Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #695658 > unrolled thread
| Started by | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-26 01:09 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-08-03 19:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 91 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 01:09 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 01:14 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 05:43 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 06:00 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 07:53 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! nobody@invalid.invalid - 2018-07-26 11:56 -0400
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 09:08 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 14:07 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 15:28 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:02 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-26 21:45 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 15:36 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 18:05 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 18:38 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 18:50 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 03:08 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 21:27 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 21:34 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 04:43 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 21:51 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 05:08 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 22:35 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 22:41 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:59 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 21:49 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 23:05 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 00:05 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 01:22 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 06:02 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 14:59 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 08:26 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 15:43 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 15:43 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 08:50 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 16:13 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 08:31 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 08:24 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 15:36 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-01 01:43 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 15:59 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 09:14 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 09:25 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 17:34 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 11:23 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 11:36 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 23:50 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 18:45 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-30 17:50 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-30 17:57 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-31 10:39 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 11:22 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 19:07 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 17:06 -0400
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-01 01:11 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 04:46 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:41 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 06:09 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 14:42 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-01 11:56 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-02 03:45 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-03 04:57 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-01 01:25 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 23:47 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-27 14:55 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 15:25 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 11:47 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:16 -0400
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-03 20:02 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 12:44 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:55 -0400
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-03 20:09 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-03 23:24 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 04:52 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 07:20 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:37 -0400
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-08-04 14:24 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 00:02 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-08-05 12:29 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 19:32 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 17:24 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 17:14 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-05 00:48 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 08:13 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 10:14 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 18:57 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 04:16 +0000
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 00:25 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 01:36 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-04 17:58 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 03:54 -0700
Re: IT IS NEVER 'PULL FORCES'- IT S WAYS PUSH FORCESS !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-08-03 19:59 -0700
