah, sure. Oh, and a helpful reminder: on your way to work Monday > morning, don't forget to stop at a Texaco to rebuild your car's gas > tank ... I don't recall, ever in my life time, having removed and replaced the gas in my vehicle. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f9aa3426482b2994b87@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703998 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <po47cp$d3v$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > <eyeroll> > > I don't even know why kensi continues to stick around this place. *I* can > barely understand the more technical bits of the things she's interested > in, and everyone else here is evidently a top-tier candidate for a > learning disability diagnosis. If *I* get this frustrated trying to > explain things to the dunces who have taken over sci.physics I can only > imagine how much worse it must be for her... > Who the fuck do you think dragged all the trolls over to sci.physics in the first place, Ko0k? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po5a65$1afr$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704061 |
On 9/22/2018 4:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: > In article <po47cp$d3v$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> I don't even know why kensi continues to stick around this place. *I* can >> barely understand the more technical bits of the things she's interested >> in, and everyone else here is evidently a top-tier candidate for a >> learning disability diagnosis. If *I* get this frustrated trying to >> explain things to the dunces who have taken over sci.physics I can only >> imagine how much worse it must be for her... > > Who the fuck do you think dragged all the trolls over to sci.physics in > the first place, Ko0k? Exxon? Shell? BP? Though I'm not sure paying a shill to spout climate change denial into a usenet group counts as "dragging" them there. Maybe if they're using slave labor supplied by the prison-industrial complex rather than hiring Russian troll farms ... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvjjzl.tvx8001mndrjgN%invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #703998 |
Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume pompously pontificated: > the dunces who have taken over sci.physics Don't be so hard on yourself, Paul. -- Ï
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po4l7c$79j$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703872 |
"Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message news:9gbpD.108839$LK2.43239@fx36.iad... > On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to >>>> recharge >>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>>> the stink. >>> >>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>> >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>> >>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >> >> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >> the battery. > > Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure > to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those > electrolytes. Plus you would then have to throw out any battery technology which doesn't use liquid electrolytes that can be exchanged, and I see a recent example where such a battery produced a full 167 Wh per liter. Assuming the capacity of a Tesla 75kWh battery, than's some 132 gallons of electrolyte. With all the necessary tanks, piping, pumping and regulation that would mean. THEN, you have to consider that the chemicals used in such systems tend to be very toxic and/or corrosive and thus NOT something that you want to spill in a car wreck, so now you need a crash resistant system around all that to protect it from impact. How big and how heavy is that car going to be now, and what's that going to do to your range? Will you have to increase the amount of electrolyte you have on board just to get the range up to something reasonable. Then consider the gasoline pump in the US is limited to a flow rate of 10 gallons per minute. How long is it going to take you to drain and then refill a system holding that much fluid? Kensi's car of the future. http://transwaysystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bellemore-4322.png --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po3nsc$13at$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703858 |
On 9/21/2018 2:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>> the stink. >> >> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >> >> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >> >> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? > > Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about > replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding > the battery. > Hey, Jimp, in "kensi"'s level of science yanking the dead batteries out of a car and shoving new charged ones in is what she calls "instant charging"!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360e1d8b947bf50994af2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703718 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <p0pd7f-meb.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp chittered: > > > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>> melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > >>> > >>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] > >>>> > >>>>> > Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the > >>>>> > tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, so what > >>>>> > actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four > >>>>> > times what the EV can deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries > >>>>> > are improving rapidly but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel > >>>>> > tanks, > >>>>> > a fat, stationary target. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting fossil fuel > >>>>> energy into chemical energy, then into electrical energy, then into > >>>>> mechanical energy. > >>> > >>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels efficiency and > >>> ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the topic has broadened ... > >>> > >>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the cost (both > >>>> monetary and in energy and resources terms) of providing the charging > >>>> infrastructure. > >>> > >>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the cost of > >>> lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the individual gas > >>> stations? > >>> > >>>> the time to charge the battery > >>> > >>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies that are > >>> coming down the pike. > >> > >> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there are no > >> available materials to let you get even close. > > > > http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could-help-to-charge- > > your-iphone-instantly/10021086 > > An iPhone is not a road vehicle. > > Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of energy > transferred per unit time? > > Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and power? > > <snip nonsense> Did Nads actually imply that if you can charge a tiny little cell phone "almost instantly," there'll come a time when you can charge electric car batteries almost instantly? That's a fuckload of power! I wouldn't want to be within a half mile of anyone attempting such a feat. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po29tp$b89$17@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703709 |
"Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message news:po1a5o$e0i$28@dont-email.me... > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp chittered: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>> >>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] >>>> >>>>> > Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the >>>>> > tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, so what >>>>> > actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four >>>>> > times what the EV can deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries >>>>> > are improving rapidly but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel >>>>> > tanks, >>>>> > a fat, stationary target. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting fossil fuel >>>>> energy into chemical energy, then into electrical energy, then into >>>>> mechanical energy. >>> >>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels efficiency and >>> ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the topic has broadened ... >>> >>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the cost (both >>>> monetary and in energy and resources terms) of providing the charging >>>> infrastructure. >>> >>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the cost of >>> lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the individual gas >>> stations? >>> >>>> the time to charge the battery >>> >>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies that are >>> coming down the pike. >> >> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there are no >> available materials to let you get even close. > > http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could-help-to-charge- > your-iphone-instantly/10021086 > > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable- > battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html When you can change 'could' into 'will' then we'll talk. Until then it's just a pipe dream like cold fusion. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360e4616444d6570994b12@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703706 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <qnkd7f-ava.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > Millions of Tesla customers disagree with you, kooky. > > Actually, all of slightly over 200,000 total so far versus over 1 billion > conventional vehicles. SPANK! Nads, I've told you a trillion times, don't exaggerate! -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <5MWoD.22016$X82.19934@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #703694 |
On 9/20/2018 4:12 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 Snipe wrote: > >> If it was a viable option I'd switch to an electric car, >> but it just ain't ready for prime-time > > Millions of Tesla customers disagree with you "Our best estimate is that Tesla has manufactured 94,637 Model 3s so far ..." Tesla Model 3 Tracker Updated at: September 20, 2018 https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tesla-tracker/ Most people will tell you that "under 100 thousand" is less than "millions". In fact, it's less than 5% of your claim, which makes your claim bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360e4647c2c79a0c994b13@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703719 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <5MWoD.22016$X82.19934@fx22.iad>, JW@me.com says... > > On 9/20/2018 4:12 PM, Nadegda wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 Snipe wrote: > > > >> If it was a viable option I'd switch to an electric car, > >> but it just ain't ready for prime-time > > > > Millions of Tesla customers disagree with you > > "Our best estimate is that Tesla has manufactured > 94,637 Model 3s so far ..." > Tesla Model 3 Tracker > Updated at: September 20, 2018 > https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tesla-tracker/ > > Most people will tell you that "under 100 thousand" > is less than "millions". In fact, it's less than 5% > of your claim, which makes your claim bullshit. Now THAT'S a real shocker... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po2phl$1at4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703719 |
On 9/20/2018 8:17 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 9/20/2018 4:12 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 Snipe wrote: >> >>> If it was a viable option I'd switch to an electric car, >>> but it just ain't ready for prime-time >> >> Millions of Tesla customers disagree with you > > "Our best estimate is that Tesla has manufactured > 94,637 Model 3s so far ..." > Tesla Model 3 Tracker > Updated at: September 20, 2018 > https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tesla-tracker/ > > Most people will tell you that "under 100 thousand" > is less than "millions". In fact, it's less than 5% > of your claim, which makes your claim bullshit. And all it took for you to "prove" that was to pretend that there were no Teslas before the Model 3, and then hope that no-one in the audience caught on. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nsof7f-vvi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703809 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 9/20/2018 8:17 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 9/20/2018 4:12 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 Snipe wrote: >>> >>>> If it was a viable option I'd switch to an electric car, >>>> but it just ain't ready for prime-time >>> >>> Millions of Tesla customers disagree with you >> >> "Our best estimate is that Tesla has manufactured >> 94,637 Model 3s so far ..." >> Tesla Model 3 Tracker >> Updated at: September 20, 2018 >> https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tesla-tracker/ >> >> Most people will tell you that "under 100 thousand" >> is less than "millions". In fact, it's less than 5% >> of your claim, which makes your claim bullshit. > > And all it took for you to "prove" that was to pretend that there were > no Teslas before the Model 3, and then hope that no-one in the audience > caught on. The total number of Tesla made vehicles of any type on the road is just over 200,000. 200,000 is nowhere near "millions" or didn't they teach you that in physics school? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web