Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #690582 > unrolled thread

We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
Last post2018-07-01 14:06 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 103 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 11:22 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:56 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:30 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0700
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-15 04:54 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:06 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-15 21:27 -0500
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 02:49 +0000
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:25 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:31 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 01:23 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:30 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-16 01:38 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:28 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:28 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 05:48 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 02:19 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:45 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:11 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:23 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 14:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:42 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 19:48 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:24 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-16 20:25 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:59 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:43 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:54 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:10 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:51 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:05 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change will <willscranton@butchersboulevard.commypanprofile> - 2018-06-23 06:41 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-15 22:25 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:44 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:34 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 21:16 -0500
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-24 22:39 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 22:49 -0500
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-25 00:17 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-25 13:44 -0500
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:46 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 05:10 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:19 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 02:42 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:08 -0700
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 06:03 +1000
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:47 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 15:36 +1000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-24 13:09 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 06:35 +1000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-24 21:50 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 14:55 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:48 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:50 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:10 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:13 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:21 -0700
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:27 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:38 -0700
                                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:27 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 10:18 +1000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:20 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-30 13:12 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-30 08:50 -0500
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 14:08 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 09:02 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-30 10:18 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-03 05:04 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 23:31 -0400
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:17 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 03:37 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:12 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 11:21 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:12 -0500
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-30 12:13 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-25 18:36 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 15:03 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:21 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:38 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:51 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 13:16 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:18 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:16 +0000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 17:20 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:22 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:06 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:09 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:10 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:12 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-01 19:51 +0100
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:45 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:11 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-01 15:01 -0600
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 14:06 -0700

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#690582 — We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
SubjectWe are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change
Message-ID<pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:

https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#690598

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-06-14 11:22 -0400
Message-ID<bLvUC.438136$PE5.370418@fx37.iad>
In reply to#690582
On 6/14/2018 7:14 AM, kensi wrote:
> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
> 
> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks 
> 
> 
Oh my GOD! "Kensi" I sure hope you are not saying it WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT!

But then every other model the IPCC has used to show how horrible 
"global warming" was going to be was totally wrong. Why should anything 
be different now?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690605

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-06-14 11:56 -0500
Message-ID<pfu6o1$foe$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#690598
On 6/14/2018 10:22 AM, benj wrote:
> On 6/14/2018 7:14 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>
>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks
>>
>>
> Oh my GOD! "Kensi" I sure hope you are not saying it WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT!
> 
> But then every other model the IPCC has used to show how horrible
> "global warming" was going to be was totally wrong. Why should anything
> be different now?

it is worser than anybody thought!


    +30 degree C rise next week in the global average !


sea levels expand bring new beaches and surfing to interior USA !

SURFs UP !   grab your boards !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692345

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 11:30 -0700
Message-ID<0c5124d3-8e92-4b22-94cd-9557b4a9a0d9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#690605
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:56:39 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 6/14/2018 10:22 AM, benj wrote:
> > On 6/14/2018 7:14 AM, kensi wrote:
> >> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
> >>
> >> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks
> >>
> >>
> > Oh my GOD! "Kensi" I sure hope you are not saying it WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT!
> > 
> > But then every other model the IPCC has used to show how horrible
> > "global warming" was going to be was totally wrong. Why should anything
> > be different now?
> 
> it is worser than anybody thought!
> 
> 
>     +30 degree C rise next week in the global average !
> 
> 
> sea levels expand bring new beaches and surfing to interior USA !
> 
> SURFs UP !   grab your boards !

GOP Mafia called climate warming a demo.conspiracy.Good reason why.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692423

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2018-07-01 11:47 -0700
Message-ID<phb7lk$eb$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#692345
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote
"Good reason why you Bert should take this deal,
since you, Bert can make these items (1) to (5) go
away "as you type" and post something like :
>
"I, Bert got mad and irrational in my response to the posters
in item (1) to (5) because they were laughing at me". -- Bert" .
>
Bert, post a sentence like that, and then items (1) to (5)
may no longer be posted to reminded you of it.
>
Also, if you do that then the deal will be sweetened in that
you may really deserve a Nobel for you "stopping light 3"
from it's source" as evidence for that will be provide for you.
>
Deal?
>
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
>
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
>
(4)
On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". --  Bert
>
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690797

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-06-15 04:54 -0400
Message-ID<pg1o1l$2up$10@dont-email.me>
In reply to#690582

"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>
> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks

That's ok, so are the models that predict the climate change.

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought--computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690802

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-06-15 21:34 -0400
Message-ID<LOZUC.96348$7H4.72835@fx12.iad>
In reply to#690797
On 6/15/2018 4:54 AM, Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>
>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks 
>>
> 
> That's ok, so are the models that predict the climate change.
> 
> https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/ 
> 
> 
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought--computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html 

This is all OLD news to anyone in science. But "kensi" keeps her head in 
the sand pretending that her fake pseudo-science is real to try to keep 
the fraud going. Is anybody dumb enough to still be fooled by this?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690804

FromDinsdale <yup@ayup.yup>
Date2018-06-15 22:06 -0400
Message-ID<pg1rav$bej$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#690802
On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.

