Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #685760 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 149 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 18:46 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:17 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 20:41 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 15:57 -0700
An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 14:15 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:32 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:16 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. OT de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 +1000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-18 22:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:16 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:02 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-19 12:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:44 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:28 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:37 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 20:42 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:07 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-19 12:35 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:40 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 22:22 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 21:34 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-20 03:15 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:18 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:38 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:42 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:26 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-02 11:27 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:45 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-04 09:26 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 15:05 +0100
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 16:42 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 00:30 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:34 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-17 05:07 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:48 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 22:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-05-17 12:10 -0500
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 13:28 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:49 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-20 10:52 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:23 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:26 -0400
"Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 10:01 -0700
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 23:38 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-21 00:11 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 04:33 +0000
Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 23:33 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 07:22 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:10 -0400
Nature herself punishes perverts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-21 09:33 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:03 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:04 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 15:47 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-21 19:14 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:16 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 20:19 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 12:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:05 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:05 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:24 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:30 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Gregory Hall condems himself. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 10:14 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:21 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:31 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-24 22:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-24 16:01 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:50 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-24 18:07 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:51 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:40 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 17:45 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:53 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:41 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:47 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:32 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:55 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:25 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-25 00:09 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 00:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 05:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 00:03 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:57 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:24 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:55 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:50 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:15 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:34 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 03:41 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 06:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:14 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:57 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:50 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:58 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:54 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:28 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:27 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:29 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:58 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:58 -0400
We can't help them, the damage has been done. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:07 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:49 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:26 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:44 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:03 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:27 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 12:35 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <pdpjov$mn0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #686295 |
On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, benj, the k00k who is constantly pontificating about climate change as if he's remotely qualified to discuss the topic, gifted us this gem: > "climatology" ...that is sort of like cosmetology" isn't it? *headdesk* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 12:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <esYLC.146340$go7.87438@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #686300 |
On 5/19/2018 12:35 PM, kensi wrote: > On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, benj, the k00k who is constantly pontificating > about climate change as if he's remotely qualified to discuss the topic, > gifted us this gem: >> "climatology" ...that is sort of like cosmetology" isn't it? > > *headdesk* > Thank you! Thank you! Thank You! I love fan mail and appreciation of my incisive wit. Chortle (Rule #5)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 22:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <pdq82h$jjt$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686301 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 19 May 2018 12:40:34 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/19/2018 12:35 PM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, benj, the k00k who is constantly pontificating >> about climate change as if he's remotely qualified to discuss the >> topic, gifted us this gem: >>> "climatology" ...that is sort of like cosmetology" isn't it? >> >> *headdesk* >> > Thank you! Thank you! Thank You! > > I love fan mail and apprecia<SMACKAKOOK!> That wasn't a compliment, you blithering idiot, kensi was being sarcastic. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 21:34 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <Jg4MC.138623$LR2.5190@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #686329 |
