Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #692586 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-04 05:07 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-07-20 21:12 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 194 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:07 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-07-04 06:39 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 12:15 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-05 13:21 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-05 14:10 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 12:04 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-06 14:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:07 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 15:29 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-05 21:59 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 13:25 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-05 23:56 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 20:02 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-06 19:38 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:18 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:26 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 19:02 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 21:15 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:20 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:05 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-22 17:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:23 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-05 22:33 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:07 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 13:28 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-05 23:50 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-06 20:03 +1000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-06 08:04 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-06 08:16 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 08:23 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-05 23:57 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 05:42 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-06 08:43 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 09:19 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 00:21 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:22 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 05:38 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 10:33 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 12:14 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 12:47 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-07 19:36 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:38 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-07-06 05:32 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-06 08:46 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-06 13:29 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-07-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:09 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 15:31 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-07 00:24 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Frank <"frank "@frank.net> - 2018-07-20 12:16 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-20 21:09 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-20 22:16 +0100
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 19:24 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-20 22:26 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-06 13:27 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-06 09:34 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 08:39 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 09:47 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-07-06 09:49 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-06 09:08 -0500
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-06 09:40 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 14:55 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-06 18:39 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 15:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 16:05 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:08 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 16:11 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-06 23:34 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:38 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-06 19:51 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:55 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:13 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:24 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:53 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:49 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 22:06 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 22:08 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:35 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-07 03:45 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 05:43 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-07 11:36 +0100
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-07 07:11 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-07-07 07:46 -0500
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-09 18:50 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:15 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-09 18:48 -0400
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 08:02 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-07 05:35 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 10:36 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 11:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 12:33 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 15:54 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 17:12 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 17:19 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 17:20 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-08 17:55 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-08 19:06 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-09 03:23 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-09 13:27 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-07-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-09 16:53 -0700
Re: Antarctica is NOT melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 17:45 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:04 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-09 18:44 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 16:11 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:03 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:20 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-07 19:38 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:41 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-10 00:01 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-07-10 08:15 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-10 19:22 +0000
