Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #693787 > unrolled thread

The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-07-13 10:05 -0400
Last post2018-07-20 14:34 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 103 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-13 10:05 -0400
    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-13 20:27 -0400
      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-13 20:06 -0500
        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-14 02:00 +0000
          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-14 08:20 -0400
            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-14 12:12 -0400
              Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-15 21:13 -0400
                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-15 20:59 -0500
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-16 02:10 +0000
                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial % <Persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 19:14 -0700
                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:43 -0400
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:38 -0400
                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-16 10:14 -0500
                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-16 02:05 +0000
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial % <Persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 19:13 -0700
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-15 23:03 -0400
                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-16 04:50 +0000
                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 23:08 -0700
                        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-16 06:09 +0000
                          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 23:27 -0700
                          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-16 08:27 -0400
                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-16 08:17 -0400
                        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 12:28 -0400
                          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:36 -0400
                            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 13:47 -0400
                              Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial % <Persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:50 -0700
                              Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-17 21:59 -0400
                                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-18 03:20 +0000
                                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-18 00:20 -0400
                                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-18 00:01 -0500
                                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-18 06:03 +0000
                                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-18 08:25 -0400
                                        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 14:02 -0400
                                          And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-18 20:52 +0000
                                            Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 13:59 -0700
                                              Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-18 21:09 +0000
                                                Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:22 -0400
                                                Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-19 00:13 -0400
                                                  Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-19 04:35 +0000
                                                    Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-19 00:45 -0400
                                                      Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:04 +0000
                                                        Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-19 07:17 -0400
                                                          Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:00 -0400
                                                            Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-19 14:11 -0500
                                                          Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 13:25 -0400
                                                            Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-20 00:54 -0400
                                                    Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 22:27 -0700
                                                      Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-19 11:48 -0500
                                                Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-07-19 04:19 +0000
                                                  Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-19 04:36 +0000
                                                    Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 22:28 -0700
                                                      Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) "Catalina" <Catalina@Beach.Sun> - 2018-07-20 03:11 -0400
                                            Re: And the SPNAK Of The Week Award goes to ... (was Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:21 -0400
                                          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:07 -0400
                                          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-19 00:09 -0400
                                            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:03 +0000
                                              Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-19 07:02 -0400
                                                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 10:50 -0400
                                                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 13:25 -0400
                                                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-20 00:50 -0400
                                              Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 08:17 -0700
                                                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial % <Persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 10:47 -0700
                                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:02 -0400
                                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 21:56 -0700
                                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-18 06:05 +0000
                                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 01:39 -0700
                                        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 14:03 -0400
                                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:06 -0400
                                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-18 07:20 -0400
                                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-18 12:42 +0100
                                        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-18 08:28 -0400
                                          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-18 13:41 +0100
                                            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-18 09:10 -0400
                                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:03 -0700
                                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:58 -0400
                                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 13:21 -0700
                          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-16 21:31 -0400
                            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 22:40 -0400
                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:52 -0400
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:40 -0400
                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-16 11:35 -0400
                    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 12:30 -0400
                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:41 -0700
                      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:40 -0400
                        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-16 13:10 -0500
            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-14 12:34 -0500
    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 01:58 -0400
    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Frank <"frank "@frank.net> - 2018-07-18 12:11 -0400
      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 14:07 -0400
        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Frank <"frank "@frank.net> - 2018-07-18 16:25 -0400
          Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-18 20:50 +0000
            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 13:59 -0700
              Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-18 21:10 +0000
                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:23 -0600
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial % <Persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:26 -0700
                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:41 -0700
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial % <Persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:44 -0700
                  Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-18 18:40 -0400
                Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:23 -0400
            Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:19 -0400
        Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:10 -0400
    Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:24 -0700
      Re: The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-20 14:34 -0700

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →


#693787 — The Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-13 10:05 -0400
SubjectThe Sinister Underbelly of Climate Change Denial
Message-ID<piabj5$1dg5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
The last few days of June 2018 saw most people in the United States 
sweltering in an epic heat wave. High temperatures were uniformly 
between 90 and 110 degrees in a mind-boggling 17 states. Heat indices in 
parts of the East and Midwest approached 120 degrees. Heat Advisories or 
Excessive Heat Warning were issued by the National Weather Service for 
all or parts of 21 states. Hazardously poor air quality arising from the 
reaction of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides with sunlight 
and heat compounded the agony in 9 states:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/07/12/the-sinister-underbelly-of-climate-change-denial/

