Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #687777 > unrolled thread

42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 22:44 -0700
    Re: 42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 09:33 -0700
    Re: 42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 12:03 -0700
      Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-31 21:24 +0000

#687777 — 42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2

42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2

Alright, now I am comfortable in doing this assault. Mind you, we await the experimental results from taking a miniature greenhouse and vacuum out all air, and replace with animal CO2 and the common constituents of air, and in a second greenhouse do the same except pump in only fire CO2. We monitor if the plants in animal CO2 live and prosper while in the other, the fire CO2, the plants die or barely grow. We have to wait for that experiment, but in the meantime, we can have the theory all set to go.

Theory of CO2, for it has valence muons of 2+4+4, which fills the 2P, and has 4 muons extra or left over. Those 4 valence muons with attendant 4 protons form two pseudo or faux orbitals. The main molecule of CO2 is a large torus composed of the 2P filled, and inside that large torus are two smaller toruses acting as bar magnets of the 2S orbital and inside that 2S torus is the 1S torus. So we have 1S torus inside 2S torus inside 2P torus, all three doing the Faraday Law of producing electricity of magnetic monopoles. That electricity gets stored in a neutron and when that neutron grows to 945 MeV it causes one of the atoms to become a higher atomic numbered element. But now, let us see what happened to those 4 left-over muons forming two faux orbitals. Those 4 muons with their 4 protons form either a 1S faux with 2S faux orbital or form a 2S faux with a 3S faux, or form a 1S faux with a 3S faux, all of which are torus. The faux orbitals are different from the real 1S or 2S because those have 2 protons each but also have neutrons, like a helium atom whereas the faux 1S and faux 2S have just 2 muons and 2 protons each and the faux orbitals are like balls that circumnavigate around the filled 2P torus creating more electricity by thrusting through the 2P torus from its outside exterior. Where the real 1S and 2S are tori bar magnets inside of 2P, the faux 1S and faux 2S are bar magnets thrusting through the 2P torus from its exterior.

Remember in this theory every atom and molecules is configured to make maximum electricity, given the number of subatomic particles present. And here is where radioactivity comes into existence. It is present, when that configuration of producing maximum electricity causes destruction of the toruses in producing electricity. Atoms and molecules that are radioactive, or unstable molecules, produce so much electricity, with their thrusting tori bar magnets that they break apart in radioactive decay. This is why alpha particles are a major form of radioactive decay, because faux orbitals are alpha particles, that get away from their 2P torus they were bonded to.

Now here we can perform another experiment-- find out if alpha particles come in a variety of masses, fractional masses of a helium atom with its 2 protons 2 neutrons and 2 muons, for the faux 1S can come in just 2 protons each 840 MeV and 2 muons each 105 MeV. Also, in accelerators, has there ever been witnessed a helium type atom which is composed of just two 945 MeV or 1890 MeV mass. Has there ever been reported a 1890 MeV mass particle thought to be a alpha particle? If so, well the proof that protons are actually 840MeV and never 938 MeV, the proof is already in.

A quick glance at my tables, here, I see a D-meson with 1869 MeV, which decays into a kaon and eventually a muon, and many many pions. Apparently the D-meson is actually two protons of 840 MeV each and two muons, and the muons come out as two muons but the two protons bundled inside a D-meson those two protons are each composed of 8 muons apiece-- for-- our calculator shows that 840 divided by 105 means a proton is 8 muons. But as a D-meson decays, we do not see 8+8 muons from 2 protons, what we see is a multiple of pions of around 135 MeV. So now 2x840= 1680 and if we divide that by 135 is about 12.44, but if we divide by 140 for pion we have 12 exactly. So, these faux 1S and 2S orbitals are seen as "primitive helium atoms" that end up decaying into 2 muons and 12 pions.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#687811

Alright, this textbook is written as a Memoir, in that I am writing it as a notebook, my daily activity, an historical accounting, along with a textbook of facts of True Chemistry. Both a textbook on True Chemistry and a historical accounting, both combined into one. 