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 12:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-10 15:22 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-10 18:01 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-06 19:46 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:12 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:22 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:39 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:57 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 18:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 23:30 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:39 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:43 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:49 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:13 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 17:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 17:58 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 19:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 19:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-06 22:55 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:34 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 20:40 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:47 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 21:57 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:29 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 21:59 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 23:35 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-06 23:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-07 03:21 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 00:54 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-07 12:33 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:39 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-07 12:14 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 12:50 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-07-07 14:52 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-08 14:56 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 12:36 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 12:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:37 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:44 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:03 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:17 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 15:11 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:46 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 00:36 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-07-08 13:51 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 12:37 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-08 16:16 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:57 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:01 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 14:12 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 15:10 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:40 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 16:45 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-15 01:45 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 00:56 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 20:42 -0700
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Catalina" <Catalina@Beach.Sun> - 2018-07-15 00:09 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-15 00:38 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Catalina" <Catalina@Beach.Sun> - 2018-07-20 04:01 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 05:12 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-20 11:04 +0100
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-15 01:40 -0600
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-15 08:08 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew "Catalina" <Catalina@Beach.Sun> - 2018-07-20 04:03 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-20 08:31 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:53 -0400
Re: Antarctica is melting faster than we knew Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-07-20 21:12 +0000
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 23:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35a9fb924dbc6d439942aa@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #692878 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <phpeou$n7r$1@dont-email.me>, invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says... > > On 7/6/2018 7:02 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <bdlokh.v9u.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > > says... > > > > > >> > >> On 2018-07-06 5:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>> On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: > >>>> On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > >>>>> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... > >>>>>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > >>>>>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... > >>>>>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>>>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we > >>>>>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice > >>>>>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> **Who is "them"? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> **OK. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> **It was your solution. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sure. > >>>>> > >>>>>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required > >>>>>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of > >>>>>> course, you're blowing smoke again. > >>>>> > >>>>> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker > >>>>> or a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required > >>>>>> information to deal with YOUR solution. > >>>>> > >>>>> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how > >>>>> much ice they deem is "appropriate". > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or > >>>>>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less > >>>>>>>> than 100% efficient)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice > >>>>>>> makers on the job. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than > >>>>>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. > >>>>> > >>>>> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce > >>>>> the ice faster than it melts. > >>>>> > >>>>> Just means you will need more ice machines. > >>>>> > >>>>>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In > >>>>>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around > >>>>>> the back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the > >>>>>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying > >>>>> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but > >>>>> apparently some feel it's necessary. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of > >>>>>>> new ice you desire. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient > >>>>>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the > >>>>>> fundamental laws of this universe. > >>>>> > >>>>> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first > >>>>> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible > >>>>> for it to have formed. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> yes that's right > >>> > >>> Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that > >>> any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during the Ice > >>> Age. > >>> > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe > >>> > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene > >>> > >>> Mount Pluto dammed the lake: > >>> > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California > >> > >> i don't know what fwiw is > > > > Figure it out. > > > > I think it just might of failed the following "test": > > http://bladerunner.wikia.com/wiki/Voight-Kampff_machine > > https://youtu.be/Umc9ezAyJv0 > > Always liked the test with Sean Young. > > :^) % is "life," just not as we know it. Sometimes it's hard to tell whether he's just acting stupid, or actually IS that stupid. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-07 09:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bdndst.trg.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #692878 |