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 05:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pje9br$a2j$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #695833 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >"I have, but know little about that. >" >The failing gravity theory these days can't find its invisible heavy stuff. So Fatio's failed gravity theory also had invisible heavy stuff? I know about the ultramundane particles which would be invisible, but didn't know they were heavy, too. Maybe if he pursued the invisible heavy stuff he could have theorized dark matter and he would have been centuries ahead of his time! >Maybe the five year olds were wrong, Michael So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter than you do?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 22:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ddf9f814-fc32-4517-9ac8-d701911bb32b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695834 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 8:08:14 AM UTC+3, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > >MM > >"I have, but know little about that. > >" > >The failing gravity theory these days can't find its invisible heavy stuff. > > So Fatio's failed gravity theory also had invisible heavy stuff? I know > about the ultramundane particles which would be invisible, but didn't know > they were heavy, too. Maybe if he pursued the invisible heavy stuff he > could have theorized dark matter and he would have been centuries ahead of > his time! > > >Maybe the five year olds were wrong, Michael > > So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter > than you do? ============================== and more about my y circlon mechanism did it net myself without knowing anything about any Facio '' much more over !! I recruit it AGAINST F EN CURVD SPACE AS A FACTOR IN GRAVITY !!! more over if you follow my above historic link and book ! my inner structure of Atom and nucleus is compatible with the ALL PUSH ' THEORY SEE my link http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an/abstract at its appendix !!!!! as the Y.Circlon mechanism as well ! as an '' attraction force maker '' John IS THAT PRECEDENTED AS WELL ?? by Facio =================================== TIA Y.Porat ==========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 22:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <23757cef-2350-4cf1-90ee-8c5834011252@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695836 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 8:35:13 AM UTC+3, por...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 8:08:14 AM UTC+3, Michael Moroney wrote: > > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > > > >MM > > >"I have, but know little about that. > > >" > > >The failing gravity theory these days can't find its invisible heavy stuff. > > > > So Fatio's failed gravity theory also had invisible heavy stuff? I know > > about the ultramundane particles which would be invisible, but didn't know > > they were heavy, too. Maybe if he pursued the invisible heavy stuff he > > could have theorized dark matter and he would have been centuries ahead of > > his time! > > > > >Maybe the five year olds were wrong, Michael > > > > So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter > > than you do? > ============================== > and more about my y circlon mechanism > > did it net myself without knowing anything about any > Facio '' > much more over !! > I recruit it > AGAINST F EN CURVD SPACE AS A FACTOR IN > GRAVITY !!! > more over > if you follow my above historic link > and book ! > my inner structure of Atom and nucleus > is compatible with > the > ALL PUSH ' THEORY > SEE my link > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an/abstract > at its appendix !!!!! > as the > Y.Circlon mechanism as well ! > > as an '' attraction force maker '' > > John > > IS THAT PRECEDENTED AS WELL ?? > by Facio > =================================== > TIA > Y.Porat > ========================== typo !! again (I quote just from my memory any wrong ''pips'' and it fails to enter http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract at its appendix ==== TIA Y.P ===========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 19:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9e19e010-e8d5-4a55-8934-5e9d3cf5d6f3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695836 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:35:13 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 8:08:14 AM UTC+3, Michael Moroney wrote: > > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > > > >MM > > >"I have, but know little about that. > > >" > > >The failing gravity theory these days can't find its invisible heavy stuff. > > > > So Fatio's failed gravity theory also had invisible heavy stuff? I know > > about the ultramundane particles which would be invisible, but didn't know > > they were heavy, too. Maybe if he pursued the invisible heavy stuff he > > could have theorized dark matter and he would have been centuries ahead of > > his time! > > > > >Maybe the five year olds were wrong, Michael > > > > So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter > > than you do? > ============================== > and more about my y circlon mechanism > > did it net myself without knowing anything about any > Facio '' > much more over !! > I recruit it > AGAINST F EN CURVD SPACE AS A FACTOR IN > GRAVITY !!! > more over > if you follow my above historic link > and book ! > my inner structure of Atom and nucleus > is compatible with > the > ALL PUSH ' THEORY > SEE my link > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an/abstract > at its appendix !!!!! > as the > Y.Circlon mechanism as well ! > > as an '' attraction force maker '' > > John > > IS THAT PRECEDENTED AS WELL ?? > by Facio > =================================== > TIA > Y.Porat > ========================== Pull of gravity.No push of gravity.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 21:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <49dc7056-53c2-4996-9655-d775bb680be7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695986 |