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#693832

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2018-07-13 20:27 -0400
Message-ID<nagikd98go7ae0k93988agqv5kkb0et4u7@4ax.com>
In reply to#693787
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:05:21 -0400, kensi wrote:

>The last few days of June 2018 saw most people in the United States 
>sweltering in an epic heat wave. High temperatures were uniformly 
>between 90 and 110 degrees in a mind-boggling 17 states. Heat indices in 
>parts of the East and Midwest approached 120 degrees. Heat Advisories or 
>Excessive Heat Warning were issued by the National Weather Service for 
>all or parts of 21 states. Hazardously poor air quality arising from the 
>reaction of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides with sunlight 
>and heat compounded the agony in 9 states:
>
>https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/07/12/the-sinister-underbelly-of-climate-change-denial/

Your text doesn't have anything to do with your subject line ...
again.

If it is in the link, you didn't sell the link with your quote.

Saying "it was hot" does nothing to encourage clicking the link.

If alarmists think their spew should get a Pavlov's dog response
(oooohhh ... buzzword .... must .. click .. link), they grossly
overestimate the esteem with which some view them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#693835

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-07-13 20:06 -0500
Message-ID<pibiaa$1elm$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#693832
On 7/13/2018 7:27 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:05:21 -0400, kensi wrote:
> 
>> The last few days of June 2018 saw most people in the United States 
>> sweltering in an epic heat wave. High temperatures were uniformly 
>> between 90 and 110 degrees in a mind-boggling 17 states. Heat indices in 
>> parts of the East and Midwest approached 120 degrees. Heat Advisories or 
>> Excessive Heat Warning were issued by the National Weather Service for 
>> all or parts of 21 states. Hazardously poor air quality arising from the 
>> reaction of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides with sunlight 
>> and heat compounded the agony in 9 states:
>>
>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/07/12/the-sinister-underbelly-of-climate-change-denial/
> 
> Your text doesn't have anything to do with your subject line ...
> again.
> 
> If it is in the link, you didn't sell the link with your quote.
> 
> Saying "it was hot" does nothing to encourage clicking the link.
> 
> If alarmists think their spew should get a Pavlov's dog response
> (oooohhh ... buzzword .... must .. click .. link), they grossly
> overestimate the esteem with which some view them.
> 
> 

hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,

this will free up the airwaves, magazines, media from red herrings like
AGW, to address important serious subjects, like fresh water decline.


the press/media are totally out of control, nuts, making stuff up, here
and in England,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#693837

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-07-14 02:00 +0000
Message-ID<piblg1$rkk$25@dont-email.me>
In reply to#693835
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 7/13/2018 7:27 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:05:21 -0400, kensi wrote:
>> 
>>> The last few days of June 2018 saw most people in the United States
>>> sweltering in an epic heat wave. High temperatures were uniformly
>>> between 90 and 110 degrees in a mind-boggling 17 states. Heat indices
>>> in parts of the East and Midwest approached 120 degrees. Heat
>>> Advisories or Excessive Heat Warning were issued by the National
>>> Weather Service for all or parts of 21 states. Hazardously poor air
>>> quality arising from the reaction of volatile organic compounds and
>>> nitrogen oxides with sunlight and heat compounded the agony in 9
>>> states:
>>>
>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/07/12/the-sinister-underbelly-of-
climate-change-denial/
>> 
>> Your text doesn't have anything to do with your subject line ...
>> again.
>> 
>> If it is in the link, you didn't sell the link with your quote.
>> 
>> Saying "it was hot" does nothing to encourage clicking the link.
>> 
>> If alarmists think their spew should get a Pavlov's dog response
>> (oooohhh ... buzzword .... must .. click .. link), they grossly
>> overestimate the esteem with which some view them.
> 
> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,

Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#693858

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2018-07-14 08:20 -0400
Message-ID<e7qjkd9b3u0ctsct214cduhdrm1qicd82i@4ax.com>
In reply to#693837
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>
>> On 7/13/2018 7:27 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:05:21 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The last few days of June 2018 saw most people in the United States
>>>> sweltering in an epic heat wave. High temperatures were uniformly
>>>> between 90 and 110 degrees in a mind-boggling 17 states. Heat indices
>>>> in parts of the East and Midwest approached 120 degrees. Heat
>>>> Advisories or Excessive Heat Warning were issued by the National
>>>> Weather Service for all or parts of 21 states. Hazardously poor air
>>>> quality arising from the reaction of volatile organic compounds and
>>>> nitrogen oxides with sunlight and heat compounded the agony in 9
>>>> states:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/07/12/the-sinister-underbelly-of-
>climate-change-denial/
>>> 
>>> Your text doesn't have anything to do with your subject line ...
>>> again.
>>> 
>>> If it is in the link, you didn't sell the link with your quote.
>>> 
>>> Saying "it was hot" does nothing to encourage clicking the link.
>>> 
>>> If alarmists think their spew should get a Pavlov's dog response
>>> (oooohhh ... buzzword .... must .. click .. link), they grossly
>>> overestimate the esteem with which some view them.
>> 
>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>
>Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.