On 2018-07-06 9:15 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 7/6/2018 7:02 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <bdlokh.v9u.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> says... >> >> >>> >>> On 2018-07-06 5:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>>> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we >>>>>>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice >>>>>>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> **Who is "them"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **OK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **It was your solution. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required >>>>>>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of >>>>>>> course, you're blowing smoke again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker >>>>>> or a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required >>>>>>> information to deal with YOUR solution. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how >>>>>> much ice they deem is "appropriate". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or >>>>>>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less >>>>>>>>> than 100% efficient)? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice >>>>>>>> makers on the job. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than >>>>>>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. >>>>>> >>>>>> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce >>>>>> the ice faster than it melts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just means you will need more ice machines. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In >>>>>>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around >>>>>>> the back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the >>>>>>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying >>>>>> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but >>>>>> apparently some feel it's necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of >>>>>>>> new ice you desire. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient >>>>>>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the >>>>>>> fundamental laws of this universe. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first >>>>>> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible >>>>>> for it to have formed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> yes that's right >>>> >>>> Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that >>>> any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during the >>>> Ice >>>> Age. >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene >>>> >>>> Mount Pluto dammed the lake: >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California >>> >>> i don't know what fwiw is >> >> Figure it out. >> > > I think it just might of failed the following "test": > > http://bladerunner.wikia.com/wiki/Voight-Kampff_machine > > https://youtu.be/Umc9ezAyJv0 > > Always liked the test with Sean Young. > > :^) even you need to be tested than you likely don't know
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 17:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pj35qj$s6h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692945 |
On 7/7/2018 9:05 AM, % wrote: > On 2018-07-06 9:15 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 7/6/2018 7:02 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <bdlokh.v9u.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 2018-07-06 5:18 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> On 7/6/2018 4:56 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in >>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon >>>>>>>>>>>> if we >>>>>>>>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice >>>>>>>>>>> makers....that will solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> **Who is "them"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **OK. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **It was your solution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required >>>>>>>> data to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of >>>>>>>> course, you're blowing smoke again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker >>>>>>> or a Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> However they like, since it's not my problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required >>>>>>>> information to deal with YOUR solution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on >>>>>>> how >>>>>>> much ice they deem is "appropriate". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem >>>>>>>>>> better or >>>>>>>>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less >>>>>>>>>> than 100% efficient)? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice >>>>>>>>> makers on the job. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less >>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce >>>>>>> the ice faster than it melts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just means you will need more ice machines. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In >>>>>>>> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around >>>>>>>> the back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the >>>>>>>> compressor. It's all wasted energy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying >>>>>>> about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but >>>>>>> apparently some feel it's necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever >>>>>>>>> amount of >>>>>>>>> new ice you desire. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient >>>>>>>> ice makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the >>>>>>>> fundamental laws of this universe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the >>>>>>> first >>>>>>> place since according to your claims it would have been impossible >>>>>>> for it to have formed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> yes that's right >>>>> >>>>> Not sure what you mean here... Are you basically outright denying that >>>>> any Ice Age existed on Earth? Fwiw, Lake Tahoe was formed during >>>>> the Ice >>>>> Age. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tahoe >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene >>>>> >>>>> Mount Pluto dammed the lake: >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pluto,_California >>>> >>>> i don't know what fwiw is >>> >>> Figure it out. >>> >> >> I think it just might of failed the following "test": >> >> http://bladerunner.wikia.com/wiki/Voight-Kampff_machine >> >> https://youtu.be/Umc9ezAyJv0 >> >> Always liked the test with Sean Young. >> >> :^) > > even you need to be tested than you likely don't know Wink... ;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35a9a7f4b4d2800d994296@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #692831 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bdll50.5ok.