On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 5:59:05 AM UTC+3, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:35:13 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 8:08:14 AM UTC+3, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > >MM > > > >"I have, but know little about that. > > > >" > > > >The failing gravity theory these days can't find its invisible heavy stuff. > > > > > > So Fatio's failed gravity theory also had invisible heavy stuff? I know > > > about the ultramundane particles which would be invisible, but didn't know > > > they were heavy, too. Maybe if he pursued the invisible heavy stuff he > > > could have theorized dark matter and he would have been centuries ahead of > > > his time! > > > > > > >Maybe the five year olds were wrong, Michael > > > > > > So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter > > > than you do? > > ============================== > > and more about my y circlon mechanism > > > > did it net myself without knowing anything about any > > Facio '' > > much more over !! > > I recruit it > > AGAINST F EN CURVD SPACE AS A FACTOR IN > > GRAVITY !!! > > more over > > if you follow my above historic link > > and book ! > > my inner structure of Atom and nucleus > > is compatible with > > the > > ALL PUSH ' THEORY > > SEE my link > > > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an/abstract > > at its appendix !!!!! > > as the > > Y.Circlon mechanism as well ! > > > > as an '' attraction force maker '' > > > > John > > > > IS THAT PRECEDENTED AS WELL ?? > > by Facio > > =================================== > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ========================== > > Pull of gravity.No push of gravity.Bert =========================== block!!head old farth --- Next !! to more clever THIKING ! people === Y.P =======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 23:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ec856da6-1813-4acb-a0f3-55e3dc064ca5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #696001 |
On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 7:49:24 AM UTC+3, por...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 5:59:05 AM UTC+3, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:35:13 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 8:08:14 AM UTC+3, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > >MM > > > > >"I have, but know little about that. > > > > >" > > > > >The failing gravity theory these days can't find its invisible heavy stuff. > > > > > > > > So Fatio's failed gravity theory also had invisible heavy stuff? I know > > > > about the ultramundane particles which would be invisible, but didn't know > > > > they were heavy, too. Maybe if he pursued the invisible heavy stuff he > > > > could have theorized dark matter and he would have been centuries ahead of > > > > his time! > > > > > > > > >Maybe the five year olds were wrong, Michael > > > > > > > > So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter > > > > than you do? > > > ============================== > > > and more about my y circlon mechanism > > > > > > did it net myself without knowing anything about any > > > Facio '' > > > much more over !! > > > I recruit it > > > AGAINST F EN CURVD SPACE AS A FACTOR IN > > > GRAVITY !!! > > > more over > > > if you follow my above historic link > > > and book ! > > > my inner structure of Atom and nucleus > > > is compatible with > > > the > > > ALL PUSH ' THEORY > > > SEE my link > > > > > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an/abstract > > > at its appendix !!!!! > > > as the > > > Y.Circlon mechanism as well ! > > > > > > as an '' attraction force maker '' > > > > > > John > > > > > > IS THAT PRECEDENTED AS WELL ?? > > > by Facio > > > =================================== > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > ========================== > > > > Pull of gravity.No push of gravity.Bert > =========================== > block!!head old farth > --- > Next !! > to more clever THIKING ! people > === > Y.P > ======================= even the farth s that you are doing here are push force .. the force that is driving your car is .. -push or pull ?? forces ?? ==== Y.P =====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 00:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4937a70b-d96c-4969-a07d-1c633cc41af9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695834 |
MM “So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter than you do?” Still haven’t found any. Observations of satellite galaxies congregated in the same plane makes it EVEN less likely (hard to do)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 01:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <35895dd1-6140-4da8-992a-1592df12ccaa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695841 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:05:10 AM UTC+3, john wrote: > MM > “So John, how does it feel that five year olds know more about dark matter > than you do?” > Still haven’t found any. > Observations of satellite galaxies congregated in the same plane makes it EVEN less likely (hard to do) ====================== who wrote that last post ?? it is not clear ?? ===== Y.P ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 06:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c5fe8620-0b4c-42c4-b763-33cc41ffc067@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695845 |
Porat “who wrote that last post ?? it is not clear ?? ” I did . I’ll make it clear. DM idiots imagine a spherical cloud of DM around galaxies- that is what is needed to “save” their idiotic swarming gravitrons, warped Space, Suck Gravity, Black Hole- predicting embarrassment of a gravity theory. Unfortunately, satellite galaxies are now shown to occupy an ecliptic plane like planets around a sun. The stupid ones are still defending it- Odd, MM, ed ed ed (Still impressed with ed’s huge mushroom intake- maybe he had the wrong kind-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 14:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjfc11$e2$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #695869 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >DM idiots imagine a spherical cloud of DM around galaxies- that is what is >needed to "save" their idiotic swarming gravitrons, warped Space, Suck >Gravity, Black Hole- predicting embarrassment of a gravity theory. Still don't understand "invisible heavy stuff", I see. Too bad the five year olds all hide from you. >Unfortunately, satellite galaxies are now shown to occupy an ecliptic plane > like planets around a sun. Why is that "unfortunate"? Does it spell doom for aliens living on planets in those galaxies for some reason? (Explain!) >The stupid ones are still defending it- Odd, MM, ed ed ed Yet you can't explain your own beliefs at all! Are you afraid we'll think you're stupid if you do? (too late!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 08:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ca364827-896c-4908-a80d-123c31f80b95@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695872 |