On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 12:44:25 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2
> 
> Alright, now I am comfortable in doing this assault. Mind you, we await the experimental results from taking a miniature greenhouse and vacuum out all air, and replace with animal CO2 and the common constituents of air, and in a second greenhouse do the same except pump in only fire CO2. We monitor if the plants in animal CO2 live and prosper while in the other, the fire CO2, the plants die or barely grow. We have to wait for that experiment, but in the meantime, we can have the theory all set to go.
> 
> Theory of CO2, for it has valence muons of 2+4+4, which fills the 2P, and has 4 muons extra or left over. Those 4 valence muons with attendant 4 protons form two pseudo or faux orbitals. The main molecule of CO2 is a large torus composed of the 2P filled, and inside that large torus are two smaller toruses acting as bar magnets of the 2S orbital and inside that 2S torus is the 1S torus. So we have 1S torus inside 2S torus inside 2P torus, all three doing the Faraday Law of producing electricity of magnetic monopoles. That electricity gets stored in a neutron and when that neutron grows to 945 MeV it causes one of the atoms to become a higher atomic numbered element. But now, let us see what happened to those 4 left-over muons forming two faux orbitals. Those 4 muons with their 4 protons form either a 1S faux with 2S faux orbital or form a 2S faux with a 3S faux, or form a 1S faux with a 3S faux, all of which are torus. The faux orbitals are different from the real 1S or 2S because those have 2 protons each but also have neutrons, like a helium atom whereas the faux 1S and faux 2S have just 2 muons and 2 protons each and the faux orbitals are like balls that circumnavigate around the filled 2P torus creating more electricity by thrusting through the 2P torus from its outside exterior. Where the real 1S and 2S are tori bar magnets inside of 2P, the faux 1S and faux 2S are bar magnets thrusting through the 2P torus from its exterior.
> 
> Remember in this theory every atom and molecules is configured to make maximum electricity, given the number of subatomic particles present. And here is where radioactivity comes into existence. It is present, when that configuration of producing maximum electricity causes destruction of the toruses in producing electricity. Atoms and molecules that are radioactive, or unstable molecules, produce so much electricity, with their thrusting tori bar magnets that they break apart in radioactive decay. This is why alpha particles are a major form of radioactive decay, because faux orbitals are alpha particles, that get away from their 2P torus they were bonded to.
> 
> Now here we can perform another experiment-- find out if alpha particles come in a variety of masses, fractional masses of a helium atom with its 2 protons 2 neutrons and 2 muons, for the faux 1S can come in just 2 protons each 840 MeV and 2 muons each 105 MeV. Also, in accelerators, has there ever been witnessed a helium type atom which is composed of just two 945 MeV or 1890 MeV mass. Has there ever been reported a 1890 MeV mass particle thought to be a alpha particle? If so, well the proof that protons are actually 840MeV and never 938 MeV, the proof is already in.
> 
> A quick glance at my tables, here, I see a D-meson with 1869 MeV, which decays into a kaon and eventually a muon, and many many pions. Apparently the D-meson is actually two protons of 840 MeV each and two muons, and the muons come out as two muons but the two protons bundled inside a D-meson those two protons are each composed of 8 muons apiece-- for-- our calculator shows that 840 divided by 105 means a proton is 8 muons. But as a D-meson decays, we do not see 8+8 muons from 2 protons, what we see is a multiple of pions of around 135 MeV. So now 2x840= 1680 and if we divide that by 135 is about 12.44, but if we divide by 140 for pion we have 12 exactly. So, these faux 1S and 2S orbitals are seen as "primitive helium atoms" that end up decaying into 2 muons and 12 pions.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687989

