Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #685939 > unrolled thread

Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunks the lifelong Math test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-17 17:15 +0000
      Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunks the lifelong Math test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 16:31 -0700

#685939 — Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Michael Moroney 	writes:
1:21 AM (10 hours ago)

> "Failure"

percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

AP writes: I am sure Ed Witten can do a percentage correctly

On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:34:16 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Edward Witten flunked it 
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Edward Witten flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#685943 — Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunks the lifelong Math test

Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Michael Moroney 	writes:
>1:21 AM (10 hours ago)

>> "Failure"

That's 'Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium', Archimedes Failure Plutonium.

>AP writes: I am sure Ed Witten can do a percentage correctly

I'm sure he can, but the point is YOU can never get the correct
percentage when you never even use the correct data. How dumb and
stoopid is that, Al?

"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean rock-hard
stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.  Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.  
Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape.  Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686247 — Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunks the lifelong Math test

Michael Moroney writes:



12:15 PM (6 hours ago)



>Michael Moroney anal buttfuckmanure stalker for 26 years 

Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation! 

(still a work in progress) 

On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 12:15:08 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
> 
> >Michael Moroney 	writes:
> >1:21 AM (10 hours ago)
> 
> >> "Failure"
> 
> That's 'Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium', Archimedes Failure Plutonium.
> 
> >AP writes: I am sure Ed Witten can do a percentage correctly
> 
> I'm sure he can, but the point is YOU can never get the correct
> percentage when you never even use the correct data. How dumb and
> stoopid is that, Al?
> 
> "I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean rock-hard
> stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface of Venus
> under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
> dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid so stupid that
> it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
> stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.  Stupid so
> collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.  
> Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
> can escape.  Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
> our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing
> else in the universe can be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly
> putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
> pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
> the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
> n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo is
> Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
> unified theory of stupid.
> 
> Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
> apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid."

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web