No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."

The leftist religion of Evolution presents Darwin Awards to species
who are not adapted to survive in their environment.

Goofy journalists trying to write about scientific topics should
expect to drown when they are beyond their depth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#693866

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-14 12:12 -0400
Message-ID<pid7e1$1ujp$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#693858
On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>
>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
> 
> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."

Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*" 
(emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694062

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2018-07-15 21:13 -0400
Message-ID<ovrnkddgqaghchc9li477ts3verclno4rh@4ax.com>
In reply to#693866
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:12:44 -0400, kensi wrote:

>On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>>
>>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
>> 
>> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."
>
>Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*" 
>(emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?

The emphasis was not mine. Learn to decipher attributions.

"Elimination" implies willful action. Who proposed that?

If someone swims beyond their depth and drowns, who was violent in
bringing about their demise.

You were zero for three ... then you called me a kOok.

Just how much remedial (or first-time) training do you need?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694065

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-07-15 20:59 -0500
Message-ID<pigu5c$1g4b$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694062
On 7/15/2018 8:13 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:12:44 -0400, kensi wrote:
> 
>> On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>>>
>>>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
>>>
>>> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."
>>
>> Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*" 
>> (emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?
> 
> The emphasis was not mine. Learn to decipher attributions.
> 
> "Elimination" implies willful action. Who proposed that?
> 
> If someone swims beyond their depth and drowns, who was violent in
> bringing about their demise.
> 
> You were zero for three ... then you called me a kOok.
> 
> Just how much remedial (or first-time) training do you need?
> 

obviously Nads prefers the "*Violent Elimination of Journalists*"
rather than the stated "*Mass Extinction of Journalists*"

        Nads, had a bad day ?

      Is kensi pupa not talking to you ?  not rubbing up on you ?


Or are you Nads, stating *you prefer Violence* as a progressive libtard,
antifa, rather than let nature take its way ?

Journalists will be extinct soon, they have almost brain power of the
dumbass Dodo, and the general public is tired of all the lies (for money).

Help a Journalist Down by contributing to the "Permanent Journalist
Solution" (PJS)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694067

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-07-16 02:10 +0000
Message-ID<pigupr$4pj$17@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694065
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:59:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> Help a Journalist Down by contributing to the "Permanent Journalist
> Solution" (PJS)

More incitement to violence. Did you know that that is illegal in most 
jurisdictions, kook? You could be a frontrunning candidate for a Bobo soon.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694069

From% <Persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-15 19:14 -0700
Message-ID<bedkie.oe2.17.5@news.alt.net>
In reply to#694067
On 2018-07-15 7:10 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:59:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> Help a Journalist Down by contributing to the "Permanent Journalist
>> Solution" (PJS)
> 
> More incitement to violence. Did you know that that is illegal in most
> jurisdictions, kook? You could be a frontrunning candidate for a Bobo soon.
> 
what do women know

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694122

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-16 10:43 -0400
Message-ID<piiatr$1rdh$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694067
On 7/15/2018 10:10 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:59:10 -0500, Sergio wrote:
> 
>> Help a Journalist Down by contributing to the "Permanent Journalist
>> Solution" (PJS)
> 
> More incitement to violence. Did you know that that is illegal in most
> jurisdictions, kook? You could be a frontrunning candidate for a Bobo soon.
> 

Yes free speech is always forbidden in your socialist utopias.
This is why Hispanics are trying to break into the U.S. instead of 
swimming to Cuba. Luckily all you hard lefties got stopped before 
Hillary could repeal the constitution.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694120