On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 12:44:25 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 42-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// the assault upon CO2, whether there is a animal CO2 different from fire CO2
> 
> Alright, now I am comfortable in doing this assault. Mind you, we await the experimental results from taking a miniature greenhouse and vacuum out all air, and replace with animal CO2 and the common constituents of air, and in a second greenhouse do the same except pump in only fire CO2. We monitor if the plants in animal CO2 live and prosper while in the other, the fire CO2, the plants die or barely grow. We have to wait for that experiment, but in the meantime, we can have the theory all set to go.
> 
> Theory of CO2, for it has valence muons of 2+4+4, which fills the 2P, and has 4 muons extra or left over. Those 4 valence muons with attendant 4 protons form two pseudo or faux orbitals. The main molecule of CO2 is a large torus composed of the 2P filled, and inside that large torus are two smaller toruses acting as bar magnets of the 2S orbital and inside that 2S torus is the 1S torus. So we have 1S torus inside 2S torus inside 2P torus, all three doing the Faraday Law of producing electricity of magnetic monopoles. That electricity gets stored in a neutron and when that neutron grows to 945 MeV it causes one of the atoms to become a higher atomic numbered element. But now, let us see what happened to those 4 left-over muons forming two faux orbitals. Those 4 muons with their 4 protons form either a 1S faux with 2S faux orbital or form a 2S faux with a 3S faux, or form a 1S faux with a 3S faux, all of which are torus. The faux orbitals are different from the real 1S or 2S because those have 2 protons each but also have neutrons, like a helium atom whereas the faux 1S and faux 2S have just 2 muons and 2 protons each and the faux orbitals are like balls that circumnavigate around the filled 2P torus creating more electricity by thrusting through the 2P torus from its outside exterior. Where the real 1S and 2S are tori bar magnets inside of 2P, the faux 1S and faux 2S are bar magnets thrusting through the 2P torus from its exterior.
> 
> Remember in this theory every atom and molecules is configured to make maximum electricity, given the number of subatomic particles present. And here is where radioactivity comes into existence. It is present, when that configuration of producing maximum electricity causes destruction of the toruses in producing electricity. Atoms and molecules that are radioactive, or unstable molecules, produce so much electricity, with their thrusting tori bar magnets that they break apart in radioactive decay. This is why alpha particles are a major form of radioactive decay, because faux orbitals are alpha particles, that get away from their 2P torus they were bonded to.
> 
> Now here we can perform another experiment-- find out if alpha particles come in a variety of masses, fractional masses of a helium atom with its 2 protons 2 neutrons and 2 muons, for the faux 1S can come in just 2 protons each 840 MeV and 2 muons each 105 MeV. Also, in accelerators, has there ever been witnessed a helium type atom which is composed of just two 945 MeV or 1890 MeV mass. Has there ever been reported a 1890 MeV mass particle thought to be a alpha particle? If so, well the proof that protons are actually 840MeV and never 938 MeV, the proof is already in.
> 
> A quick glance at my tables, here, I see a D-meson with 1869 MeV, which decays into a kaon and eventually a muon, and many many pions. Apparently the D-meson is actually two protons of 840 MeV each and two muons, and the muons come out as two muons but the two protons bundled inside a D-meson those two protons are each composed of 8 muons apiece-- for-- our calculator shows that 840 divided by 105 means a proton is 8 muons. But as a D-meson decays, we do not see 8+8 muons from 2 protons, what we see is a multiple of pions of around 135 MeV. So now 2x840= 1680 and if we divide that by 135 is about 12.44, but if we divide by 140 for pion we have 12 exactly. So, these faux 1S and 2S orbitals are seen as "primitive helium atoms" that end up decaying into 2 muons and 12 pions.
> 
> AP

I need to include the NO molecule into my list. Wikipedia says some interesting data on NO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#688011 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

Archimedes Plutonium fails:

>Here is an example from the Internet in sci.math of Ad Hominem of a 
writer
>who hates the person he is talking to, and no matter what the topic is,
>the message is always the same-- I hate your guts.

>On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> But can you tell us what is wrong with the following proof that the
>> ellipse is a conic section? After all, you say the ellipse is not a
>> conic section and what Archimedes Plutonium says is true is true, right?

<several other ad hominems by Archie snipped>

Still haven't learned not to attack me?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web