Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #690582 > unrolled thread

We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 11:22 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:56 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:30 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0700
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-15 04:54 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:06 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-15 21:27 -0500
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 02:49 +0000
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:25 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:31 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 01:23 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:30 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-16 01:38 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:28 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:28 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 05:48 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 02:19 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:45 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:11 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:23 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 14:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:42 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 19:48 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:24 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-16 20:25 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:59 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:43 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:54 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:10 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:51 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:05 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change will <willscranton@butchersboulevard.commypanprofile> - 2018-06-23 06:41 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-15 22:25 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:44 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:34 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 21:16 -0500
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-24 22:39 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 22:49 -0500
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-25 00:17 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-25 13:44 -0500
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:46 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 05:10 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:19 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 02:42 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:08 -0700
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 06:03 +1000
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:47 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 15:36 +1000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-24 13:09 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 06:35 +1000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-24 21:50 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 14:55 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:48 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:50 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:10 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:13 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:21 -0700
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:27 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:38 -0700
                                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:27 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 10:18 +1000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:20 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-30 13:12 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-30 08:50 -0500
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 14:08 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 09:02 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-30 10:18 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-03 05:04 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 23:31 -0400
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:17 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 03:37 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:12 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 11:21 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:12 -0500
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-30 12:13 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-25 18:36 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 15:03 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:21 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:38 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:51 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 13:16 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:18 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:16 +0000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 17:20 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:22 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:06 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:09 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:10 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:12 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-01 19:51 +0100
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:45 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:11 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-01 15:01 -0600
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 14:06 -0700

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#690833

On 6/16/2018 1:48 AM, vallor wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 00:31:17 -0400, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>
>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>
>>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
>>
>> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
>>
>> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being able
>> to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  I'm not
>> seeing much of that.
> 
> We once had a conversation in sci.physics about the redshift of quasars,
> and she explained things pretty well, including reference to papers she
> knew of.
> 
> I can track down the thread if there's interest, but it's not that big a
> deal.

Not a biggy for me either.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690847

On 6/16/2018 12:31 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>
>>>> You're not in science.
>>>
>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>
>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
> 
> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
> 
> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being able 
> to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  I'm not 
> seeing much of that.
> 
We are not seeing ANY of that!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690849

On 6/16/2018 10:45 AM, benj wrote:
> On 6/16/2018 12:31 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>
>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>
>>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
>>
>> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
>>
>> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being 
>> able to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  
>> I'm not seeing much of that.
>>
> We are not seeing ANY of that! 

But, we are seeing excellent representation of fascist neo-con climate 
change denyin' echo chambers.  Very amazing and excellent.  All that 
money from corporate and private sources paying for usenet subscriptions 
and basement pizza for unemployable idjit dumnasses.  Not unlike 
yourself.  So, we got Anschutz, Bradley, Coors, DeVos, Dunn, Howard, 
Koch, Pope, Scaife, Searle, Seid and others too numerous to list.  Who's 
paying for your mozzarella sticks with marinara sauce Mr. Idjit Dumnass 
who's not in science?  Do you tip the pizza delivery guy with bespoke 
asspennies?

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690853

On 6/16/2018 11:11 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/16/2018 10:45 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 6/16/2018 12:31 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, 
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
>>>
>>> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
>>>
>>> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being 
>>> able to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do. 
>>> I'm not seeing much of that.
>>>
>> We are not seeing ANY of that! 
> 
> But, we are seeing excellent representation of fascist neo-con climate 
> change denyin' echo chambers.  Very amazing and excellent.  All that 
> money from corporate and private sources paying for usenet subscriptions 
> and basement pizza for unemployable idjit dumnasses.  Not unlike 
> yourself.  So, we got Anschutz, Bradley, Coors, DeVos, Dunn, Howard, 
> Koch, Pope, Scaife, Searle, Seid and others too numerous to list.  Who's 
> paying for your mozzarella sticks with marinara sauce Mr. Idjit Dumnass 
> who's not in science?  Do you tip the pizza delivery guy with bespoke 
> asspennies?
> 
Who do you think you are talking to? Ignorant fat disgusting smelly 
liberal pig Michael Moore? As a fine looking conservative I do not gorge 
myself on greasy pizza nor do drugs, nor live in a fantasy world of 
middle school recess as you lefty libs do.

I not only have degrees in science, but actually have an education 
which you obviously do not (except in your delusions of grandeur). I 
have held a job with the title "principal research scientist" unlike you 
who have lived off government money and never held ANY job...ever! I 
actually can read, understand and have posted here on many occasions 
actual scientific papers on the facts of climate which obviously neither 
you nor "kensi" have the ability to comprehend in the slightest. So 
given your obvious ignorance you are reduced to shouting "holocaust 
denier" in people's faces to try to change the subject from your own 
inadequacies. Hint: You and so-called "Dr." "Kensi" are fooling nobody.

