Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #686308 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 10:24 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-21 04:20 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
1#3 True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:24 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-21 03:39 +0000
Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-21 04:20 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 10:24 -0700 |
| Subject | 1#3 True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV |
| Message-ID | <65753279-9c7c-47a6-b52c-7e875b40924c@googlegroups.com> |
True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV #3page #3page On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 12:45:04 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.physics: 3rd proof-- pull plug out of electrical socket and notice light flash. That flash of light was the magnetic monopoles as photons with charge energy of .5MeV, for the monopoles compose all electric currents. beta decay as monopoles, not electrons On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 5:59:14 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.physics: Old Physics clowns could not distinguish between beta decay and electricity Re: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 12:48:31 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > 3rd proof-- pull plug out of electrical socket and notice light flash. That flash of light was the magnetic monopoles as photons with charge energy of .5MeV, for the monopoles compose all electric currents. > > Now it seems to have escaped everyone's attention ever since JJ Thomson discovered the .5MeV particle, and since 1900 with the discovery of radioactivity and about the very same time, the Thomson discovery of this .5 MeV particle. The LOGICAL attention, that if the electron was .5MeV, then it is not distinct from beta radioactive decay. In other words, for those ignorant enough to think the electron was .5MeV, those same ignorant scientists would have to say then, that electricity is radioactive beta decay running through copper wires. Not a single person existed from year 1900 to 2017 with a gram of logical commonsense, not a one. For if you believe in radioactive decay, beta decay as the .5MeV particle, and believe that electricity is the flow of these .5MeV particles, then, that very same ignorant person has to believe that radioactive beta decay is electricity of .5MeV particles flowing in copper wire. What LOGICALLY solves this dilemma, is that the .5MeV particle is not the electron but rather Dirac's magnetic monopole, and thus, there is a radioactive decay of monopoles and there is monopoles in electricity, while the Real Electron is 105 MeV and stays put inside an atom tied to its 840 MeV proton, and neither one of them-- the 105 or 840 seldom decay, unless under high enormous energy bombardment. In Old Physics, they had no logical stance to stand on, to distinguish a beta radioactive decay compared to a electricity flow. Such is a world, where scientists operate without a logical mind, but rather, as dumb as a robotic mind trying to deal with physics. A robotic mind would think a .5MeV is radioactivity sometimes, yet , electricity the other times, only a dumb robotic mind would think that. Now the reason I titled this small textbook as Chemists are smarter than Physicists, is because the Chemists by the Danish team:: Positively Charged Phosphorus as a Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Anne S. Hansen, Lin Du and Henrik G. Kjaergaard* are the first scientists to make that beautiful experimentation that the Real Electron cannot be a .5MeV particle. And what will now happen is that other Chemists will lead more and more experiments on different atoms verifying Kjaergaard. Physicists are far and away, far too dumb to ever realize their .5MeV particle as never the Real-Electron, for physicists are like clown acts at a circus, they are trained to do one dumb act and simply cannot ponder and think-- "could there be a mistake in identifying the real electron". Physicists are far too stupid to ask-- did I get the Real True Electron. On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 2:48:25 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.math: distinguish between beta decay and electricity Re: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV Quoting from Wikipedia Radioactive decay (also known as nuclear decay or radioactivity) is the process by which an unstable atomic nucleus loses energy (in terms of mass in its rest frame) by emitting radiation, such as an alpha particle, beta particle with neutrino or only a neutrino in the case of electron capture, gamma ray, or electron in the case of internal conversion. A material containing such unstable nuclei is considered radioactive. Certain highly excited short-lived nuclear states can decay through neutron emission, or more rarely, proton emission. --- end quote --- I may have to do a whole new periodic table of elements before this textbook is complete. It depends on features of matter such as carbon that makes graphite and carbon that makes diamond. What I mean to say here, is that the features of a element in chemistry is all about the electrons, for chemistry is mostly the study of electrons of atoms, but then when you have muons as the real electron and you have monopoles acting on atoms, it makes chemistry a whole new science to have to juggle the characteristics of muon and monopole. So that the periodic table must include muon along with monopoles. AP Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 03:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pdtf0n$pke$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #686308 |
>Michael Moroney anal buttfuckmanure stalker for 26 years Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation! ☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact... ☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers... ☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog... ☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"... ☐ ...Post posted in the wrong topic... ☐ .....and to the wrong newsgroup... ☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded... ☐ .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it... ☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize... ☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth... ☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was, oh never mind... ☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true... ☑ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)... ☑ ...One word: Logorrhea... ☑ ...Another word: Graphomania... ☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs... ☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics... ☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years... ☑ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet... ☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google... ☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group... ☑ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"... ☐ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN... ☑ ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... ☐ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... ☐ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☐ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people... ☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☐ .....but has no clue they will never see his post... ☐ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is... ☐ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't... ☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archie's Babbling Nonsense score: 23 plutoniums!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 04:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pdthe1$jjm$5@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #686308 |
>>Michael Moroney anal buttfuckmanure stalker for 26 years Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation! >☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again... >☑ ...and again and again... >☑ ...and again and again... >☑ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam... >☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact... >☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers... >☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog... >☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"... >☐ ...Post posted in the wrong topic... >☐ .....and to the wrong newsgroup... >☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded... >☐ .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it... >☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize... >☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth... >☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math... >☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math... >☑ .....which was, oh never mind... >☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true... >☑ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)... >☑ ...One word: Logorrhea... >☑ ...Another word: Graphomania... >☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs... >☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics... >☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years... >☑ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... >☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet... >☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google... >☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group... >☑ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"... >☐ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math... >☐ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... >☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN... >☑ ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... >☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... >☐ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... >☐ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... >☐ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... >☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole... >☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... >☐ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people... >☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... >☐ .....but has no clue they will never see his post... >☐ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is... >☑ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't... >☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this... >☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archie's Babbling Nonsense score: 24 plutoniums!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web