On 5/19/2018 6:22 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 19 May 2018 12:40:34 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/19/2018 12:35 PM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, benj, the k00k who is constantly pontificating >>> about climate change as if he's remotely qualified to discuss the >>> topic, gifted us this gem: >>>> "climatology" ...that is sort of like cosmetology" isn't it? >>> >>> *headdesk* >>> >> Thank you! Thank you! Thank You! >> >> I love fan mail and apprecia<SMACKAKOOK!> > > That wasn't a compliment, you blithering idiot, kensi was being sarcastic. > And how would anyone as ignorant as you are know? I guess "she" must have told you. Ignorant moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 03:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <pdqp80$jjt$21@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686335 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 19 May 2018 21:34:27 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/19/2018 6:22 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Sat, 19 May 2018 12:40:34 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 5/19/2018 12:35 PM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, benj, the k00k who is constantly pontificating >>>> about climate change as if he's remotely qualified to discuss the >>>> topic, gifted us this gem: >>>>> "climatology" ...that is sort of like cosmetology" isn't it? >>>> >>>> *headdesk* >>>> >>> Thank you! Thank you! Thank You! >>> >>> I love fan mail and apprecia<SMACKAKOOK!> >> >> That wasn't a compliment, you blithering idiot, kensi was being >> sarcastic. > > And how would you know? To someone who, unlike you, isn't a complete and utter ignoramus, it's quite obvious. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 12:18 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <XdhMC.100504$oR2.65160@fx25.iad> |
| In reply to | #686336 |
On 5/19/2018 11:15 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 19 May 2018 21:34:27 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/19/2018 6:22 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Sat, 19 May 2018 12:40:34 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/19/2018 12:35 PM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, benj, the k00k who is constantly pontificating >>>>> about climate change as if he's remotely qualified to discuss the >>>>> topic, gifted us this gem: >>>>>> "climatology" ...that is sort of like cosmetology" isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> *headdesk* >>>>> >>>> Thank you! Thank you! Thank You! >>>> >>>> I love fan mail and apprecia<SMACKAKOOK!> >>> >>> That wasn't a compliment, you blithering idiot, kensi was being >>> sarcastic. >> >> And how would you know? > > To someone who, unlike you, isn't a complete and utter ignoramus, it's > quite obvious. > But you ARE a complete and utter ignoramus, So I guess as usual it's just your lies and fantasy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 12:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <pds89i$lps$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #686352 |
On 5/20/2018 12:18 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/19/2018 11:15 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Sat, 19 May 2018 21:34:27 -0400, benj wrote: >>> On 5/19/2018 6:22 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Sat, 19 May 2018 12:40:34 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/19/2018 12:35 PM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, benj, the k00k who is constantly pontificating >>>>>> about climate change as if he's remotely qualified to discuss the >>>>>> topic, gifted us this gem: >>>>>>> "climatology" ...that is sort of like cosmetology" isn't it? >>>>>> *headdesk* >>>>> Thank you! Thank you! Thank You! >>>>> >>>>> I love fan mail and apprecia<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> >>>> That wasn't a compliment, you blithering idiot, kensi was being >>>> sarcastic. >>> >>> And how would you know? >> >> To someone who, unlike you, isn't a complete and utter ignoramus, it's >> quite obvious. > > But you ARE a complete and utter ignoramus, So I guess as usual it's > just your lies and fantasy. Actually, Nadegda was correct. I was being sarcastic, and you are a blithering idiot. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 19:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F39FD6365CFgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223> |
| In reply to | #686207 |
Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in news:pdn9od$jjt$2@dont-email.me: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! On Fri, 18 May 2018 14:15:56 -0400, benj wrote: > >> Listen to Dr. Patrick Moore telling the science truth about the >> climate fraudsters. He's saying nothing I haven't been repeating >> here for years but unlike me and others, he is a founding member of >> Greenpeace and has a degree in Ecology rather than physics, >> engineering or even meteorology. > > In other words, he's no more qualified than a layperson to pontificate > on the topic of climate? > > SPNAK! on you. > Ja, only the Experten may speak. Fuck you. And the pig you rode in on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 17:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <0MZPC.111085$mD.72454@fx31.iad> |
| In reply to | #687996 |
On 5/31/2018 3:42 PM, Avenging Angel wrote: > Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in > news:pdn9od$jjt$2@dont-email.me: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Fri, 18 May 2018 14:15:56 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> Listen to Dr. Patrick Moore telling the science truth about the >>> climate fraudsters. He's saying nothing I haven't been repeating >>> here for years but unlike me and others, he is a founding member of >>> Greenpeace and has a degree in Ecology rather than physics, >>> engineering or even meteorology. >> >> In other words, he's no more qualified than a layperson to pontificate >> on the topic of climate? >> >> SPNAK! on you. >> > > Ja, only the Experten may speak. Fuck you. And the pig you rode in on. > Only anonymous internet lib voices have credibility. Imaginary degrees mean far more than an actual (proven) PhD. in Ecology. And for that matter, no MALE scum however, impeccable their "progressive" credentials is allowed to exercise their male dominance over lesbian "feminists" by telling true facts. I think we now have Dr. Moore pretty well discredited. Oh from what school did "kensi" get her PhD. in "astrophysics" again? Snicker (rule #5)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 11:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <rmb3hdd7gkq9qobqk2717940dnit6vt5c8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688012 |
On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:26:05 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: <...> >Only anonymous internet lib voices have credibility. Imaginary degrees >mean far more than an actual (proven) PhD. in Ecology. And for that >matter, no MALE scum however, impeccable their "progressive" credentials >is allowed to exercise their male dominance over lesbian "feminists" by >telling true facts. I think we now have Dr. Moore pretty well >discredited. Oh from what school did "kensi" get her PhD. in >"astrophysics" again? > >Snicker (rule #5) Kensi has no Ph.D. in astrophysics at all. She lies. Surely somebody with a Ph.D. would be publishing some papers respecting their research and findings in their chosen field. Where are the links to some of her works? Unlike Nads, who is too stupid to post working links because they wrap, kensi, at least, knows how to post a working URL but her problem is she's not published anything to link to. What a fraud. Watch her complain that she's not going to reveal her identity in these Godforsaken news groups but is she really so stupid that she can't redact her name or simply substitute a nom de plume? It's also apparent kensi's no astrophysicist due to the fact that all she does is shill for AGW. Some astrophysicist! Doesn't know the difference between a star and a planet. LOL! Kensi needs to be water-boarded until she can learn how to tell the truth. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 13:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <peul40$1raq$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #688279 |
On 6/2/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > Kensi needs to be water-boarded until she can learn how to tell the > truth. Violent ideation. I win. Again. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 09:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <d4p8hdhgqnnug0plpglkpvtiadgiaqtv3a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688299 |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:45:33 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 6/2/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> Kensi needs to be water-boarded until she can learn how to tell the >> truth. > >Violent ideation. I win. > >Again. > >*snicker* Nope - big boot in kensi's ass so she loses! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 15:05 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. |