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-16 10:38 -0400
Message-ID<piiald$1rdh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694065
On 7/15/2018 9:59 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/15/2018 8:13 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:12:44 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>>>>
>>>>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
>>>>
>>>> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."
>>>
>>> Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*"
>>> (emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?
>>
>> The emphasis was not mine. Learn to decipher attributions.
>>
>> "Elimination" implies willful action. Who proposed that?
>>
>> If someone swims beyond their depth and drowns, who was violent in
>> bringing about their demise.
>>
>> You were zero for three ... then you called me a kOok.
>>
>> Just how much remedial (or first-time) training do you need?
>>
> 
> obviously Nads prefers the "*Violent Elimination of Journalists*"
> rather than the stated "*Mass Extinction of Journalists*"
> 
>          Nads, had a bad day ?
> 
>        Is kensi pupa not talking to you ?  not rubbing up on you ?
> 
> 
> Or are you Nads, stating *you prefer Violence* as a progressive libtard,
> antifa, rather than let nature take its way ?
> 
> Journalists will be extinct soon, they have almost brain power of the
> dumbass Dodo, and the general public is tired of all the lies (for money).
> 
> Help a Journalist Down by contributing to the "Permanent Journalist
> Solution" (PJS)
> 

"Hard-left Journalist final solution"! I like the sound of that!
We just need to recruit some hard-right "useful idiots" to do the job 
for us the way certified terrorist organization ANTIFA  does.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694126

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-07-16 10:14 -0500
Message-ID<piicns$1vd0$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694120
On 7/16/2018 9:38 AM, benj wrote:
> On 7/15/2018 9:59 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 7/15/2018 8:13 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:12:44 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
>>>>>
>>>>> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."
>>>>
>>>> Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*"
>>>> (emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?
>>>
>>> The emphasis was not mine. Learn to decipher attributions.
>>>
>>> "Elimination" implies willful action. Who proposed that?
>>>
>>> If someone swims beyond their depth and drowns, who was violent in
>>> bringing about their demise.
>>>
>>> You were zero for three ... then you called me a kOok.
>>>
>>> Just how much remedial (or first-time) training do you need?
>>>
>>
>> obviously Nads prefers the "*Violent Elimination of Journalists*"
>> rather than the stated "*Mass Extinction of Journalists*"
>>
>>          Nads, had a bad day ?
>>
>>        Is kensi pupa not talking to you ?  not rubbing up on you ?
>>
>>
>> Or are you Nads, stating *you prefer Violence* as a progressive libtard,
>> antifa, rather than let nature take its way ?
>>
>> Journalists will be extinct soon, they have almost brain power of the
>> dumbass Dodo, and the general public is tired of all the lies (for
>> money).
>>
>> Help a Journalist Down by contributing to the "Permanent Journalist
>> Solution" (PJS)
>>
> 
> "Hard-left Journalist final solution"! I like the sound of that!
> We just need to recruit some hard-right "useful idiots" to do the job
> for us the way certified terrorist organization ANTIFA  does.
> 

a you tube video shows some antifa peoples, and they are wimps, bronies,
non-athletic, no muscular, playing dress up,  does Nads/kensi play dress
up ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694066

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-07-16 02:05 +0000
Message-ID<piguhn$4pj$16@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694062
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 21:13:01 -0400, Wally W. wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:12:44 -0400, kensi wrote:
> 
>>On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>>>
>>>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
>>> 
>>> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."
>>
>>Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*"
>>(emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?
> 
> The emphasis was not mine.

Sure it was. View the original (MID <pibiaa$1elm$1@gioia.aioe.org>) and 
you will see that the asterisks are there. I did not add them.

> "Elimination" implies willful action. Who proposed that?

Were you expecting it to happen spontaneously? The usual assumption is 
that if someone says e.g. "it's time for a lot of journalists to 
disappear" they aren't expecting this to "just happen", but intend to 
incite violence from their followers.

> If someone swims beyond their depth and drowns, who was violent in
> bringing about their demise.

You aren't seriously suggesting that journalists as an occupation are 
headed for a whole bunch of tragic accidents that had nothing to do with 
other people attacking them?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694068

From% <Persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-15 19:13 -0700
Message-ID<bedkhu.oe2.17.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#694066
On 2018-07-15 7:05 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 21:13:01 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:12:44 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>>>>
>>>>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
>>>>
>>>> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."
>>>
>>> Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*"
>>> (emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?
>>
>> The emphasis was not mine.
> 
> Sure it was. View the original (MID <pibiaa$1elm$1@gioia.aioe.org>) and
> you will see that the asterisks are there. I did not add them.
> 
>> "Elimination" implies willful action. Who proposed that?
> 
> Were you expecting it to happen spontaneously? The usual assumption is
> that if someone says e.g. "it's time for a lot of journalists to
> disappear" they aren't expecting this to "just happen", but intend to
> incite violence from their followers.
> 
>> If someone swims beyond their depth and drowns, who was violent in
>> bringing about their demise.
> 
> You aren't seriously suggesting that journalists as an occupation are
> headed for a whole bunch of tragic accidents that had nothing to do with
> other people attacking them?
> 
what do women know