MM “>Unfortunately, satellite galaxies are now shown to occupy an ecliptic plane > like planets around a sun. Why is that "unfortunate"? Does it spell doom for aliens living on planets in tho” Like Odd, you couldn’t follow a train of thought if it had actual permanent tracks behind it. Your mythical DM must be in a spherical cloud around a galaxy to work. This is a position that has been taken, Michael. Now, to find satellites all in the same plane is very much NOT symmetrical, Michael. Now, I know you prescribe to the “there is no pattern”, “there is no underlying structure “ crowd, but I’m sure you’re not at the “flat is the same as round” stage. Although you’re close
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 15:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjfej4$1re0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #695876 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > MM >> Unfortunately, satellite galaxies are now shown to occupy an ecliptic plane >> like planets around a sun. > > Why is that "unfortunate"? Does it spell doom for aliens living on > planets in tho” > Like Odd, you couldn’t follow a train of thought if it had actual > permanent tracks behind it. > Your mythical DM must be in a spherical cloud around a galaxy to work. That is an incorrect statement and I have no idea why you think this is so. What IS true is that the distribution of dark matter doesn’t have the same shape as the distribution of luminous matter. And the question that follows from that is SO WHAT? > This is a position that has been taken, Michael. Now, to find satellites > all in the same plane is very much NOT symmetrical, Michael. That’s true. Notice that in an irregular galaxy, even the stars are not arranged in a spherical distribution. So why do you think that a nonspherical distribution of satellites spells trouble for what the distribution of dark matter is?? > Now, I know you prescribe to the “there is no pattern”, “there is no > underlying structure “ crowd, but I’m sure you’re not at the “flat is the > same as round” stage. The distribution of satellites has as much to to with the distribution of dark matter as the distribution of spiral arms has to go with the distribution of dark matter. Namely, nothing. > Although you’re close > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 15:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjfej7$pk4$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #695876 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Your mythical DM must be in a spherical cloud around a galaxy to work. Let's assume that is true (I don't know in detail). > This is a position that has been taken, Michael. Now, to find > satellites all in the same plane is very much NOT symmetrical, Michael. Yeah, so? That is true of 3 galaxies so far. Plus why does the distribution of galaxies matter to the distribution of DM? We know that spiral galaxies have a central bulge and globular clusters that are NOT in the plane of the galaxy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 08:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <39f625ac-b5db-488c-8951-28177ef01b83@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695880 |
MM “Plus why does the distribution of galaxies matter to the distribution of DM” Nothing. DM is totally mythical, unproven hogwash. Computers have never been able to simulate what you say happens. You’re idiots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 16:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjfgb9$agg$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #695881 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >"Plus why does the >distribution of galaxies matter to the distribution of DM" >Nothing. >DM is totally mythical, unproven hogwash. You keep saying that but without proof. >Computers have never been able to simulate what you say happens. >You're idiots What do you mean? Computer simulation is _exactly_ how they predict dark matter! What they do is "We have this galaxy where visible matter predicts a rotation pattern X. However, we see Rotation pattern Y. But if we put a little invisible heavy stuff here, and some there, and a lot over there, we get Rotation pattern Y! So there must be a little invisible heavy stuff here, and some there, and a lot over there!" Maybe they then said "I'm glad we talked to that five year old!" And then: "Hey kid! What should we call that dark matter?" "Dark matter."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 08:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <81efaed4-6dd0-48cb-a3db-0dfabe5f3ab6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695872 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 5:59:48 PM UTC+3, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > >DM idiots imagine a spherical cloud of DM around galaxies- that is what is > >needed to "save" their idiotic swarming gravitrons, warped Space, Suck > >Gravity, Black Hole- predicting embarrassment of a gravity theory. >================================== yes indeed > Still don't understand "invisible heavy stuff" and do you see curved space ??!!!! -- that unseen stuff has mass the only mass yet it is special by moving naturally in a curved lines ============= ,================================= Y.Porat ============================ I