I call bullshit on you and "kensi".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690856

On 6/16/2018 1:23 PM, benj wrote:
> I not only have degrees in science, but actually have an education which 
> you obviously do not (except in your delusions of grandeur). I have held 
> a job with the title "principal research scientist"

Yes.  Of course.  It's important to have advanced degrees and excellent 
titles when you're a koolaid drinking dumnass internets bozo.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690875

On 6/16/2018 2:01 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/16/2018 1:23 PM, benj wrote:
>> I not only have degrees in science, but actually have an education 
>> which you obviously do not (except in your delusions of grandeur). I 
>> have held a job with the title "principal research scientist"
> 
> Yes.  Of course.  It's important to have advanced degrees and excellent 
> titles when you're a koolaid drinking dumnass internets bozo.
> 
Obviously you've got nothing. Look in back pages of the check out line 
magazines you read. There are ads that will help you get your GED IF you 
can pass it which I doubt.


*Chortle* (Rule #5)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690865

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 13:23:39 -0400, benj wrote:

> I not only have degrees in science, but actually have an education which
> you obviously do not (except in your delusions of grandeur). I have held
> a job with the title "principal research scientist" unlike you who have
> lived off government money and never held ANY job...ever!

Let me guess: the degree is in business administration or economics and 
the job was with the Heritage Foundation or a similar right-wing think 
tank spin-doctoring dubious "science" into equally-dubious 
"justifications" for supply-side voodoo, austerity, stealing from the poor 
and giving to the rich, and other conservative bullshit like that?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690870

On 2018-06-16 12:48 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 13:23:39 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> I not only have degrees in science, but actually have an education which
>> you obviously do not (except in your delusions of grandeur). I have held
>> a job with the title "principal research scientist" unlike you who have
>> lived off government money and never held ANY job...ever!
> 
> Let me guess: the degree is in business administration or economics and
> the job was with the Heritage Foundation or a similar right-wing think
> tank spin-doctoring dubious "science" into equally-dubious
> "justifications" for supply-side voodoo, austerity, stealing from the poor
> and giving to the rich, and other conservative bullshit like that?
> 
remember when everybody on usenet was a lawyer ,
and all their children were 3 grades ahead and ,
they were all millionaires , i'd just like to say ,
if you're that fk'in smart why are you in usenet

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690940

x-no-archive: yes

On 6/16/2018 1:24 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-06-16 12:48 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 13:23:39 -0400, benj wrote:
>>
>>> I not only have degrees in science, but actually have an education which
>>> you obviously do not (except in your delusions of grandeur). I have held
>>> a job with the title "principal research scientist" unlike you who have
>>> lived off government money and never held ANY job...ever!
>>
>> Let me guess: the degree is in business administration or economics and
>> the job was with the Heritage Foundation or a similar right-wing think
>> tank spin-doctoring dubious "science" into equally-dubious
>> "justifications" for supply-side voodoo, austerity, stealing from the 
>> poor
>> and giving to the rich, and other conservative bullshit like that?
>>
> remember when everybody on usenet was a lawyer ,
> and all their children were 3 grades ahead and ,
> they were all millionaires , i'd just like to say ,
> if you're that fk'in smart why are you in usenet

lol, and it's % for the win!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690879

On 6/16/2018 3:48 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 13:23:39 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> I not only have degrees in science, but actually have an education which
>> you obviously do not (except in your delusions of grandeur). I have held
>> a job with the title "principal research scientist" unlike you who have
>> lived off government money and never held ANY job...ever!
> 
> Let me guess: the degree is in business administration or economics and
> the job was with the Heritage Foundation or a similar right-wing think
> tank spin-doctoring dubious "science" into equally-dubious
> "justifications" for supply-side voodoo, austerity, stealing from the poor
> and giving to the rich, and other conservative bullshit like that?
> 
You don't have to guess, Baby Nads. Unlike your paranoid secret 
anonymous life, mine is an open book. I'm in the phone book for crying 
out loud. Even an amateur like Odd or a kook like Hanson easily looked 
me up. If you and "kensi" were competent you could too, but you'd both 
rather make fools of yourselves in a world-wide public forum by lying 
about everyone. Sad.

Working for one of the world's largest research organizations I found 
that unlike you and the media, everyone there was smart enough to know 
that the poor have no money to steal to give to anyone! Duh!!
But you lefties think you are all so clever because you figured out 
stealing from the rich is better because "that is where the money is"! 
Sorry Baby Nads but that one was said a long time ago. Catch up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690845

On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>
>>> You're not in science.
>>
>> Neither are you dimsdale.
> 
> Maybe not, but kensi is.
> 
Journalist science? WE all noticed "kensi" only cuts and pastes 
journalist drool and propaganda. Musta got a degree from one of those 
INTERNET schools where you send them money and they send you your "ph.d".

