Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #688291 > unrolled thread

46-Ionic,Metallic Bond are motion, whereas Covalent is stealing electrons static // half a closed loop is motion, gives physics motion

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  46-Ionic,Metallic Bond are motion, whereas Covalent is stealing electrons static // half a closed loop is motion, gives physics motion Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:09 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-02 19:25 +0000
      Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 17:00 -0400
    Re: 46-Ionic,Metallic Bond are motion, whereas Covalent is stealing electrons static // half a closed loop is motion, gives physics motion Herp Derpington <derp@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-02 13:51 -0700

#688291 — 46-Ionic,Metallic Bond are motion, whereas Covalent is stealing electrons static // half a closed loop is motion, gives physics motion

46-Ionic,Metallic Bond are motion, whereas Covalent is stealing electrons static // half a closed loop is motion, gives physics motion


If the Faraday law is true, then the geometry of atoms and molecules purpose is to produce Maximum Electricity in a Coil with the muon electron serving as bar magnet. This explains that covalent bond is a stealing of one or more protons (protons more so than muon electrons between atoms). But now we need to explain ionic and metallic bond. All bonds are for the purpose of Maximum Electricity to grow that atom or molecule.

Now this textbook is a Memoir textbook in that I include my personal history in discovery of these ideas. Sometimes ideas earlier are tossed out. If I were to write future editions of this book this would be a separate chapter for the ionic and metallic bond. But here, as memoir we have no chapters-- only a constant flow of ideas, new ideas, and sorting them out.
But the prior chapter was covalent bond with its looming super idea of Maximum Electricity Coil, that would shape the geometry of atoms and molecules as being toruses. Torus inside other torus, all to produce maximum electricity via Faraday law-- for tokamaks are toruses because that is the geometry of squeezing together maximum electricity.

But we saw that hydrogen atom alone is 1 proton with 1 muon, and the proton is 840MeV and muon is 105 MeV with the muon as bar magnet in Faraday law, leaving the proton to form the coil. A proton is itself 8 muons so with only 8 muons to form a coil, those 8 muons can only form a half torus, a monopole torus, think of a donut as a full torus and a donut cut in half is a monopole torus. This is why hydrogen atom alone seeks to never be alone for it seeks its other half and forms H2. How many times in Nature do you see actual H alone? The Sun and stars? But, what you truly never see alone is the 840 MeV proton without its 105 muon electron, unless you see it in a high energy physics machine that breaks the muon from its proton.

So we know the geometry of most atoms and molecules-- toruses, and they seek to be toruses because of that is the maximum means of electricity production to grow the atom or molecule.

But, when not in the shape of a full torus, the atoms and molecules are 1/2 of a torus. H alone is shaped as a 1/2 torus, with its muon doing a Faraday law bar magnet thrust through the 1/2 torus coil.

So what happens to the thrusting muon bar magnet as it reaches the open end?

Picture a C as 1/2 of a torus. So the muon starts at one end of the C and when it reaches the other open end of the C, what happens? Well, have you ever had a slinky toy? It moves. So, when the muon reaches the other end, it moves the entire 1/2 torus of its position in Space, and it creates motion of its proton 1/2 torus tube and the thrusting muon inside.

In H2 molecule, the torus is a full torus and does not do a motion in Space, except for tiny tiny motion. The H single atom is a 1/2 torus and as it reaches the other end, the open other end, it moves the entire atom in Space. And the speed of this motion is almost the speed of light, almost, for electrons in atoms are in almost the speed of light motion.

So think of the 1/2 torus that singular Hydrogen is, and moving at near the speed of light, flip flopping the C would mean the hydrogen atom is a wave. So here we begin to see how atoms are particles-- helium is a full torus and need not move, whereas singular H, is forced to move, at almost the speed of light, for its 1/2 torus in Faraday law forces it to move.

Here we begin to make the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, not so much an abstraction, but a reality of physics being both particle-- a full torus and wave-- a 1/2 torus doing the Faraday Law.

Now in my list of molecules so far, I have done only the covalent bond.


List

N2-- diamagnetic 

O2-- paramagnetic 

CO2-- paramagnetic 

O3-- diamagnetic 

CO-- diamagnetic 

C4 graphite -- diamagnetic anomaly but anomaly goes away as we see graphite is really C3, never C4 

C5 diamond-- diamagnetic anomaly but anomaly goes away as we see diamond is really C3, never C5 

B2-- paramagnetic 

H2O diamagnetic 

H2 diamagnetic 

D2 diamagnetic 

CIF diamagnetic & paramagnetic anomaly 

NO paramagnetic 

NO2 paramagnetic 

SO2 paramagnetic 


In my list so far, above, I was doing all about covalent bonding for CO2 in particular, but now I need to focus on H2 and H alone and that of NO, where the filling of the 2P orbital causes there to be a odd number of muons left over.

In Covalent bonding, we can say that the left over muons are always an even number, so as to create Faux or Pseudo Orbitals, like in CO2 has 2+4+4 = 10 with 4 left over muons, creating 1S faux, 2S faux or 3S faux orbitals.

Now we focus on NO with its 3+4 = 7 and 1 left over muon. This is the same as hydrogen solo with its 1 valence muon and its 1/2 torus geometry.

So, what is the geometry of NO, for is it a 2P filled large torus with 1S inside 2S all inside 2P, then, where is that last 1 proton with 1 muon? Is it a large 1/2 torus that has the entire 2P stuck inside it and doing a Faraday law thrust and thus the entire NO molecule is a wave in motion through Space. Or, is it the 2P  the largest torus and has the 1proton,1muon stuck to the exterior of 2P as a 1/2 torus, reminiscent of the faux 1S and faux 2S stuck to the exterior outside of 2P of CO2.

I do not know as yet. But Ionic bond and Metallic bond are far different from Covalent bond, because we experience the ionic and metallic bond with a sense of motion, especially ionic, since that is the chemistry of batteries, and there has to be motion involved with ions. With the metallic bond, there has to be motion there also, to have this ability of malleable, ductile, and the traveling of electricity-- travel of magnetic monopoles through metal.

What I think is the case, is that in NO, ion, it moves, but not as fast as say H ion.

So, here, with Ionic bond and Metallic bond we glimpse Motion arise in physics and we glimpse where and why we have a principle of either particle or wave.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#688313 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

>AD HOMINEM--it means "to the person" or "attack the person"

>Generally every person in the world knows when they heard another person 
>attacking someone. We hear voices raised and reasoning gone. We hear 
>fight. But words on a computer or in writing we hear nothing and we see 
>just words, but it is easy to tell if the discussion is attack, or if it 
>is reasoned discussion.

>Here is an example from the Internet in sci.math of Ad Hominem of a writer 
>who hates the person he is talking to, and no matter what the topic is, 
>the message is always the same-- I hate your guts.

>On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 

And you are *still* stalking me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688339 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

On 6/2/2018 3:25 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AD HOMINEM--it means "to the person" or "attack the person"
> 
>> Generally every person in the world knows when they heard another person
>> attacking someone. We hear voices raised and reasoning gone. We hear
>> fight. But words on a computer or in writing we hear nothing and we see
>> just words, but it is easy to tell if the discussion is attack, or if it
>> is reasoned discussion.
> 
>> Here is an example from the Internet in sci.math of Ad Hominem of a writer
>> who hates the person he is talking to, and no matter what the topic is,
>> the message is always the same-- I hate your guts.
> 
>> On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>
> 
> And you are *still* stalking me.
> 
Are you STILL interfering in "Archiepoo's" threads?

Outside interference in "his" thread is not permiited.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688332

Give it a rest, you retarded lunatic.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web