Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #686426 > unrolled thread

16-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// analog of CO2 is carbon diamond

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  16-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// analog of CO2 is carbon diamond Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 21:03 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-21 04:08 +0000

#686426 — 16-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// analog of CO2 is carbon diamond

16-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// analog of CO2 is carbon diamond

Now in CHEM ONE, 2nd ed., 1980, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, on page 129 gives a Figure 7-2 of facts often overlooked or ignored or never mentioned in Chemistry. The idea of Arrays of atoms in chemical bonding, in (a) shows each atom forming bond to only one neighbor in such as Iodine2 (b)
each atom forms bond to two neighbors-- infinite chains or rings S_n, Se_n, S8, in (c) each atom is bonded to three neighbors, a two dimensional network As_n, P4, in (d) each atom is bonded to four neighbors and a three dimensional structure is formed C diamond ZnS, BN, in (e) another chain structure (CH2O)_n

So, what I am looking for is major clues as to how bonding in chemistry is the thrusting bar magnet through a coil in Faraday's Law. No longer the Old Chemistry idea of a intersection of orbitals, no that is too silly and empty headed. But that bonding of chemistry in ionic, metallic, covalent is the sharing of a valence muon that travels between two or more atoms in a molecule.

Now weaker bonds such as Van der Waals would not be the muon electron but be the charged magnetic monopoles of .5MeV, and be magnetic monopoles bonding.

In Old Chemistry, most of their measurements and conclusions on CO2 such as being "linear" is all rubbish for in Old Chemistry they mistook the real electron for the magnetic monopole. So in this light, the bonding of CO2 with its 10 valence muons, 4 left-over and with diamond Carbon of its 10 valence electrons, 4 left-over.

Can we say that the geometry configuration of CO2 as a electric dynamo is in any way like the geometry configuration of C diamond.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#686427 — Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test

Why do you think that KON replying to one of your posts is stalking you?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web