Just WHICH school did "Kensi" go to again? Oh that's right! It's a 
SECRET! Bwahahahaha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690809

On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>
>> You're not in science.
> 
> Neither are you dimsdale.

You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690816

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pg1u57$fkg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup 
says...


> 
> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
> >> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> >>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
> >>
> >> You're not in science.
> > 
> > Neither are you dimsdale.
> 
> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.

Are you gonna let Pricked name-lame you?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690821

On 6/16/2018 12:10 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pg1u57$fkg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup
> says...
>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>
>>>> You're not in science.
>>>
>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>
>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
> 
> Are you gonna let Pricked name-lame you?

I got a block of imported Gruyere and crock of garlic-shallot boursin. 
And a hunk of grass beef and a loaf of fresh pumpernickel. I'm gonna 
chainsaw some fucking aspens and choke cherries in the morning.  Then 
I'm going to the dump.  Then I'll pick up some salad greens and some 
dark beer, take a nice shower and fire up the yard roaster.

With that in mind, I don't give a shit what anybody calls me.  I gots to 
come up with a Bayesian estimator to throw at a messy data problem while 
sitting in the shade of the ol' apple tree.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690823

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pg251a$ofj$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup 
says...


> 
> On 6/16/2018 12:10 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <pg1u57$fkg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup
> > says...
> >> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
> >>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> >>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
> >>>>
> >>>> You're not in science.
> >>>
> >>> Neither are you dimsdale.
> >>
> >> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
> > 
> > Are you gonna let Pricked name-lame you?
> 
> I got a block of imported Gruyere and crock of garlic-shallot boursin. 
> And a hunk of grass beef and a loaf of fresh pumpernickel. I'm gonna 
> chainsaw some fucking aspens and choke cherries in the morning.  Then 
> I'm going to the dump.  Then I'll pick up some salad greens and some 
> dark beer, take a nice shower and fire up the yard roaster.
> 
> With that in mind, I don't give a shit what anybody calls me.  I gots to 
> come up with a Bayesian estimator to throw at a messy data problem while 
> sitting in the shade of the ol' apple tree.

Well, get your parameters defined, and add the name-laming retaliation to 
your "to do" list for when you have more time.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691632

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:05:32 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pg251a$ofj$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup
> says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On 6/16/2018 12:10 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <pg1u57$fkg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup
>> > says...
>> >> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>> >>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>> >>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>> >>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You're not in science.
>> >>>
>> >>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>> >>
>> >> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>> > 
>> > Are you gonna let Pricked name-lame you?
>> 
>> I got a block of imported Gruyere and crock of garlic-shallot boursin.
>> And a hunk of grass beef and a loaf of fresh pumpernickel. I'm gonna
>> chainsaw some fucking aspens and choke cherries in the morning.  Then
>> I'm going to the dump.  Then I'll pick up some salad greens and some
>> dark beer, take a nice shower and fire up the yard roaster.
>> 
>> With that in mind, I don't give a shit what anybody calls me.  I gots
>> to come up with a Bayesian estimator to throw at a messy data problem
>> while sitting in the shade of the ol' apple tree.
> 
> Well, get your parameters defined, and add the name-laming retaliation
> to your "to do" list for when you have more time.

Risk? People care about pork-chops not uncertainty. Screw climate-change 
risk ... grow more  methane-belching pigs !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690826

x-no-archive: yes

On 6/15/2018 9:51 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/16/2018 12:10 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <pg1u57$fkg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup
>> says...
>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>
>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>
>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>
>> Are you gonna let Pricked name-lame you?
> 
> I got a block of imported Gruyere and crock of garlic-shallot boursin. 
> And a hunk of grass beef and a loaf of fresh pumpernickel. I'm gonna 
> chainsaw some fucking aspens and choke cherries in the morning.  Then 
> I'm going to the dump.  Then I'll pick up some salad greens and some 
> dark beer, take a nice shower and fire up the yard roaster.
> 
> With that in mind, I don't give a shit what anybody calls me.  I gots to 
> come up with a Bayesian estimator to throw at a messy data problem while 
> sitting in the shade of the ol' apple tree.

Let them eat imported Gruyere?

Canned peas and canned carrots tonight, but the potatoes were real.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690846

On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>
>>> You're not in science.
>>
>> Neither are you dimsdale.
> 
> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
> 
A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690850

On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>
>>>> You're not in science.
>>>
>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>
>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>
> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.

And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and 
very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690854

On 6/16/2018 11:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>
>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>
>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>
>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
> 
> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and 
> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
> 
Usual drug-soaked drooling nonsense from babbling left.
Lay off the stash for a while, dude!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web