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694070

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2018-07-15 23:03 -0400
Message-ID<3c1okdpjj51tk5n1uu3nfohtocbvavtk70@4ax.com>
In reply to#694066
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 02:05:43 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 21:13:01 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:12:44 -0400, kensi wrote:
>> 
>>>On 7/14/2018 8:20 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 02:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:06:04 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> hopefully there will soon be a *mass extinction of journalists*,
>>>>>
>>>>> Only fascists advocate for the violent elimination of journalists.
>>>> 
>>>> No one said anything about "violent" or "elimination."
>>>
>>>Oh? Then how did you expect this "*mass extinction of journalists*"
>>>(emphasis yours) to occur, kOok?
>> 
>> The emphasis was not mine.
>
>Sure it was. View the original (MID <pibiaa$1elm$1@gioia.aioe.org>) and 
>you will see that the asterisks are there. I did not add them.

Indeed: view the original. A competent reader will see I didn't add
them.

So I was right when I said, "The emphasis was not mine."

Now, both you and kensi (if that isn't redundant, as I seem to recall
some suggesting you are a sock puppet of kensi's) are wrong.

When kensi is in attributions class, maybe you should go to a class on
understanding MIDs.

>> "Elimination" implies willful action. Who proposed that?
>
>Were you expecting it to happen spontaneously? 

It seems that it was *you* who used the word "elimination."

I wan't expecting elimination. 

Do you take "straw man" classes from kensi?

>The usual assumption is 
>that if someone says e.g. "it's time for a lot of journalists to 
>disappear" they aren't expecting this to "just happen", but intend to 
>incite violence from their followers.

Maybe that is true if *you* say it.

But ... do you *have* followers?

>> If someone swims beyond their depth and drowns, who was violent in
>> bringing about their demise.
>
>You aren't seriously suggesting that journalists as an occupation are 
>headed for a whole bunch of tragic accidents that had nothing to do with 
>other people attacking them?

Who is the one here with violence, attacking, etc., on their mind?

What is wrong with this picture: journalists overreach on the front
page, then print retractions on page twelve,

Paul Harvey: "If there is one irrefutable lesson to be learned from
history it is that excesses inevitably are their own undoing."

It isn't an accident when condescending, overreaching A-holes drown
... it's karma.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694081

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-07-16 04:50 +0000
Message-ID<pih870$4pj$18@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694070
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:03:14 -0400, Wally W. wrote:

> Now, both you and kensi (if that isn't redundant, as I seem to recall
> some suggesting you are a sock puppet of kensi's) are wrong.

Nope. You are. The climate is indeed warming. And you are indeed giving 
off that "violent psychopath" vibe with your Naziesque rhetoric about 
journalists.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694090

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-15 23:08 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.35b5d63964e8d23099440d@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#694081
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pih870$4pj$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:03:14 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> 
> > Now, both you and kensi (if that isn't redundant, as I seem to recall
> > some suggesting you are a sock puppet of kensi's) are wrong.
> 
> Nope. You are. The climate is indeed warming. And you are indeed giving 
> off that "violent psychopath" vibe with your Naziesque rhetoric about 
> journalists.

There you go again, trying to Godwin your way out of another argument.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694091

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-07-16 06:09 +0000
Message-ID<pihcrb$4pj$20@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694090
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:08:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pih870$4pj$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:03:14 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>> 
>> > Now, both you and kensi (if that isn't redundant, as I seem to recall
>> > some suggesting you are a sock puppet of kensi's) are wrong.
>> 
>> Nope. You are. The climate is indeed warming. And you are indeed giving
>> off that "violent psychopath" vibe with your Naziesque rhetoric about
>> journalists.
> 
> There you go again, trying to Godwin your way out of another argument.

See .sig:

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694095

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-15 23:27 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.35b5da9b51982b49994417@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#694091
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pihcrb$4pj$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:08:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <pih870$4pj$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:03:14 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Now, both you and kensi (if that isn't redundant, as I seem to recall
> >> > some suggesting you are a sock puppet of kensi's) are wrong.
> >> 
> >> Nope. You are. The climate is indeed warming. And you are indeed giving
> >> off that "violent psychopath" vibe with your Naziesque rhetoric about
> >> journalists.
> > 
> > There you go again, trying to Godwin your way out of another argument.
> 
> See .sig:

That's your disclaimer?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web