Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #686292 > unrolled thread

9-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// does it make sense--Size of Atoms goes <----- and V

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-05-19 08:42 -0700
Last post2018-05-21 04:21 +0000
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  9-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// does it make sense--Size of Atoms goes <----- and V Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 08:42 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-21 03:40 +0000
    Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-21 04:21 +0000

#686292 — 9-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// does it make sense--Size of Atoms goes <----- and V

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-19 08:42 -0700
Subject9-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// does it make sense--Size of Atoms goes <----- and V
Message-ID<990e4756-a17e-4da4-9c7e-6d838ef46199@googlegroups.com>
9-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// does it make sense--Size of Atoms goes <----- and V


I have to ask this question because, well, the Real Electron = muon and had the wrong identity ever since JJ Thompson discovered the Dirac Magnetic Monopole back in 1897, although Thomson thought he discovered the electron when it turns out, he discovered what Dirac chased after most of his life-- the magnetic monopole, and so, it is very easy to be confused about the size of atoms if you think that a .5MeV particle is the electron when the electron is 105 MeV and deed down inside the atom near the protons.

So, is the size of atoms truly following a pattern in the periodic table where Cesium and Francium are the largest atoms and Helium and Neon the smallest sized atoms? A pattern of going <---- for largeness and of going 

|
|
V     for largeness across the Periodic Table?

Could the Magnetic Monopole and electron mix-up that lasted from Thomson of 1897 to AP 2017 also caused a wrong understanding of Size of Atoms?

I believe the Size of Atoms as given in chemistry books is correct, that Helium Neon would be the smallest and that Cesium Francium the largest of atoms. I say that because it conforms to the concept that inside all atoms is going on a Faraday and Ampere laws of maximum electricity generation by protons as coils and muons as either part of coils or as bar magnets in Faraday law.

In that light, hydrogen would be larger, far larger than helium, for its single muon electron would be making space, while in helium, its filled S orbital would have the two muon electrons inside the proton coils making electricity of magnetic monopoles.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#686418 — Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-05-21 03:40 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<pdtf46$pke$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#686292
>Michael Moroney anal buttfuckmanure stalker for 26 years

Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation!

(still a work in progress)

☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again...
☑ ...and again and again...
☑ ...and again and again...
☑ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam...
☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact...
☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers...
☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog...
☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"...
☐ ...Post posted in the wrong topic...
☐ .....and to the wrong newsgroup...
☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded...
☐ .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it...
☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize...
☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth...
☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math...
☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math...
☑ .....which was, oh never mind...
☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true...
☑ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)...
☑ ...One word: Logorrhea...
☑ ...Another word: Graphomania...
☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs...
☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics...
☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years...
☑ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... 
☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet...
☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google...
☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group...
☑ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"...
☐ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math...
☐ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN...
☑ ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9...
☐ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17...
☐ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
☐ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole...
☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
☐ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people...
☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
☐ .....but has no clue they will never see his post...
☐ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is...
☐ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't...
☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this...
☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.

Archie's Babbling Nonsense score:  23 plutoniums!


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#686436 — Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-05-21 04:21 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<pdthff$jjm$6@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#686292
>>Michael Moroney anal buttfuckmanure stalker for 26 years

>Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation!

>(still a work in progress)

>☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again...
>☑ ...and again and again...
>☑ ...and again and again...
>☑ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam...
>☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact...
>☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers...
>☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog...
>☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"...
>☐ ...Post posted in the wrong topic...
>☐ .....and to the wrong newsgroup...
>☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded...
>☐ .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it...
>☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize...
>☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth...
>☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math...
>☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math...
>☑ .....which was, oh never mind...
>☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true...
>☑ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)...
>☑ ...One word: Logorrhea...
>☑ ...Another word: Graphomania...
>☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs...
>☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics...
>☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years...
>☑ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... 
>☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet...
>☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google...
>☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group...
>☑ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"...
>☐ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math...
>☐ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
>☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN...
>☑ ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
>☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9...
>☐ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17...
>☐ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
>☐ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
>☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole...
>☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
>☐ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people...
>☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
>☐ .....but has no clue they will never see his post...
>☐ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is...
>☐ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't...
>☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this...
>☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.

>Archie's Babbling Nonsense score:  23 plutoniums!


[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web