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-07-06 4:38 PM, Scout wrote: > > > > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > > news:fq8t21F20avU1@mid.individual.net... > >> On 6/07/2018 1:56 PM, Scout wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > >>> news:fq85q1Fsbh9U1@mid.individual.net... > >>>> On 6/07/2018 11:59 AM, Scout wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>> news:phi2oi$a0t$1@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we > >>>>>> want to protect the southernmost continent: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I know, you can buy and send them a whole lot of ice makers....that > >>>>> will solve the problem. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> **Who is "them"? > >>> > >>> Those that are concerned there isn't enough ice. > >> > >> **OK. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> * How many ice makers do you think will be required? > >>> > >>> Don't care. I'm not the one complaining there isn't enough ice. > >> > >> **It was your solution. > > > > Sure. > > > >> I assume you have checked the numbers and can supply the required data > >> to tell us how many ice makers will be required. Unless, of course, > >> you're blowing smoke again. > > > > Not my problem, because I don't really care if they use 1 ice maker or a > > Billion ice makers. I'm not the one worried about the ice. > > > >>>> * How will the ice makers be powered? > >>> > >>> However they like, since it's not my problem. > >> > >> **Again: YOUR solution. YOU need to supply all the required > >> information to deal with YOUR solution. > > > > I did. The details are left up to those since those all decide on how > > much ice they deem is "appropriate". > > > > > >>>> * Do you think that the ice makers will make the problem better or > >>>> worse (remembering, of course, that ice makers are always less than > >>>> 100% efficient)? > >>> > >>> I guarantee you will end up with more ice if you put enough ice > >>> makers on the job. > >> > >> **Really? And how efficient are these ice makers? Anything less than > >> 100% will result in a nett increase in temperatures. > > > > So? You can build a glacier in the desert as long as you can produce the > > ice faster than it melts. > > > > Just means you will need more ice machines. > > > >> I have news for you: No ice maker is more than 100% efficient. In > >> fact, they are all quite a bit less. Don't believe me? Pop around the > >> back of your fridge and check out the heat coming from the compressor. > >> It's all wasted energy. > > > > If you say so, but that's your problem. Personally I think worrying > > about trying to control a natural cycle is wasted energy, but apparently > > some feel it's necessary. > > > >>> So, just keep adding ice makers until you obtain whatever amount of > >>> new ice you desire. > >> > >> **And again: It won't work, unless you can develop >100% efficient ice > >> makers. Kinda like perpetual energy, it would violate the fundamental > >> laws of this universe. > > > > So I suppose that means that ice could never have formed in the first > > place since according to your claims it would have been impossible for > > it to have formed. > > > > > yes that's right You need to get cock-slapped across your retarded face. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 22:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b7ltjd59sohsg1gauagd9mmgoktbphoi3g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #692586 |
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >protect the southernmost continent: > >https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 Protect it from what? Why is it good for land to be under ice? And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is melting faster than we knew" IOW: It's worse than we thought. Or: We are more clueless than we let on before ... remember what we said about "the science is settled?" ... well, that was pure bullshit ... and we get found out more every time we say, "It's worse than we thought."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 22:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phml38$1uk7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692714 |
On 7/5/2018 10:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >> protect the southernmost continent: >> >> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > > Protect it from what? > > Why is it good for land to be under ice? > > And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is > melting faster than we knew" > > IOW: It's worse than we thought. > > Or: We are more clueless than we let on before ... remember what we > said about "the science is settled?" ... well, that was pure bullshit > .... and we get found out more every time we say, "It's worse than we > thought." Maybe you should go back to picking boogers and looking out the window. -- Dinsdale
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 23:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <phmpu0$41s$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692715 |
On 7/5/2018 9:44 PM, Dinsdale wrote: > On 7/5/2018 10:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>> protect the southernmost continent: >>> >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>> >> >> Protect it from what? >> >> Why is it good for land to be under ice? >> >> And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is >> melting faster than we knew" >> >> IOW: It's worse than we thought. >> >> Or: We are more clueless than we let on before ... remember what we >> said about "the science is settled?" ... well, that was pure bullshit >> .... and we get found out more every time we say, "It's worse than we >> thought." > > Maybe you should go back to picking boogers and looking out the window. > WTF Dimsdale ? "booger and windows" ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 13:28 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fq85ucFsbh9U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #692714 |
On 6/07/2018 12:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >> protect the southernmost continent: >> >> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 > > Protect it from what? > > Why is it good for land to be under ice? > > And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is > melting faster than we knew" > > IOW: It's worse than we thought. **Nope. If you cared to read the article, you would realise that these are the words to focus on: "But many were surprised last week by a new study showing that Antarctica’s ice is melting three times faster today than just a decade ago." > > Or: We are more clueless than we let on before ... remember what we > said about "the science is settled?" ... well, that was pure bullshit > ... and we get found out more every time we say, "It's worse than we > thought." **Those were kensi's rather inane take on the facts. They are not the words used in the article. Try reading it, before you make a bigger fool of yourself (as if that's possible). -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 23:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <k9ptjd1tdvsrqb14pu72vdb8hem91ipfo6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #692718 |