You're not in science.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690806

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-06-15 21:27 -0500
Message-ID<ibt8id9igeh96dv4q3cvl8g6dqpaah1qmu@4ax.com>
In reply to#690804
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:

>On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>
>You're not in science.

Neither are you dimsdale.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690808

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-06-16 02:49 +0000
Message-ID<pg1tsn$hqu$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#690806
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
> 
>>On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>
>>You're not in science.
> 
> Neither are you dimsdale.

Maybe not, but kensi is.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690815

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.358e2d6c75ef070a993e72@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#690808
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pg1tsn$hqu$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
> > 
> >>On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> >>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
> >>
> >>You're not in science.
> > 
> > Neither are you dimsdale.
> 
> Maybe not, but kensi is.

But who's in Kensi?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690837

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-16 08:25 -0400
Message-ID<pg2vkc$h0$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#690815
On 6/16/2018 12:09 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> In article <pg1tsn$hqu$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>> You're not in science.
>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
> But who's in Kensi?

That's none of your damn business!

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690818

FromDinsdale <yup@ayup.yup>
Date2018-06-16 00:31 -0400
Message-ID<pg23qr$n26$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#690808
On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>
>>> You're not in science.
>>
>> Neither are you dimsdale.
> 
> Maybe not, but kensi is.

Trollbait for idjits, yes.

PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being able 
to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  I'm not 
seeing much of that.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690819

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-15 21:34 -0700
Message-ID<bbupgt.jgf.17.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to#690818
On 2018-06-15 9:31 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>
>>>> You're not in science.
>>>
>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>
>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
> 
> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
> 
> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being able 
> to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  I'm not 
> seeing much of that.
> 
i can do it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690825

FromDinsdale <yup@ayup.yup>
Date2018-06-16 01:23 -0400
Message-ID<pg26rs$qvo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#690819
On 6/16/2018 12:34 AM, % wrote:
> On 2018-06-15 9:31 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>
>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>
>>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
>>
>> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
>>
>> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being 
>> able to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  
>> I'm not seeing much of that.
>>
> i can do it

270% milk tariffs keep dairies in good financial shape, keep the cost of 
education, food and health care in the affordable range for the average 
Canadian, and annoy American presidents.  That's why Canadians can do 
stuff many Americans can't.

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690828

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-15 22:30 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.358e4046ad360f29993e76@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#690825
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pg26rs$qvo$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup 
says...


> 
> On 6/16/2018 12:34 AM, % wrote:
> > On 2018-06-15 9:31 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> >> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
> >>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> >>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You're not in science.
> >>>>
> >>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
> >>
> >> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
> >>
> >> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being 
> >> able to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  
> >> I'm not seeing much of that.
> >>
> > i can do it
> 
> 270% milk tariffs keep dairies in good financial shape, keep the cost of 
> education, food and health care in the affordable range for the average 
> Canadian, and annoy American presidents.  That's why Canadians can do 
> stuff many Americans can't.

If they can dream it, they can claim they do it.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690831

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-06-16 01:38 -0400
Message-ID<pg289u$vm7$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#690825

"Dinsdale" <yup@ayup.yup> wrote in message 
news:pg26rs$qvo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 6/16/2018 12:34 AM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-06-15 9:31 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, 
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
>>>
>>> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
>>>
>>> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being able 
>>> to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  I'm not 
>>> seeing much of that.
>>>
>> i can do it
>
> 270% milk tariffs keep dairies in good financial shape, keep the cost of 
> education, food and health care in the affordable range for the average 
> Canadian, and annoy American presidents.  That's why Canadians can do 
> stuff many Americans can't.

Yea, I've heard that you spend more in taxes that you do on food, shelter 
and clothing combined.

Further since 1961 the average Canadian family's tax bill has increased by 
1,832%

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690838

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-16 08:28 -0400
Message-ID<pg2voj$h0$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#690831
On 6/16/2018 1:38 AM, Scout wrote:

> Further since 1961 the average Canadian family's tax bill has increased 
> by 1,832%

Could it be ... inflation?!

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690861

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-16 12:28 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.358f04ca2b34d309993e7c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#690838
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pg2voj$h0$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


> 
> On 6/16/2018 1:38 AM, Scout wrote:
> 
> > Further since 1961 the average Canadian family's tax bill has increased 
> > by 1,832%
> 
> Could it be ... inflation?!

Or "free" medical care, including copious amounts of drugs for the 
Asswurm?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690832

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-06-16 05:48 +0000
Message-ID<pg28bq$thg$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#690818
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 00:31:17 -0400, Dinsdale wrote:

> On 6/15/2018 10:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 21:27:36 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>
>>>> You're not in science.
>>>
>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>> 
>> Maybe not, but kensi is.
> 
> Trollbait for idjits, yes.
> 
> PhD?  Welllllummm, anybody can post links.  Understanding and being able
> to explain a complex concept and pass it on is what PhD guy do.  I'm not
> seeing much of that.

We once had a conversation in sci.physics about the redshift of quasars, 
and she explained things pretty well, including reference to papers she 
knew of.

I can track down the thread if there's interest, but it's not that big a 
deal.

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web