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 08:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <697b3e7c-be2b-47a7-a9af-8cd523698a65@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695869 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 4:02:17 PM UTC+3, john wrote: > Porat > “who wrote that last post ?? > it is not clear ?? > ” > I did . > I’ll make it clear. > > DM idiots imagine a spherical cloud of DM around galaxies- that is what is needed to “save” their idiotic swarming gravitrons, warped Space, Suck Gravity, Black Hole- predicting embarrassment of a gravity theory. > > Unfortunately, satellite galaxies are now shown to occupy an ecliptic plane like planets around a sun. > > The stupid ones are still defending it- Odd, MM, ed ed ed > (Still impressed with ed’s huge mushroom intake- maybe he had the wrong kind- ==================== thank you John my partner ! I could not pose better ! 2 we took it much further and revolutionary !! ie against f en curved space : if space is nothing!! it cannot act and curve force lines of matter !! curvature of force lines is A OOOPERTY OF NET MASS NO NEED FOR ANYTING ELESE we see it(black on while'') even in the experiments o of faraday about force lines of a permanent ### magnet no f en curved space there it is the natural movement of the stuff that is stemming and recycled ** from the magnet !!! ===== TIA Y.Porat ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 15:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjfe5d$1qoj$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #695875 |
<poraty6@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 4:02:17 PM UTC+3, john wrote: >> Porat >> who wrote that last post ?? >> it is not clear ?? >> >> I did . >> Ill make it clear. >> >> DM idiots imagine a spherical cloud of DM around galaxies- that is what >> is needed to save their idiotic swarming gravitrons, warped Space, >> Suck Gravity, Black Hole- predicting embarrassment of a gravity theory. >> >> Unfortunately, satellite galaxies are now shown to occupy an ecliptic >> plane like planets around a sun. >> >> The stupid ones are still defending it- Odd, MM, ed ed ed >> (Still impressed with eds huge mushroom intake- maybe he had the wrong kind- > ===================thank you John my partner ! > > I could not pose better ! > > 2 > we took it much further and revolutionary !! > ie against f en curved space : > > if space is nothing!! And that presumption is wrong. > it cannot act and curve force lines of matter !! > curvature of force lines is > A OOOPERTY OF NET MASS > NO NEED FOR ANYTING ELESE > we see it(black on while'') even in the experiments o of faraday > about force lines of a permanent ### magnet > no f en curved space there > it is the natural movement of the stuff that is stemming and recycled ** > from the magnet !!! > ===== > > TIA > Y.Porat > ===================== > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-01 01:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8a21c0ae-fe18-4a42-95cd-ca10365e6014@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695878 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 6:36:17 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty6@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 4:02:17 PM UTC+3, john wrote: > >> Porat > >> who wrote that last post ?? > >> it is not clear ?? > >> > >> I did . > >> I ll make it clear. > >> > >> DM idiots imagine a spherical cloud of DM around galaxies- that is what > >> is needed to save their idiotic swarming gravitrons, warped Space, > >> Suck Gravity, Black Hole- predicting embarrassment of a gravity theory. > >> > >> Unfortunately, satellite galaxies are now shown to occupy an ecliptic > >> plane like planets around a sun. > >> > >> The stupid ones are still defending it- Odd, MM, ed ed ed > >> (Still impressed with ed s huge mushroom intake- maybe he had the wrong kind- > > ===================thank you John my partner ! > > > > I could not pose better ! > > > > 2 > > we took it much further and revolutionary !! > > ie against f en curved space : > > > > if space is nothing!! > > And that presumption is wrong. ======= piggy Bodkin !!! now stick it again to your empty parroting presumptions skull === **had there not been locations of absolute empty space NO MOTION WHATSOEVER COUD BE DONE !!!** too difficult for your parroting skull ?? got it blockhead presumptuous parrot ?? == if you anonymous Bodkin are a physics teacher? you are a criminal against mankind !!! and I would recommend to dismiss you immediately !!! == Y.Porat ======================================== >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 15:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjffh4$pk4$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #695869 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >DM idiots imagine a spherical cloud of DM around galaxies- that is what is >needed to "save" their idiotic swarming gravitrons, warped Space, Suck Gravity, Black Hole- predicting embarrassment of a gravity theory. Hey John, did you see this? "First successful test of Einstein's general relativity near supermassive black hole (Update)" https://phys.org/news/2018-07-gravity-relativity-galactic-centre-massive.html The star S2 flies through the gravity well of the black hole at the center of the galaxy at 3% of the speed of light. It confirms much of Einstein's gravity theory and GR. Pay attention to this part: "The team compared the position and velocity measurements from GRAVITY and SINFONI respectively, along with previous observations of S2 using other instruments, with the predictions of Newtonian gravity, general relativity and other theories of gravity. The new results are inconsistent with Newtonian predictions and in excellent agreement with the predictions of general relativity." That's how science works, John. GR predicted one result, Newtonian mechanics predicted a different result, and the results agreed with GR, not Newtonian mechanics. They didn't mention whether "other theories of gravity" included your retarded precessing spinny things or not. Oh that's right, you don't have even a model, so you couldn't predict anything!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web