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:28:02 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >On 6/07/2018 12:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>> protect the southernmost continent: >>> >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >> >> Protect it from what? >> >> Why is it good for land to be under ice? >> >> And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is >> melting faster than we knew" >> >> IOW: It's worse than we thought. > >**Nope. If you cared to read the article, ... but I don't care to read it. >you would realise that these >are the words to focus on: > >"But many were surprised last week by a new study showing that >Antarctica’s ice is melting three times faster today than just a decade >ago." > >> >> Or: We are more clueless than we let on before ... remember what we >> said about "the science is settled?" ... well, that was pure bullshit >> ... and we get found out more every time we say, "It's worse than we >> thought." > >**Those were kensi's rather inane take on the facts. So you are saying kensi cannot be trusted to both copy-and-paste and to interpret spew. Please encourage kensi to stop copying and pasting off-topic spew to sci.physics. You already gave an opinion on kensi's ability to report what was said in an article. >They are not the >words used in the article. Try reading it, before you make a bigger fool >of yourself (as if that's possible).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 20:03 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fq8t4iF20avU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #692719 |
On 6/07/2018 1:50 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:28:02 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: > >> On 6/07/2018 12:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>>> protect the southernmost continent: >>>> >>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>> >>> Protect it from what? >>> >>> Why is it good for land to be under ice? >>> >>> And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is >>> melting faster than we knew" >>> >>> IOW: It's worse than we thought. >> >> **Nope. If you cared to read the article, > > ... but I don't care to read it. **BINGO! Your ignorance is exposed for all to see. Congrats. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 08:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qflujdtdqg2qsjg36cdtkou4u5jnkgf57i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #692742 |
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 20:03:52 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >On 6/07/2018 1:50 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:28:02 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> >>> On 6/07/2018 12:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>>>> protect the southernmost continent: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >>>> >>>> Protect it from what? >>>> >>>> Why is it good for land to be under ice? >>>> >>>> And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is >>>> melting faster than we knew" >>>> >>>> IOW: It's worse than we thought. >>> >>> **Nope. If you cared to read the article, >> >> ... but I don't care to read it. > >**BINGO! Your ignorance is exposed for all to see. Congrats. There is wisdom in not reading every brain fart referenced by alarmists. If kensi can't be trusted to report the flavor of the article correctly, I am under no obligation to educate kensi. Perhaps you would like that job. If you are compelled to read everything suggested to you, please start here and follow all the links you encounter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Would it be ignorant of you to do otherwise? If you want to walk before you run in your efforts to educate kensi, start here: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_who_disagree_with_the_scientific_consensus_on_global_warming> And watch with interest as this unfolds (and the AGW bullshit unravels): <https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/07/03/winning-arizona-appellate-court-decides-hockey-stick-emails-must-be-released/> July 3, 2018 Arizona Appellate Court Decides Hockey Stick Emails Must Be Released Despite the University’s Appeal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 08:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phnmja$1m1e$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692746 |
On 7/6/2018 8:04 AM, Wally W. wrote: > There is wisdom in not reading every brain fart referenced by > alarmists. > > If kensi can't be trusted to report the flavor of the article > correctly, I am under no obligation to educate kensi. > > Perhaps you would like that job. > > If you are compelled to read everything suggested to you, please start > here and follow all the links you encounter: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page > > Would it be ignorant of you to do otherwise? Did you pick your morning boogers yet? Russians like booger pickers, you know. -- Dinsdale
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 08:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <phnqhs$1tai$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692747 |
On 7/6/2018 7:16 AM, Dinsdale wrote: > On 7/6/2018 8:04 AM, Wally W. wrote: >> There is wisdom in not reading every brain fart referenced by >> alarmists. >> >> If kensi can't be trusted to report the flavor of the article >> correctly, I am under no obligation to educate kensi. >> >> Perhaps you would like that job. >> >> If you are compelled to read everything suggested to you, please start >> here and follow all the links you encounter: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page >> >> Would it be ignorant of you to do otherwise? > > Did you pick your morning boogers yet? > > Russians like booger pickers, you know. > True, it is a sign of good health, and dosent waste paper. Always remove those bacteria infested little balls pluggun up your nostrals, to allow max breathing of fresh air to think clearly! and discard them. but some, like Dimsdale, probably actually eats boogers, anybodies boogers, thinking it is protien. Is that bad ? perhaps it helps his immune system strength in fighting off strange microbes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-05 23:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phmurd$ug6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #692718 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fq85ucFsbh9U2@mid.individual.net... > On 6/07/2018 12:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>> protect the southernmost continent: >>> >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >> >> Protect it from what? >> >> Why is it good for land to be under ice? >> >> And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is >> melting faster than we knew" >> >> IOW: It's worse than we thought. > > **Nope. If you cared to read the article, you would realise that these are > the words to focus on: > > "But many were surprised last week by a new study showing that Antarctica’s > ice is melting three times faster today than just a decade ago." Sure, it's part of a natural cycle, and we all know how much you love pointing out cycles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 05:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phndhp$132n$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692718 |
On 7/5/2018 11:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 6/07/2018 12:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>> protect the southernmost continent: >>> >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 ... > **Those were kensi's rather inane take on the facts. Excuse me? In fact the only part of my post that wasn't a direct quotation of the article's title or contents was the article's URL. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 08:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <i3oujdpamtobbl23l7l8vlm3d4cqan6jqu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #692718 |