| Message-ID | <1npvlvl.p1in53kljz92N%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #688672 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:45:33 -0400, Professor Kensington Fu.D. > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > > >On 6/2/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> Kensi needs to be water-boarded until she can learn how to tell the > >> truth. > > > >Violent ideation. I win. > > > >Again. > > > >*snicker* > > Nope - big boot in kensi's ass so she loses! knob of butter -- \|/ (((Ï))) U+97F1 Wearing an On!on on his belt, which was the style at the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 16:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jJ0LC.164300$g%2.138835@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #685795 |
On 5/16/2018 2:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> >>> To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on >>> TV?MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, >>> but cable news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight host >>> has proven himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of >>> ?debating? climate change: >> >> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. > > Even were that true -- so what? > In my experience Gays always want to know who else is Gay.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 00:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdiiel$o01$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685817 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:42:50 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/16/2018 2:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> by Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> >>> >>>> To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on >>>> TV?MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, >>>> but cable news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight host >>>> has proven himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of >>>> ?debating? climate change: >>> >>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >> >> Even were that true -- so what? > > In my experience Gays always want to know who else is Gay. So, what you're saying is, Checkmate is gay? Interesting ... -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 17:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9f86o.6g5.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685864 |
On 2018-05-16 5:30 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:42:50 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/16/2018 2:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> by Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on >>>>> TV?MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, >>>>> but cable news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight host >>>>> has proven himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of >>>>> ?debating? climate change: >>>> >>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>> >>> Even were that true -- so what? >> >> In my experience Gays always want to know who else is Gay. > > So, what you're saying is, Checkmate is gay? > > Interesting ... > why would that interest you , all the guys here are gay , so its likely you won't be getting boned by anyone here , although even if i was pure testosterone in a tube , you couldn't get me up
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 05:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdj2mh$v0m$2@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #685865 |
On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:34:00 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-05-16 5:30 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:42:50 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 5/16/2018 2:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on >>>>>> TV?MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate >>>>>> stories, >>>>>> but cable news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight >>>>>> host has proven himself among the smartest. He's mocked the >>>>>> absurdity of ?debating? climate change: >>>>> >>>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>>> >>>> Even were that true -- so what? >>> >>> In my experience Gays always want to know who else is Gay. >> >> So, what you're saying is, Checkmate is gay? >> >> Interesting ... > > why would that interest you , > all the guys here are gay , > so its likely you won't be getting boned by anyone here , > although even if i was pure testosterone in a tube , > you couldn't get me up Is that why you act so kooky, because you're impotent? Why haven't you seen a doctor? I hear there's a pill for that these days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 19:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdkmae$o01$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685905 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 17 May 2018 05:07:29 +0000, Libtard wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:34:00 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2018-05-16 5:30 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:42:50 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/16/2018 2:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on >>>>>>> TV?MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate >>>>>>> stories, >>>>>>> but cable news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight >>>>>>> host has proven himself among the smartest. He's mocked the >>>>>>> absurdity of ?debating? climate change: >>>>>> >>>>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>>>> >>>>> Even were that true -- so what? >>>> >>>> In my experience Gays always want to know who else is Gay. >>> >>> So, what you're saying is, Checkmate is gay? >>> >>> Interesting ... >> >> why would that interest you , >> all the guys here are gay , >> so its likely you won't be getting boned by anyone here , Good, because I don't *want* to be. Most of them are creepy AF, and none attract me. At least one is a probable rapist and a whole lot more are rape apologists at best. >> although even if i was pure testosterone in a tube , >> you couldn't get me up > > Is that why you act so kooky, because you're impotent? Why haven't you > seen a doctor? I hear there's a pill for that these days. SPANKY-SPANKY! <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 17:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.356670f11b08ae5993a33@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685864 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pdiiel$o01$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:42:50 -0400, benj wrote: > > > On 5/16/2018 2:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >>> by Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > >>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >>> > >>> > >>>> To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on > >>>> TV?MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, > >>>> but cable news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight host > >>>> has proven himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of > >>>> ?debating? climate change: > >>> > >>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. > >> > >> Even were that true -- so what? > > > > In my experience Gays always want to know who else is Gay. > > So, what you're saying is, Checkmate is gay? > > Interesting ... So, what you're saying is, you want to know who else is gay? "Interesting"... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 22:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <P06LC.176791$Hv4.15123@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #685864 |
On 5/16/2018 8:30 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:42:50 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/16/2018 2:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> by Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on >>>>> TV?MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, >>>>> but cable news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight host >>>>> has proven himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of >>>>> ?debating? climate change: >>>> >>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>> >>> Even were that true -- so what? >> >> In my experience Gays always want to know who else is Gay. > > So, what you're saying is, Checkmate is gay? > > Interesting ... > That's the science, Nads!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web