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:28:02 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >On 6/07/2018 12:33 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:07:29 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> Climate scientist Stephen Rintoul says we have to act soon if we want to >>> protect the southernmost continent: >>> >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/antarctica-melting-faster-we-knew-here-s-what-it-will-ncna884636 >> >> Protect it from what? >> >> Why is it good for land to be under ice? >> >> And let's not miss the meaning of the subject line "Antarctica is >> melting faster than we knew" >> >> IOW: It's worse than we thought. > >**Nope. "Nope" what? >If you cared to read the article, you would realise that these >are the words to focus on: Who are you to say, "these are the words to focus on"? Would you tell the author to their face that the rest of their text was worthless? Who made you king with the power to decree that only what catches your attention is worthy of focus? >**Those were kensi's rather inane take on the facts. >They are not the words used in the article. Maybe you should reconsider your focus on who is ignorant and who has reading comprehension issues. These words are used in the article: "Antarctica is melting faster than we knew." Do you see no similarity between those words and the alarmists' FUD tactic in their refrain: "It's worse than we thought"? You don't seem to be making points on either side of the alarmist fence in this group. Which raises the question: Why **is** there an alarmist fence in this group?!! Why are alarmists posting their off-topic AGW bullshit in sci.physics? Alarmists are like a persistent infestation of insidious vermin. Once they show up, it is difficult to get rid of them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 09:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phnq9q$1se3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692749 |
On 7/6/2018 8:43 AM, Wally W. wrote: > Why are alarmists posting their off-topic AGW bullshit in > sci.physics? Since when is a discussion of radiative heat transfer off-topic in sci.physics, k0ok? > Alarmists are like a persistent infestation of insidious vermin. Once > they show up, it is difficult to get rid of them. Spoken like true Nazi eugenicist scum. They *love* to compare the people they hate to "vermin" or "infection" or an "infestation", and to talk about "getting rid of" people whose views or race or sexual orientation they find inconvenient. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-07 00:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <toe0kdteborkrem9lpdq6t7e843qrc4sim@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #692751 |
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:19:56 -0400, kensi wrote: >On 7/6/2018 8:43 AM, Wally W. wrote: >> Why are alarmists posting their off-topic AGW bullshit in >> sci.physics? > >Since when is a discussion of radiative heat transfer off-topic in >sci.physics, k0ok? There was no mention of radiative heat transfer in your OP, which was off-topic. Are you going to claim that when you screech about the sky falling that you are talking about gravity? >> Alarmists are like a persistent infestation of insidious vermin. Once >> they show up, it is difficult to get rid of them. > >Spoken like true Nazi eugenicist scum. They *love* to compare the people >they hate to "vermin" or "infection" or an "infestation", ... if the shoe fits ... >and to talk >about "getting rid of" people whose views or race Like this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Parncutt In an internet text entitled "Death penalty for global warming deniers? An objective argument...a conservative conclusion"... >or sexual orientation they find inconvenient. Again OT. Try posting about that in an aberrant biology group. BTW, some sexual orientations are self-exterminating because they produce no children. They are evolutionary cul-de-sacs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-06 23:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35a9fc0e1fc5355e9942ab@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #692879 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <toe0kdteborkrem9lpdq6t7e843qrc4sim@4ax.com>, ww84wa@aim.com says... > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:19:56 -0400, kensi wrote: > > >On 7/6/2018 8:43 AM, Wally W. wrote: > >> Why are alarmists posting their off-topic AGW bullshit in > >> sci.physics? > > > >Since when is a discussion of radiative heat transfer off-topic in > >sci.physics, k0ok? > > There was no mention of radiative heat transfer in your OP, which was > off-topic. > > Are you going to claim that when you screech about the sky falling > that you are talking about gravity? > > >> Alarmists are like a persistent infestation of insidious vermin. Once > >> they show up, it is difficult to get rid of them. > > > >Spoken like true Nazi eugenicist scum. They *love* to compare the people > >they hate to "vermin" or "infection" or an "infestation", > > ... if the shoe fits ... Kensi's just trying to Godwin her way out of an argument she always loses. > >and to talk > >about "getting rid of" people whose views or race > > Like this? > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Parncutt > In an internet text entitled "Death penalty for global warming > deniers? An objective argument...a conservative conclusion"... > > >or sexual orientation they find inconvenient. > > Again OT. Try posting about that in an aberrant biology group. > > BTW, some sexual orientations are self-exterminating because they > produce no children. They are evolutionary cul-de-sacs. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-07 05:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <phq1n8$18ju$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #692879 |
On 7/7/2018 12:21 AM, Wally W. wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:19:56 -0400, kensi wrote: >> On 7/6/2018 8:43 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>> Why are alarmists posting their off-topic AGW bullshit in >>> sci.physics? >> >> Since when is a discussion of radiative heat transfer off-topic in >> sci.physics, k0ok? > > There was no mention of radiative heat transfer in your OP, which was > off-topic. What do you think AGW is, retard? A reduction in radiative heat transfer from the Earth into deep space. Therefore what you irrationally call AGW "bullshit" is indeed on topic in sci,physics -- thus proving your earlier statement incorrect. >>> Alarmists are like a persistent infestation of insidious vermin. Once >>> they show up, it is difficult to get rid of them. >> >> Spoken like true Nazi eugenicist scum. They *love* to compare the people >> they hate to "vermin" or "infection" or an "infestation", and to talk >> about "getting rid of" people whose views or race or sexual orientation >> they find inconvenient. > > Again OT. So you admit your "infestation of insidious vermin" comment was off-topic? That's a start, I suppose. > Try posting about that in an aberrant biology group. > > BTW, some sexual orientations are self-exterminating because they > produce no children. They are evolutionary cul-de-sacs. Homophobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web